Energy task force members green B.C. Liberal party coffers
NDP environment critic Rob Fleming calls it “a pay-as-you-go system”.
The Victoria-Swan Lake MLA is talking about more than $250,000 in donations to the B.C. Liberals made by individuals—or their companies—whom B.C. energy minister Blair Lekstrom selected to sit on four green energy advisory task forces.
These advisory task forces, which compose the larger Green Energy Advisory Task Force announced by Premier Gordon Campbell on November 2, have until January 2010 to report back to the provincial government with recommendations on energy policy.
They are accepting submissions from the public until December 31.
Of the 29 individuals listed as members of the four task forces, 12 can be linked to campaign contributions recorded by Elections B.C.
Cheryl Slusarchuk, chair of the advisory task force on carbon pricing, trading and export market development, made personal donations to B.C. Liberal coffers totalling $9,350 between 2005 and 2009. In addition, $5,000 is listed as a single 2009 donation from Cheryl Slusarchuk Law Corp. Slusarchuk is a partner with the law firm McCarthy Tetrault, which donated $27,970 between 2005 and 2009.
Duncan McCallum, a partner with the public sector and infrastructure group at RBC Capital Markets, is a member of the advisory task force on procurement and regulatory reform. The Royal Bank of Canada and its subsidiaries gave $93,200 in total through 24 separate payments between 2005 and 2009.
Campbell’s press secretary, Bridgitte Anderson, said the premier was in Quebec City partaking in the Olympic torch relay. She referred the Straight to Lekstrom’s office, which did not make the minister available by deadline.
Wilderness Committee national campaign director Joe Foy told the Straight he thought that the level of money involved meant B.C.’s auditor general “absolutely” needs to investigate.
“I think that the auditor general needs to look at the whole thing: the task force, the B.C. Energy Plan, the amount of money,” Foy said by phone.
He earlier stated, “People should be outraged, for instance, that at the same time these campaign donations are made, this government has set it up so that the contracts that B.C. Hydro is forced to sign with these [private power] companies are secret. People aren’t allowed to see them. That frankly should be against the law. It’s a ton of ratepayers’ money.”
This past summer, the B.C. Utilities Commission ruled that B.C. Hydro’s 2008 Long Term Acquisition Plan was “not in the public interest”, only to have its decision overturned by the government. The plan had relied heavily on long-term power-purchase agreements with independent power producers.
“I mean, the B.C. Utilities Commission jumped in and said, ”˜Hold it, put on the brakes,’ and they were whacked to the side,” Foy said. “I think the auditor-general needs to step up.”
Other members on the task forces who donated or whose companies donated to the B.C. Liberals include James Hoggan (Hoggan and Associates), Jeff Christian (Lawson Lundell), Warren Brazier (Clark Wilson), David Andrews (Cloudworks Energy), Craig Lodge (Pinnacle Pellet), Craig Aspinall (Western GeoPower Corporation), Paul Hemsley (Hemmera), Jonathan Rhone (Nexterra), John Keating (Canadian Hydro Developers), and John Walker (FortisBC).



Follow us on Twitter
Like us on Facebook
Comments
Maybe he can explain why some BC Hydro journeymen make $260,000 a year in salary?
How can a guy whose job is to cut wires make so much money off the ratepayers???
See
http://www2.canada.com/vancouversun/features/public-sector-salary-databa...
Enter salary range and get a description of the job.
BCUC said that BC Hydro's long term power plan was incomplete and ambiguous, especially in matters related to conservation, and they should file again by July 2010.
http://www.greenenergytaskforce.gov.bc.ca/task-force.html
The public gets one month to make comments, over Christmas.
Hugh, thanks for that link. By going to the accompanying FAQs one learns the completely unsurprising news that three of Premier Gordon M. Campbell's most prominent environmental endorsers in the May 12th election have been appointed to one or another of these panels:
James Hoggan, president of Hoggan and Associates and chair of the David Suzuki Foundation is chairing the panel on community engagement.
Tzeporah Berman, executive director and co-founder of PowerUp Canada and Co-Founder of ForestEthics and Matt Horne, director of Energy Solutions for the Pembina Institute are on the panel on resource development.
The FAQs state that panel members will not be paid, but their expenses will be reimbursed, which in principle seems fair enough.
To no one's suprise, there is no one from labour on these panels, which are heavily tilted towards business people. But as far as I can tell, there are no academics, even on the resource development panel, and its not that the Liberals lack for friends in universities, so that is a surprise.
Rod Smelser
I guess its cheap to tear things down but difficult for the naysayer to build anything of value.
Media people who were such prolific writers on fast ferries and politicians on both sides of the house will be vilified and hopefully is there is a way charged with criminal breach of trust because of their willful inaction on this subject. The fast ferry scandal was like a rainy Saturday at a schoolgirl's lemonade stand compared to the financial malfeasance exhibited here.
$55 billion dollars in 40 year contracts to buy a little over 1 gigawatt baseload equiv of power, BC Hydro doesn't need and must sell for a 80% loss on the springtime spot market. For the same amount of power, nuclear would cost $3.0 billion today and $1.2 billion when mass produced reactor builds begin - 2 to 5% the cost of the 40 year contracts with party friends and insiders. These contracts triple BC's public debt but because of slick accounting procedures are reported as a financial footnote rather than on the balance sheets. Cowardly BC pundits with the exception of Rafe Mair refuse to touch the issue.
Gordo's $55B in power will be worthless in a little as ten years – 30 years left on the contracts - with ultracheap new nuclear fusion and nuclear waste burning Gen IV reactors coming on line.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-kirsch/climate-bill-ignores-our_b_22...
Short term look for a more than doubling of power rates within 3 years now that BCHydro has effectively been privatized. Long term look for a BCHydro bankruptcy as industrial electricity users move to low cost nuclear powered Washington state and Alberta.
seth
Nuclear "fusion"? What have you been smoking lately?
Did you see the salary list for BC Hydro union wire cutters who make $280,000 a year in remuneration? This why you need market discipline and competition for BC Hydro.
Well for starters most of the recommendations have already been written - as is to be expected given the extremely short time-line given for "public consultation."
Most of the appointees to the Task Force are not impartial experts on energy but are already on the record promoting private power and/or receiving direct financial benefit from IPPs - hardly people that inspire trust.
If the provincial government were interested in the advice of impartial experts they would have listened to their own energy regulator the BC Utilities Commission, instead when the BCUC ruled that private power was "not in the public interest" the BC Liberals promptly over-ruled their own independent watchdog.
This scheme was cooked up by Barry Penner and Tzeporah Berman in the back rooms. Most people recognize it for the scam it is.
IPPs are a rip off because not only is BC Hydro forced to purchase expensive non-firm, undependable and intermittent power at far above market prices but at the end of the day the public doesn't own the assets.
When the BC Government introduced the 2002 Energy Plan which forbade BC Hydro from producing new sources of hydroelectricity (Point 13 of the Plan) it was actively lobbying the federal government against the implementation of the Kyoto Protocol. The 2002 Energy Plan was about deregulation of the electricity sector in BC and the slow motion privatization of BC Hydro. Don't take my word for it look at what a Liberal MLA had to say:
http://republic-news.org/archive/50-repub/repub_50_nettleton.html
or BC Liberal Minister Richard Neufeld:
http://www.sqwalk.com/Simpson_Sun_20020629_HydroMustBreakUp.htm
General Electric and Plutonic Power don't give a damn about public good or green energy they are in it for the money pure and simple - and you would be a fool to think otherwise.
Seth - you mean BC Hydro buying Ashlu IPP power at 5.5 cents for 40 years while the market price of green and renewable power is 10 cents and going up, is a bad deal? I wonder if you can do the mathematics? And then BC Hydro's own project cost them 12 cents to produce power!
Nuclear "fusion"? What have you been smoking lately?
Did you see the salary list for BC Hydro union wire cutters who make $280,000 a year in remuneration? This why you need market discipline and competition for BC Hydro
Spot price for COAL and GAS fired dirty energy is $60 today. Even this is higher than Ashlu. Now add a $40 premium for clean, green, and carbonless power that eliminates GHGs and you are approaching $100.
You are wrong about the $120 as the price for the last call. You dont have a link and just make this stuff up. Bob Elton said that based on a survey the average for renewable power in BC that includes geothermal, solar, wind, hydro is $120. He did NOT say the call was $120. They are still negotiating the call and you know what the price is?!?! You are repeating the misinformation and ignorance put out by the unions and their astroturf organizations.
And BC Hydro's own attempt at green renewable energy cost it $120 a MWh in the cost-overruned BC Hydro Aberfeldie ROR project. All this while Ashlu IPP is committed to sell green and renewable power for $55 for the next 40 years to BC Hydro. That is a subsidy of $65 for BC Hydro and its unions for 40 years. In 20 years when price of green energy is $200, Ashlu will still be selling it to BC Hydro at $55.
Did I tell you that unionized linesmen salary is $280,000 at BC Hydro? The taxpayers are paying for this. What is you relation to the astroturfs and the unions?
Did I tell you that BC Hydro showed a loss in 2009 and paid no profits to the government?
The BC Energy plan did NOT forbade new sources of energy. BC Hydro just completed Aberfeldie ROR, and is actively working on Site-C which is an astronomic 5000 GWh. Repeating a lie does not make it a truth.
Soundbite link to one guy on TV is a dishonest man's evidence. Show me where has the government mandated to privatize BC Hydro. Link please. BC Hydro has more than half a dozen expansion plans in the work - Revelstoke, Mica, Shrum, Site-C, Bridge, Seton, etc.
Check out this Dec 5, 2009 article by Scott Simpson.
Here is a little quote for you:
"And would you believe that BC Hydro's own calculations suggest that at least part of the time, the government-owned utility will be forced to sell electricity at prices lower than what it's paying independent power producers (IPPs) to deliver it to them? . . . Hydro is in the process of firming up long-term contracts with IPPs to buy power at prices that average out, conservatively, to about $100 per megawatt hour."
http://www.vancouversun.com/technology/Independent+power+costs+raise+que...
Next thing you know you'll be calling Scott a communist left-winger - lol - even though you know he is extremely conservative in his reporting on this issue.
Private power is good for you Raymondo because you have invested in the industry - for the rest of the public it is a very bad deal. Low environmental standards, no planning, no assessment of cumulative impacts, buy high and sell low strategy and the erosion of a public utility that has been a cash cow for the BC public.
Let's face it even the BC Utilities Commission, the government's own independent watchdog, said that private power purchases were "not in the public interest." http://v1.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090729.escenic_12356...
Sometimes spin only takes you so far.
And then plutonic is capturing green and clean energy that is going to no good. And its investors who are taking the risk for that and not the taxpayer. So what is wrong with Plutonic selling power to BC Hydro at below Hydro's cost?
The 2002 Energy plan is superceded by the 2007 Energy Plan, so get your facts right. Besides the Plan never said Hydro can't create new generation. Hydro is on its largest expansion program since the 1980s. Unfortunately billions of dollars will be wasted and government and taxpayers will go into debt as Hydro loses its money on projects that the private sector can accomplish at about half the cost.
When linesmen get paid $280,000 a year at BC Hydro, then you know the people of BC are getting ripped off. See
http://www2.canada.com/vancouversun/features/public-sector-salary-databa...
When linesmen get paid $280,000 a year at BC Hydro, then you know the people of BC are getting ripped off. See
http://www2.canada.com/vancouversun/features/public-sector-salary-databa...
=======================================
I went to your link and found examples of "cable spicers" who were paid annual totals of over $250K. Are you seriously suggesting that these are annual salaries? Surely they must represent a lot of hours of work in emergency situations with substantial overtime premiums.
I believe it's intentionally misleading for you to present these figures as though they were an annual salary, comparable to the executive group who work in town, in the office, in safe, comfortable conditions.
If you want to make a serious presentation on costs, perhaps you could tell us how private hydro installations remunerate trades or technical people in comparable roles. If they do not pay hourly rates and premium overtime rates comparable to BC Hydro or Telus, how in a competitive labour market are they able to attract satisfactorily skilled people? If they're paying substantially less, claiming they cannot afford it despite the high prices they are receiving for their outputs, what prevents their people from quitting and taking a job with Hydro?
Rod Smelser
Current spot price of electricity is between 3.7 and 5 cents a kwh for peak less than half that for off peak - Bloomberg. From BCHydro's annual report, its average cost to buy the new IPP power that came online between 2008 and 2009 was 10 cents. Looks like that's where that dividend is missing eh Ray.
Yup they screwed one up at Aberfeldie and you Pirates never cease reminding us of it. Why just last summer they also screwed up downtown power feed diversity and no doubt over the years many other projects. As you Pirates are fond of pointing out there is risk in all engineering works. However there are many experts in run of the river engineering projects in Europe and here at home. I'm sure that includes Bechtel and SNC Lavelin to name two. BCHydro could have simply gone out for tender and went for the best bid. Are you telling me Mr. Pirate that your projects are built by all those $million a year attorneys who run Pirate on the public dole or are they contracts too? No BCHydro is not building the projects because Gordon has told them they can't on numerous occasions and in the media.
Pulsed Nuclear fusion - Polywell, Focus Fusion and Trialpha energy (Paul Allen - $80 million) al may be functional within ten years at a tenth of a cent a kilowatt hour. The US Navy just bet $8 million on Polywell. . More likely than BC ever making money selling Pirate Power.
http://nextbigfuture.com/2009/12/iec-fusion-national-ignition-facility.html
seth
In April 2009 I asked the BC Ministry of Energy about the two BC Energy Plans (2002 and 2007).
In their reply to my email they said that Policy 13 of the 2002 Plan says that the private sector will develop new electricity generation, with BC Hydro restricted to improvements at existing plants.
The ministry also said that the 2007 Energy Plan was intended to build on, not replace the 2002 plan. So, Policy 13 of the 2002 plan still applies to BC Hydro.
The worst case scenario is that industry insiders have bought the right to set the government's energy policy.
Either way it sounds a lot like corruption.
Besides, Site-C will cost BC Hydro $160 a MWh. So its better to buy green energy at $100 instead of non-green energy at $160 - isnt it?
Market price for green energy is $40 above brown dirty energy which is $70 today.
RodSmelser - read again - these are annual "renumeration" for union work. $280,000 a year for splicing cable is what the public union COPE 378 is charging the citizens of BC. The link I provided above is irrefutable evidence.
If this isn't stealing then what is stealing?
Now if you dont mind that, then maybe you and you buddies in the union should pay for that and leave the rest of BC citizens to keep their monies???
Seth - you are wrong as usual. non-green power price is $60 US. Add another $40 for green and renewable premium to that. Have you heard of cap & trade?
Besides BC Hydro's own cost of generation is $160 for SiteC and $120 for Aberfeldie. Twice that of IPPs. Ashlu is only $55 for the next 40 years. In the meanwhile price of green power is going to escalate, starting from $100 today.
Hugh you are wrong. Site-C is a brand new plan. Aberfeldie was NOT an improvement. It was basically a new project (but still cost BC Hydro TWICE the IPP, even though it reused the existing dam that destroyed that basin.
Can you provide a link for policy 13 or for the 2002 plan, or do I have to rely on your memory for evidence?
How do you explain Site-C which BC Hydro has already spent $500 million on it, with nothing to show, and putting the people in debt? At least Plutonic spends that money and produces power, and does not indebt the people of BC.
Socialists were always losers in society. No matter what your good intentions may be (which frankly I suspect), you have lost the debate and your cause, when you resort to lies. Obviously you dont care for society or you would not lie so much for your special interests.
California will not buy IPP energy at $130 a MWh if you read the article properly the spot market price for FIRM power averaged $60 MWh. Do the math.
It is very unlikely that Site C will come in at $160 MWh - however the power it produces will be twice as valuable as IPP power as it is available year-round. Plus at the end of the day the project will be owned by the people of BC so we won't be paying guys like you for an eternity at jacked-up prices.
Aberfeldie was a rebuild and came in at slightly under $90 MWh - rebuilds are know to be more expensive - as you well know. Again we paid less for it than for the private power rip off and we the public now own the facility and the FIRM power it produces.
Very, very funny about Plutonic not indebting the people of BC. Hilarious I tell you! The fact is if Bute Inlet goes ahead we the public will be on the hook for over $10 billion to these rip-off artists for power that is NOT needed in BC and will be sold at a LOSS south of the border. Read Simpson's article again.
Bern why don't you take some truth serum and simply say: "I want to make a lot of money sucking from the public purse," at least that way your claims would have a smidgen of authenticity.
Stop wasting our time with your silliness.
BC Hydro estimates that it will have to buy at $120 and sell at $60 because no party has agreed to pay a green premium for the IPP power (Washington won't because it's out-of-state and California won't because our RORs are too big and damaging). Check its filing with BCUC to confirm.
Go to the BC government website and look up the Energy Plans yourself and find the answers to your other nonsense.
There is NO IPP selling at $120. The highest I know of is $80. Ashlu IPP is selling power for the next 40 years to BC Hydro at $55. And that is a huge plant at 50 MW. The tiny Fitzsimmons will be selling at $83.
BC Hydro's own production costs them $120 and $160 - so stop complaining when IPP's are half the price of BC Hydro. Its the socialism thing ey? You want a bloated state monopoly that you can control as a freeloading "planner" or "cable splicer" to indebt the people of BC and produce high and sell low so that you can get your COPE 378 jobs at $250,000 annual renumeration apiece? See the link below for union jobs paying $280,000 a year cutting wire.
http://www2.canada.com/vancouversun/features/public-sector-salary-databa...
Well the people of BC have voted against monopoly socialism and voted for competition to cut wastage and graft and freeloading.
The Vancouver Sun article says BC Hydro will be selling long-term power to California at $130.
In addition, California considers any project less than 30 MW in size to be green. So cut the nonsense and the ignorance. California is mandated to buy green energy and the premium currently reflects the carbon tax of $40 a MWh.
Sorry sceptical, but the Energy Plan backs me up. The Energy Plan requires BC to cover its importation of power with green and renewable energy. So dirty brown environmentally unacceptable power by coal fired plants will NOT be imported, no matter what the astroturf organizations who seem to prefer global warming and paid by the Unions say.
Site C works out to 7 cents a kilowatt hour. Site C $6.5 billion, 4600 gwh's annually, 5% money, 60 years, do the math - $65 a megawatt hour.
New nuclear would be 1.5 cents using the latest nuclear power quotes received by Ontario.
Current spot price of electricity is between 3.7 and 5 cents a kwh for peak less than half that for off peak - Bloomberg.
From BCHydro's annual report, its average cost to buy the new IPP power that came online between 2008 and 2009 was 10 cents and is contracted to rise to 12 within 3 years. The new 5000 gwh's has been widely reported at 12 cents.
seth
RodSmelser - read again - these are annual "renumeration" for union work. $280,000 a year for splicing cable is what the public union COPE 378 is charging the citizens of BC. The link I provided above is irrefutable evidence.
If this isn't stealing then what is stealing?
Now if you dont mind that, then maybe you and you buddies in the union should pay for that and leave the rest of BC citizens to keep their monies???
========================================
I am a union member, true, but I am not a member of COPE and have never worked for Hydro.
You're still attempting to mislead people. These are annual wage and salary totals, but they are NOT base salaries. They reflect unusual amounts of overtime that few union members would ever experience.
You refused to provide any pay and benefits information for the private firms you represent. If they do not pay wages comparable to Hydro and Telus, how do they keep their workers?
Your use of the term stealing is very revealing. You don't apply this term to other Hydro employees who were paid even more, and without the risk of emergency work in foul weather. It's a Victorian attitude, and all too common in B.C.
Rod Smelser
What are you people (both sides) smoking out there?
Enjoy your Olympics, kiddies!
From
http://www.thestar.com/article/668157
http://theenergycollective.com/TheEnergyCollective/44781
'.....considering the capital cost of a facility as it projects the facility's lifetime electricity output, costs during the construction period, cost of fuel, ongoing operating expenses, as well as decommissioning, disposal and financing costs," it stated.
"As a result, any evaluated price would be an estimate of the project over its lifespan."
... Areva's bid totaled $23.6 billion..
Works out to $2.4 billion a gigawatt for the normal lawyered up overregulated, lawsuited, environmentist whipsawed typical onesey and twosey reactor build or 1.5 cents a kwh averaged over 60 years.
seth