Music Arts Reviews | PuSh Festival

So Percussion brings minimalist music to the masses

By John Lucas,

At Heritage Hall on Sunday, January 24. Copresented by Music on Main and the PuSh International Performing Arts Festival. No remaining performances

One of the reasons minimalist music is so often considered an indulgence of the pretentious is that some of it can only be appreciated if you understand the theory behind it. This is the case with Four Organs, a Steve Reich work performed by Brooklyn quartet So Percussion in its two-night Vancouver debut. With local guest Vern Griffiths providing metronomic accompaniment with a pair of maracas, each of the group’s four members—Eric Beach, Josh Quillen, Adam Sliwinski, and Jason Treuting—held down various notes on his keyboard, with the duration of those notes increasing as the piece went on. Four Organs has no melodic content to speak of, just overlapping tones that form a dominant 11th chord. To put that in layman’s terms, it’s a shifting drone with dissonant intervals that can be downright piercing. No wonder early performances of the 1970 composition were met with loud boos and near riots.

The Heritage Hall audience on Sunday night was much more appreciative of what was probably the program’s most challenging music. The other works performed were no less formal exercises than Four Organs is, but they were arguably more crowd-pleasing. Reich’s Clapping Music, Nagoya Marimbas, and Music for Pieces of Wood are similar in that each features rhythmic patterns played on two or more instruments, with the parts moving out of phase with one another by one or more beats. So Percussion handled each mathematically complex piece with jaw-dropping precision.

Nagoya Marimbas proved particularly virtuosic, with Sliwinski and Treuting spinning out melodic lines that, because they were constantly in motion, created a hypnotic effect.

Griffiths again joined the quartet for Music for Pieces of Wood: as all five hammered out a beat on tuned wooden blocks, the room sounded like a telegraph office with five machines tapping out the same Morse code message out of sync with each other. The rhythmic complexity was brain-twisting, but the performance was flawless.

So Percussion followed that up with two parts of David Lang’s the so-called laws of nature, which the group commissioned in 2002. This was almost the exact opposite of the Reich works, in that it often had the performers playing in unison but on subtly different instruments—these included tuned steel rods, tom-toms, and kick drums in the thunderous, almost industrial first portion, and flowerpots and teacups in the quieter second. It was a tad repetitive, but the quirky voicing made it fun.

Not as much fun, though, as the encore, in which the quartet led an audience-participation version of Clapping Music. This might have been the highlight of the show, because you don’t need any fancy music theory to enjoy putting your hands together.

Comments

Kara Gibbs
This was a gorgeous concert. I disagree with the notion that minimalist music (or any new music for that matter) "can only be appreciated if you understand the theory behind it." The very first time I ever heard Steve Reich I had no understanding whatsoever of the theory behind it”¦ but it was exhilarating. The rhythmic tension inherent in phase music is something that causes a reaction in most people, making it actually very accessible (as far as contemporary classical music goes). This type of music doesn't require a background in musical theory”¦ just an open mind.
 
Justin Malecki
I'll go even further than Kara. I would say that it is only when one ignores the theory behind the music and concentrates on the countless layers of resonance and "higher order sound" that is created that one finds the true beauty of minimalist or process music. Only then does one see the beautiful and intricate tapestry that is created from numerous near identical threads. It is too bad that John Lucas missed out on this experience.
 
John Lucas
Thanks for your comments.

Kara: I was not trying to make a sweeping statement about all minimalist music. That's why I said "some of it". The reason I used Four Organs as an example is because it is a piece that has provoked extreme reactions from audiences. But don't take my word for it. Here's what Michael Tilson Thomas, who conducted a Four Organs performance at Carnegie Hall in 1973, remembers about that concert (as quoted by the Times): “There were at least three attempts to stop the performance by shouting it down. One woman walked down the aisle and repeatedly banged her head on the front of the stage, wailing ”˜Stop, stop, I confess’.”

And in fact, I overheard one Heritage Hall patron grumbling about how Four Organs was "pretentious" and how all the "artsy types" were supposedly pretending to enjoy it. For the record, I personally enjoyed it a lot, especially the dissonant bits! But I would be greatly remiss not to mention the fact that it has always been, and remains, a piece of music that has polarized audiences.

Justin: My knowledge of musical theory is rudimentary at best. Moreover, I thought it was a very good performance, and I feel my review reflects that.
 
 
[Comments Disclaimer]
Post a comment
· Use your real name to have your comment considered for publication in print.
· URLs and email addresses will be automatically turned into links.