Commandant illuminates Nazi horror in The Boy in the Striped Pajamas

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      Playing a concentration-camp commandant in The Boy in the Striped Pajamas—opening here Friday (November 14)—was no picnic for David Thewlis. But donning the swastika and making not-nice on-screen wasn’t as hard for the versatile British actor as one might imagine.

      “Oddly enough,” Thewlis explains, calling from Toronto, “we had quite a bit of fun on-set. The atmosphere was often quite humorous and childlike.”

      That’s because most scenes of the fablelike movie involved school-age children and it was necessary to keep things light for them.

      Adapted from John Boyne’s popular novel by director Mark Herman, the maker of eccentrically small British films like Brassed Off and Little Voice, the tale stars newcomer Asa Butterfield as Bruno, the young, openhearted son of Thewlis’s ruthless officer, with Amber Beattie as his morally pliable teenaged daughter, and Vera Farmiga as his increasingly stricken wife.

      “There was quite a nice rapport between everyone on set,” the actor continues, “and we all managed to laugh a lot. We had several dinnertime scenes where the kids would be flickin’ their food at each other.”

      At night, however, the Lancashire-born film veteran and occasional writer continued his research into the human cost of organized hatred-hence the title, which outwardly refers to the small Jewish lad (Jack Scanlon) Bruno finds on the other side of the barbed wire. Among other grim things, Thewlis read the memoir of Auschwitz commandant Rudolph Hí¶ss, who raised five children virtually on the grounds of the German death camp.

      “I often wondered what happened to those children after Hí¶ss was executed; I read somewhere that they came to Canada, actually.” (Their fate remains unsubstantiated.) “Anyway, shooting was fine, but off-set it was, ”˜All right, let’s fill my head with all this horror.’ I punished myself with some really awful dreams, I can tell you.”

      Like Thewlis, and his stoical soldier, the audience is expected to already know enough about what’s happening off-camera to grasp Bruno’s confusing plight.

      “John Boyne chose to write it through the eyes of a German commandant and an innocent boy. It’s an allegory about prejudice and confronting what it does to people. This is what attracted me to the project. It didn’t seem like anything else I knew of in the English language that could be applicable to children. It’s not a children’s film, per se, but I think it’s a good place to begin their education. With just a little effort and changes of costumes and names to a different time and place, it could be set in Darfur and have the same messages coming through.”

      The tall, craggy-faced 45-year-old, who burst onto the international stage 15 years ago with his harrowing lead role in Mike Leigh’s scabrous Naked, has since learned something about movies aimed at wee ones. He played Prof. Lupin in the last two Harry Potter movies-which, for some strange reason, I still haven’t caught.

      “Well, you haven’t missed a thing, mate,” Thewlis concludes with a laugh. “But do try to get people to see this. It’s the feel-bad movie of the year!”


      This article was updated on November 14 at 5:08 p.m. A change was made to correct a factual error.

      Comments

      1 Comments

      John Halucha

      Nov 13, 2008 at 3:03pm

      Imagine if I wrote something like, “. . . memoir of Guantanamo Bay prison chief Maj. Gen. Geoffrey Miller, who raised five children virtually on the grounds of the Cuban death camp.” Wouldn't you think that sounded idiotic, even if I argued that context indicated I meant it was an American death camp though I wrote it was Cuban?
      Imagine further that hundreds of thousands of Cubans had been tortured and murdered in that camp by the Americans who actually ran it. Wouldn't it sound grossly insensitive and cruel to call that a “Cuban” facility, seeming to put the blame on the victims?
      That's how Ken Eisner sounds by writing, “. . . memoir of Auschwitz commandant Rudolph Hí¶ss, who raised five children virtually on the grounds of the Polish death camp.” Hundreds of thousands of Polish citizens were murdered there by the Nazi German invaders who built and maintained Auschwitz.
      Eisner ought to take his cue from such knowledgeable authorities as the American Jewish Committee, which says, “. . . We would also like to remind those who are either unaware of the facts or careless in their choice of words, as has been the case with some media outlets, that Auschwitz-Birkenau and the other death camps, including Belzec, Chelmno, Majdanek, Sobibor and Treblinka, were conceived, built and operated by Nazi Germany and its allies. The camps were located in German-occupied Poland, the European country with by far the largest Jewish population, but they were most emphatically not "Polish camps". This is not a mere semantic matter. Historical integrity and accuracy hang in the balance. . . Any misrepresentation of Poland's role in the Second World War, whether intentional or accidental, would be most regrettable and therefore should not be left unchallenged.” (http://www.ajc.org/site/apps/nl/content2.asp?c=ijITI2PHKoG&b=849241&ct=8...)
      If you have any journalistic integrity or human sensitivity you will run a correction and apology, and repair that callous online error to, “. . . on the grounds of the Nazi death camp in German-occupied Poland.”
      John Halucha
      Sault Ste Marie, ON