News and Views » Blog - Politics

Blog - Politics

Open letter to Vancouver mayor and council on Olympic Village

The following open letter was sent out today (January 21):

An open letter to Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson and Vancouver City Council

Dear Mayor Robertson and members of Council:

You and your caucus were resoundingly elected in November by the citizens of Vancouver. Many of those who supported you took you at your word that your administration would find solutions to homelessness and poverty and bring accountable, transparent government back to Vancouver. In our opinion, the place to start doing both of these tasks begins with how the City deals with the Athletes' Village debacle.

There are two ways out of the current Village crisis, both of which begin by acknowledging that the City of Vancouver is now the owner of the project. One solution is to borrow the funds to complete the project for the Olympics then try to sell the units after 2010. This appears to be the primary option your administration is considering. In a falling real estate market, this option is not only financially risky due to the high interest rates involved and an uncertain future market, but fails to address promises made about Olympic "inclusivity". The latter was a reason many Vancouverites voted for the Games in the 2003 plebiscite: The public was promised that a future Athletes' Village would include a significant level of social housing.

The time to keep that promise is now and it can be accomplished by the following alternative solution. The current financial crisis, the most serious in Vancouver's history, now offers a remarkable opportunity to address the shameful poverty long neglected by three levels of government. Your administration can take a leadership role in a way that is fiscally responsible and honours previous commitments: The City of Vancouver should now take over the entire project and use it as a model of responsible community development that features a mixed model involving sold and rental units. The latter would include true social housing as well as a range of subsidy levels designed to accommodate both the working poor as well as the homeless.

We recommend that you instruct staff to consider a variety of funding options to create this model community. Whether Vancouver's long term financial health would be better served by borrowing the funds at high interest rates or if the Property Endowment Funds could be used instead are several of the options that need to be considered. We would also recommend that you ask staff to consider if potential penalties involved with Vancouver withdrawing from hosting the 2010 Games outweigh the looming costs to the City for security and other Olympic costs. Finally, since we believe that the public needs to be consulted about major capital projects, we believe it essential that the issue of funding the Village be put to Vancouver's citizens in a referendum. Council recently sidestepped this stage of the process, but we do not believe that avoiding public participation, for whatever reasons, is healthy for democracy.

We, the undersigned individuals and organizations, call on the new Council to ensure that the City of Vancouver retains ownership and control of the False Creek Athletes' Village and to further ensure that development of the property serves the urgent need for low cost housing in Vancouver

Gail Davidson
Ivan Doumenc (Work Less Party)
Reed Eurchuk
Saul Geller
Ian Gregson (WLP)
Tim Louis (COPE)
Terry Martin
Penny Parry
Drina Read (Green Party, BC)
Chris Shaw (WLP)
Geri Tramutola (WLP)
John Yaro

Post a Comment

Comments

AnonymousCommenter 669
Rating: Loading...
You sounded logic and coherent until you skipped into loony land by suggesting Vancouver withdraw from the Games. It's not just "penalties" that are involved, but also investors who bought here because of the Games, developers who built here, businesses that opened up, etc, etc. These people would lose a lot of money, and that means lawsuit.

The presence of such a poorly thought-out proposal makes me question the wisdom of the rest of your letter.
 
montyvan
Rating: Loading...
Cancel the Olympics?? Uh, a little late for that. It's not going to happen and the penalties for doing so will far outweigh any cost overruns associated with the Olympics, not to mention the huge loss of revenue and tourism.

Honestly, why do Vancouverites bitch and moan so much about things that other cities would kill to have? So many people here hate tall buildings, condos, cars, money, tourists, etc. I.e., things that make a city a City. If it were up to them, Vancouver would still be a backwater town full of industrial plants polluting the water and air.

Travel to some other cities around the world to see how good we really have it here.
 
Tieleman
Rating: Loading...
Ridiculous - this is marginal thinking at best. It certainly does nothing to help the homeless.

Bill Tieleman
 
Brent Gibson
Rating: Loading...
BG - I've been homeless and I've been reasonbly comfortably housed. I'm happily in the latter state right now in an affordable, clean, well run domicile in the Downtown East, run by the Atira Society - kudos to them and their good works. I'm not sure that that a ready-made homeless house, like the monstrosity in Calgary, is an answer for anything more than transitional states. I cannot help but picture a decaying block in E Berlin down the road as a model. The plan that is currently being pursued, i.e. rehabilitating several downtown hotels and seeking responsible, fairly paid management teams, will, in the long run, help to rehabilitate the community AND those who reside within. Any homeless question that fails to address the slumlords and the needs of the neighbourhood is doomed to create a farm team for the homeless.

And, as for even dreaming of crapping out on an obligation - irrespective of the financial costs, which may or may not exceed actual cost of games operations, but what developer with all brain lobes functioning would even consider doing a deal in this town, this province, or maybe this country if we were the chumps who couldn't begin to live up to our commitments.

 
fairway101
Rating: Loading...
I agree very strongly that the suggestion that we simply cancel the 2010 Winter Olympics is quite idiotic, considering ALL that BC would lose. However, I cannot say that I was ever in favour of us hosting the Games. The suggestion that all of BC will benefit enormously is as idiotic as the suggestion of cancelling the Games now. Those of us who live "beyond Hope" will certainly foot the lion's share of the bill, since some 80% of BC's wealth originates in the so-called "Heartland". But, we will not share equally in the benefits. How will the $600+ million spent to re-work the road from Squamish to Whistler, benefit Prince George? The road needed some work, to accomodate those who cannot drive in a sane fashion, but this huge amount of money is only being spent because of the Olympics, and even though most of that money will come from the North, only a very few of us will ever drive on it. When ALL costs are considered, these Games will do no better than most other Olympics, financially. History tells us that. The province will have spent far more than any revenue that will ever be generated by the hugely expensive projects that are being built only because of the Games. Those who generate the least amount of wealth for the province will benefit in a big way, but those of us who are footing the bill will not.

from the "Heartland" of BC
 
[Comments Disclaimer]

Post a comment

URLs and email addresses will be automatically turned into links.