B.C. court awards $179,644 for on-line defamation

Comments

A B.C. Supreme Court judge has ordered a Nanaimo man to pay $179,644.50 in damages, after finding he had published extensive defamatory comments on the Internet about a Sydney, Australia-based man from May 2003 to this April.

According to Justice D. Halfyard’s July 15 judgment, plaintiff Robert Griffin alleged that defendant Patrick Michael Sullivan “improperly obtained the plaintiff’s name, personal information and photographs, and published them on the internet, without the plaintiff’s knowledge or consent”.

Griffin successfully won general damages, aggravated damages, and damages for breach of privacy, and also obtained an injunction from Halfyard to keep Sullivan from publishing further defamatory statements about him.

According to the court documents, Sullivan defamed Griffin by labelling him on newsgroups and Web sites as a “stalker, abuser, harasser, criminal, evil, liar, killer, sexual predator, pervert, pedophile, coward, manipulator and hate monger who threatens others with death and violence, betrays confidences and is untrustworthy, is dangerous, abuses, impregnates and abandons women and publishes their personal information”.

According to Halfyard: “But the defendant admits publishing many of the alleged libels, and advances the main defence that these statements about the plaintiff were true.”

Halfyard writes that “truth is a complete defence to a defamation action”. Sullivan was found to have failed to meet this basic test.

Sullivan’s “numerous and montrous” defamatory statements followed a “vicious dispute” on the Usenet newsgroup alt.suicide.holiday.

Comments (2) Add New Comment
Ostrovsky
I hope that the current Obama administration does something about people like Ed Magedson of the RipOff Report found at http://www.ripoffreport.com, who has apparently ruined millions of people’s lives and businesses for no reason, some apparently even committing suicide, with complete and total immunity and impunity, due to a little loophole in defamation law called the CDA 230.
0
0
Rating: 0
Skeptic
CDA 230 doesn't stop anyone from suing Ed Magedson. It merely says that if you have a beef with Ed Magedson, who happens to get their internet service from Comcast or Verizon or Time Warner, you have to sue Ed Magedson - you can't sue Comcast, Verizon, or TIme Warner merely because they provided his internet connectivity. Besides, this case took place in Canada, and CDA is U.S. law, not Canadian law.
0
0
Rating: 0
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.