Yesterday evening, the monthly Critical Mass cycling ride in Vancouver chose to cross the Granville Bridge.
I'm not one of those who gets into a froth when hundreds of cycling anarchists take over the streets on the final Friday of every month.
But I was confounded by the choice of the Granville Bridge.
The City of Vancouver is encouraging drivers to go over the Granville Bridge to help ensure that the Burrard Bridge lane-reallocation trial is a success.
Cyclists have enjoyed having a safe, grade-separated lane to themselves while travelling southward over the Burrard Bridge to Kitsilano; they also have the east sidewalk to themselves while riding northward to downtown via the Burrard Bridge.
Enough cars have been diverted to the Granville Bridge to prevent Burrard from becoming jammed with traffic.
Lo and behold, Critical Mass decides to block Granville Street, infuriating some drivers who had chosen this as an alternative route out of downtown.
How dumb is that?
When the drivers choose Granville, it ultimately benefits cyclists.
This city needs bike-only lanes in many more areas than the Burrard Bridge. If this cycling trial is deemed a success, it will increase the likelihood of more cycling-only lanes being created in the future.
Last night, Critical Mass didn't help the cause of the city's cyclists--and particularly those commuter cyclists--who are desperate for safe routes into the downtown core.
Maybe next time Critical Mass's lead rider does something stupid, the rest can prove how independent-minded they are by cycling in a different direction.




Comment (46)
Comments
But then again, they don't really have a goal other than organizing a "fun" bike ride to piss everyone off.
Critical Mass has no intention of advancing the cyclist rights or creating awareness. They're a bunch of childish attention seekers who only exist to taunt and antagonize.
I live in an area that happens to be part of their route for almost all of their Friday rides. They go out of their way to get in people's faces knowing that they have power in numbers.
Idiots, yes. Surprise? Hello no!
A select few drivers will be infuriated regardless of where the mass goes. What they refuse to do is wise up and pay close enough attention to local media which will inevitably warn them of the monthly event and thus allow them to take a different route out of town. It's really not that difficult people.
While I am sure there are some people who are genuinely in a hurry to do something worthwhile - the bike ride is only once a month. It seems a little ridiculous to get in a snarl about it.
Besides when you use transit - being late and stressed is a fact of life - thanks to the cars that clog downtown so much that it takes an hour for the bus to cross from one end of the peninsula to the other.
Cars jam up the roads every day - but cyclists do it once a month and it is a big hairy deal? Give me a break.
I strongly support a more bike friendly community and Critical Mass is virulently counterproductive to that effort. Taking a small group of people who agree with the goal of a bike friendly city, and using that small group of people to piss off a much larger group of people is absolutely destructive to the cause.
After being illegally bullied daily off the majority of roads in the region by careless and reckless motorists, surely you can let cyclists enjoy riding in safety on the public streets, which are hogged by drivers, for a couple of hours a month.
How about caring about future generations for a moment?
I timed how long it took critical mass to pass one of the intersections on Granville street on Friday. It was just under 3 minutes.
Is waiting 3 minutes that big of a deal?
To the sheep:
I just wanted to say, on behalf of those who know what Critical mass is about, "f*ck you and the mode of transportation you came in on! Get mad, pull your hair out, and then bend over...and just hang on to something while we slowly slide our greasy crank-shafts in your arsses. Your from vancouver, you should be used to taking it in the rear and just turning the other cheek (pun intended). After all, you have had the Liberals taking away everything that makes this city more than just another village (arts, culture, and all the intelligence that results from them). Don't blame us for acting stupidly, blame yourselves, it's your own damn faults that we have nothing left to stimulate our imaginations, our intelligence, and to take up our time.
I have tried to attend critical mass since its inception. Not because it is so much fun (which it is), but because IT'S A PROTEST!! I know you have never seen a protest in your lives, but they tend to be disorganized and tend to have mob mentalities. Honestly...who's truly stupid here... All those who are stupid enough to go near downtown on their cars between 6pm and 10pm on the last Friday of the month deserve to get stuck. Oh, that's right, I forgot you live in a happy little bubble where everything is perfect. Get your head out of the sand once in a while and learn about the current events in your community. As for where we get the time? You have no excuse, either you waste time at work (causing you to work late), you hate your family, or you are just slow and so what does it matter if we slow you down a little more. Critical mass attracts families too, so you can't use that as an excuse for not being free on a Friday night after 6pm!
Cars are dead. The days of plentiful gas are on the way out. Hybrids and other 'environmentally' friendly vehicles put tons of toxic heavy metals into the environment. You didn't really think that Li-Ion batteries were the solution, did you? What the heck do you thinks inside of them, magic unicorn farts?
Stop being so damn lazy, get on a bike. Enough of this B.S.
And as a side note, if I hear one more whine from car drivers about how they pay for the roads and such I'll F&^king scream.
Private automobiles are more heavily subsidized than public transit.
Private automobiles are also responsible for a large portion of health care costs both in vehicular accidents and hospitalizations due to pollution.
Stop being selfish, park the hulk, and get a bike!
Critical Mass does not represent cyclists. In fact very few real cyclists that ride every day of the year - rain or shine - involve themselves in the event. (It is hardly a ride). Come the first drop of rain you won't see any of these fair weather whimps on the streets. They will be hiding like scared children indoors, on buses or more than likely in theirs or someone elses' cars.
Check your facts, Charlie. I love your passion, but not when it's baseless. Simply check http://vancouver.ca/projects/burrard/statistics.htm to confirm that "Vehicle volumes on the Granville Bridge have remained steady."
As predicted by many, traffic volumes on neither Burrard nor Granville have changed. Old habits die hard, and a close look at the cycling numbers will show you scant change there as well, so far, except for those heady first few weeks of the trial. Only time will tell, and we all hope the trial continues.
The important point is that cycling in Vancouver got measurably safer with this trial, and Critical Mass is also focussed on the well-established truth that cyclists are much safer in numbers.
May every rush hour someday see city-wide Critical Masses, Amsterdam-style, only behaving in a Critical Manners way. Traffic congestion in Vancouver, such as it is, would disappear.
Charlie, do not fall prey to Vancouver's adrenalized journalism; keep telling it Straight, and thank you for your advocacy for more separated bike lanes.
Rod Smelser
I wrote a story in August that showed vehicular traffic was down on Burrard Bridge since the experiment began, and up on the Granville Bridge. You can read it here.
Meanwhile we get so many "happy honks" waves, cheers and high fives from motorists and pedestrians it is heartwarming to know we are making a positive contribution towards cycling and sustainability. Those who feel that Critical Mass is counter-productive must be getting their information from the sensationalist media, always eager to find outrage and disension to sell their stories. Come out to the ride and find out for yourself.
I reposted Jeff's comments because they could apply to Crittical Mass. Or they could equally apply to our culture's car dependence which takes away so many of our freedoms.
All those cars spewing planet-killing pollutants and maiming innocent bystanders is a serious poke in the eye. But there's no political will to stop this thing.
If it ever got to the point where the CM looked like it was taking aim at the Port Mann Bridge or the Golden Ears Bridge (latter I've not ever been over, but anyway) we would be on to that story right away! That would be a story with some bite.
Would I or Charlie Smith be upset? Can't speak for CS, but that's a leading question that seems somewhat bizarre. I mean, I'd be so UN-upset from a journalistic point of view because this would be something of an undertaking and readers would dig the story. Can you imagine, as a cyclist, starting the process of "corking" (where cyclists bunch at intersections and exits etc to allow safe passage of snaking bikes) to facilitate the mass crossing of cyclists over the Port Mann, going eastbound during afternoon rush hour? Can you imagine former Surrey mayor Doug McCallum's face as he reads in the Surrey Leader that these cyclists (INCLUDING BOB BOSE?!?) have stormed across the Fraser? Dianne Watts would have a lot to say too I'm sure.
Keep on rockin' in the free world Rod.
This is why I stopped going on these rides, because while there may be an expression of free will they hardly qualify as intelligent, positive protest.
Incidentally, the CM ride often goes across the granville bridge and the burrard bridge, why is this any different, unless you're one of those who begrudge giving up one lane one a 6 lane bridge to cyclists.
We want cities without private automobiles. It's entirely possible (look at examples at http://carfree.com)
CM will end when there's no need to have such rides. That day will be when every street looks like a critical mass ride.
Get with the program, Charlie. You sound a little out of touch for someone whom I know has a high degree of environmental sensibility.
=====================================
Matt, my point is that you and Charlie have been adamantly opposed to any increase in capacity at Port Mann regardless of the need as expressed in traffic counts. The implicit value judgement is that the cars and trucks using that crossing are doing so frivolously and irresponsibly and therefore need not be further accommodated through the provision of additional lanes.
But when it comes to Granville Street, your paper thinks it's "idiotic" of cyclists to interefere with the vehicles there for all of about a half hour.
Rod Smelser
You 'riders' aren't trying to make any point, you are just unemployable and jealous of those of us who have a contribution to make to this world. Here's a thought, get a job. Go plant trees or something...you are giving real cyclists like me a bad name.
The only bridge that I think is dumb is the Lion's Gate as it blocks the only route to the Northshore, through the whole Stanley Park corridor without having much of an impact as few people can even tell what is going on.
Good one critical mass. So should the owners of cars, lots that ride their bike consistantly, all decide the last friday of the month to keep their bikes at home and all take their cars? No, because that's stupid and cars don't have anything to prove like cyclists do. Maybe the vehicles can also block off the streets so no bikes and pedestrians can get through. Like you said, we are all traffic, so suck it up and ride your bike, your car, the bus, whatever, like a normal human being does.
PS I hope someone maces your arrogant face and you ride by.
Most in the mass are not confrontation nor belligerent. I think most are making a point about cycling, and enjoying the ride which is amazingly safe, pleasant and fun.
If you're trying to move 500 people in a reasonable time with minimal delay, 1 lane doesn't work. If you actually count how many people are moved in a minute by the mass vs. in regular traffic, I bet it's pretty similar. We are traffic, and when critical mass of traffic needs to proceed, suitable road capacity should be able to be used.
Having done the Critical manners ride too where everything is how the law dictates (single file, bike lane only), it is ridiculously slow and we actually cause more car and bike traffic jams. Please it was much less safe than even the regular ways I ride. Current traffic rules scale very poorly with more bikes.
All cycling goes through season changes, and the mass is no exception.
Change has to come; everybody knows it. Most people just don't want to live it. If i lived in Vancouver i'd be riding with the CM ride every time i could.
i ride - everyday for 25+ years and have never felt a need to do a cm thing - i don't get it - the roads are far safer than they have ever been - and now i have so many cars getting out of my way by hitting reverse it is amazing - that never happened before - i mean never. ya'll should have been out there with me 25+ years ago when it was dangerous - dude WOW was it dangerous - i could never go a day without a major incident -
and now, because cars have learned to share the road, and be patient, you know like wait 5 seconds for the bike instead of just cutting them off - i honestly have - maybe 2 -3 incidents a year - as opposed to 2 -3 incidents a DAY.
ya'll need to take a chill pill and be happy with how far this had come, and i guarantee it is not because of you, it is in spite of you.
then again - i avoid streets at all cost - i would rather deal with a old lady shaking her cane at me than a road raged psycho macho dude driving a 5000 lb machine looking for something to pancake.
i don't use the streets - if i did, i would be dead.
....maybe that's the point here.....
might be.....