Why is private waste a public responsibility?

It’s time to ask ourselves whether we want entire departments of our local governments devoted to management of waste.

The City of Vancouver spends upwards of $13 million each year sending trucks around to collect our garbage and empty our recycling containers. Another $6 million emptying street litter bins.

So we’re incurring public costs of more than $20 million a year to manage what we call “municipal waste”. But is that waste really municipal?

Three-quarters of what we set out at the curb is throw-away products and packaging.

A strong case can be made that these are not “municipal” wastes at all. They are private wastes, produced by companies profiting from disposability. They are sold to consumers who turn to their local governments to make the problem go away.

EPR (extended producer responsibility) is a policy that would turn the clock back to a hundred years ago, before the birth of the throw away society.

In 1900, most of our waste (75 percent) was ashes from heating our homes. Look for the blocked-off openings in the exterior walls of the basement in older homes, where the coal chute used to deposit fuel for the furnace.

Then there was food waste from our kitchens. Not surprisingly, our great-grandparents threw out about the same amount of food waste as we do. Stomachs have not changed much in all that time.

What has changed is that each of us produces 13 times more throw-away products and packaging than our grandparents did. They lived in an era before plastic water bottles, “milk to go”, squeezable ketchup bottles, Swiffers, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.

You may think life is better now, with all those conveniences. But surely it doesn’t make sense for public servants to be providing the clean-up for all our throw-aways. How much more sensible for the producers to take them back and recycle them, the way beer bottles still go back to be refilled in this country of ours?

If we could eliminate all the private wastes from our public garbage system, that might just free up resources to spend on composting food waste. This is a project that has been woefully neglected while our city chases after milk jugs and yogurt containers and squeezable ketchup containers.

Helen Spiegelman is a Vancouver-based environmentalist and blog coordinator. Read more at Zero Waste.

Comments

1 Comments

plg

Apr 9, 2009 at 11:57am

Kudos to Spiegelman for her continued work on "waste".

Perhaps we need to change the way we talk about this. Should we even use the word 'waste'?

The trouble with the future Metro Vancouver Solid Waste proposal to build multiple garbage incinerators throughout the region is that these incinerators need that wasteful packaging, specifically plastics. It's where the incinerators get their fuel or BTU's, otherwise they would need to use fossil fuels to maintain any type of heat that would create high pressure steam needed to produce electricity.

I have been inside the incinerators in Burnaby and know that they have a regular practice of stripping the plastic bags containing our household throw away resources and piling them into one corner of the gigantic garbage pit. Whenever one of the incinerators temperature decreases, from trying to burn unburnables, they inject a wad of plastic into the furnace through the hoppers to increase temperature. They also burn this BTU rich resource, plastic, whenever the government agencies responsible for air quality monitoring come visiting.

On another topic of waste...

I wonder what it costs the region's taxpayers to "recycle" those free weekly newspapers owned by Canwest and Black Publications?