Blog - Politics
Fate of homeless shelters linked to Little Mountain Housing?
Is there a connection between the pending decision by the City of Vancouver on an application by the province for a demolition permit for Little Mountain Housing, and the provincial government’s foot-dragging on renewing its continued funding for homeless shelters in the city?
That may sound like a bit of a stretch, and could easily be dismissed as another conspiracy theory.
But let’s take a look at some background.
On March 31, funding ended for the five homeless shelters that were bankrolled by the provincial government, the city, and a private group.
Since April 1, the province has been the sole funder of the shelters.
In May, Vancouver council passed a motion directing staff to continue working with the province in order to keep the shelters open until April 2010.
More than a month later and until today (June 23), there’s no word about whether or not the province will come up with money, which is about $500,000 a month to maintain the shelters.
Meanwhile, the remaining residents of Little Mountain Housing, the city’s oldest social housing project, are getting more anxious, as a big portion of the area was fenced off on June 18 in preparation for demolition.
On June 1, the residents were informed by letter by the provincial government that it has applied for a demolition permit from the city.
Some 450 homeless people will be back on the streets if the five shelters close but there’s no way they’ll be allowed into the vacant units at Little Mountain, which is owned by the province.
The actual redevelopment of Little Mountain isn’t expected to start until after the 2010 Olympics, and critics have been saying it doesn’t make sense to level the social housing project.
There is also persistent speculation that the province wants to turn the six-hectare piece of prime real estate east of Queen Elizabeth Park into a parking lot in time for the 2010 Games.
The site is adjacent to the Vancouver Olympic Centre/Vancouver Paralympic Centre, home of the curling events during the games which are a mere eight months away.
The province cannot just start constructing a parking lot and has to secure permits from the city, a process that takes some time just like anything else.
But allowing the demolition of what look like livable structures at Little Mountain isn’t good optics for the city, especially for Mayor Gregor Robertson, who has promised to end street homelessness.
However, there’s not much council can do, as matters like demolition permit issuance are handled by city staff. And there’s no major reason why such a permit cannot be issued to the owner, which is the province.
In the meantime, the fate of the shelters remains up in the air.




E-mail
Print

Comments
The new structures that we will eventually see in Little Mountains place will be safe, designed to maximize the land use creating a much higher occupancy rate then what stands there now and the mixed use will bring so much to the Little Mountain community. Don't you want to be able to pick up ice cream cones right across from Queen Elizabeth park? I certainly do and I know many families will.
I think the government has been more than fair with helping the residents with alternative housing options and assistance. They will also have first choice to move back into the new buildings. I wish I was so lucky!
1.) The Little Mountain Housing Project was not meant as temporary housing for war veterans. It was constructed in 1954 (9 years after the end of WWII) and it was meant as permanent housing for families and veterans.
2.) Refurbishing the homes will be cheaper than building new ones, especially given the federal government's new program that offers funding for renovating social housing.
3.) There are no problems with the rooves (in fact they were recently improved) and there are no problems with mold and asbestos. Lots of old structures have asbestos in them and this is not a reason to demolition them. Half of Vancouver would have to be levelled if that were the case.
4.) The old structures were safe.
5.) The residents have long made use of the green space at Little Mountain.
6.) It is true that the site could hold significantly greater density as you point out. The problem is this extra density will all be in the form of expensive condominiums that you have to buy (you won't be able to rent them). We don't need more expensive condos in Vancouver. What we need more of is affordable rental housing. Given the history of the site, the entire site should be used for affordable rental housing.
7.) There are already lots of places where you can buy ice cream cones in Vancouver. We do not need to displace people out of their homes, bulldoze an entire community, and show a complete lack of respect for this important part of Vancouver history so that you can buy an ice cream cone across the street from Queen Elizabeth Park.
Post a comment