Jodie Emery: Ending drug prohibition could save our economy and stop gang violence

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      By Jodie Emery

      Gang violence is a major concern for Vancouver and British Columbia. Shootings and murders happen so often that people feel unsafe in their own homes and communities. There was another time in history when gangsters terrorized society, bought fancy cars and weapons, lived lifestyles only criminal activity could afford, and shot rivals as they fought for control over the market. Law enforcement was unable to stop the violence, regardless of how severe the penalties and policing were. This happened under alcohol prohibition, and it’s happening again now under drug prohibition.

      The modern-day example of prohibition’s absolute failure is Mexico. The United States’ southern neighbour is awash with gangs and drug cartels. These violent groups are murdering not just rivals, but also police, military personnel, politicians, and innocent victims. Over the years, Mexico’s president, Felipe Calderón, has called for more law enforcement and military deployment, but every escalation of policing and imprisonment has resulted in rising gang violence and executions. In addition, government and law enforcement officials have been corrupted by the cartels, paid enormous sums of money in order to turn a blind eye towards drug-related criminal activity.

      Is this what the province of British Columbia is headed towards? I strongly believe that, if we continue to fund and expand the failed policy of drug prohibition, Mexico’s drug war situation is a harbinger of our future. But there is a solution. Numerous experts and organizations are coming out en masse with the suggestion that repealing prohibition—ending the “war on drugs”—is the only way to stop the increasing violence, drug production, and gang growth happening across North America.

      Additionally, with the worldwide economic situation getting worse every day, it’s become clear that the financial expense of investigating, arresting, prosecuting, and imprisoning drug users and dealers is too much a burden to bear. Even the Americans are repealing mandatory minimum prison sentences for drugs because the enormous cost of jailing one in every 100 Americans is bankrupting many states.

      At this very moment, California and Massachusetts are both proposing a tax-and-regulate model for marijuana to bring the enormous underground criminal industry into government control. British Columbia can lead the way in Canada by introducing similar legislation for cannabis marijuana, which would eventually result in taxing and regulating all psychoactive substances. The cannabis industry in B.C. is worth currently $7 billion to $12 billion, and in a legal environment, the gross revenue to producers would be about $1 billion with a corresponding $2 billion in tax revenues at the retail level.

      B.C.’s legislative assembly would implement a taxed and regulated system for marijuana. The health minister will establish regulations for the production and distribution of cannabis in the same way the province is responsible for regulating the distribution of alcohol and tobacco. (The B.C. regulatory system for alcohol is, in fact, how we emerged from alcohol prohibition.) The solicitor general would instruct all police to cease arrests for marijuana, and the attorney general of B.C. would no longer accept any prosecutions of marijuana-related cases. The reduction in imprisonment would reduce incarceration costs, keep families together, and prevent youth from joining gangs. Children who have a parent in prison are at greater risk to seek life guidance from gangs, and prisoners are often recruited into gangs while behind bars.

      The minister of finance would determine taxes and licences for the production and distribution of cannabis products, and collect income taxes from producers, and retail sales tax from retailers. (California’s proposal is a $50 tax per ounce.) The Ministry of Small Business would issue licenses for producers, giving preference to outdoor greenhouse cultivation using the sun and organic nutrients, and employing numerous farmers and agricultural technicians in B.C.’s economically depressed resource towns and regions. Municipalities would have the prerogative of inspecting unlicensed grow-ops and ordering them removed if they pose a safety hazard. The education minister would abolish the DARE program and teach drug education in schools through programs run by health officials. Youth drug education outside of the schools would operate similar to alcohol and tobacco campaigns, which have been proven to reduce the use of these substances among young people.

      This model would be effective in drastically reducing gangs, their control over the drug market, and the related violence and murders. Repealing prohibition in favour of a legal model would not only save billions of dollars in law enforcement, courts, and prosecutions, but would also move billions of dollars from the underground economy into the legitimate market to be taxed and regulated. Criminals who try to produce and distribute marijuana outside the regulated industry would be investigated and tried for tax evasion, just as the gangsters were in the 1930s when alcohol prohibition was repealed. Once we end prohibition, gangs will be dealt a severe financial blow, our economy will be buoyed, the streets will be safer, and B.C. will be a leading example for the rest of Canada.

      Jodie Emery is the Green Party of B.C. candidate in Vancouver-Fraserview.

      Comments

      14 Comments

      seth

      Apr 3, 2009 at 2:39pm

      seth

      Remember Greenies for Gordo.

      Yes Jody many excellent points but poorly researched like a lot of Greenie initiatives. This sort of provincial tinkering with federal law would simply result in your neocon friend - you know the one your federal Greenies almost handed a majority government - Stephen Harper ordering the lieutenant governor to refuse your proposed ultra vires legislation.

      If the attorney general refused to enforce federal drug laws your friend Harper would simply toss him in the can.

      The Social Credit party in Alberta in the 1930's tried to get through some enlightened banking legislation and got a thorough butt kicking from the feds at that time.

      Still some excellent points and many NDP party members agree with you. You could have contributed immensely by working for change on the inside helping the NDP defeat Gordo in Vancouver - Fraserview by seeking and undoubtedly winning the NDP nomination. Instead you are actively seeking to attract left leaning NDP votes to your lost cause ensuring the reelection of Mr Brown himself Gordo "the ogre" Campbell. Rest assured Gordo and gang would love to see all the province's ganga users locked in some federal prison.

      0 0Rating: 0

      Marc Scott Emery

      Apr 3, 2009 at 6:44pm

      The BC NDP is identical on all policing and justice issues to the BC Liberals. It is a myth that this province has an opposition to the Liberals! Carole James and her silent and feckless MLA's support more police, more tasers, more drug war, more "safety" inspections (warrantless invasions of peoples home due to electrical bills), more incarceration. The BC NDP in power and out never advocate civilian oversight for policing. The BC NDP want to keep our national occupation force -the RCMP- as the BC police force.

      The BC Greens are true champions of safe streets, reduced crime, and reined in police. End prohibition, ban tasers, end the surveillance cameras on Vancouver streets, abolish the RCMP and reinstate a BC provincial police service, establish a powerful board of civilian oversight on policing, ban all future megaprojects requiring massive tax subsidies, end fish farming in BC, complete primary, secondary and tertiary treatment of the sewage systems throughout the province. No more Olympics, convention centers or transit lines to nowhere that soak the resources of this province and impair the ability of BC to have optimum hospital, school and housing care. Spending priorities under the BC Greens are clearly more transparent and consistent than the NDP's self-indulgent spreading of taxpayer largesse to the public service unions and their ilk.

      0 0Rating: 0

      Marc Scott Emery

      Apr 3, 2009 at 6:53pm

      By the way, if you want to find out what happens to drug-law reformers like Jodie who decide to help the NDP, look no further than Dana Larsen and Kirk Tousaw, both drug-law reformers who won an NDP nomination meeting fair and square in 2008 only to be bounced out because of youtube videos showing them -gasp- smoking pot.

      The federal NDP has blessedly wonderful MP's in Ottawa by the names of Bill Siksay, fearless on the issues like his mentor Svend Robinson was, and Libby Davies, a courageous and correct woman on crime, policing and justice issues.

      The BC NDP has no such luminaries in Victoria, no such visionaries of social justice. And for voters who place value on principles and correct theory, the BC Green Party is the choice for change.

      0 0Rating: 0

      Sarah30

      Apr 3, 2009 at 7:38pm

      So by "drugs" you mean marijuana - is that not only a small piece of the pie? I somehow can't believe there would be no more gangs in Vancouver just because people can grow/sell pot - as long as all other drugs are legal this solution would only be a drop in the bucket.

      0 0Rating: 0

      seth

      Apr 4, 2009 at 5:35am

      seth

      You just don't get it Mark.

      Greenies are for Gordo. A greenie vote simply attracts low information voters from the left to vote Green not NDP and thereby insuring Mr Brown Gordo "the Ogre" Campbell wins reelection. He then gets to spend the next four years damning up rivers all over the province for his pirate power projects wasting tens of billions in taxpayer revenues and wrecking hundreds of pristine rivers, building fish farms in every inlet that can support them thereby destroying countless salmon runs, drilling for oil off the coast and leaving more kids starving than in any other province in Canada. One thing for sure he will be throwing all his support into Harper's tough new drug laws and do his best to throw you and Jodie and Dana Larsen and Kirk Tousaw in the slam. None of those things would happen under a Carole James government. As much as you despise her I can't believe you like Gordo more.

      As I stated earlier most NDP rank and file support a lot of your police/ ganga issues and you and homies would help the people of BC a lot more if all joined the NDP attended policy conventions and overwhelmed the law n' order/labour wing off the party. Carole James has to get elected and she can't do it with candidates openly breaking the law. Your friends in the neocon mainstream media would eat her alive.

      You Emery's need to compare yourselves to another well meaning Greenie idiot named Ralph Nader who by attracting 5% of the progressive vote in 2000, singlehandedly gave the world one million dead Iraqis and the worst economic crisis since the 1930's. You really need to think of the damage you will do to BC by reelecting Gordo "the Ogre" Campbell.

      0 0Rating: 0

      Foresight

      Apr 4, 2009 at 10:04am

      This is old news. Plagiary is the product of lack of their own research. Marc's new 'princes of pot' is just saying what most of us have been saying for years. When did she become "princes of pipe dreams"? The 'herb Cannabis' is NOT the problem in prohibition. It's the manufactured drugs, cocaine, heroin, methamphetamine, ecstasy and a host of other poisons. Back to reality. We Canadians don't need to look at the # 1and #2 most corrupt nations, the u.s.a. and Mexico to see that prohibition won't work. Americans boast an appitite of 350 metric tons of cocaine, 20 metric tons of heroin each year and Mexico is their 'drug corridor'. We won't even touch on the corruption problems in Mexico.
      The NDP did themselves a favor by 'bouncing' the "crystal methamphetamine promoter, Dana Larson" (Cannabis Culture Sept-Oct, 2000) from their nominations. Hey, Marc Emery owns that rag, is he a 'promoter of crystal methamphetamine' also? Most uneducated don't understand that it's these "dangerous drug and their promoters" that are the biggest "players in prohibition", not the 'healing herb Cannabis'.
      Charge the 'players' with 'tax evasion' and take their product and give it to those that need it, under a very supervised program, weaning them off the 'poisons' on a weekly basis. This might not be the right answer or the best way to proceed, but it's a lot better than what the federal, provincial and Vancouver's health professionals and providers are doing about these 'dangerous diseases', drug addictions.
      Jodie sure writes a lot like Marc, using the Spanish American colloquialism, 'marijuana', in favor of the botanically correct name 'Cannabis". Does she belive like Marc, that The Sovereign Canadian border is 'just an imaginary line'? Imagine going to the u.s.a. every time you want to see him. All over his "own stupidity". Don't be misslead by those that don't know.

      0 0Rating: 0

      Dungeness_Crab

      Apr 4, 2009 at 10:39am

      I presume you mean "as long as all other drugs are ILLEGAL"

      And no, it wouldn't mean there would be no more gangs. But they will definitely be kneecapped financially, thus reducing their ranks drastically, and once again relegated to the dank corners of society from whence they came.

      0 0Rating: 0

      thecossack

      Apr 4, 2009 at 12:46pm

      With a little work she could almost sound like a politician. The motherhood statements need a bit of work though. The figures for tax income are ludicrous at best. The pot industry already pays huge taxes on its paraphernalia, fertilizers, vehicles, rentals, purchases of property, etc. As for "kneecapping" the criminal organizations, what a laugh. The triads have been around since recorded time. As long as there is a market for anything cheaper there will be a black market and there will be organized crime making a buck. You cannot even count the local John Gotti wannabes as real organized crime, just a low level fly by night bunch of two bit in your face hoods. Which, interestingly enough have had some rounding up by the often desecrated "lazy bums" police departments.

      Pornography and gambling are regulated and taxed and we even have gaming grants to kids sports regimes like Little League. So why is the real organized crime into gambling? Because its a money maker and if you keep a low profile the cops do not pay any attention to it. That's why its been around for so long, as opposed to the local in your face riff raff.

      0 0Rating: 0

      montyvan

      Apr 4, 2009 at 2:25pm

      Carole James is a vapid, ineffectual puppet whose strings are pulled by the Unions and CUPE. If she gets elected, it will just be one OUTRAGE after another over shit that doesn't matter. Oh, and 30% raises for union workers when everyone else is having their salary or jobs cut. That's about all the NDP are good at: complaining and bitching, with their only solution being higher union wages. Great, that's just what B.C. needs in this worldwide economic climate.

      Just look what our NDP Mayor has given Vancouver so far: Chickens, spy cameras on every street corner, turning City Hall lawn into a garden, canceling the moratorium on deadly Tasers, and lots more homeless shelters. Yes, that's what Vancouver needs most.

      0 0Rating: 0

      Marc Scott Emery

      Apr 4, 2009 at 5:42pm

      Seth, the rank and file have no power over elected MLA's, they do what Carole James tells them to do, and nothing the BC NDP party membership wants ever gets translated into action on the floor of the Legislature. Nice guys like Nicholas Simons (Powell River - Sunshine Coast) have turned into total wimps and can't bring themselves to propose a ban on tasers, or a reduction in policing, or make a bill to beef up civilian oversight, or ridding the surveillance cameras from Vancouver streets, etc.

      As to repealing prohibition, it would start with ending marijuana prohibition, then once a regulatory regime has been tested and verified, the repeal of all other prohibitions would proceed.

      Very little gambling has organized crime involved, because legal gambling is virtually everywhere, including online and in licensed facilities everywhere. It used to be called 'running the numbers' when the various mobs controlled it, but its been a while since I heard someone in BC go to a "bookie", when they can buy lottery tickets on every street corner, play poker in 10 casinos in the lower mainland, etc.

      I haven't seen many liquor bootleggers either since BC ended alcohol prohibition in the early 30's and put in place the regulations on alcohol we see today.

      With all the legal escorts permitted to advertise, the number of pimps in this town is pretty small relative to the thousands of women operating as escorts.

      All these casinos, lotteries, escorts, alcohol outlets are subject to regulation, tax collection, age restrictions, etc.

      This is simply the way that drug distribution will be done also, to similar beneficial effect to BC.

      The BC NDP is mostly likely to change for the better if the NDP under Carole James is defeated this election and a new BC NDP leader is chosen from amongst their admittedly gutless and cowardly caucus. Perhaps if that new leader develops a backbone, vision, and some new ideas, perhaps the BC NDP of the future will be worth a look. But certainly not in 2009.

      Once we get STV in the province, then electing Green MLA's is a certainty and we can finally be rid of this lose-lose paridigm of having to select the lesser odious of two stinky corrupted, parties.

      0 0Rating: 0