News and Views » Blog - Politics

Blog - Politics

The sun sets on a field of corn in the United States. The West's growing demand for biofuels is contributing to food shortages around the world.

Dodo-Bird photo.

Food crisis sparks violence across the globe

Across the planet, the price of basic foods are soaring. In many cases, the result has been violence. Focusing on the past few months, here’s a trip around the globe:

Close to home, in Haiti, rising food prices led to political upheaval at the highest level. On April 12, the Senate voted to dismiss Prime Minister Jacques-Edouard Alexis.

In previous weeks, violent looting and pillaging overtook several cities in Haiti. Amid the rioting, five people were killed and a UN peacekeeper was dragged from his car and shot dead. According to BBC News, the prices of rice, beans, and fruit have risen 50 percent in Haiti in the past year.

Across the Atlantic, demonstrators in London and across the United Kingdom on April 16 condemned a government plan for mandatory biofuel blending.

Biofuels such as ethanol–which is commonly derived from corn–were once regarded by Western governments as a partial solution to rising fuel costs. However, evidence is now showing that the use of biofuels will likely accelerate climate change, and is definitely contributing to the world’s growing food shortage.

Down to Africa now. Many reports on the crisis have drawn attention to recent riots in Morocco, such as this story in the Financial Post.

To the south, in Ivory Coast, clashes between police and protesters on March 31 left dozens injured. Approximately 1,500 demonstrators overturned parked cars and burned tires while chanting, “We are hungry,” and “Life is too expensive,” allAfrica.com, an electronic news distributor, reported.

That story also reported unrest in nearby Senegal on March 30, in which demonstrators clashed with police. a repeat of similar uprisings in January, which were mirrored in neighbouring Mauritania the same month.

In Burkino Faso, allAfrica’s report continued, food protests in all areas of the country resulted in hundreds of arrests. And to the east in Cameroon, demonstrations against rising food prices in February also turned violent.

Across the continent, in Kenya, where tensions remain high after a contested presidential election in December 2007, the population is also facing food shortages that have led to violence. On April 18, allAfrica.com reported that in the last two months, the price of rice has soared by 75 percent, and in the last year, the price of wheat had risen by 120 percent.

On April 6 in Cairo, Egypt, “widespread public outrage” aimed at rising food prices poured onto the streets, the International Herald Tribune reported. Hundreds of students demonstrated at three universities and riot police fired tear gas into crowds that had gathered in the city’s textile industry. By the end of the day, more than 200 were arrested.

Elsewhere in the Middle East, on April 7 in Jordan, approximately 7,000 UN employees went on strike in a demand for higher wages. The Jerusalem Post reported that the protest was the result of a 50-percent spike in food and fuel prices in the country.

In Yemen, government forces clashed with protesters for the better part of the first week of April. Significant increases in the prices of wheat, rice, and vegetable oil led youth to take to the streets in demand of jobs, Reuters reported.

Back in January 2008, in Pakistan, paramilitary troops were deployed around the country to guard wheat supplies. According to BBC News, wheat shortages have led to large-scale rioting in the past.

In India on April 21, a 12-hour bandh (protest or strike) ground the eastern province of West Bengal to a stand still Opposition parties demanded that something be done about spiralling food prices.

In neighbouring Bangladesh, nearly two dozen people were injured on April 12 when police opened fire with tear gas and used batons to disperse thousands of protesters in the nation’s capital, Dhaka. The crowds were demanding higher wages to help deal with food prices, according to a report in India Daily, which characterized the food shortage as a “silent famine.”

In Burma (also known as Myanmar), increases in the price of rice led to serious budget shortfalls for aid groups working with Burmese refugee groups living on the border of Thailand.

According to a report in the Irrawaddy, a Burmese news magazine based out of Thailand, regular assistance to 130,000 refugees spread across seven camps has been reduced to essential services. The delivery of nonfood items like building supplies, soap, and mosquito nets, has been drastically reduced.

In Thailand, the world’s largest rice exporter, Prime Minister Samak Sundarave used his April 6 radio address to alleviate a growing panic in the country. “Rice will never be out of stock,” he claimed. “We’ll never starve.”

According to the New York Times, the rising cost of rice has led to fears of regional unrest across East Asia. In Vietnam, the Times reported on March 29, some of the world’s largest rice producers have placed limits on the amount of rice they export. In Indonesia, soybean shortages have led to protests. And in the Philippines, on March 25, President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo ordered a crackdown on hoarders and moved to alleviate growing public unrest.

And finally, on April 17, the Guardian reported that the “hand-to-mouth existence of North Korea’s 23 million inhabitants is at risk of deteriorating into a serious tragedy”.

North Korea’s political situation is partly to blame for the pariah state’s desperate situation. But the UN’s World Food program did warn on April 16 that basic rations are dwindling as a result of prices rising to a point where a single kilogram of rice can cost one-third of a typical North Korean’s monthly salary.

That’s 21 countries.

And that’s not including nations like Mexico or Mozambique, where major demonstrations against rising food prices were held in 2007. Nor Guinea or Uzbekistan, where disturbances related to the rising cost of food were also reported recent months, but from where reliable information is difficult to obtain.

Areas where political circumstances make it difficult to measure the impact of actual food shortages, such as the Palestinian territories’ Gaza Strip, Iraq, Sudan’s Darfur region, and Zimbabwe, were also omitted.

On April 22, Reuters reported that former UN secretary-general Kofi Annan told a news briefing that “We might already be seeing the beginning of major hunger disasters.”

Two days earlier, Jean Ziegler, UN special rapporteur on the right to food, characterized rising global food prices as a “silent mass murder”. He warned that one day starving people could rise up against their persecutors, Reuters reported, just as they did in the French Revolution.

Post a Comment

Comments

Wilde
Rating: Loading...
World-wide food shortages, protests and riots, carbon-based tax increases and greater restrictions on citizens freedom and prosperity are but some of the serious negative implications already emanating from the climate alarmist agenda. Al Gore should be forced to surrender his 'Peace Prize' while pseudo-scientist David Suzuki might as well put a match to his green credit scheme for all the good it's going to do.

Whatever happened to the multitude of GMO crops and all the government relief efforts that were supposed to diminish starvation around the planet? It would appear they've only worsened the situation.

The timing of the recently established Doomsday Seed Vault is certainly curious. The Clinton, Rockefeller & Monsanto foundation recently invested millions to build a giant seed bank in one of the world’s most remote spots in the Arctic for what they state is a means to conserve crop diversity for the future.

What future do these seed bank financiers envision that would threaten the global availability of current seeds, almost all of which are already well protected in designated seed banks around the world? What do they know that the rest of us don't?

This seed safe will have dual blast-proof doors with motion sensors, two airlocks and walls of steel-reinforced concrete one metre thick. Sounds like they're expecting some unwelcome company.

Three million different varieties of seeds from around the world could be sealed away in this isolated hideout. This is like something out of a bizarre science fiction novel -- except in this case, it's a disturbing reality.

When corporate argri-business and politicians of ill repute conspire, you can bet your bottom dollar they don't have society's best interests in mind. Monsanto is well known for pressuring farmers to adopt its "terminator" seed. www.banterminator.org/

Maybe this euphemism has just taken on a whole new meaning.

As it is with the global warming hoax -- only those with a vested interest are going to benefit from these spurious undertakings.

http://breakthematrix.com/
 
Travis Lupick
Rating: Loading...
Good comment. However, at this point in the "debate" (which I am hesitant to even call it,) I'm curious about how global warming can be described as a "hoax". Care to elaborate?

Anyways, for our readers, here are a couple of good stories on the Svalbard Global Seed Vault in Norway, which I am quite sure is the "doomsday vault" discussed in the above comment. (There are many of these projects around the world.)

From the U.K.'s Guardian, which includes an extensive photo gallery: Svalbard's giant cold store

And from BBC News, which includes a diagram of the structure: 'Doomsday' seeds arrive in Norway

Wikipedia's entry on the project is also informative.
 
Wilde
Rating: Loading...
Regarding my previous comment that global warming is a "hoax", let me first clarify that I don't deny that weather patterns are becoming more unpredictable and extreme, and that many factors contribute to this trend.

My contention is that there is not a "consensus" on global warming as alarmists like Al Gore and the corporate media would have us believe. I also take exception to the premise that the average citizen is largely to blame for world-wide pollution and should therefore be forced to pay additional punitive taxes.

Isn't it curious that Premier Gordon Campbell -- never one to be known as "eco-friendly" -- suddenly jumps on the green-washing bandwagon with his War on Climate Change? It's equally odd and disconcerting that big industry was mostly exempt from his carbon taxing.

If government's main concern was preservation of the environment and welfare of the majority, it should penalize the biggest polluters in the world who profit billions from their carbon industries -- like the chemical, coal-fired and petrochemical plants, nuclear waste disposal, mining, and the plastic and metals production factories.

While greater taxation is driving small business to the brink of failure, corporations like Exxon Mobil boast of their history making $40 billion annual profits.

PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) claim that the large livestock farming industry creates more pollution than all vehicular traffic combined. You won't hear any of these enviro-busting industries mentioned in Al Gore's documentary though. Neither will you hear of the impact that the airlines have on our environment as thousands of planes fly daily burning upwards of 30,000 gallons of leaded aviation fuel -- on takeoff alone. Of course, Gore wouldn't want to disparage the industry that facilitates his jet setting propagandizing.

Obviously you can't just shut down factories and industry any more than you can inhibit people from utilizing transportation they rely upon. Previous gas price hikes haven't deterred motorists from driving and neither will Campbell's. It's nothing more than a swindle.

With a 20 room private mansion that uses 20 times the national U.S. average of gas and electricity, Gore can hardly consider himself a role model for the carbon-neutral life style. While he lavishes himself in his heated swimming pool, the poor and the middle class await the onslaught of carbon taxes to eviscerate any disposable income they have left. A think tank from Gore's home state, the Tennessee Center for Policy Research, states that Gore deserves an Oscar for hypocrisy to go along with the two Academy Awards his movie won.

Gore's claim that global warming is causing increased ferocity of extreme weather events like hurricanes and the deadly cyclone in Burma has been disputed by many meteorologists and professors, including some that he based his theory on in his own documentary.

In addition, as the Business and Media Institute reports, "In October 2007, CNN Meteorologist Rob Marciano disputed Gore’s claim that there is a strong correlation between intense storms and global warming. He explained that “global warming does not conclusively cause stronger hurricanes like we've seen,” pointing out that “by the end of this century we might get about a 5% increase.”

Hurricane researchers William Gray and Philip Klotzbach of Colorado State University have also discounted man-made global warming as a contributor to increased hurricane activity. "Long-period natural climate alterations that historical and paleo-climate records show to have occurred many times in the past," are responsible for hurricane patterns according to the researchers.

The fact is, thirty years ago scientists were predicting another ice age, not global warming. This year's winter, the coldest in twelve years for Canada, certainly would attest to that forecast.

There is scientific evidence that Mars is also experiencing warming. Did humans cause this too? Even if the earth is warming, it's most likely due to solar activity, not us. As one meteorologist has said, "I don't know which is more arrogant -- to state that we caused global warming, or that we're going to fix it."

Global Warming Hoax

Official British Court Finds Inaccuracies in Al Gore’s doumentary

Scientists Doubt Climate Change




 
[Comments Disclaimer]

Post a comment

URLs and email addresses will be automatically turned into links.