Sometimes reading the news and listening to the pronouncements of politicians, especially south of the border, I’m bewildered by the rampant ignorance about science and the antipathy toward it.
Exercise is an important factor in reducing a number of our major health problems, from diabetes to stroke, Alzheimer’s, heart disease, and cancer. Our bodies evolved to be active.
It’s easy to be cynical about the annual declarations made by our world leaders. Nevertheless, the International Year of Forests marks a critical moment on our planet.
Rather than subsidizing the tar sands and all the fossil fuel industry through massive tax breaks, we should be investing in energy technologies that will benefit our health, economy, and climate.
It would also be great if we could shift our thinking about economics to include the value of conservation and the services that ecosystems and plants and animals provide for us.
We take notice when animals die in large numbers, but observations going back more than a century suggest that the mass-mortality events of recent weeks aren’t as unusual as we might think.
We’ve come through the first decade of the 21st century, and it seemed appropriate to revisit a chapter marking the new millennium in my book, The Sacred Balance.
It isn’t every day that an international science summit brings together traditional Aboriginal knowledge and Western science. However, threats to a unique species call for a unique approach.
We saw what happened when the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig exploded in the Gulf of Mexico. Imagine a similar incident in an inland sea one-sixth the size of the Gulf of Mexico.
If we are to resolve some of the serious issues around pollution, climate change, human health, and energy consumption, we must look to cities for solutions.
As long as harvests are tightly controlled, eating species lower on the food chain takes much less of the world’s ecosystem energy and is therefore more sustainable.
The environmental costs associated with much of the coffee consumed worldwide is too high, according to many scientists who study the industry and its impacts.
No question about it, Canadians are embracing the idea of eating food produced closer to home, a sustainability movement that has been dubbed “locavorism”.
When wading through the words of pundits and the babble of political posturing, I can’t help but think of some of the simple truths we learned as children.
Although seeing the rivers run red with salmon once again is cause for celebration, we can’t say this signals a reversal of the declines in Fraser River salmon populations that have been occurring over the past two decades.
Are we driving ourselves into oblivion? Or will new automobile technology save us from the environmental impact of the fossil-fuelled tanks we use to get around?
Sometimes a new science emerges that not only offers hope for our continued survival as a species but that also makes obvious how little we have really learned in our relatively brief time on Earth.
Environmentalists won’t be happy until we’re living in caves and scrounging for roots and berries. At least, that’s what I hear over and over again.
It’s time we all started ignoring the insane blathering of the deniers. We’ve already wasted too much time on them—and we don’t have time to waste.
We like to think we’re blessed with an abundance of clean water in Canada, but we really don’t have a much larger sustainable supply of water than most places.
Unfortunately, the disappearance of plants and animals seems only to get the attention of politicians when it results in serious economic and social upheaval.
The explosion on BP’s Deepwater Horizon platform in the Gulf of Mexico and subsequent uncontrolled release of millions of litres of oil a day is a monumental disaster. But why are we surprised?
Although forest companies have voluntarily put the imminent threat of further logging in caribou habitat on hold, Aboriginal people must work out the ultimate fate of the forest with provincial, territorial, and federal governments.
Now, I know that a car is an amazing piece of technology, but it’s just a means of getting us from point A to point B. Do we ever stop to consider that this simple act works against what our bodies need?
We’ve been assured many times that the technology is safe, but the Gulf disaster shows that no technology is foolproof. Can we really afford the risk?
Canada’s towns and cities are at a crossroads. Down one path is urban sprawl. In the other direction is ending sprawl using the principles of “smart growth".
The industry still has a way to go before it can create a large supply of fresh salmon, but the fact that retailers are getting on board will help spur consumer demand and make the industry more viable.
It’s been a long time since fish, people, and the tides have been able to travel freely along the whole length of the “river that bends like a bow”
We don’t usually think of our cosmetics as a source of pollution. But U.S. researchers found that one eighth of the 82,000 ingredients used in personal-care products are industrial chemicals.
Cars and trucks are among the biggest contributors to the heat-trapping emissions that cause global warming. That makes driving a good place to start in confronting one of the most serious challenges humans face.
We often look to technological fixes without acknowledging our ignorance about how the world works, and then we end up trying to correct the unexpected problems that result.
This budget continues to pin our hopes, our future, and our economy on rapidly dwindling and highly polluting resources while much of the rest of the world creates jobs and new opportunities with green energy.