Don Davies: Stephen Harper's prorogation of Parliament sets back work on key issues

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      By Don Davies

      Stephen Harper’s decision to prorogue Parliament is gaining notoriety—and infamy.

      It’s not difficult to see why.

      His action undermines Canadian democracy by barring Parliament from holding the government accountable.

      It halts all committee work in progress, including in-depth studies on federal prison programs for the mentally ill, pension reform, and the inquiry into Afghan detainee torture allegations.

      It kills 36 government bills, all of which will have to be re-introduced at square one. Although many of these Conservative bills are of dubious value or outright misguided, a number of them do deal with important issues, like consumer protection, white-collar crime, and on-line criminal activity.

      And it is unacceptable to shut down our elected chamber simply because the prime minister wants to avoid criticism.

      This decision, however, is as unsurprising as it is undemocratic. It is part of a long-standing pattern of running from accountability that has marked the Harper administration from the start.

      Consider that this is the second time Harper has prorogued the House in 12 months—both times to avoid the scrutiny of, and accountability to, both Parliament and the Canadian public.

      It is the fourth time he has abruptly ended a session in three years. He’s also broken his word on fixed election dates.

      And it is accompanied by an increasingly blatant disregard for the rule of law, including refusing to comply with access to information orders or to disclose to parliamentarians unredacted documents pertaining to the torture issue in Afghanistan.

      Ironically, while Stephen Harper is actively blocking elected members of Parliament from working in the House of Commons, he is moving swiftly to appoint more unelected senators—something he promised he would never do.

      Boiled down, from both a policy perspective and a practical one, the conducting of our nation’s business has been set back, and our tradition of respect for parliamentary democracy is being damaged.

      As a parliamentarian, there are a number of issues that I would have liked to see tackled during the prorogation period. Certainly, there is no shortage of important subjects that need our attention.

      There is a pension crisis in Canada. Many individuals are struggling to find work and need help to recover from the economic recession. Families are challenged in every respect.

      Post-Copenhagen, environmental urgencies remain unaddressed. Homelessness, a lack of affordable housing, and the need for accessible, quality childcare are pressing. We are facing a huge deficit, and serious questions of fiscal policy and taxation choices must be made.

      Of all these critical issues, I believe we particularly need to focus attention on the social agenda and the environment. This embraces issues that have been generally ignored by the Conservatives, but which affect many Canadians, including our most vulnerable.

      So, if I were in Parliament in February, I would be working on three major issues: housing, poverty, and the environment.

      We need to implement a national housing strategy with the goal of ensuring that every single Canadian has decent, affordable shelter. Through years of Liberal and Conservative neglect, the federal government has been totally absent from this arena. My colleague Libby Davies has a bill before Parliament that would establish such a strategy, and if we were in session next month, we could be moving that bill closer to implementation.

      We need to address the appalling rates of child and seniors’ poverty in our country. We managed to get billions of federal dollars rolling within months when faced with a crisis of the banking and business community. I believe similar concentrated efforts to ensure no Canadian lives below the poverty line are equally achievable—and February in Ottawa would be a great time to start. Universal childcare, increased pensions for seniors, and poverty-reduction programs across the board should not wait any longer.

      We need to develop a national green jobs strategy that will put Canada’s industrial and manufacturing sectors on track, creating the well-paying employment our citizens need on a clean and sustainable basis. And every month we fail to address climate change is a month closer to environmental and economic disaster. In my view, parliamentary attention is vital to sustaining momentum in this area.

      Canadians expect their MPs to work together to find solutions for the challenges facing our country. They expect us to do so when it requires sacrifice, hard work, and, yes, even some criticism—just as they do, every day, themselves.

      Until Parliament resumes, however, we will continue to do the important work that is needed in our communities—meeting constituents, working with local groups, and listening to the priorities of our citizens.

      I, for one, will let Harper know what I hear.

      Don Davies is the NDP MP for Vancouver Kingsway.

      Comments

      8 Comments

      RodSmelser

      Jan 11, 2010 at 4:48pm

      Davies is right, this manouevre is gaining notoriety, and for good reason. One can only hope that the Olympics glow, with all the Ministers and other Tory front-benchers getting theie photos taken with victorious Canadian athletes and visiting celebrities, doesn't overshadow this prorogation caper in the minds of voters.

      I'm favourably inclined towards Davies' list of parliamentary priorties as well, in that it includes universal child care, a major missing element in the Canadian job market and social policy system.

      The political side of this caper is, I am afraid, almost too conspiratorial for words. I think the Conservatives, who have the best polling and voter analysis material money can buy, must have seen the public reaction coming. They would have known beforehand that this was going to cost them a few points in the polls, and that these percentage points would likely flow directly to the Liberals. So why did they do it?

      To do just that, to spot the Liberals some opinion poll points at a time when their traditional rival was flailing badly -- the Liberals had brushed against the 25% line in some polls this Fall -- figuring they will recover those points later. It's a temporary lifeline to keep an old rival APPARENTLY in the game a while longer, to ensure that Ignatieff remains afloat in his own party, and to prevent the Liberal label from flat-lining completely with voters, which could open a big doorway of opportunity for Jack Layton and the NDP.

      Rod Smelser

      D.S.

      Jan 11, 2010 at 7:27pm

      This sounds a lot like what the liberals are saying. Until they give their head a shake and join the left Harpper is going to just keep smiling until he gets his pension and laughs all the way to the bank. So if your really thinking about the little Canadian get together and kick him out.

      Unlikely

      Jan 12, 2010 at 5:59am

      "Until they give their head a shake and join the left..."

      Well, maybe it could happen. If "the left" dropped its pro-communist stances, stopped openly discriminating against Caucasian males, and altogether dumped its "extreme left" fringe associations, I think Canadian voters might better be able to stomach them.

      Until then, it's business as usual.

      AWP

      Jan 12, 2010 at 10:38pm

      its the economy, nothing else

      Isis B.

      Jan 13, 2010 at 3:31am

      Check out the Canadians Against Proroguing Parliament group on facebook and actions planned for January 23rd across the country. The lack of accountability and undemocratic nature of Harper's actions are not going unnoticed.

      glen p robbins

      Jan 13, 2010 at 9:05pm

      I don't agree -- . Pollsters in parties--don't do a good job. If they were any good at all, Harper would have a majority NOW. Close is just that--it is no cigar. I have on another blog called this a stupid mistake--I hold that opinion. The fact that there is a coalescence among any groups--Facebook etc., the press writes about--gives the old perogy legs. This is a stupid mistake because those voters who don't care about Afghan detainees, or get miffed with 'war crimes' arguments---don't support perogy parliament. The PM would have been better letting his Progressive minister McKay take the heat, tough it out, and take the 50/50 outcome that likely would have prevailed. Now, some voters who would have said "The Taliban can stick it--torture or not"----might begin to rethink their position as they realize that Canadian soldiers don't want this distraction. A good effort in Haiti--with cash AND Canadian help will ameliorate these types of perceptions--but only a little.

      Stryder

      Jan 13, 2010 at 9:13pm

      Mr. Harpers ambition will trump the peoples business every time.

      glen p robbins

      Jan 15, 2010 at 9:03pm

      Stryder -- it is unfortunate that each time a position of power is taken up -- it seems it isn't long before we start crying this tune. We got sick of Glen Clark--sick of Jean Chretien--we're double-sick of Gordon Campbell-and now we are becoming a sick of Stephen Harper. I wonder when this pattern of frustration will change?