News and Views » News Features

Hunting for grizzly bears

Ian McAllister

Several years ago, the B.C. Liberal government lifted a ban on hunting grizzlies, but critics say the decision was based on faulty science.

By Andrew Findlay,

The Zodiac glides along the water, nudging up against the bank of a river that flows into the heart of the Fiordland Recreation Area on the central coast. The passengers step out and wade through a lush estuary blossoming with purple lupines and knee-deep in Lyngby’s sedge, a favourite springtime food of coastal grizzlies. Here and there, the fertile alluvium is freshly overturned where a grizzly has clawed the ground to uncover succulent silverweed roots. A quick scan of the broad floodplain with binoculars reveals two grizzlies methodically eating their way along the forest’s edge, their distinctive shoulder humps shimmering with blond-brown fur. Camera shutters click furiously.

More and more foreigners are paying top dollar for the opportunity to see a magnificent grizzly in the wild. British Columbia, though, still permits the sport killing of an animal that is highly evocative of what remains of our wilderness and is regarded as a keystone indicator of ecosystem health. Last year, a record-setting 430 grizzlies died for sport, for animal control, or from poaching, yet the complex science used by government to establish hunting quotas remains at the heart of one of the most controversial wildlife-management issues in Canada. That’s why environmentalists, First Nations, and bear-viewing companies believe the province is risking international shame over the hunting of grizzlies, considered by the federal Species at Risk Act, the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, and the B.C. Conservation Data Centre to be a species of special concern.

A recent public-opinion poll that says most British Columbians—73 percent—want the provincial government to end the hunt is adding fuel to the controversy. The poll was commissioned by Pacific Wild, a nonprofit group started last year by Ian McAllister after his split from the Raincoast Conservation Society, an environmental group he helped found more than 15 years ago.

“I think the results of this poll are pretty compelling,” says McAllister, who, in his fight to end sport hunting of grizzlies on the central coast, spearheaded a successful $1.35-million buyout of a guide-outfitter’s coastal hunting licence. “Ending the sport hunt will have a positive spinoff for a whole range of other species, and it’s the least we can do for grizzly bears.”

Armed with the results of the poll, conservationists, First Nations, and grizzly-bear-viewing operators plan to turn up the pressure on government to halt the hunt, arguing that bears are worth more alive than dead, that most people don’t support the hunt on ethical grounds, and that the science underpinning the hunt is weak.

Post a Comment

Comments

Skip
Rating: Loading...
I am totally opposed to Grizzly bear hunting. Clearly, the BC government is pandering to hunting groups and perhaps even to some members of the Chinese community that use Grizzly bear body parts for certain medicines. Please let me know how I can participate in helping to stop the hunt and aid in Grizzly protection
schemes.
 
BearMatters
Rating: Loading...
After reading this well written and researched article I hope people will write to the Premier and Minister of Environment to let them know what they think of trophy hunting of grizzly bears and any trophy hunting of wildlife in B.C. Perhaps we are entering a new era in B.C. where sport hunting is socially unacceptable and cameras and wildlife education replaces guns and bear rugs.
Please e-mail: Barry.Penner.mla@leg.bc.ca; Premier@gov.bc.ca
Bears Matter
 
galaxy999ca
Rating: Loading...
What these activists don't tell you is this was an exceptional year; from 1991 to 2002 the average harvest was 250 bears per year, with a notable decrease towards the end of that period. Moreover, that "shocking" figure of 430 includes defensive shootings and animal-control measures as well as licensed hunts. The number-one cause of grizzly death is starvation. As long as this remains true, the species is in no danger. In any case, harvest statistics are not a reliable indicator of species numbers.

Furthermore, while bear-watching may indeed create more revenue, it is also far more disruptive to the bears than hunting. When large numbers of humans are placed in close proximity to wild animals, the latter lose their fear of man--and the results can be fatal for both. Hunters, being fewer in number and more secretive than tourists, do not create this problem. Hunting animals only enhances their wildness. Treating their home as a zoo destroys it.

As for those who consider hunting in general to be a barbaric ritual best consigned to history, let every man so disposed swear off all meat, forever. Contracting your killing out--which is what you do when you pay a butcher or a grocer for meat--is not morally superior to doing it yourself.

Common sense is not so common. -Voltaire
 
legi0n
Rating: Loading...
Any public poll where the polled are ignorant on the issue is void. It's like polling people on the necessity of increasing the Canadian $ against the US $. Many will say yay or nay but few will actually know why.

One thing that's missing from the article is that most conservation projects and studies are funded with money from hunter licenses. No more licenses, no more money; no more people to count bears and enforce rules. No hunters to report poachers. Now put that in the context of a strong demand for Bear Gall Bladder in some Asian countries and some will notice soaring poaching. The end result will be worst than managed bear populations.

The other aspect is again something 99.9% of the polled have no clue about: the habitat capacity. In this case it simply means some piece of land can only support a finite number of bears. The surplus will be driven in areas where they'll die of starvation and/or exposure. That's how hunting limits are established: harvest the surplus.

And believe me, a hunter's bullet is way more humane than weeks of starvation/exposure.
 
le_r0umain
Rating: Loading...
The poll quoted in the article looks to me like the "carbon tax poll" the BC government invoked. Allegedly a majority said yes (and now they regret it). Sure thing, at the time it looked like a trendy thing to do but the outcome is not so trendy.
Whoever is shallow enough not to check both sides of a story and acts on biased information deserves the consequences.
 
A-S
Rating: Loading...
I am personally apalled at the lack of journalistic integrity displayed by Andrew Findlay in this piece of naive and heavilly biased eco-drivel.

It must be a terrible burden to have to right the world of its woes amidst the background clatter of Starbucks. If he and his like-minded hypocrits took the the time to do REAL research, they would perhaps see beyond their own noses. These are the people who pretend to be oh-so-enlightened and yet attempt to mould the world to their beliefs at every opportunity. How such perfection is possible while sucking the foam off a latte-latte is beyond me!

The activists quoted in this, uh, article, are poor lost souls who drift from one protest to another ... in search of what is beyond me!

And never let the truth stand in the way of a story, hey? Just another hack trying to make a buck, I guess!

As for the rest of you concrete jungle philosophers...try not to be quite so sheep-like. It confuses those of us who might otherwise have expected some semblance of original thought. As much as I enjoyed the scene in Monty Python's Life of Brian where the "activists" couldn't decide whether to "follow the gourd" or "follow the sandal", it is possible to have too much of a good thing!
 
karen Dunn Vanderberg
Rating: Loading...
Leave the BEARS alone, stay out of the Great Bear Rainforst and other reserves, with all your Trophy Hunters.This is as bad as the Seal Hunt. AND keep the foreigners out of our operation rooms- let them in if no Canadians, or BC person is waiting - like my husband and others who I know, have been waiting for over a year,. Think of BC and Canada first DON'T keep giving everything away.
 
[Comments Disclaimer]

Post a comment

· Use your real name to have your comment considered for publication in print.
· URLs and email addresses will be automatically turned into links.