Will Canwest woes ultimately result in one daily Vancouver paper?

This idea came to me yesterday from a former Pacific Press reporter. He pointed to Canwest's current woes, and wondered if the company might decide to eliminate one of its daily Vancouver newspapers to cope with its credit crunch.

Yesterday, Canwest shares fell to 31 cents after the Globe and Mail reported that the company might seek bankruptcy protection by the end of February.

One obvious cost-cutting measure, according to this former scribe, would be to shut down either the Vancouver Sun or the Province.

In the past, Canwest and the companies that owned the papers before, Hollinger and Southam, maintained both Vancouver daily papers through hard times in part to keep competitors like Torstar and the Sun newspaper chain out of the market.

But with the economy in the tank, it would be foolhardy for anyone to start another daily paper in Vancouver, which eliminates the disincentive to shut down one of the two daily papers.

Canwest could eliminate  a huge number of staff, reduce distribution costs, and possibly jack up the price of advertising in its remaining daily paper. That would help the company's share price.

Of course, all of this might be dependent on Canwest requiring a major restructuring. It hasn't happened...yet. It's  still early in the game. But if this occurs,  you heard it here first.

Comments

interactbiz
Too bad for people creating the newspapers but ownership is getting the results they deserve. The Asper family greedily aimed to build an all powerful media empire. They moved too fast, paid too much and squeezed operations too hard. Leverage can vault you up but it can slam you down. They gambled and lost. I subscribed loyally to the Vancouver papers for many years but stopped a while ago because both quality and west coast focus was gradually lost.

Reading about Canwest's financial woes in the Strait provides a delicious irony for those of us around 40 years ago when shoes were on different feet. The people at Pacific Press smugly reported on difficulties at the Georgia Strait. Troubles caused by a Mayor who directed police harassment aimed at closing down a progressive voice. Mayor Tom preferred the city to be run for the benefit of landlords and developers and the Strait didn't serve aims of the business establishment.

Gee, look who survives.
 
peasant43
Come on. There is only one paper now, and it's the same as the news on TV. There has been only one source of mainstream news in the for a while now--a long while.

Hopefully some of the redundant typists working for the McPapers will find more celebrity gossip gigs. Or, perhaps, they might try being real journalists, but I doubt it.
 
sleepswithangels
I read my first GS in 1968 and still have the copy. The fact that GS is still owned by the same guy speaks volumes about its integrity and reliability. The trend towards media domination by a small group of right wing lichtspittles for Zionist/American global hegemony has been unrelenting and has brought our democracy to the point it is such in name only. One would have thought we had little left to celebrate as our independence and sovereignty as a nation has been eroded and dismantled thanks to Canwest,CTV, Bell Globe Media and other right wing media entities acting as cheerleaders for integration with the insatiable American Empire....yet today I can make preparations to dance on Canwest's grave and snicker about the prospect of Lord Tubby's romantic encounters in his new crib.
Lest we become too smug about these delightful developments it is essential that independence is restored to the CBC and that Harper isn't able to change our laws to allow Newscorp to swallow up Canwest.
 
interactbiz
In 1970 or 1971, I was a junior in a downtown firm of chartered accountants. The nihilist hippies at the Georgia Strait were being threatened by the tax department to conform with filing requirements, or else. A partner in the firm where I worked was somehow contacted and the file assigned to me. (Remembering the first client meetings can still provoke a giggle or two from me.)

I was making progress when told to put the job on hold. It seemed that the older gents in the partnership didn't want the firm's name associated with a bunch of revolutionaries. A fine argument ensued. Eventually, a compromise emerged. I should return to complete the necessary work and prepare various documents for filing. But, I was to do as much as possible away from the office and any correspondence or reports were to be issued on plain white paper - no company letterhead allowed.

Eventually, the job was complete but my boss worried that, if the client was too happy, they might want more work done. So, in the time honored method of professionals, he hiked the fee, charging about double the amount of our work-in-progress value. That led to one of the boys at G.S. phoning the partner to complain, a call that lasted about 5 minutes. Afterward, I sneaked a look at the billing ledger to see if the poor guys earned a break. Nope, the partner had added another $200 bucks for "client consultation."
 
 
[Comments Disclaimer]
Post a comment
· Use your real name to have your comment considered for publication in print.
· URLs and email addresses will be automatically turned into links.