Anti-obesity campaigns missing the mark

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      Desiree Devine wasn’t always a 305-pound porn star. Three years ago, at the age of 23, she had just graduated with a bachelor’s degree in engineering and was keeping her six-foot frame in athletic shape. She was, literally, half her current weight—150 pounds—she told the Georgia Straight in a phone interview from Florida, where she’s on location for a video shoot.

      “Then I got cancer and put on the weight,” she recalled. “I thought my life was going to be over.”¦Who was going to want me when I was all fat? I thought I was just disgusting.”

      Depressed but finished her cancer treatment, Devine didn’t work or socialize much for a year. Then a friend of a friend, who was in the adult-entertainment industry, said she liked Devine’s look. Would she consider appearing in a video with her?

      “It was very liberating,” Devine said. “You’re in front of a camera and you lose all your modesty, because the camera picks up every flaw, every piece of cellulite.”¦At the same time, you take a huge risk because there’s so many people who want to criticize you.”¦But I’ll take the bad with the good, because the good is so good.”

      Now porn is her full-time gig. Her Web site opens with a crotch shot; Devine reclines to reveal her rolls and masturbates with what looks like a cherry Chupa Chups lollipop. Her video credits include Whale Watching 3; Big Tits Big Toys 2, and many others. Devine was one of a handful of entertainers who represented the Big Beautiful Women category for the first time at the AVN Adult Entertainment Expo, which took place in January at the Sands Expo centre in Las Vegas, Nevada.

      Fat sex is either your thing or it’s not, Devine said. But more and more porn fans, she explained, are admitting their love for BBW. If porn is the ultimate gauge of what’s desirable in the 21st century, Devine’s conclusion is that it’s hip to be fat.

      Outside the adult market, 2008 was a banner year for fatties in pop culture. Whitney Thompson won America’s Next Top Model, the first plus-sizer to earn Tyra Banks’s adoration. All of the humans in Pixar’s WALL-E are morbidly obese—and eventually become heroes, rather than jokes. DreamWorks’s Kung Fu Panda stars an obese bear whose martial-arts journey focuses on achieving self-acceptance rather than losing weight.

      With 41.1 percent of Vancouverites reporting themselves to be either overweight or obese, according to the 2005 Canadian Community Health Survey, the city has among the lowest incidences of fatness of cities in North America. Despite its image as a mecca for yogis and vegans, an honest look at the bodies trundling down Main Street or through Stanley Park illustrates the reality that many of us are fat.

      Not everyone thinks fat is hot. The B.C. Liberal government, along with many public-health agencies worldwide, has been flogging healthy eating and antiobesity campaigns for five years. Locally shot TV shows The Last 10 Pounds Bootcamp and Bulging Brides continue to get airtime, as does NBC’s The Biggest Loser.

      There’s a cacophony right now on the subject of fat. But is the noise helping people live healthier, happier lives?

      At Heritage Hall on January 17, curvy burlesque performer Joanie Gyoza (aka Joan Pham) shimmied out of her clothes for a room full of future brides at the wedding show Indie I Do. Bumping and grinding out of a red cheongsam, Pham ended her performance wearing a girdle, stockings, and a pair of gold pasties with black tassels that she whirled in circles as she exited the stage, twirling her 36C breasts. For joie de vivre, Pham is unbeatable. But the 25-year-old wasn’t this confident a decade ago—due in part to the admonishments of her doctor.

      “He meant well, but he was always explaining how unhealthy it was to be overweight,” she told the Straight. “I was 155 pounds when I was 14, and I remember coming home from the doctor and just crying. I remember thinking, ”˜Oh, my God, I’m so obese.’ That’s when I really started to retreat as a person. I felt ugly. It’s hard to admit that, even now.”

      From age 17 to 21, she battled her weight. Two years ago, she knew she was losing the fight, so she just gave up. Now, she said, she likes to make and eat cupcakes, dance for exercise, and express her creativity. She also enjoys her job as a registered nurse.

      Is it so bad that Pham is content filling out her girdle?

      In 2004, the provincial government slammed fat citizens for costing the health-care system $38 million per year in obesity-related costs. That year, a standing committee on health presented a report called The Path to Health and Wellness: Making British Columbians Healthier by 2010. It reported that people become fat simply because their energy “in” is greater than their energy “out”, and that losing weight should be as simple as reversing that. However, the report states, no jurisdiction has ever run an antifat campaign that has worked.

      “But we all know that we [the government] must try,” it noted.

      ActNow B.C. kicked off in 2005. The program exhorts British Columbians to lose weight through healthy eating and exercise. The January 2008 report entitled Measuring Our Success, however, showed B.C.’s obesity and overweight rates increasing slightly between 2003 and 2005. The “projection” optimistically shows the opposite, with obesity rates declining every year between 2003 and 2010.

      The Vancouver doctor who’s creating the most international obesity buzz, Jay Wortman, isn’t surprised that the antifat campaigns aren’t working. In fact, he said, they further stigmatize bulky folks.

      “People love to hate fat people,” the Vancouver-based Health Canada scientist told the Straight. “People love to blame them. And we subtly encourage that, because the model we have right now is that you’re fat because you eat too much and don’t exercise enough. And if you choose not to do those things, it suggests a flaw in your character. Physicians and other practitioners don’t overtly send the message, but it’s implicit in the current understanding of why you’re fat.”

      Wortman has spent the past decade studying why so many folks are fat. What he’s found—and the medical profession is by no means unanimous on this—is that character flaws aren’t the problem. He says obesity is a symptom of North America’s love affair with carbohydrates, especially simple carbs such as high-fructose corn syrup, popularized in the 1970s. Not so coincidentally, he said, that’s when obesity and Type 2 diabetes rates skyrocketed.

      After he was diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes in his late 40s, Wortman cut carbohydrates out of his diet to buy himself some time so that he could research treatment options for himself. He found that without carbs, his diabetes went away. He dropped 25 pounds almost immediately. His energy level improved, and he spontaneously felt like exercising.

      Wortman argues that at least 25 percent of Canadians have insulin resistance, in addition to those who have prediabetes and diabetes. That is, their bodies have become, for lack of a simpler description, allergic to carbohydrates. That means they’re overproducing insulin to absorb glucose, which does two things. First, it tells muscle cells there’s not enough energy coming in; second, it convinces the liver to help the body store more fat. So a person with insulin resistance feels tired and hungry and puts on weight.

      “A lot of people think you become insulin-resistant because you’re fat. But it’s a chicken-and-egg thing. Maybe you become fat because you’re insulin-resistant.” In other words, being fat is usually a symptom of insulin resistance rather than a cause of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and the $38 million a year in “obesity-related costs”, Wortman posits.

      In the 1970s, Wortman said, when North America became fat, public health bodies were pushing citizens to eat a low-fat diet. People listened, he said, and they replaced fats with carbs. Now, he said, public health is telling people to eat less and exercise more—the exact opposite of what an insulin-resistant body is telling its owner to do. That’s why so many people fail at making those simple lifestyle changes.

      “Now you know why people think I’m crazy,” Wortman said. Recent science backs up his experience, he noted. But the message runs so counter to common medical wisdom—that fat people are fat because they eat too much and don’t exercise enough—that many physicians resist the research.

      Nonfat adults think fat people are “dirtier, lazier, less attractive, less active, less healthy, less dynamic, less hardworking, and”¦[have] less self-discipline.” This is according to a report by a UBC associate professor of psychology who was quoted at a hearing of the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal on an obesity-related discrimination complaint back in 2000.

      For Surrey’s Shimona Henry, who is a confident, “fabulous” size-20 pinup photographer, battling those attitudes has become her business. She shoots local women in provocative poses, and her goal is to “bring out the bombshell” in women from mini to maxi, the 23-year-old told the Straight.

      At the same time, Henry’s personal struggles with weight highlight this era’s competing messages about fat. On the one hand, she appreciates the new pop-culture profile of curvy women. On the other hand, if the path to a lighter body were obvious, she would take it.

      The year she was 21, after watching her aunt die from obesity-related illnesses, she put herself on an extreme diet-and-exercise regimen. She made it down to a size 14, which still put her firmly in the “overweight” category.

      “It was 24 hours a day,” Henry recalled. “I had to watch everything I put into my mouth; I wrote it all down. It became my number-one priority and the only thing I thought about.”

      She couldn’t make the weight loss last. She got busier. Henry lives with and cares for a sister who has Down syndrome and her 89-year-old grandmother, works full-time, and has a pinup business on the side. She said she simply can’t do it all and get her weight down to a government-approved level at the same time.

      Henry said provincial government weight-loss programs make her neither happier nor healthier. Especially those such as 2008’s Healthier Choices in Vending Machines in B.C. Public Buildings, which sucked Oh Henry!s and Doritos out of universities and public schools.

      Pham noted that fat can also be an economic issue: eating healthy food and finding time to exercise are far easier to do when there’s extra money in the house. This was echoed in University of Victoria medical ethicist Marsha Hanen’s 2008 lecture for the Sheldon Chumir Foundation, entitled “Responsibility for Health Care: Mine, Theirs or Everyone’s?”

      Hanen documented health disparities in Japan and Britain between the highest and lowest earners. Her argument is that until governments are prepared to address the growing gap between rich and poor, obesity and its financial costs will be with us.

      Wortman feels that individuals haven’t been given the opportunity to address their own obesity because they haven’t been given the right health information. He said most fat people are fat for undiagnosed metabolic reasons—such as insulin resistance—not because they are lazy, stupid, or undisciplined.

      For fat folks, it will have been a dynamic decade between 2000—when the human-rights tribunal heard of the popular hatred for fat people—and 2010, by which time the B.C. government hopes obesity and overweight rates will have plummeted in time for the Olympics. But what’s really changed? Apart from a Canadian Community Health Survey blip showing that B.C. residents’ self-reported rate of obesity declined from 12.7 percent in 2005 to 10.9 percent in 2007, it’s unclear whether we’re getting thinner or fatter as a population. Indeed, self-reported rates are notoriously inaccurate, according to the 2004 Path to Health and Wellness report.

      For Henry, Pham, and Devine, the answer has been to struggle through the self-judgment and to use their size to help others face the fury.

      With a provincial election on May 12, the parties have an opportunity to design health and social programs that really help the 53.6 percent of B.C. residents still struggling with their weight. Given that no jurisdiction in the world has yet instituted a successful antifat plan, an effective, respectful program based on current research would be a global achievement.

      Comments

      9 Comments

      Ryan

      Apr 30, 2009 at 3:38pm

      So what do we do? Do we let people get to the size of a blimp and pay for all the heath costs involved? Or do we try to get people to live in a more healthy way.

      We shouldn't be normalizing obesity. 305 pounds is not normal, nor is it healthy.

      Many important factors are raised in the story. The very high level of added sugar to foods, the cost (in time and money) of eating healthy food, and the lack of time people have to exercise. The government should focus on those issues and maybe rates of obesity will drop.

      However, as an overweight person myself, overweight people have to be honest. We have to take control. No one is forcing food down our throat. No one has locked in us a room so we can't run.

      It's about choices, and while some overweight people do have medical reasons for being overweight, most don't. Most don't want to exercise because they want do something else. They eat junk food because they want to. And some are just plain lazy. I know I am.

      We can't and shouldn't expect to get a pat on our heads and a "Oh it's alright. It's okay you're fat. It's not your fault" because it is our fault and it's not okay.

      Shimona Henry

      Apr 30, 2009 at 9:08pm

      I have struggled all of my life with my weight and will probably have to as long as I live. I am seeing a nutritionist and allergist since being interviewed for this article and I have been basically eating an organic, vegan diet and have lost weight.

      For me, being curvy is the only way to go, but as my Aunt's fate has shown, I need to keep looking for a balanced way to bring my weight down. I need to find a balance between being happy and curvacious, while healthy at the same time.

      I thought I had tried it all, but seeing the nutritionist and allergist has made a huge impact on my life so far because I have been shown why my body was struggling to shed pounds, even when I was eating what is considered a healthy diet for the majority of people.

      Anyways, I just wanted to say that if anyone reading this has had trouble losing weight or yo-yo-ing on diets, seeing a nutritionist might be a very beneficial way to go as they can tailor your diet to your body specifically, paying attention to food sensitivites, metabolism etc. without making life miserable!

      Xox,
      Shimona

      David Gillespie

      Apr 30, 2009 at 9:17pm

      Obesity is the visible symptom of an addiction to fructose (not just HFCS, sugar is half fructose too), as is insulin resistance and ultimately heart disease and diabetes.

      It's time we started treating the addiction rather than ridiculing the victims and telling them nonsense about how to 'fix the problem'.

      More info here:
      <object width="300" height="251"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vlwr-UFOPiE&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vlwr-UFOPiE&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="300" height="251"></embed></object>

      Ryan

      Apr 30, 2009 at 10:48pm

      I should add that the industrial food complex does have a lot to answer for when it comes to high rates of obesity.

      Just like all corporations, they have to make a profit every year. And they hope a bit more profit every year. The problem is the human's diet is "inelastic", meaning it doesn't increase much.

      So they have to cut their costs (they have done a good job on this and can't go much lower) or they have to add value. Which means processing. They are basically making food that we are hard wired to want to eat lots of. Problem solved for their profit margins. But not we are seeing the cost of that in peoples health.

      There is nothing wrong with being curvy. Being super skinny is just as unheathly as being over weight in many cases.

      Like David, I feel a lot of the problem comes down to sugar in our foods. Again, the food business can make alot of money adding sugar to foods because it's cheap and we love it.

      New Poster

      May 1, 2009 at 9:59pm

      As someone who has been overweight for most of her life, I can say that being fat is not fun. Fat people are definitely treated differently, especially in Vancouver. When I lost 80 pounds, I was still considered overweight (a curvy size 10-12) by Vancouver standards.
      When an injury & depression get in the way of my exercise & eating plan, the pounds came back on. But it was so much worse than before. When I was fat before I didn't know the difference. I didn't know what it was like to have men come up to me and ask for my phone number or to fit into the cute, trendy clothes.
      The more weight I re-gained, the lower my self esteem got. I have gained back the weight and am now 250 pounds. I'm still beautiful, but Vancouver men don't notice me. And I feel so terrible, it's embarrassing to be seen. It's a struggle to go to work when you feel like an ugly blob. And running, biking, dancing, they're all so much harder to do with an injury and an extra 80 pounds.
      Money is another issue. Not everyone has the discipline or the physical ability to go out running every morning. Many fat people struggle with the grocery bill. The cost of fresh produce and meat is about 10X more than stocking up on Kraft Dinner. Yoga & dancing classes aren't cheap, either.
      Anyway, there is truth in the over-eating and under-exercising aspect of being overweight. But it goes much deeper than that. I think if overweight people weren't judged, there would probably be fewer overweight people, because the stigma of being fat causes more pain, and fat people's vice of choice is food. And so the cycle continues...

      sleepswithangels

      May 3, 2009 at 8:36am

      I suppose if it wasn't for all the chubby chasers a lot of fat people would have zero positive reinforcement for their lot in life. I wonder if I was ever obese in a previous life. There...that's all the wondering I'm going to do.
      I'm going to hop on the bike and ride to Grandville Island to buy some veggies and have some fresh squeezed juice then look for some hills to climb. After that I'll light up a "fatty" and pump some iron.
      Life is gooooooood.
      SMBs

      kagil

      May 7, 2009 at 11:07pm

      I don't think I'd be fat if I could walk. I was a size 7 until I had a bad ankle injury that has turned out too complicated for even surgery to fix, then a fall caused me to injury the other one terribly. Yet if I go to the store, and I use a cart, people look at me like, she's so fat she can't walk. I guess it is easier to see the fat tummy than the scares all over my feet and lower legs. I don't like to go out.

      Zoom

      May 9, 2009 at 12:51pm

      I prefer fat women. I don't use words like "obese" as they are medical terms, and the medical establishment has been blatantly against size acceptance and for anti-fat prejudice. I wouldn't care for or against their opinion on the healthiness or non- of fatness, except they are treating statistics like facts and saying "I'm right, you're wrong", so I must take a contrary position in the name of justice. Also they look cute to me with extra blubber.

      J. Radler

      Jul 16, 2012 at 11:12am

      I am an American who recently graduated from university, and I have been struggling with my weight for my entire life. The ironic thing is that when I started university, I was in excellent shape. I was part of the NROTC program for future naval officers, and we had to pass certain physical readiness exams once a semester. I always passed mine with flying colors when it came to running and calisthenics, but I failed the overall exam EVERY TIME because I was too heavy for their outdated Body Mass Index charts. Here I was, a guy who ran 5 miles every morning and led my platoon in the number of flutter kicks and situps I could do, but I was failing the physical readiness exams because I was still "too fat" because I had a little bit of spare tire I couldn't get rid of and my body proportions didn't fit into a chart used by the medical officer.

      I got drummed out of the program because I was "too fat", and I gave up (admittedly my fault), and then I ACTUALLY got fat. Here I am, 100 lbs heavier than I was when I was dropped from the program three years ago.

      I was not fat when I was in that program, but one of my main problems is that I was in excellent shape but STILL was called fat. I worked hard to condition my body and I was still told I was fat. I have a large frame and bulky muscles, but I put on fat like it's no one's business if I don't take meticulous care of my body and stay on a strict diet.

      What was the point of being in shape when I was still considered "fat" when I was in excellent condition?

      Stop judging me by the size of my frame and the little bit of fat you can see, and worry about how I'm running circles around you. It's not about health at all, it's about fitting into a conformist average size range. That makes me the angriest, because no matter how hard I try, I will always be outside the norms for body size.

      I think THAT is a key problem with anti-obesity campaigns. Especially anti-obesity campaigns administrated by a bunch of people who can pig out on doritos and coke every day and never gain an ounce.

      Just my opinion.