Gwynne Dyer: Japan's August election is a revolution

Some years ago, a political science professor at a Japanese university told me that he reckoned you could fit everybody who counted in Japan into one room. There are about 400 of them, so it would have to be a ballroom. All but a couple would be men, of course—and at least half of them would be there because their fathers and grandfathers were in the same ballroom 25 and 50 years ago.

The Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) won a landslide victory in the election on August 30, sweeping the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) out after an almost unbroken 54 years in power, but it still must break that system if it is really going to change Japan. It won’t be easy.

Since the last elected LDP prime minister resigned three years ago, three other members have filled the job: Shinzo Abe, the grandson of a former prime minister; Yasuo Fukuda, the son of a former prime minister; and now Taro Aso, also the grandson of a former prime minister. And what about Yukio Hatoyama, the DPJ leader who will soon be the prime minister and promises to break the system? He is the grandson of the prime minister who defeated Aso’s grandfather.

The DPJ should end up with between 308 members in the 480-seat House of Representatives, which should be a majority big enough to crush all opposition, but it’s a bit more complicated than that in Japan. Not everybody in that small ballroom filled with the 400 people who matter is a politician.

Most of them are the businessmen who run the giant corporations that used to be called zaibatsu (the pre-Second World War industrial conglomerates) and the top layer of senior civil servants—all of whom have been in bed with the LDP all of their working lives. In Japan they call it the “iron triangle”: LDP faction leaders, senior civil servants, and industrial bosses, all working together to stifle change and keep themselves in power. It’s a hard combination to beat.

The one previous time in living memory when the LDP lost power—to a fragile coalition of opposition parties in 1993—the iron triangle immediately set to work to undermine and discredit the new government, and the LDP was back in power in 11 months. That isn’t going to happen this time, for three reasons.

1. The LDP has presided over another 15 years of economic stagnation, and people no longer link it with the boom years.

2. This time it is a single opposition party, ready to take over the government.

3. The recession is ending in Japan, although unemployment remains high.

Nevertheless, it will be a miracle if the Democratic Party of Japan can really change the country even with four undisturbed years in power.

About 15 years ago, when I was young and foolish, I spent a couple of months in Japan pursuing a single question: why was Japan the only developed country outside the Communist world that didn’t have a “Sixties”? (I had just finished a television series, which is the moral equivalent of living in a cave for two years, so I needed to get out a bit.)

Was there something unique in Japanese culture that insulated it from social and political trends elsewhere in the industrialized world? Why were Japanese people still so deferential, so hierarchical, so docile in the face of arrogant power and insolent corruption? Why was Japan, for all intents and purposes, a one-party state?

That was the question I went with, in my ignorance—but everybody in Japan knows the answer. Japan’s equivalent of the “Sixties” actually began in the 1950s, but it was ruthlessly crushed.

By the 1950s the Cold War was going full blast in Asia, and the United States was afraid that the youth revolution getting underway in Japan was the prelude to a Communist take-over. It probably wasn’t anything of the sort, but the U.S. was occupying Japan and so took action to stop it.

The old zaibatsu were allowed to rebuild, because that was the quickest way to get Japan back on its feet economically. Conservative politicians (including some war criminals) were encouraged to form a political party that received full American support, the LDP. And the government that emerged from this, with considerable help from its yakuza (gangster) allies, beat the kids’ revolt into the ground.

By the time the rest of the developed world had its Sixties, the battle had been fought and lost in Japan. During the half-century that followed, most people just kept their heads down and stayed out of trouble. It is still rare for ordinary people to discuss politics in Japan, even though the active repression ended a generation ago.

That is the system and the mindset that the DPJ must start to dismantle if Japan is to become a normal democratic country. The “iron triangle” will fight until the very last ditch to preserve the present system, however badly it has served the country. So the key question becomes: can the DPJ reach and take the last ditch in only four years?

Gwynne Dyer’s latest book, Climate Wars, was published recently in Canada by Random House.

Note: This article was originally published on August 25 and was updated on August 31 to take Japan's official election results into account.

Comments

4 Comments

Dyer Consequences

Aug 25, 2009 at 4:06pm

Gwynne, I like your use of war-based analogies to describe things. It turns a mundane topic into a theater of confrontational tactics thus imparting high drama. Do you have a military background or what?

Jib Halyard

Aug 25, 2009 at 11:39pm

It's refreshing to see a major commentator analyse the Japanese habit of conformism and deference without invoking the tired (and frankly racist) cliche of traditional culture as an explanation. Modern Japanese society is so shot through with despair and neurosis that it's obvious the straitjacket has been imposed artificially from above, rather than being some quaint cultural trait.
Let's hope your optimism is warranted, and that change is in the air. If it fails this time, it won't be because of genetics.

Wrye

Aug 28, 2009 at 11:25am

Of course, there are a lot of vested interests in Japan who want to convince people that it is a matter of genetics and culture, and whatever you do, don't look behind the curtain...

I do so like Dyer's stuff. He's one of the few journalists who actually seems to go and do research and then write about it like we're all reasonable adults.

petr

Sep 9, 2009 at 9:28am

still to an extent it is traditional.. Japan may not have had a 'sixties' but also - in the 19th century there were rebellions and uprisings in 1848 all over Europe because of the conditions that existed and the common people were starting to think for themselves and had seen revolutions like the French and American. Nothing of the sort existed in Japan. Japan modernized because Commodore Perry forced it to open up to the west and the Japanese realized how far behind they were. At the time the vast majority of people were peasants living under the Shogunate who had few rights and didnt expect any. Another point would be that historically they are a fairly large population living on a relatively small island - leading to their way of living harmoniously together maintained by a complex system of obligations to elders to superiors etc. which is quite alien to westerners that live in Japan. (I say this from some experience as I lived there for a year 18years ago). Values that are important are being part of a group and a strong work ethic, but not necessarily western or American values such as independence and self-reliance.. 'The nail that stands out gets hammered down' is a common saying.