News and Views » Commentary

Commentary

Dave Steele: Meat just doesn't cut it in today's environment

By Dave Steele

There’s little doubt about it. Humans evolved as omnivores. The shapes of our teeth, the lengths of our intestines, and a wealth of fossil evidence (arrowheads, butchered animal bones, et cetera) all point to an omnivorous past.

Natural selection favoured meat eating because it allowed our ancestors to survive where edible plant supplies were in short supply. Our forebears could flourish on fruits and grains and berries when those were plentiful and switch to meat when edible plants were scarce. Had early humans not led omnivorous lives, they almost certainly would have died out.

But that was then. This is now.

In the past, humans were few and far between. The pressure we exerted on the world around us was slight. Today, with our population approaching seven billion, the pressures we exert are enormous. No longer a boon to humanity, our hunger for meat has become the single biggest contributor to planetary degradation. Be it global warming, fossil-fuel depletion, water depletion or desertification, meat consumption is a prime factor in the problem. And meat takes food out of the mouths of the hungry.

On today’s factory farms, it takes 2.4 pounds of dry corn, soy, and oats to produce a pound of chicken; eight to 10 pounds of similar feed is required for every pound of beef. According to Cornell University’s David Pimentel, nearly 800 million people could fill their stomachs for a year on the grain fed to U.S. animals alone. And that’s just the tip of the iceberg.

According to Pimentel’s careful reckoning, modern western diets could not exist at all were it not for the enormous amount of fossil fuels we pour into them. Just getting nitrogen into our fertilizers takes the equivalent of nearly one million barrels of oil each day. Add in the other components—the pesticides, the herbicides, the combines, the tractors, and all the rest—and the numbers become astronomical. As Pimentel shows, the way we raise meat, it takes some 28 calories of fossil fuel input to generate one calorie of food value. Even modern lacto-ovo vegetarian diets, he warns, can’t be maintained in our world without excessive amounts of oil and gas.

Meat production accelerates global warming, too. All those burned fossil fuels have to go somewhere. Worse, our cows and sheep and other ruminants emit methane as they digest their feed. Together, Canada’s 10 million cows release the methane equivalent of a half ton of CO2 for every man, woman, and child in the country. According to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, animal agriculture is responsible for a bigger share of global warming than all of the cars and trucks and ships and planes in the world combined!

And animal agriculture emits other pollutants, too. Nearly three-quarters of North American ammonia emissions are due directly or indirectly to animal farming. Manure contaminates our ground water. The Worldwatch Institute reports that farm animals in the United States generate 130 times more bodily waste than humans.

Animal agriculture destroys land and habitat, too. Raising livestock and the soybeans to feed them is easily the biggest contributor to rainforest destruction. More than two acres of tropical rainforest are cleared per second to graze or feed farm animals. Around the world, tens of billions of tons of topsoil are lost each year to cultivation of animal feed crops.

Fish are no solution either. We’ve mined the oceans so badly that almost all of the world’s fisheries are in serious decline. Hunting? Sorry. All of North America’s wildlife would be wiped out were we to satisfy our current hunger for meat that way.

In the past, the meat eating was a boon to us. But today, the opposite is true. Natural selection operates on the here and now. If we don’t curtail our consumption of meat and eggs and milk and cheese, natural selection will eventually work in the strongest way against our meat-eating habits.

But we’re lucky. We evolved as omnivores. We can choose what we eat. Plants or animals.

Choose plants. There’s an awful lot at stake.

Dave Steele is the vice president of Earthsave Canada.

Post a Comment

Comments

Roxy
Rating: Loading...
What a great article! I choose plants. They're better for me, they're better for the planet, and there's no animal suffering.
 
Casman55
Rating: Loading...
OK Mr. Steele give me one example of a large industrialized culture that is existing without endemic malnutrition that is not at least supplementing their vegetarian diet with plenty of animal protein of some kind.
Where you are going to get all the natural fertilizers you need for all these crops? Human feces?
The large scale plant farming necessary would also have serious ecological repercussions.
 
Trent
Rating: Loading...
Dear Casman55,
Your first question is a strawman argument. No large industrialized culture has ever attempted to go collectively vegetarian. So we have no successes or failures to measure against.

Your second question answers itself. The land used to feed animals can be used to feed people instead, with surplus food to spare.
 
sleepswithangels
Rating: Loading...
I predict meat eaters will become increasingly twitchy as the cost of their poison goes through the roof in years to come. This problem will eventually sort itself out as the longevity rates of meat eaters keeps declining. More and more of these semiconscious throwbacks will succumb to disease (think: ecoli/madcow etc etc) while the rest age ever more rapidly due to the chemicals in their chosen "comfort" food.
Darwin was right..people who make stupid and willfully ignorant choices will eventually die off and their progeny will either smarten up or lead the kind of lives that Thomas Hobbes wrote about.
 
montyvan
Rating: Loading...
Good luck trying to convince an entire population to become vegetarian. It's completely unrealistic. I think a better solution would be to go back to local, small farms. It's the large international food companies that are doing the most damage to our environment, and providing poor-quality food as well.

Small, organic farms that raise livestock and chickens humanely and cleanly could dramatically reduce the waste and pollution. This would naturally raise the cost of animal protein which would deter people from eating as much. Kind of like what happened when gas prices were so high.

Better nutritional education for the public would also help.

And once again I see the usual suspects here passing judgement on those who chose a different diet then their own. That kind of small-minded rhetoric isn't going to convince anyone to see your point of view. No one.
 
Casman55
Rating: Loading...
Dear Trent,
No large industrialized culture has done it because it's not viable.
The low grade feed that domestic animals eat is not a viable replacement. Have you ever considered how many pounds of corn or grain it would take to grow a pound of human?
The reason people keep trying to sneak animal protein into cattle and chicken feed is because it is much a more efficient.
The planet cannot sustain 7 billion plant eating people either.
A mix of vegetable and animal food can be produced locally year round in the Canadian climate. A nutritious plant diet cannot.
As for disease from food the most recent is scare is from tainted peanuts and quite few people have have been poisoned by spinach and lettuce over the years too.
The answer is in population control, better distribution of wealth and food, more local food production and common sense.
 
sleepswithangels
Rating: Loading...
Pearls before swine. Personally I don't give a hoot if people keep eating themselves to death. Part of me is considering buying lots of stock in funeral homes and the other part of me is laughing my tush off. I'm closer to 60 than 50 and after 29 years of not eating meat and 34 years of martial arts I'm able to date really hot 20 somethings and wake up happy virtually every day. Keep scarfing down the Maple Leaf mystery meats and the Big Macs....do us all a favour and make sure you supersize everything....the sooner your type becomes extinct the sooner we can truly heal the planet and start anew.
 
alisonc
Rating: Loading...
Great article and glad to see it in a mainstream publication. Raising plants for direct human consumption rather than raising plants and then feeding it to animals and then consuming them is obviously way more efficient and logical for feeding us hungry and many humans on the planet.
 
prettyclassy
Rating: Loading...
"the sooner your type becomes extinct the sooner we can truly heal the planet and start anew."

It doesn't matter how valid either life choice is, wishing death to other people is probably the most despicable thing you can do. By speaking like an ignorant teenager, what you actually accomplished was making people believe that vegetarians care more about feeling superior to others than actually reducing their impact on the planet.

I can't think of something more pathetic than a vegetarian barbecue. Tasteless tofu dogs, bland veggie burgers, with a side of veggies and dip. Think of all the dishes that cheese makes possible, nachos, pizza, without it, italian food would become a thing of legend.

Dave Steele, Vice President of "Earthsave Canada", doesn't once mention the suffering animals endure for our survival and quality of life, isn't that the bottom line?

The pollution caused by the live stock industry is not a valid argument because you would then need to shut, down, everything. No cars, No planes, everything runs on fossil fuel at some capacity. That's not the industry's fault, that's our government for allowing patents to destroy the possibility of advancement in technology, which of course extends to the issue of global warming.

Blaming the meat industry for global warming is like blaming Penthouse for child molesters, or Led Zeppelin for a rise in opiate production, or Led Zeppelin for sending troops to Afghanistan to ensure a rise in opiate production.
You should blame yourself for actually believing you ever lived in a democracy.
 
Casman55
Rating: Loading...
Dear sleepswithangels,
Is the reason you date 20 somethings because you eat plants or because you are shallow and unable to relate to women close to your own age?
 
KKnowles
Rating: Loading...
sleepswithangels - I couldn't have said it better. Throughout history, humans have succumbed to diseases and viruses to which they were exposed - mad cow, avian flu, e-coli, salmonella, etc. are all primarily related to meat.
Contaminated meat is an increasingly effective way to thin out the population, and is caused by the deplorable conditions in which these animals are raised to serve humans as food. I choose plants, too.
 
Casman55
Rating: Loading...
There you go! I applaud your ability to choose and if that makes you feel better great!
I happen to think we (our culture)eat way too much meat and should treat domestic animals better BUT
Tell me did your cat choose plants too?
You guys are like religious fanatics. You don't let facts or logic get in the way of a good story. You try to convert everybody around you. And everybody that doesn't believe what you believe is going to hell.
Don't blame me (or my type) for all the misery in the world. There is plenty of blame to go around.
 
sleepswithangels
Rating: Loading...
Wow.. holy Attention Deficit Disorder 'prettyclassy'....you really like to bounce around a lot of disconnected skewed logic.
Given all the suffering and torture animals go through to provide meatheads with their daily fix of dead flesh
I'll lose zero sleep over my wishing a similar fate on all you mystery meat wiener eaters.

As for my choice in dating partners I've given equal time to ladies my own age who, no surprise, were easier to relate to
but were carrying baggage a whole 777 load of therapists couldn't begin to deal with. Why just in the last 12 months I had
one two month relationship with another Dragon a few months older than myself who I still think is one pretty fine fox but
she could not get past the fact I forgot her birthday while I was on the other side of the globe..my bad but wtf..get over it.
I just recently concluded a six week relationship with a psychologist a couple of years younger who was a few sandwiches
short of a picnic in the emotions section of her psyche and I'm pretty sure I escaped a fate worse than listeriosis laced with a
generous portion of mad cow by making a hasty escape. After dating three different shrinks over the years I should know better
by now.

That brings me back to the reason I date women half my age. It keeps me feeling and thinking young which in turn does wonders
for my overall health...unlike the fate that befalls meat eaters who invariably go through life with a foot in the proverbial charnal house.
No surprise there are meatheads posting nonsensical blather here...next to consumerism there isn't a more common and hard to kick
addiction out there than those addicted to all kinds of comfort food...especially the dead animal variety.
 
Casman55
Rating: Loading...
Thanks for the peak into your "physco " there sleepswithangles helps to explain a few things. With you on their side the veggies will go far. Plants are living things too and react to their surroundings, "bleed" when they are cut etc. Just because they don't move as much gives you the right to mow them down, exploit them and mess with the natural order of things on this planet guilt free right? That logic would mean it's OK to eat a few people I've seen lately. All of us exist because something dies and we all die too no mater how many seeds you eat. Humans technology and booming population make them a problem on this planet no matter what they eat. Live with the guilt!
 
sleepswithangels
Rating: Loading...
I think you should lay off the Grandpa Burgers Casman55. If you know a vegetarian you should get them to explain how your last post makes you a candidate for a lifetime disability pension based on pronounced mental impairment. Of course that wouldn't preclude you from a career in right wing politics.
 
Whiteyy
Rating: Loading...
Mr. anti meat - - - time is obviously something you have lots of. Cattle producers raise cattle if they can make a dollar. In Canada, unless its a hobby farm or a very high efficiency grass beef farm it's no longer economically feasible. Many producers accept the need for a dual carrer -- farming and dentist - farming and accountant - farming and journalist etc. They have a practical view of the world and will only produce a product that the land can sustain and that the public wishes to buy. your advocacy of an alternative eating lifestyle leaves most farmers with a benign sense of bemusement because their efforts will only be successful with certain folks anyway. They're not out to convince vegans of a meat-included lifestyle, so worry not. We're not worrying that meat's not passing your lips, nor are we incapable of adapting to the future even if that future sees fewer beef cattle. We are businessmen and women after all, people first not committed to cows but to a bottom line from Agriculture. You could undoubtedly learn a lot from a farmer.
 
west coaster
Rating: Loading...
Kudos to Steele and the Georgia Straight for addressing the seriously under reported link between meat production and gobal warming! Even Al Gore hasn't had the nerve to rattle the animal agriculture industry, and yet it is ludicrous that this most accessible action on behalf of our planet- the simple act of choosing healthy plant foods over those of animal origin... so doable for the vast majority of us blessed with the priviledge of choice- isn't already being promoted by every environmental group out there!

Anyone lucky enough to access three square meals a day has the power to make a tremendous impact on their ecological footprint by going veg. The collective significance of each individual choice cannot be overemphasized.

Another poster mentioned that Steele's article didn't focus on animal welfare...
EarthSave and countless other environmental/animal-friendly groups have been making the point for decades that our cultural addictions to animal products contribute to the most suffering and deprivation animals are subjected to on the planet. But the fact that literally billions of animals are commodified on a daily basis, butchered by people rarely met by the consumer, and devoured with little knowledge, if any, of how the animals were raised and transported doesn't seem to have been enough to wake up some people to the incredible impact the food on their plates really has on the well being of others.

The personal health benefits from consuming more vegetables and fruits and limiting or eliminating entirely products derived from animals seems to be the biggest reason people go vegetarian and vegan. But there have always been environmental reasons to feel good about that choice too. Global warming just happens to be one gigantic side effect that- unlike runoff from factory farms, or the unpleasant business of killing animals one becomes attached to on the small family farms people like to romanticize about a return to these days (as if the animals volunteer to surrender their lives with gratitude to their butchers) - makes it impossible to turn a blind eye to the perils of melting ice packs, and the catastrophes wrought by crazy weather.

So what difference does it make, as one commentor has posted here, whether or not there have been any cultures before now that have managed to survive without supplementing their diets with animals products, if the opportunity to do so today is available for those of us who recognize the value of adopting such a lifestyle?

Today the whole world is watching the west... growing affluence in China and India means many there are busy emulating our supposed 'good life', including our utterly unsustainable, animal product-centred diets. It's up to all of us to start modeling a very different 'good life' as our warming planet moves ever closer to the global village.

Stock-free farming is gaining interest in North America, and already has a certification progam in the UK. Veganism today, is much farther ahead than where vegetarianism was in the 70's (thanks to the world wide web it is a truly global lifestyle movement). There has never been a more crucial time to look seriously at the points Steele touches upon in his excellent article.
 
Whitedeer
Rating: Loading...
Essentially what it boils down to is that people will be selfish in one way or another. For those who choose to not eat the flesh of another animal or the by-products of such choose that for many reasons. Perhaps it is for health, environmental, ethical, or humanitarian reasons. For those who do not take to heart the hard facts in the above article they are doing so for their own selfish reasons.

People walk around obese while others starve. We "grow" animals to simply satisfy our tastebuds and those involved (meat eaters and producers) con themselves and others into thinking that plant based foods can not provide the essential nutrients to maintain health. Our society is so sad in that we refuse to adapt even when the evidence is all around us that the planet can no longer support the greed and gluttony.

Casman55 mentioned contamination in peanuts, lettuce and spinach... I would like to remind you that salmonella and ecoli are not naturally found in plant based foods but are a direct result of human/animal waste.
 
dogmann
Rating: Loading...
dogmann ,Your forgeting what the real problem is, it's overpopulation of the planet that is the problem, not eating meat. If people would stop having so many kids, that would stop the pressures on our food supply. I'll keep eating meat as I chose not to have kids and I'm in better shape than people ten or fifteen years younger than myself and I've never had to own or drive a car,mostly because I walk, cycle as much as possible and don't care how long it takes me. I could not live on a vegetarian diet, nor would I even want to.Grass fed beef is the best beef, forget about grain fed as it's only done to fatten up cattle and actually makes it less healthy to eat and is done just to raise the profits.You can eat your soy burgers/tofu burgers and I'll stick to red meat, rice,potatoes,side order/stirfried vegetables and that's my choice and lets just see how many of you vegetarians can even get close to my level of physical activivity, let alone surpasse it.
 
Latarnik
Rating: Loading...
There was never any gold medal winner at the Olympics or a Nobel Prize winner, who did not eat meet or at least meat products like milk or eggs. Monkeys eat meat, even other monkeys. We are not like cows or sheep, more like bears or pigs. . The next movie by washed out politician Al Gore will have a title NEVER MIND. Global warming is a scam to enrich Russian oligarchs at the expense of Canadians and Americans. Some serious scientists are predicting ice age anytime soon. I would lock all the alarmists in one room and would not feed them until they agree, whether any activities of man could influence the climate in a long run. Mayas and Aztecs as well as many other nations disappeared due to hot weather and mini ice age we had only few hundred years ago. Tenured scientists will write whatever their employers will tell them to write. Fraudulent science is blooming. Pharmaceutical companies are not bribing doctors anymore, top civil servants are telling us what shots we must give to our children or take ourselves to travel anywhere. Mercury in in those medication for small children are just a genocide. Keep smoking what you must have been smoking to persuade people to give up meat. There were plenty of utopians like Karl Marx, who proposed to nationalize women, so they will have to make themselves available, any time, to any man, specially those who were more equal, like leaders of the socialist parties such as Hitler or Stalin, 1984 is coming to the town near us.
Mark Jaworski Vancouver BC
 
ducksrock
Rating: Loading...
Excellent article! You can't be a meat eating environmentalist, that's for sure. No matter what hybrid vehicle you drive or how much you cycle, your footprint is still going to be enormous if you eat animal based foods. The UN says that animal agriculture causes more pollution than all the trains, planes, automobiles an ships combined!
 
veganandproudof it
Rating: Loading...
Wow, there are so many weak arguments, false logic, and misguided ideas for defending a meat-based diet here. The health benefits alone for a plant-based diet compared to a meat-based diet and the staggering disease, obesity, and illness rates that go along with it, should be enough to make people make the choice that will help themselves, the environment, and all the billions of animals that are tortured and killed by current society's bloodlust. (Just read The China Study or a multitude of other books to learn the truth about what you currently may think is healthy, but is in fact FAR from the truth).
Just a couple quick responses to other posts...
To dogmann... overpopulation wouldn't be a problem (there wouldn't BE 'over' population) if many of developed society's people didn't eat meat and other animal products. This animal-based consumption is what strains and degrades all of our resources, which is only exacerbated by not just more and more people eating that way, but by the people already on the planet increasing their consumption. Factory farming and all the atrocities that go along with it, for the animals and the environment, are the only way to produce enough animal-based products to meet the demand, which in the end is killing us all.
To Latarnik, you seem to like to throw out generalizations without being aware of actual facts. But ultimately, what does it matter if there has or hasn't been a vegan gold medalist or Nobel Prize Winner. That proves absolutely nothing, and certainly doesn't state whether being a vegan had or doesn't have anything to do with that. However, you seem to not know even about famous sprinter, Carl Lewis, who was a gold medalist AND a vegan; he ran his fastest times as a vegan, too. And while you like to boast about your physique, I doubt you have anything to compare to vegan athlete and multi-time winner of the Ironman triathlon, Dave Scott, or a bevy of many other runners, weight lifters, and cyclists who are all highly competitive, decorated, and vegan.
As for Nobel Prize winners, ...Isaac Bashevis Singer, George Bernard Shaw, and Albert Einstein were vegetarian and strongly felt that this was a higher and better state for themselves and society, and the future of both.
 
sleepswithangels
Rating: Loading...
Listening to meat eaters justify their consumption of dead animals is very much like listening to the convoluted, skewed nonsensical logic of a hard core addict. Never mind that there is no peer reviewed data to back up their ridiculous claims "The large scale plant farming necessary would also have serious ecological repercussions." or "The pollution caused by the live stock industry is not a valid argument because you would then need to shut, down, everything" or "Your forgeting what the real problem is, it's overpopulation of the planet that is the problem, not eating meat. If people would stop having so many kids, that would stop the pressures on our food supply." or "There was never any gold medal winner at the Olympics or a Nobel Prize winner, who did not eat meet or at least meat products like milk or eggs. Monkeys eat meat, even other monkeys."...and everything else Mark Jaworski wrote in his bizarre rant sounds eerily like the rantings of a junkie whose supply is being threatened.
I haven't forgotten the cheap and desperate shot taken by whiteyy whose defensive sounding post resorted to making an implication that since I had time to make multiple comments here I must not be doing anything productive with my time as if farmers were the only people capable of multitasking. Yeah...farmers can sure multitask what with all whining they do while they're filling the spreader with chemicals or injecting their livestock with hormones and excessive antibiotics so they can fatten their wallets at the expense of the health of those ignorant enough to eat their dangerous products.
 
Layla
Rating: Loading...
Dogmann says "let's just see how many of you vegetarians can even get close to my level of physical activivity, let alone surpasse it."

You might want to speak to Brendan Brazier, author of "The Thrive Diet" and vegan ironman triathlete!

Thank you to the Georgia Straight and David Steele for this excellent article.
 
shmoe727
Rating: Loading...
what does dating have to do with anything??

this debate has two sides

a meatless diet is more ethical and healthier than a diet that includes significant amounts of meat.

vs

meat is tasty and i will try to refute any argument that suggests i shouldn't eat it.

True there are plenty of valid arguments against vegetarianism but really only one motive to fight for the meat based diet: Old Habits Die Hard
 
dogmann
Rating: Loading...
After reading some of these biased comments(mine were biased also) it occured to me that people are extremly intolerant of others whom are different. No wonder hate crime is rampant. If people hate because ones diet is different? Than hating because ones skin is different, ones culture is different,or sexuality is different isn't so hard to understand. Radical vegetarians,TheKKK, and gay bashers all have the same thing in common, an intolerance of anyone whom is different .I personaly think everyone has the freedom to choose as diversity makes this a better world, unfortunately, I seem to be a minority in my thinking judging by some of the vegetarian responses to the simple choice in diet omnivores make. All this talk about food has made me decide to have a beef stirfry with sliced peppers, onions,carrots,bok choy,and celery with a bit of hot peppers and ginger and soy sauce over some white rice, mmmmm.
 
dogmann
Rating: Loading...
To montyvan: Your comment was the only one that made sense and was intelligent, logical, and although I don't agree with raising the price of meat as meat is all ready expensive(lean cuts that is) as people would only eat the unhealthy meats to save money.I do agree farms should be smaller, less commercial, rather than these mass production,(meat factories) where animals are fed hormones, antibiotics and processed animal feed, and the same for vegetables with those geneticly modified seed,over use of pesticides and chemical fertilizers.Organic produce and organic meat are the way to go.
 
Latarnik
Rating: Loading...
I take it back and acknowledge that they were olympians and nobelists who were not eating meat. Several years ago I destroyed big body of research of one scientist who has almost proven that people who do not eat meat have a stronger will. I reviewed his work and discovered that he has taken effect for a cause, because only people who have a strong will, could become vegetarians. They could ignore sizzling steak or smell of bacon?
He lost his research grant and I felt sorry for him.
There is a distinct possibility that Jews and Muslim do not eat pork because of envy. They knew that it takes 10 times as much feed to obtain one kilo of edible pork , compared to kilo of lamb or goat. They went to their priests and demanded a law forbidding rich people to eat pork or they will not put anything on a collection plate or sacrificial altar. I believe that sacrificial lambs barbecued on the altar were eaten by the priests (after the service) not by Gods. Threatened with mutiny they declared pork to be non kosher. There is no better explanation of aversion to pork. With more than half of the human race starving, one third would not eat pork for religious reason, one third would not eat beef (Hindus) for religious reason and some Africans would not eat eggs, because they believe that they come out from unclean place (!)
I feel sorry for all those religious fanatics and smokers who complain about a lack of clean air.
I eat whatever makes me feel good and keeps healthy. At the age of 70 I do not need doctors or Viagra! Porridge, fruits, roasted pork and red wine keep me happy.
Mark Jaworski, Vancouver BC
 
taralbg
Rating: Loading...
great article!!
thanks
 
my name is meat
Rating: Loading...
So are you saying, in the beginning few paragraphs, that instead of eating the cows, and slaughtering them inhumanely, you would rather we not use the resources to feed them and inhumanely starve them to death? And you say something about it contributing to global warming and desertification? The only reason i can think of for that is the animals eating our grass which produces less oxygen and therefore globalwarming and therefore more deserts. But if we don't eat the animals, then there are more than ever and they eat more and more, if we wouldn't eat the animals, then they would overrun us, we need to eat them. God didn't create animals just for fun, he created them as part of the food cycle, we eat them. Period. OK dude? OK.
 
lel601
Rating: Loading...
This is a great article. I have learned a lot from it and the comments posted here. Ignorance is not bliss. It could kill and make a lot of people sick. I am on the verge of not eating any animal products. I rarely eat it and have been cutting back on all of my animal based foods. What is sending me over the edge to completely cut it all out is the recent illnesses that have stemmed directly from raising meat/poultry/pork. The swine flu is probably going to turn into a global pandemic and in the past few years there was many other illnesses "created" directly from processing/raising livestock etc. The government needs to stop subsidizing the industries related to the production of meat/poultry/pork etc and give the money to the farmers that focus on growing plant based items. As for manure, not needed. Ever hear of composting plants? Also, animals will not starve. They should just stop allowing them to over procreate. They stick the babies in cages for the most part anyways. It all comes down to global health.
 
Thanks
Rating: Loading...
Great. Well, it looks like I have all the "facts" now. I'll go and have my steak in peace. Thanks.
 
[Comments Disclaimer]

Post a comment

URLs and email addresses will be automatically turned into links.