What's the secret of Stephen Harper's success? Assume voters are stupid

Henry Louis Mencken once wrote: "No one in this world has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people. Nor has anyone ever lost public office thereby."

I sometimes wonder if Prime Minister Stephen Harper has taken this quotation to heart.

You could see it during the 2008 federal election campaign when he derided the Liberal Green Shift as a gas tax. The media and the public  ate it up rather than subjecting  Harper's claims to serious scrutiny.  

The Conservatives' contempt for  voters' intelligence was also on display when the party distributed images of a  puffin crapping on the shoulder of then-Opposition leader Stephane Dion.

Here are  six examples over the past week in which Mencken's comment appears to be guiding Conservative actions:

* Harper and Environment Minister Jim Prentice refused to acknowledge the urgency of global warming on the eve of important climate-change negotiations in Copenhagen next month. They didn't seem too bothered by a new report from the Global Carbon Project. Based on  the latest study on carbon-dioxide emissions,  the report  suggested that global temperatures could rise by an average of 6 ° C by the end of the century.

* Harper's defence minister, Peter MacKay, smeared senior diplomat Richard Colvin for telling a special Commons committee on Afghanistan that he sent a blizzard of e-mails warning about the torture of Afghan detainees after they were turned over to Afghan captors in 2006 and 2007. On November 20, Foreign Affairs Canada and the Department of National Defence stated that future witnesses "will provide important context and information about this issue". NDP foreign affairs critic Paul Dewar correctly interpreted these messages as an attempt to intimidate witnesses to toe the government's line as well as a way to subvert Commons hearings. Harper probably thinks the masses won't pay sufficient attention to this issue  to recognize the magnitude of his government's outrageous conduct.

* Harper met an Indian movie star, Akshay Kumar, on a trip to Mumbai in a cheap attempt to win South Asian votes at the same time as Citizenship and Immigration Minister Jason Kenney is cutting the number of refugees by more than half next year.

* The Conservatives had the gall to distribute a pamphlet in ridings with large numbers of Jewish voters claiming that Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff was no friend of Israel even though a former Liberal government listed Hamas and Hezbollah as terrorist organizations over the objections of many Canadians of Arab descent.

* Finance Minister Jim Flaherty released a draft code of conduct for the credit and debit card industry that did not include any controls over interest rates charged by the issuers of these cards. It's hard to see how these proposed rules would have any impact on the amount of  interest  that consumers fork over to the banks, but it gives the Conservatives a chance to claim that they're doing something about credit cards.

* Flaherty gave another speech about the $50-billion-plus budget deficit in which he failed to acknowledge that Conservative military policies will have a tremendously negative  long-term effect on government finances. Estimates of the cost of the Afghan war have exceeded $20 billion (including the cost of rehabilitation for veterans of the conflict).

In all of the examples listed above, Harper appears to be assuming that most voters are stupid or, at the very least, that  they're not paying attention.

Clearly, the prime minister is, in the words of Mencken, not under the impression that he will lose his public office by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people.

Wouldn't it be wonderful if one day, the great masses of the plain people proved Harper wrong.

Comments

low self esteem
I suspect a lot of Canadians are well aware that they are being pillaged but they are just too insecure and downtrodden to do anything about it.
 
Barry O
Actually, PMSH just assume cranky writers from flaky left wing west coast rags are stupid.

Look in the mirror dufus. It will be painful but educational for you.
 
NoNameCS
Niiice, Barry O. You know, instead of calling people names, maybe the Conservative Party could try and engage two brain cells to mount, ooooh, what do we call those again... right, an "argument".

You should try it sometime. It's not as easy as calling people "dufus" or "stupid", but you'll see that with practice, it may bring you far enough on the path to civilization that you'll be able to leave your mom's basement. Maybe.
 
Patsplace
I think that it is you that assume that Canadians are stupid. To swallow the swill that you put out as informed journalism should require stupidity as a requirement for reading it.
 
trout
Harper is a lot more like the Shah of Iran than a legitimate Canadian Prime Minister.
Let's face it, Canadian rules no longer apply because that's not where we live now.
 
Sandy
Chuck:
Get over yourself, If anybody treats voters as morons or stupid, it is the Liberal Party of Canada, the most corrupt, arrogant, and incompetent nincompoops who unfortunaley until Harper came along, taxed and spent Canadians into oppression,

Chuck quit being a Liberal stooge, and get with the program

I am thankful for evry day that Canada is free of Liberal tyranny , and Liberal Corruption
 
Sean John
And telling the electorate 'we have to tax you because the world is going to end in 10 years' is what? Telling them a gun registry makes their life safer is what? There are just as many examples of comtempt for voters from the Libs. The whole 'raison d' etre' for socialism is to 'take care of the people because their are not capable to taking care of themselves'.
 
Fed Liberal = Fed Con
Vote NDP
 
Guybrush Threepwood
Some questions:

-When did Harper call the Green Shift a Gas Tax? A citation with a date and medium would be nice.

-If the puffin was part of a strategy personally devised by Stephen Harper that assumed Canadians were stupid, why on earth would it have been pulled, and apologised for, within hours of it going up?

-How are you trying to relate South Asian vote pandering to cutting refugees? There's no conflict here. The Sikh voters that he's playing to are not known for being refugee claimants. You'll never see Harper buttering up the refugee vote - theres no inconsistency here. You're trying to conflate refugees with immigrants (and immigration is rising in Canada).

-How do the actions of the Liberal Party in 2002 in any way relate to the claim that Michael Ignatieff is not a friend of Israel? Seriously. This is a massive non sequitur that you should be ashamed of. Its on the level of "The Conservatives say that Michael Ignatieff is not a friend of Israel, but they fail to point out that George W. Bush is." Or "The Conservatives claim that Michael Ignatieff is not a friend of Israel, but puppies are cute!"

-Flaherty's rules had nothing to do with interest rates. Nobody said they would. He was examining competition in the processing industry, and finding ways to help merchants. Nobody except you is saying this has anything to do with consumer interest rates. Why should it?

-The effect of a $20bn war spread out over 10 years is not "tremendously negative" or "long term", relative to a $50bn deficit. In fact, its so small to not be worth mentioning. Which it wasnt.
 
ak88
By the author's own logic if voters are "stupid" enough to buy Stephen Harper's propaganda then they should also lap up Mr. Smith's own baseless rhetoric because this article amounts to a similar, unpremised, attack.
The only difference being this article coming from the other side of the spectrum. There is still no argument only unpremised assumptions about the Conservative's motives.

For shame Charlie for assuming that your readership is stupid.
 
Jean Naimard1
Conservatives appear more popular, but in reality, they are not, as they only got less than 40% of the votes. And if you factor the abysmally low participation rate of the last general election, it dwindles to less than 20% of the electorate.

Granted, the liberals are lame, and they still haven't understood their lesson that electors really don't like to be taken for stupid (which also explains the less than 20% effective popularity rate of the CRAP*).

Following the next election, which is going to yield yet another minority government (thanks to federal parties for ignoring Québec which then votes Bloc en masse), watch the progressives (NPD+grits+Bloc) effectively do a coalition to push aside the CRAP*.

* Canadian Reform Alliance Party.
 
Morty
Sandy: Responsible taxation is not the same as tyranny, and the Conservative party, from the 1867 railway scandal through the entire provincial government of Grant Devine to the attempt to bribe Chuck Cadman and the in-and-out scam, has shown itself far more capable of corruption than the Liberals. The Liberal party, like the Democratic party in the U.S., has demonstrated its ability to manage the country effectively (and if you think the Conservatives have done a better job, you'll have to provide evidence because there's none that's obvious). The Conservatives, like the Republicans, have demonstrated only an ability to convince people to vote against their self-interest.
 
Hazlit
There is a difference between stupid voters and stupid readers. Most readers are NOT stupid. Most voters ARE.

Certainly if Stephen Harper is presuming that voters are stupid he's doing something clever. He's certainly smarter than Bush who assumed everyone was as stupid as he was.
 
Mr Perfect
Climate change is always happening. It was snowing today in Banff, raining in Vancouver and it was a beautiful day in Cape Breton. Copenhagen is a meeting of a bunch of people who think they can control the weather all over the world. Its crap I tell you.
 
Surecure
Harper assumes the public is stupid? I thought that was the credo of the Liberal party. After all, the only thing they have to do is suggest a "hidden agenda" offering no proof whatsoever and the public quivers in their boots as if they also believe the boogeyman is real.

Ever since the Conservatives got into power, fair and logical political discourse seems to have gone the way of the dodo. Instead, now all we see are endless attempts by the other parties to create scandals (all of which have fizzled down to their base element: nothing) and hoping the public is too stupid to notice that their version of alternatives is simply to say, "We're not them."

Harper thinks the public is stupid? I think you're looking at the wrong guy.
 
Suspicious...
since when were there this many Steven Harper supporters reading the GS?
 
Non Voters are Stupid
If we did a study of those who did not vote, it would be young people, the poor, working poor and Natives...if they voted for the party that would protect their interest the NDP they would kick some 'LIB-CON'S" gluteus maximus, and perhaps we would see some progress in this country for the people, the "CON-LIB"S", are one of the same...democracy is all messed up, the elites laugh at us and play us big time...Mandatory voting I am sure we would see radical change in our political system...Greens...love your enviromental message, but your the same, hook up with the NDP, if you reaally care about the enviroment...scare the old boys network...and actually wield some power...it's all messed up...but hey this is "democracy"...Students look out, if you have any political backbone, beyond what's in and not, your going to get your respective gluteus maximus's kicked, as tuition will go up like california, I suspect your student unions are too busy organizing donut/music fest for you...But you get what you deserve...all you individuals!
 
Stryder
It is a given that out of 33 million people there is going to be, to put it bluntly some truly stupid people. For instance take a few weeks ago Mr. Harper played the piano and in spite of him doing all the things mentioned in the above articles and as we know much more, his approval rating actually jumped 2 points. As far as I can see it seems to be as much as 20-30 percent of the population that is to one degree or another intellectually challenged.
 
Two Party System
I think it's time to start the Bloc in BC. Then maybe we would return to a representative democracy and not face the ridiculous dilemma necessitated by choosing the lesser of two evils. At any rate, it'd sure be nice to see both Harper's face and Dion's when ANYone else wins the next erection.
 
Reality
Hidden agenda, soldiers in our streets, the end of same sex marriage and the right to choose, health care destroyed, he pocketed the wafer and put the cpc logo on our Olympic team.

Harper is evil. Look at all of the proof I just gave you.

Stupid people, can't you see the truth!
 
TJC
to Guybrush Threepwood: gas tax info- Tories pounce on Liberal carbon tax

James Cowan, National Post Published: Monday, May 12, 2008

Read more: http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=510317#ixzz0XhaNVnAk

 
bluetech
-"Harper and Environment Minister Jim Prentice refused to acknowledge the urgency of global warming on the eve of important climate-change negotiations in Copenhagen next month"
In light of the info all over the net wrt Hadley e-mails( that MSM has chosen to ignore), perhaps Prentice will now declare that AGW is a scam.
This blog post in itself assumes readers and voters are stupid. Why reference the Hezbollah situation without clarifying that Liberal Party members happily joined an Hezbollah March, complete with flags of the terrorist group?
 
Chris Brown
Intimidation now works in Canada. The strategy of the right is based on numbers, setting the less educated against the more educated. Demographics make it a winning strategy, as long as they stick to lies for which they know there is an audience. Lots of people are hurting, afraid, and easily manipulated because of a narrow perspective. The right is going after these voters, and getting them.

Perhaps Neanderthals were the collaborative nice guys, and they were killed off by gangs of homo sapiens led by bullies like Jason Kenny and Peter Mackay.
 
George T. Baker
Apathy is the appetite that is rarely quenched by politicians. Today's politician is not a "facts man" he is a "winning team man", and therefore is not concerned about whether he is performing well, but rather is he re-electable? Rightfully so, his Oiliness is on a path to a majority government and Canadians will either move with this right wing push or they will just move.


Ugh!
 
J
LETS ALL VOTE GREEN NEXT ELECTION
 
bytemylobster
Mr Harper is so popular because he is from Calgary (next neighbourhood to me), is not an old-fart, has a nice looking family, and learned French.

Terry Noble/Saltchuk
 
Hey J
Your Stupid, The Greens have absolutely no chance of having even an inkling of influence, They should fold into the NDP, stay as an International Non-governmental Organization, and work against the LIB-CONS, and still then we can only likely get another minority government, where the NDP having more influence.
 
greggron
Bunch of whinging leftists losers...nothing you can do but cry. Your movement is dead and you will never taste power again. Yes, you are bitter. It is eating you up inside. Global warming is now a proven fraud. Canada has taken control of its borders. Canada is now for Canadians. Foreign leeches and liberal academics are despised. Sad time to be a lib/leftist. But you truly deserve it for the damage you wrought on this country over the last 30 years.
 
Hey greggron
your stupider than J...not even worthy of comment beyond this.
 
Susaan
Mencken also furnished us with
“It is Hell, of course, that makes priests powerful, not Heaven, for after thousands of years of so-called civilization fear remains the one common denominator of mankind”
and
"The cynics are right nine times out of ten."

Charlie:
1) It may be social and economic suicide for Canada to sign on to Copenhagen without firmly shadowing a US approach. We do want leadership but we shouldn't be lemmings just to prove we are morally superior.
2) Andrew Coyne's latest in McLeans clearly differs from your take on the 10%ers mailed into jewish concentrated ridings. The tone may be harsh, he says but it is factual any way you look at it. Context is not just for what you personally believe or wish were true.
3) Richard Colvin, according to released documents to the Globe today suggest that Colvin has plenty more to answer for in his judgements given that he spent less than half a day outside safe confines during his entire tour. Evidently seeing a book of matches on the ground doesn't necessarily mean someone burned the house down.
 
Harper Signs
If he agreed to Copenhagen Treaty, I wonder what his base in Alberta would do, when he has shut down all that very dirty oil production? This should be a good one to watch, how much is Harper willing to undermine Canada's image in the world so that he can stay in power?

OMG...if he did sign, then we end up getting all their population migrating here and be stuck with a Campbell like guy forever...ohhh the world of politics!
 
Wake Up and Smell the Deceit
Because its all around and be afraid, very afraid because governments are counting on a misinformed public which ha ha the voter pays for as billions end up in the pockets of advertisers. Its something the Cons picked up from the Libs, its not what you say or do that counts but on how many ads and commercials you can get out there because you get the media on your side and its smooth sailing ahead as these guys work the numbers and the public as spin, spin, spin Canadians until they are all spun out.
 
 
[Comments Disclaimer]
Post a comment
· Use your real name to have your comment considered for publication in print.
· URLs and email addresses will be automatically turned into links.