Virginia Greene: 2010 Olympics will be biggest advertisement ever for B.C.
By Virginia Greene
If you’re old enough to remember Expo 86, you’ll understand why many community and business leaders are excited about the long-term value of the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games. If you’re not old enough to remember, keep reading because you might just get a sense of what’s to come in 2010 and beyond. Opened in May 1986, Expo 86 ended six months later with some 22,111,578 visits. By any measure, it was a great success and raised the bar for every world’s fair that followed.
During Expo 86, I worked for the B.C. Ministry of Tourism and was responsible for marketing our province’s tourism brand to the world. With leadership and direction from then premier Bill Bennett and key ministers, we made sure that Expo 86 was a launching pad, not a landing pad.
Like Expo 86, the 2010 Games will provide a unique international platform for Vancouver, Whistler, and the rest of British Columbia. With 10,000 media and an international television audience in the billions, the Games will be British Columbia’s biggest advertisement ever. Yes, I understand there are some who never wanted the Games in the first place. Certainly not all British Columbians welcomed Expo 86. But, when the Olympics get underway in February, I am convinced it will ignite the same kind of community spirit and pride that we saw during Expo 86.
Views on the Olympics
Ivan Doumenc: 2010 Winter Olympics will be Vancouver's demise
Marla Renn: Attempts to silence dissent won't stifle resistance to 2010 Olympics
Joyce Murray: The triumphs and challenges of the 2010 Olympics and Paralympics
Philip Boyle and Kevin D. Haggerty: Olympic-size questions about surveillance and privacy
Peter Julian: Corporate Olympics need to return to sporting roots
Jane Sterk: The inconvenient legacy of Vancouver's 2010 Olympics
Alvin Singh: Social legacy of Vancouver Olympics won’t be what was promised
Kathy Corrigan: B.C. government should be upfront about real cost of 2010 Olympics
Dean Skoreyko: Civil rights should not be traded away for 2010 Olympics
Garry John and Maude Barlow: 2010 Olympics will leave legacy of social, environmental destruction



E-mail
Print
Comments
If Ms. Greene believes that the Olympics alone will make for great things-I believe she is being short sighted in the extreme. The 2010 Olympics will only provide a beginning of potential opportunities to prove Vancouver (BC) is an International player. The gross indecencies of the Campbell BC Liberal government--shabby to pathetic/phony environmental and poverty policy may take away from these anticipated opportunities.
What people outside of Vancouver know of Vancouver is "BC bud" (laced with LSD and coke by the way, that's why it's so desirable), and the beautiful scenery. That's it.
All the Olympics will really do is make it harder to move around (there's already test road closures that has caused tonnes of problems, and VANOC ads telling inhabitants to find other modes of transportation such as buses to go downtown. Then we see news stories that Translink says that they'll be overwhelmed by people). How is this good for the city? If I owned a hotel or restaurant, then sure, it's good for me. Other than that, it's not good for anyone.
The media should have Michael Buble everywhere. He is Sinatra 2010. "Haven't met you yet" --song of the year (GPR).
Get Buble and other great music--who is playing where?--is the Straight going to cover this? Competitive sports and great music go hand in hand.
I also hope protestors are evident. Everyone civil---but freedom of speech no matter the event---because it is a continuing right--while the Olympics is not a continuing event (in the day to day sense of that).
The event is meant to draw investment to develop the transportation infrastructure linked to the port to entice the booming Chinese and Indian market. The Anglo-American economic system is never going to be the same and our port may become the major west coast hub for material traffic from Asia.
Miguel
the only reason asian capital moved into vancouver was because of pattison family pushing the government to open the flootgates to people from hong kong when it was return to china and the uk had said they didn't want any people from hong kong coming to the uk so they had to go somewhere and pattison family figured they could make a quick buck that way. and so it happened. if anyting all this resulted in sky rocketing real estate prices, rents being pushed up so people could no longer afford to live in the downtown, wages went way down by up to 30% plus a whole bunch of people moved to vancouver when the economy could not absorb any of them workwise resulting in low wage competition for canadian workers who saw their decent salaries being reduced to crappy salaries, who saw their affordable apartment in downtown vancouver replaced by a cheap apartment in east vancouver or burnaby. expo 86 brought nothing but misery for the people of bc and the olympics will be no different.
we're told that tourists/visitors are expected to spend $900 million during the games. big deal with the multi billion dollars spent on it. you still run a huge deficit. remember the summer games in greece? yep an 8 billion euro deficit from the olympics alone and the other eu countries had to bail them out for 8 billion euro's
They'll be amazed at the lack of turnstiles at the skytrain and use them more than expected, causing people who are just trying to get to work huge delays.
They'll drive down east hastings and wonder how the city's mayor and council can let this type of thing happen. They'll travel through downtown and see a homeless person literally on every block. How, oh how, was this allowed to happen, oh mayor?! I'm on my way to the post office to post a letter to you right now, oh no I can't, your police force is escorting bikers through red lights and stopsigns, blocking me.
Miguel
There are far better and more economical ways to get the BC is GREAT! message out.
Some buisness types--all good chamber members will make hugh amounts on the OH-Limp-icks, but most of us will pay and pay and pay--for many years.
Expo 86 was just as much of a crock--and billy boy and his buddies made a lot off it.
Will there be another gigantic leap in housing prices? That isn't a healthy, "best place to be" situation.
You cannot pay people minimum wage and expect them to thrive, no matter how many jobs they have.
I was born in this city and I can't afford to live here.
Post a comment