Fish biologist links fish farms to disappearing Fraser River salmon
A fish biologist with an environmental group has suggested that fish farms could be a contributing factor behind a stunning drop in the expected return of Fraser River sockeye.
Stan Proboszcz, who works for Watershed Watch Society, told the Georgia Straight there are three theories that could help explain why Fisheries and Oceans Canada has missed the mark on its forecast.
Ӣ Ocean temperature changes are affecting the food dynamics for juvenile sockeye on their way out to sea.
Ӣ Warming temperatures in the Fraser River are stressing juvenile salmon, which could have an impact on mortality.
Ӣ Salmon farms in Georgia Strait are infecting juvenile sockeye with sea lice.
“I’m sure it’s a combination of factors,” Proboszcz said.
He noted that a 2008 study by fisheries researcher Alexandra Morton demonstrated that juvenile sockeye salmon travelling near the Discovery Islands area off the east coast of Vancouver Island were infected with sea lice.
The study’s abstract noted that sample sizes were too low to support a formal statistical analysis.
“She sampled pinks; she sampled chums; and she sampled sockeye,” Proboszcz said. “This is where the discovery came about where she saw elevated levels of sea lice on sockeye.”
The peer-reviewed study appeared in the North American Journal of Fisheries Management, which is published by the American Fisheries Society.
"Watershed Watch is involved with the Raincoast Conservation Foundation and the Pacific Salmon Commission, and we’re following up on that sockeye research," he added. "We have some preliminary results that indicate the sockeye that migrate around the farms in Discovery Islands are indeed Fraser River stocks.”
Later this month, Fisheries Minister Gail Shea is heading a Fisheries and Oceans Canada delegation to an aquaculture conference, Aqua Nor 2009, in Norway. Critics say the federal government is in a conflict of interest as a promoter or aquaculture at the same time that it's regulating the industry.
Initially, the federal government expected six million to 10.6 million salmon to return to the Fraser River this year. According to Jeff Grout, regional resource manager-salmon, the government now expects between one million to 1.7 million to return.
In an interview with the Straight, Grout rejected any suggestion that fish farms could be a contributing factor behind the shockingly low returns.
“We certainly don’t have scientific evidence that suggests lice from the farms have caused the poor marine survival across all of our sockeye groups,” Grout said. “We have seen poor returns in the Skeena as well, and there aren’t any salmon farms situated along the migration routes there.”
He noted that his department forecast two million Skeena sockeye to return this year. “The accounting of the run is still going on there, but we’re expecting it to be probably just less than a million,” Grout said.
He pointed out that a couple of years ago, there were widespread poor returns across a range of species, including pink, coho, Chinook, and chum salmon.
“It appeared related to the year they went into the ocean,” Grout said. “There were very warm conditions. Plankton levels appeared to be low for the species”¦.We may have had warmer water predators moving up into that warm water.”
Proboszcz said Fisheries and Oceans Canada can’t do much about climate change, but it should stop denying the science concerning the impact of sea lice from fish farms on juvenile wild salmon. He described it as a “worldwide epidemic”.
“The science has been published over and over again in country after country after country,” Proboszcz said. “So we really need to seriously consider the negative effects of salmon farms in this situation. Removing the farms from the outmigrating areas would be a great start. It’s the easiest thing to do.”




Follow us on Twitter
Like us on Facebook
Comments
As to the Skeena, that is no river to compare anything by as there are enormous issues there. People who fish that river are furious with DFO over what they see as horrible mis-management on a host of issues.
As to the other species, well that remains to be seen, but each salmon species migrates to sea on different years, and lumping them is useless.
On the southwest corner of Vancouver Island the Somass River sockeye did not pass a salmon farm on their way to sea and they are returning at 2xs the number DFO forecast.
There is something very wrong here. Government is guessing, while ignoring the one factor we could fix and is causing EXACTLY this problem worldwide. Only a massive public voice will force government to see the salmon farm issue for what it is.
Please join 16,000 people in signing a letter to the MInister of Fisheries asking that the laws of Canada finally be applied to salmon farms at www.adopt-a-fry.org
Government climate interventionists are using the same method of sale as well...
Smart guy - knows the game.
All other species of salmon are returning to the Skeena in large numbers but my guess is the Fraser will see a huge loss to their Pink salmon run as well this year.
“In the case of Fraser River sockeye, since the closest salmon farm is over 110 kilometres away from the Fraser River's mouth, there is no opportunity for out-migrating Fraser River salmon fry to come in contact with farmed salmon during their critical early life stages and; therefore, no chance for sea louse transmission to occur,”
At least by blathering this nonsense, she is allowing us an opportunity to see how little she or her industry knows or cares about wild salmon.
Salmon have tails. Salmon swim. Salmon swim THOUSANDS of kilometers as smolts from their natal streams, past places as the Broughtons (as in the case of Fraser sockeye smolts) out to the Alaska gyre for between 1.5 years (pinks) to ~ 5 years (some chinooks) and back along the coast (which includes the Broughtons) to spawn and die.
Anyone who knows anything about salmon knows this (which apparently excludes Walling), and anyone who cares about wild salmon is concerned about this (again, excluding Walling).
http://www.phdcomics.com/comics.php?f=1174
Stop the hysterics... please just stop.
Anything that government touches seems to affect things to a huge degree.
I was up in the Bella Bella region fishing this past week and as a result of the closure to commercial fishing for herring this year I personally viewed anglers catching some of the largest Coho Salmon I have ever seen. One angler caught a 23 lb coho. I caught a 19 lb coho. The average catch was over 11 lbs. On previous trips a 15lb coho would have been considered a winner in our derby. This year a 23 pounder.
This goes to show you that when the fish have the adequate food supply then they get the chance to grow.
The funny thing is the 23 pounder wasn't even ready to head to the river, it had one more year to go.
Isn't it weird that all of them don't show up?
Is it possible that someone just got there and grabbed lots of them?
Do we check for these things or do we just assume that yes, my paper I wrote is correct so see? Do we do due diligence as well in every instance?
Thank you for the englightening information though and yes, it is a possibility to consider. But as a citizen I would like to see a thorough investigation that includes:
A) Sea Lice thresholds in relation to rising temperatures
B) Sea Lice thresholds in relation to farmed salmon
C) Maps of Ships in the area of the 'funnel'
D) A map of undersea radar activity and is there anything new there?
E) Seismic activity - Fish do know what goes on under the sea?
F) None of the above? What else?
Give us a picture, not just your paper.
Fact! - sea lice are found naturally on sockeye well before they swim near salmon farms.
Fact! - salmon farms are managed well for sea lice and are little risk to Pacific wild salmon (Pacific Salmon Forum final report).
Fact! - other species of wild salmon that swim in the same waters as the Fraser River sockeye have had great returns (Campbell River, Adam River, Eve River, Philips River, Haydon Creek).
Fact! - the Broughton Archipelago (you remember, that area that was supposed to see Pink salmon go extinct next year because of salmon farms) is having very good returns of Pink salmon. Huh?
Fact! - the closest salmon farm is 120 kms from the mouth of the Fraser River.
Fact! - just a few years ago the Fraser River had very good returns of sockeye...and the same salmon farms were operating then.
Fact! - some Fraser River stocks (there are several) have had good returns this year, some not. Why the difference? And why would a consistent like salmon farms only target one stock?
Fact! - the Skeena River had 50% of expected returns...it's north of salmon farms and these salmon would never come in contact with farms.
Fact! - South East Alaska has had terribly low returns of sockeye...no salmon farms (but they do "ranch" salmon which could be a factor).
Fact! - Northern Alaska has caught 15% more sockeye than they expected...geex, wonder where our salmon might have gone!
Kinda Fact! - This biologist (Stan Probowhuchumacallhim) gets paid by commercial fishing interest groups to slander salmon farmers.
Wow, that's a lot of fact! Too bad most people that read the Straight couldn't care less about fact, after all, why let fact get in the way of a good story eh?