Becci Gindin-Clarke: Foie gras is a cruel dish better left unserved
By Becci Gindin-Clarke
To some, foie gras represents the ultimate in luxury food. In reality, it is one of the most extreme forms of cruelty still permitted today, and yet it appears on the menus of many of Vancouver’s finest restaurants.
Foie gras is the liver of ducks who have been force-fed with a mechanical pump almost to the point of death. The purpose of this process is to swell the liver up to 10 times its normal size, so that it becomes fatty and extremely rich.
Canadian foie gras comes from Quebec, where 500,000 ducks are killed annually for foie gras. The majority comes from three producers, each of which slaughters in excess of 2,000 ducks each week. In these factory farms, ducks are raised in large, enclosed sheds. Some farms have small, crowded pens in which a few ducks are kept; others restrain each duck in an individual cage.
Two to three times each day, a farm worker goes down the line, grabs each bird, and forces a metal pipe down his throat. A machine pumps a corn-meal mixture directly into the duck’s stomach in only a few seconds. Each duck is force-fed up to one-third of his body weight in food each day. After two weeks, they are slaughtered.
The process of force-feeding enlarges the liver so dramatically that other organs are pushed to the side, making breathing difficult. The ducks must struggle to stand and can barely walk; they have been observed attempting to push themselves forward with their wings when their legs can no longer support their swollen bodies. During the force-feeding process, bills are cracked, tongues are torn, and necks are punctured by the metal feeding tubes.
The Global Action Network’s undercover investigations at Quebec’s foie gras farms have shown ducks vomiting bright-red, bloodstained food from their damaged throats. Necropsied foie gras birds frequently reveal signs of trauma—scarring, lacerations, and bacterial and fungal infections. Not surprisingly, the B.C. SPCA opposes foie gras, describing force-feeding as an “intrusive, stressful and painful experience”.
Why would anybody defend this wholly unnecessary “delicacy”?
Sixteen countries have outlawed the practice of force-feeding. Israel, once the world’s fourth-largest producer, banned it in 2005 because of animal welfare concerns. California has passed a law that will ban the production and sale of foie gras by 2012.
Chicago passed a nearly unanimous ban on the sale of foie gras which was repealed two years later through some sneaky political maneuvering. How would such a ban fare in Vancouver? Are our politicians willing to take a stand and stick to it like California, or would they wimp out like Chicago? The NPA-heavy council voted to ban rodeos in Vancouver. Is the current Vision Vancouver-led council going to be more or less progressive on animal welfare issues?
At Liberation B.C., we are hopeful that positive change will come about in Vancouver under Mayor Gregor Robertson’s leadership. We have been engaging the public and collecting petition signatures in favour of a ban on the sale of foie gras, and the support we’ve received has been overwhelming.
Becci Gindin-Clarke is a director of Liberation B.C.



E-mail
Print
Comments
I'm glad to see Israel is adopting such a progressive policy towards animal-rights concerns. I'm sure the 1000+ Palestinians that have been killed in the last month by Israeli forces will be very glad that no one in the area is eating duck liver.
After reading how this product is produced I wonder if anyone could still eat it?
I know I couldn't.
I'm not advocating animal torture—quite the opposite, in fact. Animals should be treated with kindness and humanity. I just think humans should, too.
Establisments that want to defend foie gross as a delicacy need to be shamed out of their trade in cruelty, but the consumers who claim ignorance are just as much to blame. Supply and demand, folks. There will always be people who have no idea what it means to excercise mercy, but I applaud Liberation BC and the Strait for exposing the truth in such an accessible, tangible way to the general public. It's up to everyone not to turn a blind eye to the most obvious perversions out there, and foie gros is absolutely one of them.
I hope to read more from you regarding all sorts of animal exploitation issues. This kind of voice is way overdue in The Straight.
Kudos!
Laura K
Vancouver
I am so pleased that someone has once again brought this to the attention of the public. Anyone with any sort of feeling or moral will understand that this is wrong. Foie Gras... don't we have enough food on the menus already? Do we need to torture more and more animals innocent creatures to feed our appetites? Can you not se the madness in that. Please, next time make a different choice on the menu. Don't keep giving them a reason to continue the toture, they have just as much right to be here as me and you. Please eat with a conscience.
I sure hope that those in a position to do so will ban this practice and the food itself. : (
Thank you so much for your efforts to educate the public and the politicians.
The Straight article makes no effort to be balanced and factual. For example, it claims that Chicago repealed its ban on fois gras "through some sneaky political maneuvering." Real sneaky: city council voted 37-6 to repeal the law after the Mayor said it was the "silliest ordinance" the city council ever passed and it made Chicago "the laughingstock of the nation."
The American Veterinary Medical Association examined the foie gras issue and concluded that potential risks to animals can be mitigated by effective management. They found that empirical research addressing health and welfare states of bird production is limited in both quantity and quality. Becci Gindin-Clarke seems unbothered by that information gap.
Will meatless warriors be satisfied if farmers stop forced feedings? Of course not. The goal is to turn us all into vegans, whether by persuasion or coercion.
Back to the original topic. I applaud people that become informed about issues and voice a logical, well formulated argument and I encourage such debate. However, I ask the question why Liberation BC slanders a number of fine establishments in the city that promote some of the most wholesome and balanced culinary programs in Vancouver, yet allow many other more influential establishments (aka supermarkets that shall remain nameless) carry on what they are doing and polluting a far greater portion of the population?
Priorty #1 in BC's culinary world is not a ban on foie gras. Although I sympathise with and understand the position against some foie gras production, Liberation BC wastes the public's time with these miniscule publicity stunts while choosing not to tackle the bigger, tougher issues that are confronting us today. More people in our generation will be harmed by obesity than foie gras production or consumption, therefore I would ask Lib BC to crawl back into their self-aggrandizing cave and emerge when they have a comprehensive, logical, and action-oriented program to liberate BC from the biggest evils that haunt our culinary world.
I spent a day on a small bird farm in the Perigord. The woman showed how they fed their geese and explained that the birds must be handled gently because, if they were not, the quality of production would suffer. This young family produced ducks and geese with respect, most birds wandered freely in an orchard pasture, not even bothered by young children and a dog playing nearby. Compare that to a battery chicken farm in the Fraser Valley with tens of thousand of chicken stuffed together. Or, the feedlots where steers and hogs stand in excrement, waiting for the abattoir. Come on vegans, choose your targets with sense.
Hi, interactbiz. This is the author here.
Thank you for your comment. You'll be relieved to know that I did recognize this "information gap", and to figure out exactly what was going on, I did some research.
As a result, our website has a good deal of information on this very issue. You might be interested to know that the AVMA has also not come out against gestation crates for pigs or forced molting and battery cages for egg-laying chickens, which are both practices that individuals such as yourself recognize as morally indefensible. The AVMA has traditionally sided with the industry; their animal welfare committee has, on the other hand, recommended that the House of Delegates adopt the following position: "Resolved, that the AVMA opposes the practice of mechanical force feeding of ducks and geese to produce foie gras because of the adverse effects on the birds' health and welfare associated with this practice."
If you would like more information, you can check out the full research here: http://liberationbc.org/campaigns/foie_gras/fuel_facts
As for your second comment, in which you suggest we choose our targets more carefully, I would recommend you once again check our website. There you will see that Liberation BC's most major campaigns have been specifically against the factory farmed chicken and turkey you (very appropriately) malign.
Thank you again for your input.
culinarydesignsolutions.wordpress.com
I would much rather buy a small quantity of foie gras once or twice a year, than the vast amount of commercial, antibiotic-laden beef, chicken, and pork that are produced. These animals are the source of major environmental problems - from antibiotic-resistant bacteria, to greenhouse gas, and land-fill waste management!
I am saddened and disappointed by the amount of emotional rhetoric surrounding this "animal cruelty", when far crueler and devious practices are being performed by Big Business so that you can buy cheap meat at the grocery store. Use your brains, not your hearts, and set loftier priorities instead: boycott large commercial meat operations that clearly have a larger societal/environmental impact than the relatively unimportant foie gras issue...
Post a comment