The Miracle Worker is impressive but incomplete

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      By William Gibson. Directed by Meg Roe. A Playhouse Theatre Company production. At the Vancouver Playhouse on Thursday, October 15. Continues until October 31

      There’s some beautiful work—and there are some big holes—in the Playhouse production of The Miracle Worker.

      William Gibson’s play, which began as a 1957 teleplay and premiered on Broadway in 1959, shows us the first weeks in the relationship between Helen Keller, who was deaf and blind, and her teacher, Annie Sullivan. Annie was 20 when she first met six-year-old Helen on the Keller homestead in Alabama in 1888. Annie taught the isolated child how to communicate, and it’s impossible to stay dry-eyed during the breakthrough scene in which Helen discovers language.

      At many points the play is thin, however, and requires charismatic performances from both its leads to stay engaging. In the second act, Annie takes Helen to a remote summerhouse to teach her without her family’s interference, for instance, and, if their interactions aren’t nuanced and heartfelt, there’s little to watch.

      On opening night, 11-year-old Margot Berner played Helen. (She alternates the role with Emma Grabinsky.) Berner is fantastic. Fearless. In her hands, Helen’s disabilities feel real and the character’s considerable depth of emotion rings true.

      But The Miracle Worker is really Annie’s story, and Anna Cummer, who plays that part, is less successful. Under Meg Roe’s direction, Cummer’s Annie is so relentlessly determined from the first time we see her, that her rigidity becomes a straitjacket. In this production, Annie is stripped of warmth and humour. It’s not that Cummer is incapable of showing vulnerability; when Annie finally cracks, it’s touching, but until then the character’s containment is so successful that Cummer’s performance is reduced to one shrill note. Because Cummer shows her chops when she’s finally allowed to, Roe seems to be the culprit here.

      Jennifer Clement’s portrait of Helen’s mother Kate is beautifully multicoloured—steel-willed, politic, playful. And Ryan Beil gives Helen’s half-brother James a surprising—and pleasing—hard edge of bitterness.

      Allan Stichbury’s set design is a stunner. Half-walls of a huge white house that appears to be made of paper float over the playing area. The design speaks to ennui, lack of definition, loneliness, even as it evokes a transcendent possibility. Stichbury and Roe use a revolve, a choice that expedites the play’s many transitions and adds to the sense that, for Helen, the physical world is unreliable.

      With its pastoral ochres and chilling blues, John Webber’s dramatic lighting complements the palette of Sheila White’s elegantly simple costumes.

      Roe and her company have worked hard on a moving play that can also be simplistic and sentimental. The results are impressive, but incomplete.

      Comments

      4 Comments

      Zhe Demoe

      Oct 19, 2009 at 2:17pm

      Would it be possible for the critics in this town to observe a moratorium on the use of the word "chops" ? Perhaps they could agree to reserve it for plays about butchers or lumberjacks. I am so sick of this ugly, hackneyed, overused, affected and unnecessary metaphor. Acting chops, vocal chops, has the chops required... how about just <i>she can act, sing</i> etc. etc.

      sleepwalker

      Oct 20, 2009 at 4:27pm

      As usual Colin you're off the mark. I've seen the show twice now and I think its the best theater this town has seen in a while. Everything about this play is rather remarkable, acting, casting, directing, set deisgn, music design. I think what Meg Roe has done with this classic is pure genious.

      theatre snob

      Oct 22, 2009 at 6:50pm

      I couldn't agree more, Colin. I despised being yelled at by Annie/Anna all night. Although,I am not sure who is at fault. I found all the other performances, sets, music, costumes wonderful. Such a shame that the lead performance was so annoying...except for the final moment.

      Raoul

      Nov 2, 2009 at 5:42pm

      Huh? I must have seen a different show. I thought Ms Cummer was outstanding and I thought her choices made complete sense because she's deaf, so she can't hear how loud she is, and she has to learn that, which she does by the end. It made total sense to me. I've seen this actor before and she I thought she did a brilliant job. I found her very believable and authentic.