Minority workers face "glass door" barrier

Two SFU economics professors have introduced a new phrase to help explain why visible-minority immigrants who have been in the country for 10 years or less don’t earn as much as Canadian-born workers.

In a paper to be published in the American Statistical Association’s Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Krishna Pendakur and Simon Woodcock state that a “glass door” prevents these new arrivals from getting into firms that pay well.

Many are familiar with the “glass ceiling” obstacles faced by women and minority groups in moving up the work ladder and landing higher-paying positions.

“Glass doors are analogous to glass ceilings in the sense that it’s a situation that minority workers face, a truncated distribution of firms,” Pendakur told the Georgia Straight. “If minority workers face glass doors, that’s going to result in a glass ceiling at the level of the economy as a whole.”

Entitled Glass Ceilings or Glass Doors? Wage Disparity Within and Between Firms, the study states that “for some immigrant groups, the sorting of these workers across firms accounts for as much as half of the economy-wide wage disparity they face.”

On May 1, Statistics Canada released a detailed study of incomes in Canada using the latest data from the last census. According to Earnings and Incomes of Canadians Over the Past Quarter Century, 2006 Census: Findings, the gap in earnings between recent immigrants and Canadian-born workers worsened in the last two-and-a-half decades.

“In 1980, recent immigrant men who had some employment income earned 85 cents for each dollar received by Canadian-born men,” the StatsCan paper stated. “By 2005, the ratio had dropped to 63 cents. The corresponding numbers for recent immigrant women were 85 cents and 56 cents, respectively.”

The study noted that the disparity widened “even though the educational attainment of recent immigrant earners rose much faster than that of their Canadian-born counterparts, during this 25-year period”.

“While recent immigrant men earned only about 63 cents for every dollar earned by their Canadian-born counterparts in 2005, the corresponding number was 67 cents in 2000,” it also stated. “Recent immigrant women also lost ground relative to their Canadian-born counterparts in recent years. In 2000, they earned 65 cents for each dollar received by Canadian-born women, compared to 56 cents in 2005.”

The StatsCan paper also provided a table showing that the median income in 2005 of recent male immigrants with a university degree was $30,332. In contrast, Canadian-born male workers with a university degree earned $62,566.

Recent female immigrants with a university degree didn’t fare any better. They earned $18,969, compared with a median income of $44,545 for Canadian-born workers with a university degree.

Pendakur suggested that if glass doors are preventing recent immigrants from getting their foot inside better-paying companies, then it might be useful to review government policies, particularly the federal Employment Equity Act.

“If glass doors drive disparity, then a quota system could potentially help,” Pendakur said.

Comments

5 Comments

gerrycgc

Jun 5, 2008 at 5:08pm

Shouldn't these professors compare apples and apples. Not apples and oranges. The foreign university degree is probably not even recognized in Canada.

Also, a recent immigrant may not even speak english. Which is a must have for a high paid position in Canada. This so-called study sounds flawed. But maybe they wanted a flawed result on purpose.
To support a quota/equity system. Which is discriminatory as well. Depending on your point of view.

fakename

Jun 5, 2008 at 8:27pm

It's nice when evidence supports the obvious, sometime that's what it takes to get the message through. Good work people.

koby17

Jun 6, 2008 at 5:57pm

I have been in the Country for 12 years and am a visible minority, and I do not agree quota system is just and fair. This is actually a discrimination against Canadian born persons, and it creat groups base on color and heritage and will create hate between groups.

The solution should be strong immigration service, to help new Canadians on fitting in the community and their abilities.

Making employers to hire base on quota regardless on compentencies will make our Country less competitive, and results will be decline in economy and no one will have jobs.

mike laseter

May 13, 2010 at 8:15pm

I have been Canada for more than 30 years with a Canadian university degree. I have seen Caucasian Canadian have held higher position than me with no degree.

Chris Rocks says it best.
There are always going to be the dumbest and smartest. The rest are in the middle.
But you will never see a dumbest minority with the best jobs.
But you will see an uneducated Caucasian with the top job. George Bush, Stockwell Day, ect. That is life.......

Enni

Oct 9, 2010 at 5:04pm

"I have been Canada for more than 30 years with a Canadian university degree. I have seen Caucasian Canadian have held higher position than me with no degree."

Mike, I cannot see your race posted here. All I can notice is that your grammar is poor. Try "I have been *in* Canada for more than 30 years..." and then correct the other errors you have made.

Your limited ability to write in English may be the reason that Caucasian Canadians are holding higher positions than you. An employee with excellent writing ability will often be promoted over an employee that does not.

Will you choose to believe you are not being promoted because of your race, and do nothing to improve your writing skills? Please consider all possible reasons you are being left behind.