Lifestyle » Health » Health Features

Homeopathic remedies reduce outdoor worries

Keep basic homeopathic remedies handy and you’ll be ready for summer’s stings, bumps, and scrapes.

By Sonya McLeod,

It was early September. As per my usual daily routine, I was dropping my two kids off at their Montessori school. Aysha, my very mature and independent 5-year-old, bounded up the school steps and greeted the teacher at the door confidently. Her younger sister, Sahara, age four, was not as keen as her sister to get to class. Sahara, who is more goofy by nature, was more interested in hanging and climbing on the metal railing outside of the school. As she placed her hand on the metal bars, her silly smile turned into a painful grimace and she let out a bloodcurdling scream. She started crying hysterically. I ran to see what had happened and discovered the source of her distress, a huge wasp on the railing. Her hand was swollen from the sting, and I could tell by the size of the wasp and by her reaction that she was in a lot of pain.

Other parents were giving me advice such as, “Put some baking soda on it,” but I knew exactly what to do. I rushed Sahara home and promptly gave her a couple doses of homeopathic Apis mellifica. Immediately, the swelling went down, and Sahara collected herself and stopped screaming. Half an hour after she was stung, I sent her back to school with a few doses of Apis in her pocket. Later that night, all traces of the bee sting were gone. (Of course, if you are allergic to bee venom or are showing signs of a severe reaction to a sting, go immediately to the nearest emergency room.)

Homeopathy is a system of natural medicine that has been used effectively for chronic and acute health conditions for more than 200 years. It was first pioneered by German doctor Samuel Hahnemann. It is such a versatile form of medicine that it can also be used for first aid. Unfortunately, homeopathy is not very well known in North America. It is, however, very popular in other parts of the world, such as Europe and India. In London, for example, they even have a homeopathic hospital. Prince Charles is a very loyal and vocal advocate for homeopathy.

Homeopathic remedies come in sugar-pill form, and are therefore very pleasant and sweet-tasting. Parents have no problem getting their kids to take homeopathic remedies because of this. Homeopathic remedies should always be taken dry, with no food or drink, dissolved under the tongue. They can be purchased at local health-food stores or at some homeopathic clinics. Most homeopathic products in Canada are distributed by a homeopathic company based in Quebec, called Boiron. Some homeopathic clinics also sell homeopathic first-aid kits, which I strongly believe no household should be without.

I rely solely on my homeopathic first-aid kit for my children’s injuries. Whenever Sahara and Aysha fall down or get injured, I immediately reach for the Arnica bottle after the normal cleaning of any scrapes or cuts. Arnica is a remedy that is good for any type of injury, especially for the prevention of bruising and swelling after a fall or impact. Immediately after taking one dose of Arnica, my children stop crying. Before using Arnica, my children bruised normally just like other children. Now, because I usually use this remedy, they hardly ever bruise. Also, if they have hit themselves on the head and a goose egg appears, I give them a few doses of Arnica and the swelling goes down and the goose egg disappears within a few hours. Don’t believe me? Try it yourself. I use it only in a high 1M potency. Because of this strength, only one dose is needed. For more severe impacts, the 1M might have to be repeated a few more times in 15- to 30-minute intervals.

When it comes to injuries, Arnica is unbelievably useful. I cannot say enough good things about this remedy. It is like magic. After any type of injury, whether it be a muscle strain, puncture wound, or bruise, take one dose of Arnica first. After that, give one of the remedies listed below for the specific type of injury that is indicated.

Apis was mentioned at the beginning of this article. It is a very good remedy to have on hand, one that is used to take away the pain, swelling, and redness after a bee sting or insect bite. I like to use this remedy in a 200C potency, repeated every 15 to 30 minutes for a few doses.

To prevent infection, homeopaths use a remedy called Ledum palustre. If your child is running around the beach or park barefoot and steps on glass or a rusty nail that pierces the skin, think of Ledum. If the wound looks serious, you can administer this remedy on your way to the hospital. Common sense is, obviously, your best defence. It is also useful to prevent infection after an animal bite. Ledum works best in the 30C potency. It can be given every 15 to 30 minutes in three doses, then can be given three times a day until the danger of infection has passed. If an infection develops that quickly gets worse or does not respond to this treatment, visit emergency.

We also use Calendula cream topically, which is very good for closing minor open wounds.

Hypericum is a remedy that we use for injuries to nerves. The main indication for Hypericum is shooting pain. In cases where there is a wound that is already infected, Ledum will not help. Once a wound is infected and there is shooting pain, you must use Hypericum. It is also a useful remedy for any kind of nerve pain and spinal injuries. This remedy works best in the 30C or 200C potency, repeated every 15 to 30 minutes until there is relief. Of course, if the injury or infection is serious, use your common sense and also visit the doctor or hospital.

Now we are going to talk about two very common sports-injury remedies: Rhus toxicodendron and Bryonia. Rhus tox and Bryonia are for injuries to the muscles, joints, and tendons. Bryonia is the right medicine if the injury is worse from any kind of motion and better from lying down and not moving the injured part. With a Rhus tox injury, the injury might be worse from starting to move, but once the person gets moving the injury feels better. Generally, with Rhus tox, movement brings relief to the injury. For these remedies, use either the 30C or 200C potency. A few repetitions 15 to 30 minutes apart should bring relief. If the problem is more chronic, a 30C potency repeated three times a day may be necessary.

For injuries of the cartilage, bones, and ligaments, we use Ruta graveolens. It can also be a useful remedy for sprains and strains if Arnica, Rhus tox, or Bryonia have not helped. This remedy has a special affinity for the knees and elbows and can be given in a 30C or 200C potency, like Bryonia or Rhus tox, repeated a few times or daily if needed.

There are more homeopathic first-aid remedies, but these are the basic ones that everyone should have in their first-aid kit. Carry these remedies with you to the great outdoors, and you can play and enjoy your summer worry-free. For more chronic conditions, you may have to consult a classical homeopath.

Sonya McLeod is a classical homeopath practising in her private Vancouver clinic. Further inquiries can be directed to her at 604-677-7742.

Comments

Caroline
I would love to see your first aid kit! I have been slowly making the switch from chemicals and synthetics to natural remedies. We use baking soda in the bath, vinegar to clean the carpets and have recently been using Topricin natural pain cream. They have one for hubby and I and they have one for kids. They work great and I just had to try it out on our daughter's bee sting. Anyway- I love all the info here. Thank you!
 
Dr. Mom
Well, good journalism here, folks... From what I have read, homeopathy offers nothing more than an expensive placebo. The National Health Service, American Medical Association and Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology all say that there is no scientific basis for the treatments. So far, it has been shown to be nothing more than sham science. If you are a believer in homeopathy, perhaps you might also consider buying a vial of snake oil...
 
Lib
"no scientific basis for the treatments"...is that supposed to be an indictment? How many "proven" products, endorsed by science, have had to be recalled as dangerous over the decades? Like many others, I am sick and tired of the failings of infallible science, and in this age where we see what we're reaped, what we've done to the earth and the human mechanism through science, I for one am open at least to further investigation of natural aids and treatments.
 
Coeur Birmingham
Thanks for the information! As mom to a precocious toddler, I have been wanting to try something homeopathic rather than a generic OTC drug in treating the day-to-day lumps & bumps she encounters. I had been concerned about trying homeopathic options with my young child but now will try out your recommendations...thanks again!
 
sue22
I used to be a skeptic of homeopathy until I had a condition where nothing else helped. I tried acupuncture, conventional medicine, herbal medicine, and nutrition, and even though they helped temporarily to subdue and ameliorate the symptoms, the condition came back, always reccurring. A friend of mine suggested I see a homeopath, and at the time I just thought it was an alternative kind of herbalism. The remedy my homeopath gave me, I must say, changed my life. I am free of the condition, and now I use homeopathy not only for acute conditions, such as injuries, bites, colds, etc, but also constitutionally.

Homeopathy, when used constitutionally for the totality of your symptoms (mental, emotional, spiritual, and physical), can have transformative power greater than any other kind of medicine (allopathic or alternative) that I have ever seen. While it is true that homeopathy has no scientific evidence supporting it (that is, there is not yet a theory or explanation explaining how it works), there is vast clinical evidence and literature not only supporting but also proving its efficacy.

Before Einstein formulated his theory of relativity, the Newtonian view of the world was purely mechanical. Allopathic as well as some other alternative modalities act on this mechanical basis. Homeopathy, however, acts on a completely different plane, the energetic one. Now, this is uncharted territory not only for the medical person and biologist, but even for the physicist, even though they are covering new ground as far as quantum mechanics goes and the ture structure of the universe. My guess is it will be a while before the scientists will be able to explain how homeopathy works...but I am not going to be the one holding my breath until they find an explanation.

Honestly, I feel sorry for the skeptics that are not open enough, or will never be open enough, to truly experience the transformative and healing properties of the mysterious and intriguing art (and future science) that we call homeopathy. These people will probably be at their death bed still not open to even try homeopathy, while it could help, just because of a limiting belief system and stubborn personality. After all, similar skeptics were holding on so tight to the belief that the Earth was flat (before there was any evidence pointing otherwise) that when the Earth was proved to be round, they still believed the Earth was flat...

Luckily, I will be smiling when the homeopathic medical revolution comes along, and when the true healing art makes its way back to the place where it belongs...in the hearts, minds, and drawers of all cultures of the world. Thank you homeopathy.
 
Pragmatist
I have to say, that this so-called distilled water gave me back my wife. She was a severe migraine sufferer since adolescence. When I met her she was bed-ridden a day or two a week. She was on all the prophylactics so-called sicence could offer - under the treatment of the best neurologists. A year after we got married, she was introduced to a homeopath. Her life was turned around in the space of a month and her health has steadily improved since then. My father is a radiologist. I respect medical science. It has its place, but it does not have all the answers. It is easy to dismiss what you cannot understand.
 
Hugh
If the time comes when the efficacy of homeopathic treatments is substantiated by tenable scientific evidence, then that will be the day to take such this kind of article seriously. For now, there is absolutely no conclusive proof that homeopathy works more effectively than traditional medicine (if at all). Anecdotal evidence is no evidence at all, especially when it is as subjective as a mother discussing her children's owies.
Ms. McLeod's advice is, at best, quixotically naive; at worst, irresponsible and dangerous. "For more chronic conditions, you may have to consult a classical homeopath." Oh, please. Anyone purporting to give medical advice ought to have actual training; everything else is tantamount to the foolishness of faith healing. This is not skepticism; this is common sense.
 
Elena Cecchetto
A Homeopathic First Aid Kit in every household! It is the smart way to a healthy, and 'pain-free' family.
 
Jenny Lindstrom
My comment goes to all the naysayers: for the moment change the lens with which you view the world. As a society we value being given choice, we value freedom, and we value our individual uniqueness on this planet. Over the years we have been led to believe that allopathic medicine is the only way to obtain health and wellness. The job of these allopathic organizations are to set and maintain standards for population health, and when the crunch comes these standards are greatly impacted by Olympics, taxes, and the wiley unknown economic forces, leaving families forever stuck within a system of medical care that palliates instead of cures. As a result many families have not sat back and let this happen. Brave families search for alternatives, and sometimes seemingly odd means of restoring health to their loved ones. I am the mom in one such of these families. I am also a nurse. In my experience Canada is far behind the rest of the world in the options that we offer families. Do not get me wrong we have an excellent health care system that tries desperately to look after all people, but we do not have an open mind and we do not very often value individuality, and we are driven to cut costs and we are afraid to take risks. In my experience allopathic medicine can have extremely harmful side effects as well as not even touch patients, let alone palliate, and yet in the name of science we continue with the same prescriptions instead of looking at other modes of healing. So to all the sensitives out there and to those families brave enough to say "I will seek out restorative health" your remedy is waiting.
 
Allyson Burden
"It's just placebo effect" is such a tiresome argument.
COUNTLESS numbers of animals and babies have benefited from homeopathy and these organisms are not subject to the placebo effect.
Quantum physics is moving us closer to an understanding of the workings of energetic medical modalities like homeopathy.
If only it was just the sceptics enduring the pharmaceutical side-effects in the interim.
 
Open
Although our inclination towards skepticism and critique are very useful intellectual tools, if we are to refrain from coming off as static, un-evolved/evolving beings we must remember that science is equally dynamic and ever developing. We must refrain from confusing science, and everything it has illuminated for us up to this point, with all that we will ever know.
Our existence during this particular time in history is so seeped in scientific advantage that we must excite in the endless possibilities of future human 'truths' and knowledge - not mindlessly down all that is, and will continue to dawn throughout our lifetime. We must remember that we are, and have always been on a continuum.
To many of us, the definition of medicine is whatever works - plain and simple. A few current definitions of medicine include "any substance or substances used in treating disease or illness" and "the art or science of restoring or preserving health or due physical condition". Whether homeopathy succeeds by way of methods that contemporary science can or cannot prove is irrelevant. We cannot conclusively judge a system of medicine that does work, based science alone, we may merely critique it.
T.H. Huxley described science as "organised common sense" (see BC Skeptics webpage). I would maintain that the countless cases of health restored and preserved by homeopathy, or any other system for that matter, should be enough proof for our organised common sense at this point in history.
 
Lee Moller
Many of you find me quite disagreeable. To you, I say this:

I can be easily convinced you are right and I am wrong. Can you say the reverse? What experiment, or series of experiments, would satisfiy you you are wrong? If your answer is "none" (i.e.: you *know* you are right), then you are lost.
 
Ms Fab
Homeopathy works.
 
Johnny Five
Shame on the Georgia Straight for publishing such a biased piece of tripe. Responsible journalism should provide both sides of an argument. This is nothing more than a shameless advertisement for a pseudo-science. Demanding evidence isn't being close minded, it's being responsible.
 
Placebo
If you have an injury to a bone, for the sake of your kids, take them to a doctor and stop prescribing unproven placebos to people who apparently have trouble grasping any semblance of good sense.
 
kathleen taylor
As a nurse, i see the downward spiral that `modern medicine' has to offer patients - side effects, more pills to counteract the other pills and their side effects, emergency room visitis for minor concerns (because the public has been become incompetant to figure out that they can pull out their own splinters). As a mom, I had my son on antibiotics, just like the Dr. told me to, when he was 10 days old and that went on for another 18 months. Thankfully then, i met a homeopath and it took me 3 years to turn my sons health around. He is now 20years old and doesn't have a Dr. becuase he doesn't need one - he works at a physically demanding job and has his second degree brown belt. My daughter has been to a Dr. once. She 19 years old. If more people weren't afraid to help themselves and their families, if even for minor ailments how healthy could we get? It's not science that tells me homeopathy works - it's seeing my healthy children, year in and year out, getting healthier, mentally and physically.
 
Melany Fulgham
What do you call alternative medicine that's been proven to work? Medicine!

There have been many, many, many studies on the efficacy of homeopathy, and they all reach one conclusion. It works no better than placebo. While the treatments are harmless (they are made from water), they become harmful when people substitute them for real medicine.

If your child steps on a rusty nail, don't go to a homeopathist. Rush them to the doctor and get a Tetanus shot.
 
Michelle Kotko
When I was in Europe, I was advised to pick up a homeopathic remedy at a regular pharmacy for the flu. The remedy worked; my flu symptoms were reversed within a few hours. I didn't have a clue about homeopathy and its controversy as it was simply sold as an option in a pharmacy. Later, I wanted to know more and found out that 80 percent of French physicians prescribed it. I'm assuming, that this is because they have found it to work. Later, back in Canada, I began to use it with my daughter because antibiotics were not working for her repeated ear infections. Again, it was great to have an option.
Period.
 
Alexei Konn
If you ask a skeptic, “What letters can complete the sequence E-X-P-E-R-I-?” they can’t help themselves, even if they’ve read Pavlov they still can’t help themselves, and they shout ”˜-M-E-N-T,’ and look triumphant, and you don’t have the heart to ask, ”˜Is that all?’ or to suggest ”˜-I-E-N-C-E,’ in case they’ve never heard of the word or don’t understand the concept, and so instead you reach for something else to say, like ”˜You’re good at spelling.’
 
Jesse Brydle
People, let's not be so open minded our brains fall out! 'Alternative treatment' means one of two things: treatment that has not been proven to work, or treatment that has been proven not to work. Homeopathy fits right into that second category. All this talk about energy and quantum physics is pure nonsense used very deliberately to give this bogus pseudoscience an air of credibility. There is, in fact, a very complex and poorly understood mechanism at play, but it is called the placebo effect, not quantum hocus pocus.

The references in the article to 'concentrations' like 30C, etc refer to the amount of dilution of a treatment. 30C means a dilution of one to 100 to the power of 30. At that level, it's extremely unlikely to find even a single molecule of the original substance in the final solution. Homeopathic pills are nothing more than sugar pills, or sometimes milk powder. As for water retaining a 'memory', there is not a bit of evidence that this is the case, nor is there any known mechanism for it happening. The chemistry of water is something we do understand quite well, and quantum mechanics doesn't even enter into it.
 
Jesse Brydle
For some hard facts, rather than slinging anecdotes back and forth, here is a collection of people directly harmed by homeopathy:
http://whatstheharm.net/homeopathy.html

And here is an article that lays out the case against homeopathy, except this one is actually sourced with published research, rather than the above article, which is 100% subjective:
http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/homeo.html
 
Joe Fulgham
I don't even know where to start with this article. Firstly, the theory behind homeopathy is complete magic. To make a homeopathic remedy you first mix one part of "active ingredient" (something that *causes* the problem, because "like cures like" apparently, so a homeopathic sleeping pill uses caffeine) with 10 parts water. This is called a "1C" solution.

However, the idea behind homeopathy is that the less of the ingredient is more effective, so that 1C solution is then mixed with 10 parts water making a "2C" solution. This is repeated until the desired level of dilution is achieved. Standard homeopathic remedies use 30C.

The math here is a bit hard to imagine, but 30C is one part of active ingredient in a one with thirty zeroes after it parts water.

In order for there to be even ONE MOLECULE of caffeine in a 30C solution you would need a sphere of water nearly the radius of the Earth's orbit around the sun! This means that it's almost inconceivable that there's one molecule of active in ingredient in all the 30C homeopathic remedies in the entire world combined.

Now, as to the claims made in this article -- she put her water on a wasp sting and the swelling eventually went down and she stopped crying. She claims this was caused by the homeopathic medicine because it happened after. This is a post-hoc fallacy. She also rushed her home. Perhaps her house has magical healing properties! It's just as likely as water curing it.

What's more likely is this was both a placebo effect and simply the passage of time. Insect stings rarely hurt more than a few hours.

If homeopathy actually worked, you could do a study comparing its use on wasp stings compared to a placebo. Similar trials have been conducted on homeopathic remedies and the evidence is conclusive: Homeopathy is no more effective than a placebo.

There's no magic, just post-hoc rationalization.

For more info, check out http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/does-homeopathy-work

Shame on you Straight for publishing this deceptive article.
 
Educate yourself
There is a lot of misinformation out there about homeopathy, because of 200 years of misunderstanding and unanswered questions surrounding this approach to healing. We still don't know how homeopathy works, although we know that you can begin to grasp it better with modern physics than chemistry or biochemistry.
Diluting a substance in water many times doesn't produce a homeopathic remedy, despite what Joe Fulgham suggests (plus, he's actually describing how to dilute a 1X and 2X remedy (not 1C and 2C) and tells the concentration for a 30 C has 30 zeroes after the decimal point, but this is actually for a 30 X potency - a 30 C potency is actually corresponding to a concentration of 10 EXP -60 (60 digits after the decimal point!). It's obvious to anyone who knows a little chemistry that this is a much lower concentration that the limit given by Avogadro, so there is actually not even a molecule left, statistically speaking, in that solution.
So, chemistry cannot explain how homeopathic remedies work, and conventional medicine has to rely on the "placebo" effect to explain its results. But this is inaccurate.
Fractals, the theory of chaos, the research done on water (see books like "The Memory of Water"), and other current research in physics are giving us the models to begin to understand homeopathic dilutions.
To make a homeopathic remedy, as I started to say earlier, one does need to do a series of dilutions, but with each dilution comes a series of "succussions" or hard shaking of the water, otherwise, in the end, you simply get a diluted product of the initial compound, not a homeopathic remedy. Why is the shaking so important to give the remedies their healing properties? We theorize that the water is "impregnated" with energetic properties from the initial diluted substance and that which each new dilution, this energy is increased, while the concentration decreases. This is a challenging concept to accept, but the future should be able to tell us more about this phenomenon.
Second, the use of homeopathic remedies, when prescribed "homeopathically", must be individualized for each case treated. This means that if we see 10 people with viral hepatitis, we may see 10 different cases of symptoms, and we may need to prescribe 10 different remedies, one corresponding to each specific symptom picture, and all have the potential to cure each case.
Because of this need to individualize the use of a remedy, research on homeopathy has failed to show its potential. The approach to testing the remedies is flawed. You cannot test homeopathic remedies the same way you test a new drug: we know in advance that the selected remedy is not going to help all the patients, only those who match the symptom picture known for that remedy (that's why it's called "homeopathy": "like cures like"; symptom pictures of patients must be matched to those of the remedies).
One possible exception to this rule might be first aid prescribing, when you don't have to individualize the case as often as for illnesses and chronic diseases to help a patient: things evolve so rapidly (as opposed to a chronic disease case) and the prescription is given early, before an individual "picture" has had time to develop, so the odds work in your favour that the remedy will work, if you do not delay the administration of the remedy. Of course, COMMON SENSE, once again, dictates that even if a remedy might, or will, help the patient, mechanical injuries must be attended to (set a bone and put on a cast, stop a bleeding gash and protect from infection, etc...). So, conventional medicine must be used concurrently.
Ideally, alternative medicine should become part of full health care, what we sometimes call "Integrative Medicine". Educate yourself to learn how to best use both types of medicine together, for the best results for the patients. Don't just dismiss things as quackery just because you do not understand them... yet!
 
Jesse Brydle
You refer to research in physics that provides a mechanism for the memory of water. Can you provide a link to the studies you refer to? I'd much prefer a paper published in a peer-reviewed journal to a popular book written by a proponent, as I'm sure we can both agree those are dubious sources.

I believe the succussions refer specifically to 10 back and forth motions in each directional axis. Why 10? Would 9 work? 10 seems quite arbitrary. Why three directions? Why would a single bout of shaking not confer the memory? Why do the preparations not also require rotational succussions? Through what mechanism does this shaking pass chemical memory to water?

Any quantity of water will contain a huge number of impurities - why does it not retain a memory of flaked skin that lands in it? These impurities would be present before and after each round of succussion, so they would be subject to the same process of 'memorification'.

Also, I have never heard a satisfactory explanation for the principle of 'like cures like'. It is my understanding that this is simply an assertion made with no reason or evidence.

I try to have an open mind about these kinds of things, but I find the evidence to be completely unsatisfactory. At a certain point I must conclude that any perceived efficacy must be due to placebo effect or regression to the mean.
 
Jesse Brydle
One more comment - the notion that homeopathy cannot be tested like other treatments is ridiculous. This is called special pleading. What you have done is set up an unfalsifiable claim. If tests had come out positive you'd be trumpeting them from the rooftops, yet when they come out negative, you rationalize it away. If homeopathy makes any scientific claims - which it must make in order to be recommended as a treatment, then those claims are testable. The claims made by homeopaths have, in fact, been tested, and the tests showed no statistically significant results (more accurately, the meta-analysis shows no result). If you want to shift the goalposts around, the burden falls to you to prove your claims. This has not been done.
 
Rett Anderson
To read some studies on homeopathic remedies, including double blind placebo studies go to this link. Click on Alternative Therapies then click on H, then click on homeopathy. Check out the study for flu!

BTW, the World Health Organization states that homeopathy is the most widely used system of medicine next to the conventional.

http://www.alleghanyregional.com/healthcontent.asp?page=/choice/demonstr...
 
Jesse Brydle
Rett, all of the sources for the articles I looked at in your link were from alt. med journals or specifically homeopathy journals - not recognized scientific journals. No details are given as to the administration of treatment vs. placebo, etc. I don't mean to sound deliberately negative, but with claims like this the rigour is essential. Proper science and skepticism requires every angle be investigated to the fullest, and that has simply not been demonstrated.

Wide use of homeopathy is a complete non-sequitar. Especially seeing as how "conventional medicine" is defined as "all medical treatments that have been proven to work". Anything that is 'next to' conventional medicine is to be taken with a grain of salt. Which... really, is all homeopathy is anyhow.
 
Alexei Konn
Congratulations (?) to the editors of the Georgia Straight: you have just been educated as to the precise factual and scientific degree of “shame” you should now be feeling, having printed “sham” “biased” “nonsense””¦

And congratulations (?) to those who have read the article and subsequent positive reception: if you classified this material concerning homeopathy under any heading other than those just listed then “You are lost” (see emails above for all words in scare quotes, as supplied courtesy of your local BC skeptics).

How does it feel to have interacted with some really scientific individuals who are qualified to call down shame on you, and to determine that ”˜you are lost’? Does any of this remind you of other events that you or your grandparents or great grandparents may have had the misfortune to suffer, far away and long ago? Or simply 'far away' if you or they have had the misfortune to have had to flee a country where people who call shame down on others also have the power to make laws to 'clarify' just how lost and shameful you are supposed to be?
 
Joel Hitchcock
Reading over these comments, I cannot help but chuckle. Must we get so worked up?

I will comment on some of Jesse Brydle's content. The site providing cases of homeopathy being dangerous is not evidence that homeopathy is dangerous in itself but simply ineffective in those instances, and the conditions were directly responsible for injury, death. Certainly, many of those cases should have taken other measures. So the danger, as I understand you to mean it, is that people choosing homeopathy over the other methods will be duped and the condition will inevitably worsen and endanger them. So there are some cases for that, and there are cases where homeopathy has been the only help. So what to do?

And if we will point out the dangers of homeopathy, let's also look to what is being recognized not only by the public, but the regulatory bodies in medicine and Universities conducting test regarding both the efficacy and dangers of pharmaceuticals. So not only is there a strike against Big Pharma in regard to being ineffective in some cases, but the medicine itself has been proven injurious and fatal. This is something we cannot say about homeopathy (because it's placebo, you might feel - sure - you can take any position you feel is right).

I would direct some to the Canadian Centre For Policy Alternatives website.
http://www.policyalternatives.ca

It isn't online yet, but in the June 2009 issue an article by Helke Ferrie discusses the many lawsuits that Big Pharma is dealing with. Regarding safety I can quote: "The Canadian Medical Association reported that at least 23,000 people in Canada die every year from properly prescribed drugs . . ." - note 'properly' - "Drug related injuries and deaths reached record levels in the first 3 months of 2008: about 5000 deaths and over 21,000 injuries were recorded in the U.S." This number is estimated to be higher as the US FDA claims that only 10% of cases are reported.
 
Joel Hitchcock

And the article goes on and on. Quite remarkable actually. And this needs to be pointed to, and good going for the established bodies for being honest and willing to take a drastic reassessment regarding the direction of western or science based medicine. (I don't want to really get into this term "Science", as any one of can certainly know scientifically that we hear a sentence in the mind's ear, can speak it aloud, yet offer no real evidence of how this is possible - not mechanically - but on the basis of Awareness itself - of which there is no evidence for other than we all sit around with a sense of "I am here" within - I'll leave it at that.)

On a more personal note: who among us cannot stand to root out the biases that alter our seeing for what is simply there, homeopaths, medical doctors, etc. We'd all benefit from taking our uncollected heads out of our collective arse most of the time. So it is not an argument about who is in the position of right as if automatic credit can be given.
 
Joel Hitchcock
Ya - I'm a training homeopath - but big deal - I'm human first, and a conscious being even before that. It seems within my own being that I might be the most doubtful homeopath walking the planet, and yet be encouraged continually by what I have seen in myself and in others through the homeopathic method. So what to do? In some case I'd say that diet is more profound. One case should see a centre in genetic research. In another case I might suggest the person see a Yogi if a meditation has gone a bit haywire. Or why not have a good cry on one's father's shoulders - sometimes that can do the trick. Western Medicine has nailed it on so many ventures - and it's not that drugs are "bad", but some of the underlining principles are not so iron clad, as we are now discovering. OK. Let's move on. But holding on, covering up, due to profits - that's as much the problem as toxic doses of pills.

I had to move on from the advice of my doctors when I was not helped by the latest research in digestive diseases. In my case, turns out homeopathy, dietary changes, yoga have provided me health that quite simply baffles the specialists I saw in the past who guaranteed I'd be down one colon. I know this. Those who witnessed this know this. What's not scientific about this exactly? Because it's not repeatable in testing? I'm not a statistic, but a living individual, and while all mankind shares all these similarities, it is the slight differences rendering one unique that is most telling, most substantial for it's inexplicable nature - for what are we to do with that which does not fit the pattern? It does not render it non-existent - for there it is. And how are we are aware of what we do not know? And neither the homeopathic paradigm or the medical science paradigm can have any claim as to have rendered all that is inexplicable explained by a concept that communicates consistency.

One last note: what's the deal regarding attacking irresponsible journalism? It was an article designed to communicate the views of that community, not blow the lid wide open on everything about anything. Sonya McLeod presents a concise and well communicated introduction to those interested in homeopathy. Perhaps the next time someone writes about gay-rights, or city planning we should be up in arms about how biased and irresponsible the journalism was because someone actually had a point of view. Get real.
 
Joel Hitchcock
SOURCES and RESOURCES:

S. Chopra. Corrupt to the Core: Memoirs of A Health Canada Whistleblower, Kos, 2009

Orthomolecular Medicine News Service: www.nutirteam.com

Drug recalls, interactions: Public Citizen's Worst Pills - Best Pills News. www.worstpills.org

On antidepressants: www.greenspiration.org, drug-induced suicides and mass murders www.drugawareness.org and www.ssristories.com

 
James Pannozzi
Well, I see comments from those who have actually tried Homeopathy and have discovered its power, efficacy and in many cases, superiority, over many conventional, side effect ridden remedies, good! Then there are comments from those who have been brainwashed by media attacks against Homeopathy - most often this involves not looking at facts, and passing along various innuendo against Homeopathy.

For the chronically uninformed, M. Ennis, a pharmaceutical researcher in Ireland, has demonstrated biological activity from high dilution solutions in which all molecules of the original stimulant were diluted away and yes, the effects were still observed (Inflammation Research vol 53, p181). This experiment has been repeated and confirmed in numerous repetitions. Nonsense that Homeopathy was just "placebo" effect was convincingly refuted in a recent Journal of Clinical Epidemiology article - the "placebo" rationalization does remain a rather funny example of Homeopathy critics begrudingly acknowledging its curative effect but then attempting to explain it away in terms of their crippled "scientific" reductionism.

And, last but not least, we still see totally uninformed "sceptics" attempting to tell us that Homeopathy is dangerous. It is actually quite dangerous to the pharmaceutical industry and their FDA approved (like Vioxx!!) side effect ridden nostrums which continue to kill people despite all that "science" behind them. People catch on rather fast as to what is really "dangerous" and what is not.
Forthcoming medical reforms will, hopefully, eliminate the one sided obstructionist viewpoints of special interests as Homeopathy and other Complementary and Alternative medicine systems rise to the forefront of modern medicine.
 
Jesse Brydle
In response to Joel:

"So the danger, as I understand you to mean it, is that people choosing homeopathy over the other methods will be duped and the condition will inevitably worsen and endanger them. So there are some cases for that, and there are cases where homeopathy has been the only help. So what to do?"

Yes, that's exactly what I mean. Homeopathy cannot directly cause harm to anyone, as it has a completely null effect. The harm comes from forgoing proven treatments of serious conditions in favour of unproven 'alternative' treatments. At best, the harm is wasted money. At worst it can result in death from the untreated condition. Here is an example of such a case, where a baby girl died a horrible and painful death that could have been easily prevented with conventional medicine. http://bit.ly/1a9bRe

You say there are cases where homeopathy has been the only help. I think you're reaching a bit with that statement. A single anecdote proves nothing. And many accumulated anecdotes don't count either - there are many possible inaccuracies that can sneak in, namely that successes get reported and passed on far more than failures. Only a properly controlled clinical test can determine if homeopathy actually has any positive effect. This has not been done.

Consider that your average cold symptoms last 2-3 days. Day one you start to feel a little under the weather, day two you feel awful, so you go to your local natural remedy supplier and get some homeopathic treatment. On day three your symptoms start to improve, and the next day you're back to normal. It is human nature to search for a cause in such cases, and very often the person will credit homeopathy as having helped them, when in fact they very well may have gotten better all on their own. This is the reason controlled trials are so important.
 
Catherine Dean
Today Vancouver Sun and NYTimes reported acetaminophen/tylenol responsible for over 400 deaths in U.S. last yr, over 4200 hospital visits for OD and is the leading cause of liver damage ... Homeopathy is a science of medicine that has an important role to play in taking care of your family's health.
 
Jesse Brydle
Catherine, can you provide a link to those stories? I assume you were talking about this in the NY Times: http://bit.ly/khHDz
and this in the Vancouver Sun: http://bit.ly/2rEjN

Neither of those stories has any mention of homeopathy though. Is the last sentence in your comment meant to be part of the quote, or are those your own words?

It is a fallacy to claim that problems in conventional medicine prove the efficacy of alternative treatments. The faulty logic need not be pointed out, yet that very claim is often made in support of treatments like homeopathy.

No one is claiming conventional medicine is without fault or flaw. When used improperly it carries severe risks, and even when used properly can be dangerous. It is the very fact that these medicines are efficacious that makes such side effects possible.

Meanwhile, I have seen a demonstration of an 80 year old man swallowing an entire bottle of homeopathic sleeping pills - 32 tablets in total - and remaining alert and awake for hours, well into the night. The bottle warned not to exceed 4 pills at a time, and to call poison control if more were accidentally ingested. The placebo effect is perfectly capable of reducing subjective pain, causing drowsiness, etc. but it cannot replicate the effects of real drugs.
 
Darlene Thomas
There are many problems with conventional medicine being the 3rd leading cause of death in America. Read Dr. Strand's "Death by Prescription". You appear to have your mind set, regardless of supportive research of the efficacy of homeopathy. Check facts about flu in 1918 and low mortality rates when treated by homeopathy as compared to conventional medicine. A more recent example would be information presented in Dec of 2008 regarding the prevention of a Leptospirosis epidemic in Cuba with homeopathic treatment as opposed to the conventional vaccine. Since the Cuba is not under the yoke of the international pharmaceutical juggernaut, they are not held back from adopting homeopathy and other alternative medicines wholeheartedly into their national health programs. There is medical research that supports statistics that homeopathy works. A person needs an open mind to find it. Wishing you well!

 
Jesse Brydle
Darlene,

I can't find anything about homeopathy preventing Leptosperosis in Cuba in 2008. Do you have a link? It would be very very difficult to prove that homeopathy actually prevented any kind of outbreak. All you can show is that no outbreak occurred. By that logic, I could say the can of Coke I drank last week prevented me from catching Swine Flu this week because I don't currently have Swine Flu. That would be a 'post hoc ergo propter hoc' fallacy. If they have another means of proof I'd be interested to see a link to the study.

You speak of the 'yoke of the international pharmaceutical juggernaut' as if homeopathy is widely prevented from being used in most countries. I think you'll find you're sorely mistaken there. Homeopathy has extremely wide usage across the world, particularly in Europe, and more so all the time in North America. I can find homeopathic remedies in any pharmacy in my city. The only way homeopathy might be restricted is by agencies like the FDA which require treatments be scientifically proven to work before specific health claims can be advertised. Again, homeopathy simply has not met any reasonable standard of evidence.

Other proponents have been claiming homeopathy's wide usage as evidence of its effectiveness. You can't have it both ways.
 
Jesse Brydle
I realize no one is following this thread any more, but I have to take one more jab ;)

Darlene, you say "There is medical research that supports statistics that homeopathy works. A person needs an open mind to find it." Yes, and the emperor is wearing the most beautiful silk garments which are visible only to the most enlightened. The proponents of homeopathy in this thread keep assuring me that evidence exists, yet not a single link has been provided to an unbiased, properly controlled, peer reviewed source. Where is this evidence? Calling me closed minded is not going to cut it.

The Cochrane Collaboration is a volunteer group dedicated to analyzing existing scientific research and compiling meta-analyses to determine the overall findings of certain treatments. They are considered unbiased and accurate in professional circles. Here are their findings on homeopathy:
http://www.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab003803.html
http://www.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab000353.html
http://www.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab005648.html

Open minded does not mean you believe anything you see or hear. Open minded means you're willing to consider any evidence presented, and to align yourself with the most probable conclusion given by the best available evidence. By all means, I'm 100% open to your evidence, as long as it is of high quality (not anecdotal, not funded and reviewed only by practitioners). Don't tell me to go searching for it myself - I've done that and found nothing. I've given plenty of links to support my claims in this debate. Please, it's only reasonable to ask you to provide your own.
 
janz
From the moment you mentioned a wasp on the railings, then it changed to a bee sting and the hoeopathy saved her from...etc, I wasnt able to believe a further word said!
 
elmorunner
Lots of kids stop crying when you give them sugar, especially 30 minutes later.
 
homeo-mom
We've had terrific results using Homeopathy with our baby. She's never needed Tylenol. We don't use sugar pills, we use the purified water vials that hold the medicine. Specifically Camilia made by Boiron. She has no idea what it is we're giving to her, but she goes from screaming in agony from teething pain, to being happy and jovial within 10 minutes of receiving the medicine. Each and every time. It is the only medication she's ever received, and it has worked like a charm these last several months since her teething started. It gives me peace of mind that we're giving her something safe with no fears of recalls like Tylenol has had recently.
 
Leith
If it's the only medication she's ever received perhaps you could try a placebo and see if it has the same effect. I use Rescue Remedy on my pets so I'm not anti, I have an open mind, and test results. It could even be the attention, or caring response she receives that is the real medicine.
 
Tracy W
This is all the proof one should need. Homeopathy is not medicine.

http://www.1023.org.uk/the-1023-overdose-event.php
 
 
[Comments Disclaimer]
Post a comment
· Use your real name to have your comment considered for publication in print.
· URLs and email addresses will be automatically turned into links.