News and Views » Straight Talk

Canadian government shamed by hoax at Copenhagen summit on climate change

By Travis Lupick,

A sophisticated hoax has targeted the Canadian government and caused a ruckus at the UN Climate Change Conference (COP15) currently underway in Copenhagen, Denmark. The elaborate prank is an attempt to embarrass the Canadian delegation to the summit, which has received criticism from the world press for its allegedly obstructionist role in negotiations.

Update

Yes Men claim responsibility for Canada Copenhagen hoax

At the centre of the ruse is a spoof news release in which Environment Canada announces the launch of “Agenda 2020”, an ambitious plan for reducing the country’s carbon emissions.

The release in part states:

Agenda 2020 sets binding emissions reductions targets of 40% below 1990 levels by 2020 and at least 80% by 2050, in line with the recommendations of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and approaching the levels demanded by the African Group (link). The plan also introduces a new instrument, known as the "Climate Debt Mechanism" (CDM), committing Canada to much-needed funding to those developing countries facing the most dire consequences of climate change. CDM payments will begin with 1% and rise to the equivalent of 5% of Canada's GDP annually by 2030.

It was made available at http://www.enviro-canada.ca/agenda2020. Environment Canada's actual Web site is located at http://www.ec.gc.ca/. The news was also distributed on a fake Twitter account for Jim Prentice, Canada's minister of the environment.

The fake media release announcing a plan to significantly cut carbon emissions was posted on a Web site made to look very similar to that of Environment Canada's.

The release was also circulated via e-mail from the address, press@enviro-Canada.ca. The department’s actual e-mail address for media-related correspondence is media@ec.gc.ca.

Following the publication of the initial release, an alleged response to the launch of Agenda 2020 was made by the Ugandan delegation to Copenhagen.

That release states:

The Ugandan delegation to the COP-15 climate talks has been the first to react to Canada's announcement of ambitious new emissions-reduction targets and vigorous climate-debt reparations to African nations.

The second release was again distributed via the e-mail address press@enviro-Canada.ca. It was also made available at a mock COP15 Web site with the URL http://cop-15.org/. The summit’s actual English Web site is located at http://en.cop15.dk/.

A video of a woman allegedly speaking for the government of Uganda was posted at a Web site closely resembling the official Web site for COP15.

Questions remain as to the authenticity of the Ugandan delegation’s alleged response. In a blog post, CBC News summed up the level of confusion around the video posted on the fake COP15 Web site, writing, “Is the Ugandan delegation in on the joke? Wait, is that even really the Ugandan delegation? Is there a Ugandan delegation at COP15 at all?”

Next, a third release was issued, this one denying the legitimacy of the first two. It in part read:

One hour ago, a spoof press release targeted Canada in order to generate hurtful rumors and mislead the Conference of Parties on Canada's positions on climate change, and to damage Canada's standing with the international business community.

The release, from "press@enviro-canada.ca," alleges Canada's acceptance of unrealistic emissions-reduction targets, as well as a so-called "Climate Debt Mechanism," a bilateral agreement between Canada and Africa to furnish that continent with enormous sums in "reparation" for climate damage and to "offset" adaptation.

This third release, sent from media@ec-gc.ca, also turned out to be a fake. Note that the “ec” and “gc” in the address’s domain name are separated by a dash and not a period.

This release states that major media outlets had reported on the original two releases, and linked to a story allegedly published in the European edition of the Wall Street Journal.

A news story on the media releases presenting themselves as being sent out from Environment Canada was posted on a Web site designed to appear as the European edition of the Wall Street Journal.

But the authenticity of this site was also quickly called into question and appears to be a fake. Its URL is http://online.europe-wsj.com/ while the legitimate European edition of the Wall Street Journal is located at http://europe.wsj.com/.

The third release representing itself as a product of Canada's environment department also aimed to draw attention to the Alberta tar sands. It included the following passages:

Canada's current energy policy represents an elegant synthesis of the most advanced science, while remaining faithful to Canada's tradition of political pragmatism. Experts note, for example, that the much-decried oil sands of Alberta, contrary to environmentalists' dire assertions, are enabling Canada to meet ambitious emissions goals by providing her, as well as her neighbors, with the energy resources needed to transition to a cleaner energy future.

“Without the dynamism of our oil sands industry,” says Bruce Carson, a special Adviser to Environment Canada, “we in Canada would not have the energy - moral, financial and literal - to develop the alternative energy future the whole world craves.”

A few hours later, a fourth and, so far, final release was sent out from the second fake e-mail address. This release states:

We at Environment Canada wish to thank the international press community for their measured and understanding response to the hoax that struck our agency earlier this afternoon, while expressing our condolences to the Ugandan delegation who were swept up in the excitement of this false future "vision." (Click here for video.)

This sophisticated operation was reported in the Toronto Star, The Globe and Mail, and a number of other outlets as the irresponsible spoof that it was.

Environment Canada wishes to stress that the Ugandan delegation's impassioned response to the announcement is a dramatic tragedy for those who stand to suffer the most.

At the time of publication, Environment Canada had not posted a response to the affair on its Web site. However, as reported in the Globe and Mail, Dimitri Soudas, spokesman for Prime Minister Stephen Harper, stated in an e-mail, "More time should be dedicated to playing a constructive role instead of childish pranks."

It remains unknown who perpetrated the hoax.


You can follow Travis Lupick on Twitter at twitter.com/tlupick.


Comments

Over the line and not funny
Whatever 'attention' you are trying to draw to the seriousness of the issue... deliberately impersonating official government press releases is fairly serious. On something like a climate change conference it's kind of harmless, but in general this kind of thing should be punished hard. It's not difficult to think of other situations where that kind of stunt would cause a serious international incident. Go CSIS.

Personally, I think they should start the investigation by checking the UBC AMS executives' computers. I hear they are all about making senseless statements in international forums without the permission of their representatives.
 
Wow
The Climate jihadists have reached a new low of lies and deceit, first it was climategate and now this. Canada should withdraw from these imposed talks, and first, launch a full public inquiry into climate-gate and second find out who impersonated the Canadian government, make sure it is all public and lay the approbiate criminal charges. These wingnuts have gone to far.
 
Meme Mine
Sorry, I guess I’m a denier now because I can’t ignore the implications of the emails from ”¦”¦”¦”¦”¦the SCIENTISTS! You know, the “scientists” we have been trusting all along telling us the planet is slowly dying from human CO2. I DEMAND absolute PROOF the planet is dying before I deny my children their futures. This is too important to politicize. And besides, wouldn’t we be relieved to know the world’s longest emergency is no longer a grave danger to all life on the planet? We better be sure. This is too important a sacrifice of our lifestyle and to future ridicule when history calls climate change by humans; modern day witch burning
We can’t cherry pick what the scientists say as that would no longer be science now would it?
 
nuhuh
BTW - the person behind this hoax is Igor Vamos, supposedly a Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and a 'culture jamming artist'. Obviously highly qualified to discuss climate science. *rolls eyes*. The truth is, there is much debate among actual scientists about climate change in general, the only people to whom the debate is closed are careerist scientists who've specialized in alarmism and a reputation to protect at any cost and sanctimonious but uninformed twits such as these.
 
Daniel
To all the those that don't believe in climate change:

In a house of six students, this year alone we've gone through eight computers, three cars, a dozen ipods... We've got 8 cellphones, and we try to dispose of these things properly when they break, and realize they'll need to be replaced next year.

Fifty years ago, these things did not exist. We have a very real problem, climate change is very practical, and not as wishy-washy hippy as you'd believe.

If it takes some hoaxers to bring attention to the issue, and bring out the losts souls so we can better inform them, than I think it was a good news day.
 
Moving forward
@ Wow & Meme Mine:

1. No scientific body of National or International standing has challenged the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_ipcc_fourth_assess...).
2. The Associated Press did an exhaustive review of the hacked East Anglia University emails and found that the “emails stolen from climate scientists at the University of East Anglia show they stonewalled sceptics and discussed hiding data. But the messages don't support claims that the science of global warming was faked” (http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/science-of-globa...).
3. The other day 1,700 UK scientists confirmed the connection between have been human activity to climate change. (http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j9MrjlmXzORMlHNvYfE9yA...)
4. Despite avoiding any meaningful action on climate change to date, Canada’s Conservative government has already confirmed the science connecting human activity to climate change (http://news.globaltv.com/technology/mail+hacking+controversy+doesn+chang...)
5. The fossil fuel industries have been outed for trying to create confusion and doubt about the science but they once again have been rebuked (http://straight.com/article-265275/taking-goliath / http://thetyee.ca/Books/2009/12/10/ClimateDeniers/).
6. It's time to stop denying (http://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/cold-comfort-the-psycho...) our role in causing climate change and start figuring out how to make the changes necessary so that our planet will continue to support our species long into the future.
 
Andrew Eden-Balfour
I'm afraid I have to side with the protestors and the hoax people on this, Canada, I love you and all since I'm Canadian; but your policies on climate are just simply attrotious at best, especially since you have just lowered expected emmission cuts by 2/3. I know that the oil sands are a major importance to Alberta's and Canada's economy, but Mr. Harper your being too biased on the oil sands and ignoring the environment. You got to have a balance of both in order to please everybody otherwise not only you'll be a joke to developed countries who are serious about climate change; but to also please Canadians, specially central and eastern canadians if you want to stay prime minister.
 
Stryder
I quess one bad joke deserves another.
 
The Poop
TREASON ~ YANKEES GO HOME.

THERE IS ONLY ONE WAY FORWARD:

There is something we can all do RIGHT NOW (please copy and ROCK THAT NET!!!):

SIGN THIS PETITION RIGHT NOW:
http://www.cwf-fcf.org/en/action/your-voice/petitions/true-or-false-peti...

SHARE THE VIDEO:


This is from 1992?! As a cancer survivor; I would like to ensure that the rising cancer commodities release their IRON GRIP on our Canaday.

If not our generation; then WHEN???

We could also start a on-line pledge; to sign and shoot around the net; that I will vote for Human Rights next year!

Sincerely,
 
greggron
It`s just one hoax after another from the lunatic left eco-nazis.
 
Meme Mine
The Sad History of GlowBULL WARmongering, the Left's WMD Scam:
1965

A U. S. President's Advisory Committee panel warns that the greenhouse effect is a matter of "real concern."

1975

U. S. scientist Wallace Broecker puts the term "global warming" into the public domain.

1988

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) formed to collate and assess evidence on climate change.

1989

Carbon emissions from fossil fuel burning and industry reach six billion tonnes per year.

1990

IPCC concludes that temperatures have risen by 0.3-0.6o C over the last century and that human activities are significantly adding to concentrations of greenhouse gases.

1997

Kyoto Protocol agreed. Developed nations pledge to reduce emissions by an average of 5% by the period 2008-2012, with wide variations on targets for individual countries.

2001

IPCC Third Assessment Report finds "new and stronger evidence" that humanity's emissions of greenhouse gases are the main cause of global warming.

2005

The Kyoto Protocol comes into force. The U. S. is the only country to not ratify.

2006

Carbon emissions from fossil fuel burning and industry reaches eight billion tonnes per year.

2007

The IPCC concludes it is more than 90% likely that humanity's emissions of greenhouse gases are responsible for modern-day climate change.

Dec. 7-18, 2009

192 governments will convene for the UN climate summit in Copenhagen.

The long term effects of climate change?

Thousands of recently hacked e-mails, which suggest leading scientists manipulated data, have been released, changing the face of the climate debate. So how many of these previous predictions still hold water?

2020

Flash floods will very likely increase in Europe. Less rainfall could reduce agriculture yields by up to 50% in some parts of the world.

2030

Up to 18% of the world's coral reefs will likely be lost. Glaciers on equatorial mountains in Africa will disappear. Urban populations in developing countries will more than double.

2040

The Arctic Sea could be ice-free in the summer and winter ice depth will shrink drastically.

Crop yields could increase by up to 20% in East and Southeast Asia, while decreasing by up to 30% in Central and South Asia. A quarter of the world's plant and vertebrate animal species could face extinction.

2050

Small alpine glaciers may disappear completely; large glaciers will shrink by 30-70%.

In Australia, there will likely be an additional 3,200-5,200 heat-related deaths per year. In the United Kingdom, cold-related deaths will outpace heat-related ones.

2070

As glaciers disappear and areas a ected by drought increase, electricity production for the world's existing hydropower stations will decrease. Hydropower potential may decline by as much as 6% in Europe and up to 50% in the Mediterranean.

2080

While some parts of the world dry out, others will be become flooded. Up to 100 million people could experience coastal flooding each year. Between 1.1 and 3.2 billion people will experience water shortages. Up to 600 million will go hungry.

Sea levels could rise around New York City by more than one meter, potentially causing extensive flooding around the city.

2085

The risk of dengue fever is estimated to increase to 3.5 billion people.

2100

Ocean pH levels will very likely decrease by as much as 0.5 pH units, impairing the ability of marine organisms such as corals, crabs and oysters to form shells or exoskeletons.

Due to the thawing permafrost, Earth will emit more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere than it absorbs. New climate zones appear on up to 39% of the world's land surface, radically transforming the planet. Up to one-third of all species of plants and land animals -- more than a million total -- could be driven to extinction.

 
Acemeister
You fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders - The most famous of which is "never get involved in a land war in Asia" - but only slightly less well-known is this: "Never go to Copenhagen when there are billions of Canadian tax dollars on the line"! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha...

Let's just dump untold dollars into the global warming hoax/industry so some big UN agency (or the like) can feed them to African despots (after all, they need those marble palaces built somehow). That ought to keep the planet cooler... At least it will when the central air is turned on in those third world castles.

How can taxing us to incredible heights actually have an effect on the solar cycle - which, either cooling or warming, is the real impetus for global climate change?

How can making Canadians pay ever more (through taxes, not through actual supply and demand of a commodity) for heating their furnaces and gasoline bring down the world's temperature. It was minus 44 here in evil Alberta last night - but when it drops to zero in Vancouver, it is crisis time, right? The same loons that use gas and oil from the polluters should walk in the cold or shut off the furnace when the incredible -2 cold snap hits... The rest of Canada faces reality in the winter, not endless pontificating about saving the world from the very "greenhouse" gas we are all exhaling 8 times a minute.

Hey, last time I heard, as the glaciers retreat, underneath that sheet of ice, they seem to find a lot of grass and frozen wildlife. So it was pretty darn warm up north 1000's of years ago - wonder if the wooly mammoth exhaust and tar pits caused that type of heat wave?

Ah, to be a socialist or eco-nut. Where reality doesn't matter and some crazy "end" is worth any means to get there...

 
We can Dream
Who ever did this hoax, good on them! Canada is an embarassment, per capita we are one of worse polluters in the world. Our Prime Minister is more concerned about not upsetting his political base, by cutting the tar sands projects, then he is about our responsibiltiy to the world and future generations.
Yes who ever did this hoax, put us on the media map again, unfortunately for all the wrong reasons. I am upset, and vow to inform as many people about this on going embarrassment of the self centered conservatives. I have and will continue to learn more of our various political parties positions and when our next election comes out will mobilize other voters against Harper, is very unlikey the Liberals are any better, but I will give them a chance.

I suggest to the readership to contact your local MP and find out their position start to put pressure on them if you care about our planet

To those naysayers, I strongley suggest you do your homework before you attempt to educate the rest of us. Are you willing to take a chance and do nothing? What are the consequences if we do nothing and this turns out to be real? What are the consequences if we something and it is true? Why would you want to gamble with your own future and future generations?

These are legitimate questions and would be interested in knowing your opinion on doing nothing and waiting to see what happens. What right do we have to compromise future generations?
 
Is it so simple?
This Acemeister character has issues, he is blantant racist when he makes arguements that suggest tha t Africa is full of criminal leaders.

He fails to recognize that Europe, USA, and Canada owe their powerful positions to ripping off the Indigenous peoples of lands, resources, and labour. He probably is unaware/or even supports slavery.

Why has Africa, which has an abundance of natural resources remains so financially poor? It is because it is under neo-colonial control. Try reading a book once in a while. 500 years of colonialism, slavery, racism, and outright theft of their wealth which continues to sustain other countries outside of Africa.

Multinational corporations and fat cat bankers have been hoarding the wealth of the world (of course you would have read a book or two, to know this) that is the money that should be going back to the people.
This simpleton should wake up, and realize that he has been programmed and stop the divide and conquer strategy that the fat cats want him to do.
 
Support your local yes men being sued by Canwest
Share the video and then find out more at www.seriouslyfreespeech.ca
Canwest's Global War on Satire

 
Acemeister
Is it so simple? Of course not - but it seems to me that every liberal's knee-jerk reaction to a realistic statement is to yell "racist" or even "blantant racist". So too is it typical to ignore any statement that can't be countered. Just change the subject, right? To one that is full of socialist platitudes (like the good ol' blame the corporations).

The reality is that, regardless of the history of Africa, there are countless despots who take aid from developed country to feather their nests. For every Mandela, there are lots of Amin's. I, and every rational person, don't care what race they are - the fact is that indigenous African leadership is corrupt, more times than not. The transfer payments to developing countries will not lower the temperature.

You can only continue blaming Europe for so long... Whether you call it colonial or not, it would seem that there was a lot less starvation and internecine killing prior to self rule.

Canada has received little to none of Africa's resources (excepting the sparkly rocks we know as diamonds) - but has given untold billions in aid. Canada's involvement with slavery was largely limited to providing a safe haven for American refugees. I've personally hired hundreds of African immigrants to well paying Canadian jobs - and see the funds they send home to assist their families - so I have a little better grasp on modern history than it would seem you do. Living in the past, though, is a far better way of justifying hackneyed socialist attitudes, right?

I wouldn't go as far as to insult you - but this simpleton just needs to repeat: Ah, to be a socialist or eco-nut. Where reality doesn't matter and some crazy "end" is worth any means to get there...

Merry Christmas!
 
hinotes
My Dad was born in 1889 and witnessed hundreds of changes. He was born in the USA, where he was a teacher. One day I had asked him, why he left the USA, and came to Canada, to homestead, he said, it, was because of rotten government. I, burst out laughing, he admitted, it didn't do him any better to come to Canada. He, was from the era of paddle ships on the Mississippi, and, lived until he was 99. He refused to use DDT, he refused to use artificial fertilizer, he said, his animals would be artificial meat. He noticed, a big change, in the Columbia ice fields in Jasper National Park. He came through there in 1910, and was shocked, when he saw them again at 79 years of age. He said, the ice fields, used be down to the road, and, he said, now it's a good walk to get up to them. He was right about the DDT, he said the birds, owls and such were missing by a large number. So, any one thinking, there is no global warming, had better rethink. Man, has polluted earths streams, rivers and the oceans, man has even been polluting space. Their will be a nasty price to pay, for what we have done to our planet.
 
What? Me? No!
It hurts when the truth hits you in the face, doesnt it?
 
Judy Cross
Guilt trips. CO2 isn't pollution and Copenhagen is an excuse to impose world government based on fraudulent science.
Harper pledged $10 Billion to the hoax months ago. They are all on the same page now. Global governance which allows them to ration energy use and dictate policy that lines the pockets of not only Al Gore and Maurice Strong, but the head of the IPCC.

"A story emerging out of Britain suggests “follow the money” may explain the enthusiasm of the United Nations to pursue caps on carbon emissions, despite doubts surfacing in the scientific community about the validity of the underlying global warming hypothesis.

A Mumbai-based Indian multinational conglomerate with business ties to Rajendra K. Pachauri, the chairman since 2002 of the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, or IPCC, stands to make several hundred million dollars in European Union carbon credits simply by closing a steel production facility in Britain with the loss of 1,700 jobs."
http://www.matador94.nl/global-climate-related/u-n-climate-chief-pachaur...

Meme mine...are you reading chicken entrails for 2020 onward ? All the signs point to cooling for 10-20 years.
http://motls.blogspot.com/2009/09/mojib-latif-warns-ipcc-of-cooling.html
 
Btok
Steve Watson
Prisonplanet.com
Friday, Dec 18, 2009
Amid all the mainstream media reports of the talks in Copenhagen “limping” to a close and having failed, Lord Christopher Monckton, reporting from the summit, has stated that the only goal of the conference was to implement the framework and the funding for a world government – which he asserts has been achieved.“That is the one thing that they are definitely going to succeed in doing here and they will announce that as a victory in itself, and they will be right because that is the one and only single aim of this entire global warming conference, to establish the mechanism, the structure, and above all the funding for a world government.” the British politician, business consultant, policy adviser exclusively told the Alex Jones show yesterday.“They are going to take from the western countries the very large financial resources required to do that.” Monckton said, adding “They will disguise it by saying they are setting up a $100 billion fund for adaptation to climate change in third world countries, but actually, this money will almost all be gobbled up by the international bureaucracy.”“The first thing they will do, and the one thing I think they were always going to succeed in doing at this conference is to agree to establish what will be delicately called ”˜the institutional framework’. Now that is a code word for world government.”Lord Monckton explained that although the word “government” has been dropped from the treaty, all the interlocking bureaucratic features of a world government are still present in the final draft of the treaty, which also legislates for a global tax on financial transactions that will be paid directly to the World Bank. Check out what Government is doing behind your back at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VebOTc-7shU

PS: We need to establish the truth about Climate Change from credible Scientists' stop these Climate Summits before we’re all taxed and acquire some UN arrests!
 
we can dream can suck it
there is no global warming. that is a load of bull made up by gullable people like yourself that will believe anything the government says just because there are a couple fake facts to back it up. open your eyes and pay attention its 2010 and the world is still here and doing good.
 
 
[Comments Disclaimer]
Post a comment
· Use your real name to have your comment considered for publication in print.
· URLs and email addresses will be automatically turned into links.