Shutdown of Bloedel Conservatory, Stanley Park petting zoo divides park board
Vancouver Trolley Company owner Jim Storey called it “a sad day for the city”.
Storey was referring to the 4-3 vote by the Vancouver park board on November 25 to close down the Bloedel Floral Conservatory and the Stanley Park petting zoo to help deal with a $2.8-million anticipated budget shortfall.
“We don’t have enough attractions in the city now and to lose a few is very sad,” Storey said by phone. “I wish there could have been alternatives found.”
Vision Vancouver park board commissioner Aaron Jasper, a former long-time Gray Line tour bus driver and guide, said the closures were unavoidable in light of Vision’s decision not to bring in more than a two-percent tax increase in the next city budget.
Jasper, along with fellow Vision commissioners Constance Barnes, Sarah Blyth, and board chair Raj Hundal, voted in favour of the shutdowns.
COPE commissioner Loretta Woodcock, NPA commissioner Ian Robertson, and Green commissioner Stuart Mackinnon were opposed.
“COPE’s position, obviously, is that we should increase the taxes, right?” Jasper fired back to the Straight regarding the cuts. “Fine, I respect that she [Woodcock] has taken that position, that is different to Vision Vancouver’s. Stuart just thinks we should just say no, and doesn’t propose any solutions.”
Jasper claimed that, when comparing park board cuts to those facing other city departments, the park board has “the lowest percentages”.
“The kind of choices that we were facing: close down a community centre or close down the Bloedel Conservatory,” Jasper said. “Well, the choice is pretty clear.”
Mackinnon told the Straight he has “already written to city council to ask them to reconsider their [planned] two-percent tax increase”.
“The city has what they consider a global inflationary increase of four percent,” Mackinnon said by phone. “That includes regular inflation and increased costs and everything, plus wages. Two percent is what they are proposing as a tax hike, even though there’s a four-percent inflationary rise. So there is a two-percent gap there.”
Mackinnon said a four-percent tax hike would still result in a shortfall, but he said he has calculated that it would be half what it is under Vision’s scenario.
“Aaron and I had some sharp words last night, and I don’t suppose I am his best friend at the moment,” Mackinnon added.
According to Mackinnon, the park board is also the cart being placed before city council’s horse, in that council has based estimated cuts on a two-percent increase, but does not know what the final numbers will be.
For that reason, Mackinnon has not given up hope on the conservatory and the petting zoo yet.
“I’m advising everyone who calls me and e-mails me to get on to mayor and council and phone,” he said. “Do whatever you can to let council know—especially if you’re willing to pay a higher tax bill. If you’re not willing to pay a higher tax bill, then you have to live with these cuts. But if you’re willing to pay a little bit more in order to have libraries, parks, and community centres, then get on to city council and let them know.”
Tourism Vancouver spokesperson Walt Judas told the Straight his group is understanding “when tough budget decisions are made”.
“But obviously when it affects an attraction like the conservatory or the petting zoo, that’s unfortunate, because it impacts both residents and visitors alike.”
The park-board budget will go to city council for approval December 3.




Follow us on Twitter
Like us on Facebook
Comments
We need to invest in our public sector. Attractions in our city and community services like community centres and libraries all serve our citizens even more so during tough economic times. And guess what? They have spin offs!
Arts groups are citing that for every $1 the government puts into Arts, they get $1.36 back.
Our public sector needs its own economic stimulus package. This will ripple throughout the city and benefit lots of levels.
We have the "Own the Podium" program for our Olympic medal aspiring athletes. But for our artists participating in our Cultural Olympiad - we cut their grants. It's like knee-capping athletes to undermine their chances of winning - but I thought only American figure skaters did that to each other. Why are our munincipal and provincial governments making cuts to our cultural institutions?
www.gunghaggisfatchoy.com
Having made the decision to host this expensive Five-Ring Circus, we should be prepared to pay for it through higher taxes--not by cannabalizing public services.
PS: What's going to happen to the animals in the petting zoo and the parrots of the Bloedel Conservatory? Too bad they can't vote!
I respect your decision to shut down the conservatory and know that it was your last option. i just have a question. Do you think its possible to open a new conservatory for birds? smaller, GREENER, to replace the birds home? the shelters and greyhaven are already over-populated with birds, so they need good homes. if not, may i respectfully ask where you plan on sending the birds?
thank you for your time,
PS : can you please send me a response to majid25jet@hotmail.com
thank you.
majid.
Sounds like a good stimulus project that the BC Liberals or the Conservatives could chomp onto... I see ribbon cuttings and press releases and jobs in the trades sector, which would love to help repair the building to its former splendor... if BC Place can get a new roof, why can't the Conservatory?
My question? Why do taxpayers have to unknowingly shoulder the cost for Commissioner Constance Barnes alcohol rehab on Bowen Island (http://vancouver.24hrs.ca/Columnists/RebelwithaClause/2009/08/26/1062512...) and not be given a chance to support the Vancouver treasures we truly care about? Why are philanthropists and the public not allowed adequate time to raise the funds needed for upgrades and the budget shortfall? Bloedel is just now enjoying increased traffic after the Canada Line construction and recent parking lot upgrades that made visiting difficult for many. We give Commissioner Barnes a second chance ... why does she feel it necessary to axe the remaining treasures of Vancouver?
Animals and birds become easily stressed when forced to travel. When the Crystal Garden was forced to close in Victoria a high percentage of the animals died during relocation (including an endangered Lion Tamarind). The beautiful tall trees there where chopped up and discarded. Can we stand by and let similar fates fall on the residents of Bloedel and the Zoo?
Please let your voices be heard at the City Hall Public Meeting Dec. 3, 2009 at 7:30. Let the Commissioners know they are making a grave and irreversible mistake! Write letters, make phone calls, tell your friends to do the same!
In the state that it is in right now, the Conservatory is not green. Repair it and it will be green again.
"The Vision Commissioners respect the class A Heritage status and we are currently looking for a more sustainable use for the building". The Conservatory was built and designed to be a green house. What more sustainable use would you be looking for?
From the City of Vancouver Heritage Conservation Program: The Bloedel Conservatory is significant for its historical, symbolic, cultural, technological and social values, particularly for its use of new technologies and building methods to create both a futuristic design and an exotic ecological environment .... The Conservatory, housing tropical plants and birds, is a cultural extension of the early horticultural tradition in the city. Full text at http://www.historicplaces.ca/visit-visite/com-ful_e.aspx?id=8776
The Conservatory and Children's Farmyard are invaluable assets to this city and need to be preserved.
I'm outraged that four Vision commissioners, each with less than one year's experience in elected office or policy making have decided to do away with two long standing Vancouver institutions, with virtually no public consultation or debate. The fact that Sara Blythe's above post included a thinly veiled partisan attack seems an indication of her real priorities. I'm even more outraged that I voted for these four in the first place.. Fool me once won't get fooled again
The Park Board mission is to "Provide, Preserve and Advocate" - not to destroy.
This is a decision best decided by the people of Vancouver, not agenda-bound political neophytes.
I'm afraid the parks board has made rather a poor show with this decision, which I'm sorry to say shows a considerable lack of effort, imagination, and long term thinking. We're all human, I suppose, but I deeply hope more considered and enlightened views on the matter prevail at the upcoming city Council meeting.
The matter of the alleged urgency of the pending costs for roof replacement is certainly a serious one, but this is the first time most Vancouverites have heard it given mention, and I have no doubt they will do the right thing in that regard, so long as they are given sufficient time.
The argument that previous Park Board councils have neglected the Conservatory seems a bit odd...The solution to neglect of the Conservatory is to scrap it ?
I do sympathize with members of the Parks Board Council, they were handed, it seems, an odious and unenviable mandate in terms of their budget cuts, but this is not the way to fulfill it, especially given their larger mandate within the context of Vancouver's past, present, and future.
http://www.petitiononline.com/4bloedel/petition.html