Why do the arts matter?
As we enter a landmark arts season, severe provincial cutbacks are reminding people that culture is crucial
There’s an anecdote about Winston Churchill making the rounds lately. The story goes that during World War II, the British prime minister was asked by fellow politicians to shut down theatres and cultural institutions in order to save money. “What are we fighting for then?’’ his response is said to have been.
As we enter a new arts season, the province’s artists are facing severe budget shortfalls by way of cancelled gambling grants, decreased B.C. Arts Council support, and the prospect of an 89-percent cut in the province’s core arts-and-culture spending in the next two years. In response, the cultural community has been galvanized into action. But, as the Alliance for Arts and Culture’s executive director, Amir Ali Alibhai, points out, support from the general public is crucial if the province’s cultural sector is to survive: “We need to remind audiences that the reason they can have access to the work is because of the very generous core support provided by various levels of government.”¦We need to start that dialogue with the public, so that it’s not easy to see the arts as a frill or a luxury.”
To that end, the Straight asked a cross section of local people to channel their inner Churchill, and explain why the arts matter so much.
Jay Hirabayashi (executive director of Kokoro Dance):
“I think that most people take the arts for granted without really realizing how much it contributes to their quality of life. I think that everything—the clothes people wear, radio, television, newspapers—is coloured and influenced by the arts. And if there wasn’t that creative stream of artists feeding what we see all around us, it would indeed be like the grey square that we [protesters against the province’s cutbacks to arts funding] have adopted as the symbol of life without art.”
Jim Green (cultural and developmental consultant):
“Why do people go to Venice, Italy? Do they go there because they’re looking for a better Wal-Mart? They go there because the whole city is dripping in culture. Thirty-three percent of the economy of London, England, is based on arts and culture. When it comes to Vancouver, a lot of people who are not progressive in their thinking about tourism use the concept of the three Ms: mountains, moose, and Mounties.”¦But it’s not who we are. You can live in Vancouver and never see a moose in your life, but you can also go see Robert Lepage or you can go see Stan Douglas’s work or go to the Vancouver Opera. That is the calling card of cities.”
Barbara-Jo McIntosh (director of the board of the Cultch, and owner of Barbara-Jo’s Books to Cooks bookstore):
“What nurtures me is live performances of music and theatre.”¦It’s wonderful to watch a good movie and it’s wonderful to see a good TV program or something funny on YouTube or listen to a good record, but there’s nothing like being in the room where something live is being produced right in front of you, and you get to feel every aspect of it. I think it does integrate into your soul and make you a better person.”
Gregor Robertson (mayor of Vancouver):
“The arts are at the core of Vancouver’s identity and spirit. Beyond that, arts and culture are a huge economic driver here.”¦Particularly right now, with the 2010 Games coming, the world coming to Vancouver, it’s critical for our cultural sector to be ready and poised to break through on the world stage. That was part of our [Olympic] bid, and there’s an expectation that our artists will shine alongside our athletes. The cuts will make that much more challenging. They may undermine the work of many great organizations that are supporting artists and preparing to make a big splash in 2010.”
Adrienne Wong (artistic producer with Neworld Theatre):
“From a personal point of view, art helps me to figure out my wider philosophy about who I am and where I fit into society—as well as giving me an opportunity to see, even if only briefly, what it might be like to be someone else. And so in some ways, not to sound totally cheesy, practising art has become very spiritual for me. It serves the purpose that the church would have served, or schoolteachers would have served, when I was younger. It’s about just being aware of what it is to be an individual inside of a larger community, and the responsibilities of that.”
Marcus Youssef (artistic producer with Neworld Theatre):
“What happens in that moment in Grade 7 when the teacher says, ”˜Okay, we’re going to do improv?’ The bad kids suddenly become good, acting out suddenly becomes a good thing, and there’s a way of engaging and an excitement about people being together that doesn’t exist in the same way as when we’re doing a math class or we’re doing other things like that.”¦Arts and culture is a real, living, breathing industry which, like sport and education and medicine and social service, grows the economy, provides for families, pays taxes, and is an integral part of the majority of our lives.”
Yulanda Faris (arts philanthropist, chair of the Vancouver Opera Foundation, honorary chair of Judith Marcuse Dance Projects, and past president of the Vancouver Opera Association board):
“I think of how we teach in the very early years. We use song, we use dance, movement, storytelling, we read to our children. All the elements of what I consider the arts are the most effective methods of teaching. Studies prove that children that do not get that stimulation do not develop as well.”¦If it matters when you’re a child, it doesn’t matter any less when you’re an adult. It’s how you form a civil society.”
Dominic Lopes (philosophy professor and associate dean of arts at UBC):
“There’s no question that the arts bring tourists to town, that they generate all kinds of spinoffs.”¦We also get things from the arts personally; it’s consolation, for instance. [Henri] Matisse thought of the arts as providing a safe space for us from the trials and tribulations of life. At the same time, the arts provoke us. They challenge our basic assumptions.”¦But really, at the end of the day, the fact is that we couldn’t imagine our lives without the arts.”¦Anthropologists have found ornamentation in archaeological sites going back hundreds of thousands of years. The earliest paintings in Chauvet are 30,000 to 40,000 years old, and we have musical instruments that are that old. So the minute that we had minds that were sophisticated enough to make art, we used them to make art.”
Lukas McCormick (16-year-old member of the Cultch’s Youth Panel):
“Personally, life would be rather boring without the arts. There are so many opportunities for so many people to work and have fun doing it. I think it would be a tragedy without it. I’ve found the youth panel is an amazing opportunity just to get out there and have a chance to try all sorts of things.”
Cyrena Huang (Vancouver Academy of Music cello teacher):
“As a self-employed cello teacher, the funding cuts don't directly affect me. What they do affect is society’s attitude towards art, especially that of future generations. I don't want to live in a city without art. A city without art is a city devoid of humanity, and I don't care how pretty the mountains are.”



Follow us on Twitter
Like us on Facebook
Comments
He argued that the populations of the cities needed theatres and cinemas to help them have a little enjoyment amid the agonies of war.
There is a copy of a memo on the subject at the back of his WW2 memoirs.
He also argued with the transport planners to allow enough capacity on the trains to deliver flowers to the cities so that the ladies could be cheered up.
As an accomplished painter himself Churchill knew the value that the arts bring to a community.
I came across these nuggets whilst researching Churchill for a book I recently published called Churchill's Secret Skills.
http://www.straight.com/article-254046/bc-finance-minister-colin-hansens...
Fiona Bowie: Interesting link, but I would really like to the see the stats he cited in that video. If you could truly generate a 30% return on investment, then RBC, BMO, TD and Scotiabank and ever other firm on Bay Street would be throwing money at it like it's the biggest bar mitzvah in history. Even I'd take all my mutual funds out of my RRSPs and give it to the. To put that in perspective, Berkshire Hathaway, probably the best managed company in the world just recorded a 14% profit increase. I hate to say it, but there's no way that anyone's doubling that with government spending.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32335659/ns/business-earnings/
Suddenly, it is simply all right to exploit people. Whatever you think of that, it constitutes a radical change in philosophy which hasn't been addressed in any way.
http://www.straight.com/article-253877/confusion-bc-arts-council-grants-...
This might sound like a trite detail, but the government should make arts commitments directly through the Arts Council, instead of attempting to juggling around funds they don't have from departments that have no interest in dispersing them. In the end, it seems to constitute a bizarre, unintended arrangement where wealth is transfered from one group of largely economically marginalized citizens (gamblers) to another (artists). If they could balance their revenue and expenditures in the first place, they wouldn't be in this mess when it turns out there isn't enough money to foot the bills.
As for the idea of laundering money from immorality into morality... well... I think you're definitely onto something there. That's certainly an interesting, provocative and necessary idea that someone should explore -- I'll take a note from the Obama playbook and gladly admit that it's way above my pay grade.
Are casino-goers "economically marginalized"? I'm not aware of any studies to that effect.
However, I am aware of the BC government's own study that concluded for every dollar spent on grants through the BC Arts Council, between $1.05 and $1.36 was returned to the provincial treasury. I expect that this is largely due to the contribution of unpaid and underpaid labour by artists and cultural workers, which enables additional spending associated with grant-supported organizations and projects.
But none of that is "why the arts matter". It is simply one side or another of a rather petty argument that doesn't get at the core of the issue. The arts matter because they are part of what makes us human, part of what makes life more liveable, a means for social and political discussion to take place, a way for ideas to be communicated outside of the protocols and restraints of business or bureaucracy or authority, a means for us to viscerally understand the thoughts and feelings of others, an arena for celebration and for mourning and for things we cannot ourselves find the words to say.
And that is beyond the value of money. But without public support, less of us have access to the arts. Without public support, the arts will only be easily available to the very wealthiest among us. And that is why, I think, agents of social repression make the arts one of their first targets.
The one cause was unfortunate, the other dismaying.
http://www.orato.com/business-career/bc-government-cuts-20-million-for-art
That statement is kinda meaningless and obviously political. First of all, is that the average rate of return on a quarterly basis? yearly? every twenty years? every three hundred? It means nothing. But assuming it's yearly, the upper end of that rate of return is impossibly high. That's like Madoff-level returns. if you're making 36 cents for every dollar you invest per year, then you're beating the yearly dividend of Coca-Cola by more than 10 times, where you make about $1.60/year for every 50 or so dollars you invest. that's crazy. not right.
Yet, we persevere. We work two or three jobs at a time. We accept a lifetime of diminished economic achievement. We don't buy houses, we don't retire, we don't send our children to private schools. And, we buy each other's art, go to each other's performances, and teach each other's children (and everyone else's) how to explore the arts.
We're not asking for the people of BC to make us rich. We simply need it to be possible to continue. It's already a struggle. It always has been. The Province over-extended itself on the Olympics and we are paying the price for it. The Mayor is quite correct in his statement that this will not help our image during the Olympics.
If we lose our artists, the cost and time required to rebuild the base will be much greater than the cost of simply maintaining it. We are already losing our artists to Calgary, Edmonton and Toronto, where they can hope to make some kind of income. And, artists contribute to other industries besides the arts. We work in film, animation and video game design, three of BC's largest industries.
It's a stupid and short-sighted move, but a common one. The arts usually take the first hit.
If the Province needs to tighten its belt why are there still many examples of government waste? A recent example is the $1.5 million spent by crown corporations to buy tickets to Olympic events, or the fact that the Premier's office has increased its own budget from $2 million under the previous government to almost $20 million. How about the BC Rail fiasco? I could go on and on.
Yes, we are in a recession and many in the arts sector were anticipating some cuts. But the level of cuts (90% for BC Arts Council) is likely to devastate this sector.
The statistics that show a $1.36 return for every $1 spent are from the BC governments own ministry of Tourism, Culture and Arts. The study has since been removed from their website in what I suspect is an attempt to obfuscate the issue in the public's mind. While it may seem counter-intuitive to believe that the arts is a net revenue generator the governments own economists have shown that it is. Since this is coming from a fiscally conservative party with a neoconservative bias, what reason is there to doubt these studies?
It makes no sense to cut the arts to this extent. The Province does have to tighten its belt and its perfectly reasonable to expect some cuts. But the real problem is not that the Province is broke, it's that the Arts a not a priority for the Provincial Government.
That is not the same as a direct investment where the investor gets a direct return. Taxes don't work that way.
Do you work for the PAB under your real name? Is this part of your strategy now, to remove the source material and then spread misinformation about it, so that nobody can argue about the actual contents, since your bosses directed that it be removed from circulation? That's sad, very sad.
What I find most interesting is that the BC Liberal shills who post on this subject are unable to address the question "why do the arts matter?" Or even, more appropriate to their attitude and demeanor, "why we think the arts don't matter". They are only capable of spreading irrelevancies, propagating straw man arguments, and making fools of themselves.
I am not political and can only speak from opinions based on the theatre I have seen in my Canadian city.
I want to ask some questions.
1. In the states the arts is a huge money maker. Why isn't Canada? (please try to answer this question as unbiased as possible)
2. A lot of people made comments like "art is part of the human condition. we need it to survive" Of course we do. Art in itself is imagination and creativity. we don't need money to create that. We need money from that so that we can live on the creativity and not have to waitress all the time. So it is up to us to make our art as reachable as we can in order to connect with the public endear them and make them want "need" more.
3. Why are so many people on these comments saying people need the arts in Canada. Nobody cares for it. When I do shows half the seats are filled unless it's at a suave center where the seats are populated by sixty plus. The young generation doesn't like theatre. Why are we telling them they do? Why are we telling them what they should or should not like? Art is stimulating. But then why are so many of the young generation bored? Because they are stupid? Because they are trashy? Why? Could it be that maybe we are giving them what WE THINK they want?
Art is necessary BUT it is a responsibility. A responsibility to please to enlighten to stimulate. If Canadian art in not capable of doing it to the masses and just to the wealthy and city bohemians, why should tax payers who live in the suburbs and never get to see anything because there is no theatre or what not. (my mother a nurse would love to see plays at the big theatre in her area but can't because it's simply too expensive)
I am an artist in three mediums and will never give it up. I never get paid very much for what I do and still do it. Thing is we have to stop wining and make a difference. a lot of the theatre I see in my (well known) city is not very good. even the best centers. I hate to say it (and it isn't just me I can assure you) Maybe we have to ask ourselves why we make art. For ourselves? Or for the world.
Please answer my question. Don't be angry with my feelings. Enlighten me PLEASE!!!!! I find there is a lot of snobbery in the arts and I don't understand how such people can create pieces that appeal to the majority. So prove to me you aren't a snob and answer me why we deserve money to put imagination on paper, with out being condescending.
AND WHY DO WE GUILT TRIP THE PUBLIC INTO SEEING OUR ART? IT DOESN'T WORK. (The whole "it is important that you support the arts"...no one knows it exists, so if it died no one would miss it. To make money by putting your "feeling" on paper or in body is to be very fortunate because every single one of us has "feeling" only few can survive by just tapping into it. And people retiring to the tv... maybe tv is better. Is it?
"feeling" Means a whole assortment of things that make us able to muse channel the "This is what I have to say" stuff
I want to reach the public through the art not through the importance of it. ...?
Maybe I am wrong.
WOULD TENNESSEE WILLIAMS NEED GOVERNMENT SUPPORT? if yes, I might change my mind...