Blog - Politics
What's the secret of Stephen Harper's success? Assume voters are stupid
Henry Louis Mencken once wrote: "No one in this world has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people. Nor has anyone ever lost public office thereby."
I sometimes wonder if Prime Minister Stephen Harper has taken this quotation to heart.
You could see it during the 2008 federal election campaign when he derided the Liberal Green Shift as a gas tax. The media and the public ate it up rather than subjecting Harper's claims to serious scrutiny.
The Conservatives' contempt for voters' intelligence was also on display when the party distributed images of a puffin crapping on the shoulder of then-Opposition leader Stephane Dion.
Here are six examples over the past week in which Mencken's comment appears to be guiding Conservative actions:
* Harper and Environment Minister Jim Prentice refused to acknowledge the urgency of global warming on the eve of important climate-change negotiations in Copenhagen next month. They didn't seem too bothered by a new report from the Global Carbon Project. Based on the latest study on carbon-dioxide emissions, the report suggested that global temperatures could rise by an average of 6 ° C by the end of the century.
* Harper's defence minister, Peter MacKay, smeared senior diplomat Richard Colvin for telling a special Commons committee on Afghanistan that he sent a blizzard of e-mails warning about the torture of Afghan detainees after they were turned over to Afghan captors in 2006 and 2007. On November 20, Foreign Affairs Canada and the Department of National Defence stated that future witnesses "will provide important context and information about this issue". NDP foreign affairs critic Paul Dewar correctly interpreted these messages as an attempt to intimidate witnesses to toe the government's line as well as a way to subvert Commons hearings. Harper probably thinks the masses won't pay sufficient attention to this issue to recognize the magnitude of his government's outrageous conduct.
* Harper met an Indian movie star, Akshay Kumar, on a trip to Mumbai in a cheap attempt to win South Asian votes at the same time as Citizenship and Immigration Minister Jason Kenney is cutting the number of refugees by more than half next year.
* The Conservatives had the gall to distribute a pamphlet in ridings with large numbers of Jewish voters claiming that Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff was no friend of Israel even though a former Liberal government listed Hamas and Hezbollah as terrorist organizations over the objections of many Canadians of Arab descent.
* Finance Minister Jim Flaherty released a draft code of conduct for the credit and debit card industry that did not include any controls over interest rates charged by the issuers of these cards. It's hard to see how these proposed rules would have any impact on the amount of interest that consumers fork over to the banks, but it gives the Conservatives a chance to claim that they're doing something about credit cards.
* Flaherty gave another speech about the $50-billion-plus budget deficit in which he failed to acknowledge that Conservative military policies will have a tremendously negative long-term effect on government finances. Estimates of the cost of the Afghan war have exceeded $20 billion (including the cost of rehabilitation for veterans of the conflict).
In all of the examples listed above, Harper appears to be assuming that most voters are stupid or, at the very least, that they're not paying attention.
Clearly, the prime minister is, in the words of Mencken, not under the impression that he will lose his public office by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people.
Wouldn't it be wonderful if one day, the great masses of the plain people proved Harper wrong.



E-mail
Print

Comments
Look in the mirror dufus. It will be painful but educational for you.
You should try it sometime. It's not as easy as calling people "dufus" or "stupid", but you'll see that with practice, it may bring you far enough on the path to civilization that you'll be able to leave your mom's basement. Maybe.
Let's face it, Canadian rules no longer apply because that's not where we live now.
Get over yourself, If anybody treats voters as morons or stupid, it is the Liberal Party of Canada, the most corrupt, arrogant, and incompetent nincompoops who unfortunaley until Harper came along, taxed and spent Canadians into oppression,
Chuck quit being a Liberal stooge, and get with the program
I am thankful for evry day that Canada is free of Liberal tyranny , and Liberal Corruption
-When did Harper call the Green Shift a Gas Tax? A citation with a date and medium would be nice.
-If the puffin was part of a strategy personally devised by Stephen Harper that assumed Canadians were stupid, why on earth would it have been pulled, and apologised for, within hours of it going up?
-How are you trying to relate South Asian vote pandering to cutting refugees? There's no conflict here. The Sikh voters that he's playing to are not known for being refugee claimants. You'll never see Harper buttering up the refugee vote - theres no inconsistency here. You're trying to conflate refugees with immigrants (and immigration is rising in Canada).
-How do the actions of the Liberal Party in 2002 in any way relate to the claim that Michael Ignatieff is not a friend of Israel? Seriously. This is a massive non sequitur that you should be ashamed of. Its on the level of "The Conservatives say that Michael Ignatieff is not a friend of Israel, but they fail to point out that George W. Bush is." Or "The Conservatives claim that Michael Ignatieff is not a friend of Israel, but puppies are cute!"
-Flaherty's rules had nothing to do with interest rates. Nobody said they would. He was examining competition in the processing industry, and finding ways to help merchants. Nobody except you is saying this has anything to do with consumer interest rates. Why should it?
-The effect of a $20bn war spread out over 10 years is not "tremendously negative" or "long term", relative to a $50bn deficit. In fact, its so small to not be worth mentioning. Which it wasnt.
The only difference being this article coming from the other side of the spectrum. There is still no argument only unpremised assumptions about the Conservative's motives.
For shame Charlie for assuming that your readership is stupid.
Granted, the liberals are lame, and they still haven't understood their lesson that electors really don't like to be taken for stupid (which also explains the less than 20% effective popularity rate of the CRAP*).
Following the next election, which is going to yield yet another minority government (thanks to federal parties for ignoring Québec which then votes Bloc en masse), watch the progressives (NPD+grits+Bloc) effectively do a coalition to push aside the CRAP*.
* Canadian Reform Alliance Party.
Certainly if Stephen Harper is presuming that voters are stupid he's doing something clever. He's certainly smarter than Bush who assumed everyone was as stupid as he was.
Ever since the Conservatives got into power, fair and logical political discourse seems to have gone the way of the dodo. Instead, now all we see are endless attempts by the other parties to create scandals (all of which have fizzled down to their base element: nothing) and hoping the public is too stupid to notice that their version of alternatives is simply to say, "We're not them."
Harper thinks the public is stupid? I think you're looking at the wrong guy.
Harper is evil. Look at all of the proof I just gave you.
Stupid people, can't you see the truth!
James Cowan, National Post Published: Monday, May 12, 2008
Read more: http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=510317#ixzz0XhaNVnAk
In light of the info all over the net wrt Hadley e-mails( that MSM has chosen to ignore), perhaps Prentice will now declare that AGW is a scam.
This blog post in itself assumes readers and voters are stupid. Why reference the Hezbollah situation without clarifying that Liberal Party members happily joined an Hezbollah March, complete with flags of the terrorist group?
Perhaps Neanderthals were the collaborative nice guys, and they were killed off by gangs of homo sapiens led by bullies like Jason Kenny and Peter Mackay.
Ugh!
Terry Noble/Saltchuk
“It is Hell, of course, that makes priests powerful, not Heaven, for after thousands of years of so-called civilization fear remains the one common denominator of mankind”
and
"The cynics are right nine times out of ten."
Charlie:
1) It may be social and economic suicide for Canada to sign on to Copenhagen without firmly shadowing a US approach. We do want leadership but we shouldn't be lemmings just to prove we are morally superior.
2) Andrew Coyne's latest in McLeans clearly differs from your take on the 10%ers mailed into jewish concentrated ridings. The tone may be harsh, he says but it is factual any way you look at it. Context is not just for what you personally believe or wish were true.
3) Richard Colvin, according to released documents to the Globe today suggest that Colvin has plenty more to answer for in his judgements given that he spent less than half a day outside safe confines during his entire tour. Evidently seeing a book of matches on the ground doesn't necessarily mean someone burned the house down.
OMG...if he did sign, then we end up getting all their population migrating here and be stuck with a Campbell like guy forever...ohhh the world of politics!
Post a comment