News and Views » Straight Issues

Straight Issues

Stéphane Dion may have to focus on issues other than the environment if he wants to win B.C. voters in the federal campaign.

B.C. may balk at Stéphane Dion's Green Shift plan

On what issues should federal politicians get cracking?


Dave Jones
Security consultant and former Vancouver Police officer

“The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse: mental health, homelessness, addictions, and crime. If we could defeat those four, that would be a platform worth applauding. Their resolution is fundamental to us having a safer, more functional society, and a less expensive one. The way we deal we these now is…excusing the most heinous of acts, the most heinous of behaviour, and on the basis of what? They had a bad life?”


Kim Baird
Chief, Tsawwassen First Nation

“First Nations are very concerned about any policy that will assist with the dire conditions on the reserves and a commitment from parties to try to address them and not just talk about them. The poverty and Third World conditions on reserves are appalling. It would be hard for a minority government to achieve much without a much broader, aggressive planned approach and a commitment from all parties and First Nations as well.”


Victor Wong
Executive director, Chinese Canadian National Council

“For the Chinese community, there will be a number of issues that federal politicians will have to address. The government is moving forward to implement…a bill that makes immigration more of a business model as opposed to a nation-building model. Bill C-51, the regulation of natural health products, is also an issue. A third issue will be the head tax. The head tax has not been completely resolved.”


Derrick O’Keefe
Cochair, StopWar.ca coalition

“At present, Canadian aid to Afghanistan is being used as a smokescreen for war. We should give genuine aid to Afghanistan without any strings attached. I think that voters should punish all the politicians who voted for more war. The Liberals and Conservatives got together to extend Canada’s military presence in Afghanistan until 2011, even though poll after poll showed Canadians want the troops brought home much sooner.”

British Columbians are divided over the carbon tax brought in by the provincial Liberal government. And this means it’s going to be tricky for Stéphane Dion and his federal Liberals to wage an election campaign in B.C. around his “Green Shift” plan, which also involves a carbon tax.

Mario Canseco, director of global studies with polling firm Angus Reid, made this assessment amid wide expectations before the Georgia Straight went to press that Conservative prime minister Stephen Harper will engineer a federal election this fall.

In a phone interview, Canseco suggested that federal Liberals may have to “tailor the message and do something different here in B.C.”, like focusing on Harper’s character or the credentials of the Liberals in managing the economy.

“If they run their campaign based on the environment, and on the actual possibility of having this new carbon tax come in, it’s going to be very, very complicated,” Canseco said.

It doesn’t help that the federal Liberals are trailing behind the three other major parties in voting intentions among British Columbians. According to Angus Reid survey results released on August 30, the Conservatives are leading the pack with 33 percent; the NDP is favoured by 25 percent; the Green party, 20 percent; and the federal Liberals, 19 percent.

The B.C. carbon tax took effect on July 1 this year, starting at $10 per tonne on associated carbon or carbon-equivalent emissions. The tax, which applies to fossil fuels, including gasoline, diesel, and natural gas, will increase to $30 in 2012.

In June, Dion unveiled his Green Shift plan, which features a carbon tax rising from $10 per tonne to $40 per tonne over a four-year period. The tax will not apply to gasoline at the pumps; it will cover diesel and aviation fuel starting in the second year.

These two carbon-tax models provide that all revenues be returned to individuals and businesses through tax reductions.

Results of an Angus Reid survey released on August 27 showed that almost half of British Columbians reported that the provincial carbon tax has either severely or moderately affected their household finances. Twenty-seven percent reported that they have a slight problem with the tax, and only 24 percent indicated that they have no trouble with the policy.

The Dion plan pledges that the federal government will work with provinces like B.C. to ensure that “our system to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions is administered fairly.”

Liberal MP Joyce Murray, who won the March 17, 2008, by-election in Vancouver Quadra, has been holding town-hall meetings in the riding to promote Dion’s Green Shift plan.

According to Murray’s spokesperson, Robert Kraljii, the former B.C. Liberal environment minister will convene another meeting on this proposal at UBC on September 13.

“The provincial Liberals may have their own gas tax, but we have no gas tax in our carbon tax,” Kraljii told the Straight. “The challenge with the provincial election also coming [in 2009] and with the [provincial] NDP campaign to axe the tax is that many people are confused when we talk about our Green Shift.”

Murray is one of the designated spokespeople for Dion’s Green Shift. In an interview following her election, Murray stressed that putting a price on carbon emissions is widely accepted as a sound measure to address the challenge of “catastrophic global warming”.

“We have a serious, serious problem and we need governments to take this seriously,” Murray told the Straight. “The Conservatives are not. That’s clear from their attack ads and just their policies, actually, and their government [is] led by someone who’s denied the existence of climate change and fought against measures to deal with it until very recently.”

Murray can expect to tangle for a second time with UBC Sauder School of Business lecturer Deborah Meredith, who is running again as the Conservative candidate for Vancouver Quadra.

Meredith, who lost to Murray by only 151 votes in the by-election, noted that Dion’s carbon tax appears to be the only major plank of the federal Liberal platform at this time.

“I don’t think that we want any new taxes,” Meredith told the Straight of B.C. voters.

Election will kill some controversial bills

> Bill S-205: an act that aims to make it easier to declare bankruptcy on student loans, so one could do so after two years rather than 10

> Bill C-52: an act that would rejig the way Canada deals with consumer products’ safety, with the aim of clearing toxic products off shelves

> Bill C-25: an act that aims to make it easier to keep youth who are accused of a crime detained before they go to trial if they are considered dangerous

> Bill C-484: an act that would make injuring a pregnant woman a double crime by making the injuring of her fetus a crime

> Bill C-6: an act that requires voters to have their faces uncovered so officials can visually identify them

> Bill C-428: an act cracking down on the manufacture of crystal meth

Source: www.canada.gc.ca/

Post a Comment

Comments

ubuntulistener
Rating: Loading...
Don't know a darn thing about Bill C-XX, or any other Bill for that matter, but I have read "10 Great reasons not to hate Taxes", and don't mind paying into a system that provides services to everyone, and not just the rich.
 
ubuntulistener
Rating: Loading...
If we can acknowledge the need for a carbon-tax to help everyone think a little bit about carbon emissions, why do we have to wait until 2012 to go to $30.00 per tonne? Are we going to be more affluent by 2012 than we are now?
$10.00 per tonne is an insult to anyone with a brain.
 
RickW
Rating: Loading...
Why start off with taxes? That is like using the stick instead of the carrot? Why not start off with incentives NOT to use carbon-producing products, or to use LESS of them, rather than threats?
 
easterplanet
Rating: Loading...
Re: B.C. may balk at Dion's "Green Shift" (note that the "f" is silent).
Again, some politician is proposing an environmental remedy without first consulting with me, which is a big no-no because the environment of this planet is my responsibility. Again, with Dion's carbon tax, it is a Mark Jaccard-type measure which means that it is a complaint-buy-out type of tax, it supposedly pays you back the same money that it takes from you. Knowing the innate inefficiency of government, you would know that you cannot get back out the same what you have put in, there is a huge operating overhead, which would be covered by you mugs, that foolish taxpayers. As well, The Dion tax begs the question as to which jurisdiction "carbon taxing" belongs - apparently B.C., with no objection from Alberta or any other province, has claimed that turf as a provincial responsibility. So good luck, feds! In the election campaign, the Harperites will link a federal carbon tax with a National Energy Program, the mere mention of which will send voters running to Harper like rats to cheese.Then the bigger problem is - what will happen to these complaint-buy-out tax schemes, when someone actually gets the nerve to put on a carbon tax and use the money raised to HELP THE ENVIRONMENT?
Robert McCroskey on the Easter Planet
http://pan-am.uniserve.com/environment.htm
Surrey, BC

 
[Comments Disclaimer]

Post a comment

URLs and email addresses will be automatically turned into links.