Letters
Vaccine facts were not fully investigated
Squalene? Long-term neurological damage? The Georgia Straight really hit the nail on the head with the article [“What’s in your vaccine?”, November 19-26]. Squalene may be natural, but injecting the substance produces an entirely different outcome than ingesting it, as shown by a number of independent studies.
The problem is that for too long, vaccine stats have reflected a “don’t look, don’t find, don’t report” syndrome. Anyone who doubts this should access [TV station] WLWT’s investigative report on vaccine victims in the military, “Secret Shots”.
As for damage-control claims that the anthrax vaccine never had squalene, award-winning investigative journalist Gary Matsumoto has compiled an impressive body of evidence in [his book] Vaccine-A, showing it was, indeed, used in an experimental anthrax vaccine. As retired U.S. army colonel David Hackworth remarked: “Even the Nazis didn’t run medical experiments on their own troops.”
> Darren Pearson / Vancouver



E-mail
Print

Comments
Also caught last week's article and if immediate problems are non-specific, and the serious stuff like neurological damage doesn't show up for years, we could be in for one rude awakening years down the road.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19751689
This analysis concluded that squalene-containing vaccines are associated with a slightly lower risk of chronic diseases than normal flu vaccines. No change in the rate of autoimmune diseases was seen, which were just as rare as they are in unvaccinated people.
All the denial, damage control and cover-up in the world can't mask the reality of what they have suffered.
Post a comment