Straight Talk
UBC student union president faces calls for resignation over United Nations complaint
A complaint to the United Nations has student councillors calling for Alma Mater Society president Blake Frederick to resign.
The president of a student union at the University of British Columbia is facing calls for his resignation after he filed a complaint to the United Nations on behalf of the organization.
Blake Frederick announced yesterday (November 26) that the Alma Mater Society is asking the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights to appoint an independent expert or special rapporteur to investigate human-rights violations in Canada’s postsecondary education system.
Tomorrow evening (November 28), the AMS student council will consider motions urging Frederick and vice president Tim Chu to step down, as well as a third motion that would rescind the complaint.
Matthew Naylor, an arts representative on the council and a former AMS vice president, told the Straight today (November 27) that he only found out about the complaint yesterday after the student union sent out a press release and Frederick held a press conference.
“What council’s more upset about, I think, is not only is this complaint ill-advised, it has also been done in a way that pulled the wool over council’s eyes, that deliberately concealed this action from council, and has proved to be immensely embarrassing for the organization that they sit on the board of and ostensibly have some control over,” Naylor, a political-science student, said by phone.
According to Naylor, the complaint has garnered an “overwhelmingly unfavourable” response from his fellow students and councillors.
He said he plans to vote in favour of all three motions at tomorrow’s meeting.
If Frederick and Chu, who were both involved in bringing the complaint forward, don’t resign, the council will serve them with a notice of impeachment, which would be followed by a hearing in seven days, Naylor said.
Updates
UBC student union council reprimands president over United Nations complaint
UBC student union president Blake Frederick fights recall
Open letter: UBC Alma Mater Society president and vice president won't resign
UBC student council calls on president to resign over United Nations complaint



E-mail
Print

Comments
http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/cescr.htm
Article 13
(c) Higher education shall be made equally accessible to all, on the basis of capacity, by every appropriate means, and in particular by the progressive introduction of free education
Canada's interpretation appears to be:
c) Higher education shall be made disproportionately available to those of superior pecuniary means and in particular by the progressive introduction of restrictive fees and laws to safeguard limited access.
I graduated from UBC in 1989 - undergrad tuition was still low. Thanks to others who fought for us during the 70s, we had a tuition hike freeze.
Stop acting out of fear and support this man!
If you're from outside the University, don't get tricked by Blake's radical partisan supporters. His actions were absurd and a complete embarrassment. This is why I dread paying student fees every year. Not because I'm strapped for cash, but because I know they are going to go fund junk like this. If the executive ran things with any sort of neutrality, planning or responsibility they could easily give students what they need on half the budget.
How your lot has proceeded has made you students look bad and UBC to a degree, perhaps the great majority of UBC students will come forward and restore some dignity on behalf of UBC student society and get on with supporting your president on this very important issue.
YES, tuition costs and ways of alleviating pressure on students are both important issues for many students and should be addressed. As a side note, I think the answer is not a reduction in tuition but rather a reduction in loan interest rates to below prime rates.
However as this article states, many students and many AMS board members do not think that THIS was a productive way of addressing those issues-- and it wasn't done in a proper, transparent and democratic way by the President.
An elected representative cannot take action alone without the support of his/her constituents and colleagues, regardless of the issue-- and I do not understand how anybody supportive of democracy can argue otherwise...again, regardless of the merits of the cause.
Open Letter to Council regarding Saturday AMS Council Meeting
We are aware that Council has called a meeting on Saturday to consider whether or not to ask for our resignations. Unfortunately, neither of us will be able to attend this meeting due to prior commitments. This point was made clear to Councillors when they initially decided to call the meeting for Saturday. The two staff members who we directed to work on the complaint will also be unable to attend. We will, however, be able to address Council at our regularly scheduled meeting on Wednesday, December 2nd at 6:00 p.m. There have been many allegations flying around and many questions such as: “Why the UN?”; “What effect will such a complaint actually have?”; and “What democratic process did you follow to file the complaint?” We strongly believe that Council should withhold any discussion of disciplinary action before we are able to clarify the facts around this issue and clearly explain the motives behind the complaint.
We believe that students should be extremely concerned that some members of Council have indicated they will attempt to illegally impeach Executive members who are democratically elected by the UBC student body. Given the fractured opinions of students on this issue, we encourage those Councillors who wish to impeach us from our elected positions to initiate the proper formal and legal process by conducting a referendum.
We also find it curious that we have been targeted exclusively on this issue by some Council members. It is important to note that we raised the topic of the UN complaint several times at our Executive Committee meetings and that VP Finance, Tom Dvorak and VP Academic and University Affairs, Johannes Rebane signed the contract with Pivot Legal Society to go forward with the complaint. We believe that if any call is made for our resignations, they must be coupled with a call for the resignations of Tom Dvorak and Johannes Rebane.
We both appreciate the seriousness of the current situation and will be prepared on Wednesday to give a full account of the facts.
Signed,
Blake Frederick
President
Alma Mater Society of UBC Vancouver
and
Tim Chu
VP External
Alma Mater Society of UBC Vancouver
Posted 28 November 2009 by Communications
Why should he be impeached? We could sit here and troll the internet for new forums in which to debate the tuition issue until our keyboards break, but that's not the crux of the matter here.
The main point is that Blake KNOWINGLY acted contrary to the desires of the constituents that elected him. Had he consulted ANYBODY regarding this complaint he would have quickly found out just how opposed students are to this move. But he knew that, so he decided to go behind the students' backs and do this without telling anybody. When a person is elected to an office it is their job to represent the population that elected them to the best of their ability. Not only has Blake proved unable to do that but he has shown that he is willing to go to great lengths to abuse the power he has been given to achieve his own personal goals.
Again, what has been debated here so far is whether or not students SHOULD want this to happen (and I view this as a valid debate!). However, the fact is that right now they DON'T. Blake knew that but he did this anyway. That is why he should be impeached.
It's also worth noting that the "outpouring of student support" for Blake is rivaled if not exceeded by his opposition. This man is not a martyr for student ideals. He is not being crucified by crooked despots. On the contrary, it is he that has acted corruptly, and this the system lashing back against him.
It's beyond petty that those AMS counselors are taking about being embarrassed by this... kinda shows what they're priorities are. They should be ashamed for being so bitterly against something so vitally important.
The remedy? Spankings. I suggest that Alumni have the right to put these brats over our collective knee and spank the self-righteousness out of them. Then perhaps they won't continue this conduct later on at the Legislature.
Continental Europe has cheaper universities, but lacks research funding at the graduate level and also has less accessibility because students are prevented to go to university at all based off secondary or even primary education placement. In 3rd world countries such as India or Bangladesh, lack of available space in universities causes students not even to have the flexibility to choose or change their major. This was both a foolish complaint, no one with any knowledge of higher education across countries is going to take it seriously. It is also an insult to those of us who understand the value of our alma mater.
The interesting thing is some of the commentators have no idea about the economic stress students are under and they don't care.
How petty of Naylor and his supporters!
The most recent ridiculous decision made by the AMS council (before the retraction from the UN complaint) was the DENIAL given to students with disabilities to have a NON-VOTING seat on council! This goes directly against AMS policies surrounding inclusion.
It will not be hard to demonstrate that council has been taken over by self-selected Liberal students who are doing personal politics. The Ubyssey reported that the students with disabilities left screaming 'shame on you' and crying. This is the type of AMS council we have - taken over by people who elect themselves year after year and do not let anyone who is not aligned with their party politics have a say or get anything done.
I am willing to bet my degree that, if we take the list of people who voted for Blake's resignation and the shameful and cowardly retraction of the UN complaint, and compare it with the people who voted against having a NON-VOTING seat held by students with disabilities at the AMS, we will have an almost perfect name-by-name match. And yet, nobody has yet raised any concerns about how shameful was this decision of the Council. People who voted for that refusal are acting against AMS' s own policies, and should be liable for it. Now, what is worse: putting students with disabilities down or calling the government responsible for their failings (no matter how pro-government you might be, Liberals, the facts are clear = they have not followed something they have signed on to do). Another pattern emerges, the cowardly double standard applied to Dvorak and Rebane, who are forgiven for signing off, and who have retracted in fear from the bold UN complaint. So, no mater what you do, as long as Naylor is in council, if you don't conform to the Liberal party line, you will be crucified - unless, of course, something ELSE happens - can't wait to see it.
$27'000 is pickles when your in your future career you'll earn $44 000 per year (the median income of people with a university degree, according to a 2001 report by Statistics Canada)..
Did every single councillor vote against the students-with-disabilites-seat? If that was the case, I feel like you would have mentioned it.
So it is true that every councillor who voted against a disabilities seat voted against Blake.
It is ALSO true that every councillor who voted FOR a disabilities seat voted against Blake.
Can I have you degree now?
Deciding to not give disabled students a non-voting seat isn't about disabled students at all. The question is, if we start handing out non-voting seats, where does it stop? You could easily argue that all kinds of groups of students deserve to have representation. That is obviously an unsustainable and infeasible way to run such a council.
Post a comment