A transportation truth: most politicians don't care about transit riders

Last night, I went to a dinner attended by two former politicians who were strong supporters of the Canada Line.

I’m guessing that neither of them takes the bus very often, if at all. In fairness, I could be wrong, which is why I'm not going to identify them. I know that most politicians do not take the bus regularly.

I'm guessing that many politicians  probably have no idea that it costs $3.75 to take a SeaBus from Lonsdale Quay to downtown Vancouver during weekdays.

It's shocking that it  takes $10 to ride the transit system from Surrey to Vancouver and back during weekdays. That adds up to 1.25 hours of labour for a minimum-wage worker.

The politicians and bureaucrats who make decisions about our transit system live in a different world. They usually own their  homes. They have assets in the hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars. And they can often get around the city in air-conditioned comfort in their automobiles.

TransLink is now proposing to impose more fees on gasoline and parking, and has suggested a new vehicle tax to raise more money to fund regional transportation.

Otherwise, there will be devastating cuts  to bus service.

Now, about that Canada Line. Why do politicians support rapid-transit projects where there isn’t sufficient density to justify them? And why do they opt for a SkyTrain system when no other major city in North America has chosen this as the backbone of its transit system because it's too expensive?

Here’s the answer. Most of our idiotic politicians don’t care about transit riders and never have. If they did, they wouldn’t  have built  a $1.2-billion Millennium Line where practically nobody lives.

The U-Pass was created in part to  lure more SFU students onto the Millennium Line to avoid the embarrassment of having to report  rotten ridership numbers.

The U-Pass isn't available to students at VCC, mainly because there are already enough transit riders jammed onto those 99-B buses whizzing along Broadway.

If  politicians really  cared about transit riders, they wouldn’t impose a SkyTrain-style system down Cambie Street and into Richmond when the densities in these areas can only support a rapid-bus system, at best. They know that the ridership is really going along Broadway.

Anyone who has spent a half an hour analyzing transit research  knows that building the Canada Line  is a colossal waste of money--$2 billion and counting, so far, to give existing transit users a better ride.  Diverting this much money to one route  will only cannibalize the bus system.

If  politicians cared about transit riders, they wouldn’t choose a $1.4-billion SkyTrain-style system through Port Moody to Coquitlam because this too will cannibalize the bus system.

There won't be sufficient ridership to justify the expense. Hence, we'll see more cuts to bus service, inevitably accompanied by higher fares.  

The modal split--which is a fancy term for the ratio of transit users to people going to and from work in cars--won't change after billions have been spent.

Politicians and bureaucrats  should be choosing transit systems based on current and future densities, and not based on political lobbying from people who merely want to spur land development.

Politicians shouldn't cave into  pressure from  a federal government that wants to  subsidize Montreal-based transit and engineering companies  that make whopping profits every time we choose the wrong transit technology.

All of this will inevitably lead to even higher transit fares. That's  because property and vehicle owners will throw politicians out of power if they impose too many new taxes.

Here’s the reality: TransLink wants to dip into everyone’s pockets, including those of senior levels of government, because it supported rotten rapid-transit choices in areas that could barely justify a rapid-bus service.

The politicians who supported these schemes  were fools. We're only beginning to see the results.  And don’t believe them the next time they bleat about how much they care about transit riders because most of them haven’t seen the inside of a public bus in years.

There are war-crimes tribunals for politicians who launch illegal attacks on other countries.

Maybe it's time we created a transit-crimes tribunal to hold politicians and bureaucrats accountable for  pushing our regional transportation and  transit  systems  to the brink of bankruptcy.

Comments

3 Comments

seth

Mar 13, 2009 at 11:16am

seth
Traffic congestion and the need for the Port Mann upgrade and other translink projects could be eliminated within the year if our government organizations instituted mandatory telecommuting plans adding corporate carrot/stick incentives later. The US GTA has marked 40% of US federal civilian employee jobs as telecommutable. I would assume Canadian/BC/muni governments are more or less the same. A Carlton university survey found 60% of those surveyed would telecommute if they could. Stats Can has it that that institutions under the control/purview of the BC Government ie hydro ferries municipals control more than 350,000 employees. Imagine 200,000 or so daily commuters gone from the roads!!!

Kingston had a taxi system in the 70's where the cabs were dispatched in an orderly fashion east to west and north to south picking up and dropping off passengers as they went along. The fare was about double the bus fare With modern GPS and computer based control ,it would be easy to set up a similar system. Not going to happen though. Taxi cab companies like it the way it is and spend millions in campaign donations to keep it that way. An outfit tried to set up a van based system $5 anywhere in the Surrey BC but were shut down by the city.

Ron van der Eerden

Mar 23, 2009 at 4:50pm

All of our transit problems come down to one thing, and it isn't expensive metros. Yes, SkyTrain is too expensive. But the problem is everbody's lack of recognition that our metros are cheap compared to how much we subsidize motorists.
If we removed the subsidies to build roads, motorists would each have to pay about $6000 per year to fund them. That would leave thousands of dollars a year in every taxpayer's pocket. Individuals could spend that on driving, or keep most of it and take the bus. Transit could be profitable with that increased ridership. So the taxpayer would save again instead of subsidizing transit to compete against subsidized motorists.
Everything boils down to this:. We pay people to drive! We must sop doing that!

Bernadette Keenan

Jul 5, 2009 at 10:52am

don't know about Canada Line giving people a better ride. I understand the B-line from Richmond will be cancelled and many who use it are not happy about extra transfers. Same with express bus riders from South of the Fraser who will now be diverted into Richmond and have to transfer from seated in comfort to probably standing room only. This may add time to their commute and be the straw that keeps them off transit.
BernadetteK