Vote on smoking bans for Vancouver parks and beaches expected February 1
There’s a good chance that Dr. Stuart Kreisman will enjoy the seawall and beaches of Stanley Park quite soon without inhaling secondhand cigarette smoke.
Kreisman, a doctor and endocrinologist with St. Paul’s Hospital, likes to jog, bike, and in-line skate at any time of the year in the park, and he’s not happy having smokers around puffing away.
“I find it to be bothersome and inappropriate that individuals who are looking for healthy time on the beaches end up breathing in somebody else’s secondhand smoke,” Kreisman told the Straight. “The excuse that this is outdoors doesn’t cut it.”
Kreisman has been working with the staff of the Vancouver park board on a smoking ban on the city’s parks, beaches, and trails, and it looks like some form of prohibition will soon be in place.
Vision Vancouver park board commissioner Raj Hundal told the Straight that the board is expected to take up on February 1 a staff recommendation on how to deal with smoking in the city’s park system.
Hundal recalled that staff conducted a survey last year about this issue, and respondents overwhelmingly supported the idea of a smoking regulation.
He clarified that the measure might not be a total ban but rather may involve the establishment of smoke-free zones.
“This is coming up for discussion,” Hundal said when asked how large the zones would be.
The park commissioner noted that the city would not be the first to deal with smoking in public parks. He said that the City of White Rock, City of West Vancouver, and the District of North Vancouver all have smoke-free beaches, playgrounds, and playing fields.
Many members of the previous park board have said that they wanted to ban smoking but they failed to follow through on this matter.
The smokers’ rights group MyChoice.ca doesn’t have a B.C. talking head, but its Quebec-based spokesperson Arminda Mota spoke to the Straight by phone about this potential move by the Vancouver park board.
“My short comment would be, when will the craziness stop?” Mota asked.
According to her, the anti-smoking movement has accomplished very little in reducing the smoking rate in the country.
“The more aggressive the anti-smokers get, the less people quit,” Mota said. “There is a hardcore of about 20 percent of the population, which is exactly five million adults in Canada right now.”
Mota noted that smoking is already banned in a lot of places. “My question is, how come they don’t ban it [cigarettes] period?” she said. “Take it off the market if it’s too bad for us.”
Mota said that it’s a fact that smoking is bad for health. But she also noted that “bullying” and making smokers feel guilty “doesn’t help”. She said that education is an effective way of reducing smoking.
Kreisman believes in a more robust intervention.
“The less places people can smoke, the less likely they are to smoke,” Kreisman said. “We don’t want young kids on the beach looking at a whole bunch of teenagers smoking, and saying, ‘Look how cool they are.’”
Kreisman added, “People who start smoking don’t start as adults. They start as children. Ninety percent of smokers start before the age of 18.”




E-mail
Print
Comments
Me thinks there are more productive ways to address these concerns. I don't see the need to get pushy.
I'm all fine if the government wants to make cigarettes illegal; chances are really high that people would quit if they couldn't buy them. That won't happen however, as everyone enjoys the obscene amounts of taxes that smokers generate. Everyone know cigarettes are bad for you; the photos of the dying babies on the packages make that fairly clear.
If you want clean beaches, install ashtrays. If you want people to stop smoking, stop selling cigarettes. Until then, leave the smokers alone.
Our bodies are capable of defending us from small levels of toxins. We are exposed to small amounts of dangerous chemicals everyday in our lives. Secondhand smoke is no more dangerous then the invisible exhaust of a million automobiles.
Like the bar and pub associations before him, who predicted massive layoffs (in fact, there were ZERO!) and business failures (fact: ZERO!) as a result of the smoking bans brought in about 10 years ago, Johnny is now suggesting that there is some link between the extent to which smoking is permitted or not permitted...and having fun or being bored, respectively. Like the bar and pub Neanderthals, Johnny clearly believes 'THE SKY WILL FALL' if smoking is banned in parks and on beaches.
Note to self, Johnny: The sky didn't fall 10 years ago and...well, I'll let you figure the rest out.
While condoning smoking anywhere and everywhere, Johnny proudly tells the world, "...and I don't even smoke." Sort of like condoning drinking and driving, then saying, "...and I don't even drink!" And, for the record, most tobacco executives don't smoke either...and they sure as hell don't want their own kids to smoke, but everybody else's kids -- especially those in Third World countries -- are 'fair game' as far as they're concerned!
It never ceases to amaze me how some people minimize -- and even trivialize -- a product that kills 47,000 Canadians, each and every year. It's a leading cause of forest fires (and a huge threat to Stanley Park every summer)...and the leading form of litter, by far! And Johnny calls it "a nuisance"???
But the real 'highlight' of Johnny's little missive is his use of the word "freedom".
The only logical response to anyone who [AB]uses the word "freedom" while condoning smoking in any public place or workplace, indoors or outdoors, is laughter. Just in case you didn't know it, Johnny, nicotine is the most addictive drug known...and addiction eliminates 'freedom'.
I would be remiss if I didn't say a word or two about Arminda Mota, the head of a (tobacco industry-funded) so-called "smokers' rights" group called MyChoice.ca.
First, what I said about "freedom", above, also applies to "choice".
And finally, at least 2 or 3 times over the years, I've challenged Mota to debate any and all tobacco issues...and, like the 'snakes in the grass' at the tobacco industry who she so proudly represents, she refuses.
Get out there and enjoy all that secondhand smoke while you can, Johnny; it's days are numbered!
Pick up your cigarette butts - or face a littering fine
We already have enough laws for that!
And stop creating new laws when the old one would do just fine with a little enforcement!
If education worked, as Arminda Mota claims, there would already be no problem. Smokers have had over 50 years of education and they're still no smarter or more considerate. How much more education do they need?
My only concern is enforcement. The enforcement of buffer zones has been appalling. How about we start cracking down on the laws we already have and, if we add new ones (and I hope we do), follow up with enforcement as well. Unenforced laws just make smokers even more arrogant and the rest of us are left feeling more abandoned by the people who should be protecting us than ever.
Post a comment