Overzealous security clampdown on photography around Olympic venue in Vancouver

A video surveillance camera just behind the security fence at the Vancouver Olympic Centre.

Stephen Hui

You can’t take photographs from the streets or sidewalks surrounding the Vancouver Olympic Centre, despite the fact they are public property.

At least that’s what this Georgia Straight journalist was told this morning (February 9) on three occasions while circumnavigating the 2010 Olympics’ curling venue at Hillcrest Park, before being escorted across the street for standing in an unfenced but apparently closed area.

The first incident occurred as I was taking pictures of video surveillance cameras located just behind the Olympic security fence along the Ontario Street sidewalk. A yellow-jacketed man behind a gate told me that objects inside the fence were off-limits for photography. I told him I was on public property and continued down the sidewalk.

A few minutes later, as I snapped shots of people gathered at an entry point along the fence, one of them approached me. He said he was from Vancouver Fire and Rescue Services, and he didn’t think I could take photos there due to “security reasons”.

When I told him I was on public property and from the Straight, he didn’t push the issue. He and his firefighting colleagues were there to take a tour of the venue, where a few of them will be stationed during the Games.

I continued walking around the fence to where it lines Midlothian Avenue, which is closed to vehicle traffic. As I aimed my camera at the media entry gate, I noticed a woman with a safety vest approaching me. Her accreditation badge identified her as an Olympic transportation attendant. I hit the record-video button on my camera.

“We’re actually closed right now,” she said. “So, all photography is actually not allowed.”

According to the attendant, although I was standing outside the fence, I was still within the security “perimeter”. I asked her where the boundary was, and she pointed to the grass of Queen Elizabeth Park on the other side of the street.

I observed that, as we spoke, a woman was walking down Midlothian. (Earlier, I had seen several other people strolling down the street without any interference.)

“Yeah, she is, but she also doesn’t have a camera,” the attendant said. “I’m sorry, I was just given strict instructions on photography.”

Then she said, “Sorry, I’ll just have to escort you out.”

As we walked up the street, she said Midlothian will be open to accredited media during the Games, when more security will be present.

“It’s just a little bit more of a strict guideline with the Olympics around, so we have to follow protocol,” she said.

After I arrived at work today, I called Rob Holmes, president of the B.C. Civil Liberties Association, for his thoughts on my experience. According to the lawyer, there’s no good reason why I couldn’t stand outside an Olympic fence and take pictures.

“I think it’s not the best start to the Olympic season if they’re doing that kind of stuff,” he said by phone. “The fact is that you’re entitled to take pictures of whatever you can see from a public place.”

Holmes argued that it’s important for citizens not to stay silent about run-ins with overzealous Olympic personnel.

“As our mothers used to say, you’re not supposed to be good just when somebody’s looking,” Holmes said. “So, it’s important that this be brought to the attention of the people who are in charge, so that they can actually show some managerial control over what’s going down on the ground.”

You can follow Stephen Hui on Twitter at twitter.com/stephenhui.

Update: No photography ban around Games venue, Olympic security unit says

See also: Photos: Olympics bring security checkpoints, fences, and closures to Vancouver

Comments

Bulletproofcourier
Interesting. I think I'll head out for a bike ride wearing my helmet cam and publish a video called "Olympic Perimeter Helmet Cam". Look for it soon, just google my name or the video name.
 
Whatever
Photog flash mobz, anyone??
 
MLB
How about getting a comment from the other side of the story? Oh yes, biased reporting!
 
Stephan
Get a court injuction right away? A restraining order? -- Stephan
 
bscene
So big deal, they wouldn't let you take photos. I could understand your concern if this was an everyday occurrence but it is not. Normally, Vancouver isn't what you would call a high profile target for terrorists. With the Olympics here now, it most certainly is. These people are just doing their job as best they can in the way they have been instructed. This is about keeping competitors, spectators and tourists safe.

Don't get me wrong, we need to watch the conduct of VANOC and the police during these games to ensure that our civil liberties are not violated. This however, is a non-issue.

Put your telephoto lens on, cross the street and take your pictures from there.
 
John Goldsmith
While this could simply be the case of one cranky security guard, I spent the entire last Saturday at the foot of BC Place and without hassle. Nobody gave me or the other photographers I was with a difficult time. In fact, the police were welcoming to me. One Montreal-based Sergeant even handed me his card if I needed his name for publishing even though my shot of him would clearly be less than flattering (see link below). Other Olympic security guards were actually welcoming and even wanted to be in the photographs. I took their portrait and gave them my card to contact me for a free copy. And, I am not accredited either.

While I can sit here and be an armchair photographer, I wish the Straight photographer would have challenged the security guard and asked to speak with management. While VANOC and the Integrated Security Unit will no doubt be tough on photographers, it is our right (and duty) to stand our ground as photographers, writers and citizen journalists.

As far as not being able to take photos on public land... well, just wait until the hoards of Olympic ticket holders show up with their dSLRs, point-and-shoots and cell phone cameras. They cannot stop the unstoppable wave of digital media and it's worth pressing the issue if and when we are confronted.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/waxypoetic/4338544612/
 
don h
Oh no! You're not getting what you want. The system isn't working.

Whatever.
 
thanks?
I feel so much safer now :-P
 
macacanadian
Boo. It was almost inevitable that they'd start treating photographers like terrorists.

Lame, Vancouver, very lame.
 
couloir
wouldnt really blame em... the security ppl are poorly trained and even more poorly informed when it comes to things... theyre just following vague instructions from vanoc managers who are probably just as informed.
 
Stephen Elliott-Buckley
MLB wrote:
"How about getting a comment from the other side of the story? Oh yes, biased reporting!"

VANOC does not usually respond to journalists' calls.
 
fan22
My question to the writer is, what kind of man runs to the B.C. Civil Liberties Association after being denied taking photos?
 
DJ BALL
Photog Flash Mob sounds ill.
Heil VANOC !
 
GS
Instead of naysayers who like to bash people without offering solutions we need more people in Van like "Olympic Perimeter Helmet Cam" guy!!!!! Everyone get out there with your cameras and bring lots of people taking pics and video... unfortunately I'm stuck here in Vernon so I can't participate or I would sure be involved in this tyranny being expressed on our freedoms!! We are not China!!! We are Canada... we are supposed to be free!!!!
 
kl
I find it sad that some here mock someone who is willing to stand up for his rights. Also there is no other side of the story. Our rights are our rights!
 
MJM
Sounds similar to unlawful harassment by police and security guards towards photographers here in the UK.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jan/23/photographers-protest-stop-sear...
 
dcinbc
Would it be too much to ask what you find so exciting about taking pictures of security cameras? Do you feel the compulsion to do the same whenever you use an ATM machine, or are you just trying to get pictures of a 'jack-booted thug' pinning you to the wall, violating your civil liberties for your 'friends'? Get a grip and focus your citizen journalism on something more worthy of your talents - there's no shortage of issues in our city. If someone did do something stupid like detonate an explosive device that hurt one of your friends, wouldn't you want the police to catch the person who did it, or would you rather congratulate the 'freedom fighters' for exercising their rights? It cuts both ways, Stephen. No one wants to curb your freedoms, and if you did nothing wrong, you've nothing to fear. Our crazy politics may be a lot of things, but as much as we dislike the centre-right, they aren't a dictatorship. They just figured out a way to split the opposition and keep their jobs.
The cops have enough to do without you being a pest, and the security people are merely doing what they're told. 19 days for now, we'll all breathe a big sigh of relief, and days after that, the venue cameras will be taken down with nothing left to secure. Might as well start looking for another story and get a jump on the folks who can't let this one go. It's a done deal - might as well enjoy the circus as complain about it. And no, I don't like it any better than you do, friend.
 
duncan
"...if you did nothing wrong, you've nothing to fear."

The same line that is brought out every time any sort of new surveillance or security measure is placed on a population. As if it justifies every imaginable infringement on civil liberties and fundemental freedoms the people have.
 
fan22
Totally agree with dcinbc. Too bad people will not bother to read his post.
 
Sean Bickerton
The transportation assistant is entitled to her own opinion but had no authority to evict a law-abiding citizen from public property or to restrict their lawful behaviour. Worse, she created a disturbance of the peace and interfered with the constitutionally protected freedom of information vital to our democracy.

The journalist from the Georgia Straight is owed an apology, and VANOC should instruct self-aggrandizing staff to leave policing and security to uniformed officers that know the law - preferably officers from our own, well-trained Vancouver Police Department.
 
Andrew
I read dcinbc's post, and so did duncan, and duncan had a great response to it.
 
fan22
I can tell the photographer is a timid person when confronted and the first thing he does after the non-incident is run off to BC Civil Liberties and his BLOG.

Too bad he didn't take the VANOC employee up in talking with her manager as she offered in the his 'hidden video.'

BTW did the VANOC employee give you permission to film her? Talk about infringing on people's rights.
 
Typical Non Gullible Canadian
Every time the government and the military / intelligence apparatus violates another right, they are diminishing the most precious commodity in society - human rights and freedoms. They are also setting a precedent for the continuing diminishment of human rights. The line between corporate / government rights and human rights is always being pushed back, with the goal that eventually humans will possess no rights, and the corporate / military / government complex will possess them all.

Progressive desensitization is the way they get us to accept more and more infringements of our rights. They also employ a mountain of skillfully crafted lies, engendering fear to make us lose our clarity and resolve. This entire 2010 Olympics security frenzy is built on two things - the terrorist response of some Palestinians in Munich to the organised mass terrorism of the zionist military who forcefully displaced 800,000 Palestinians, flattened their homes and villages, and stole their land, relegating them to a landless, stateless, impoverished status, living in refugee camps for 60 years, followed by countless additional war crimes, crimes against peace and crimes against humanity committed by the state of Israel - justified once again by a mountain of lies - against the Palestinian and the Lebanese peoples. These Palestinian people were sorely aggrieved, and there has been only salt added to their wounds for the past 60 years, which doesn't justify kidnapping or murder, but is an explanation for it. Without the state crimes that the USA, Canada, the UK, and Israel commit regularly, there would be no reason for there being any freedom fighters desperate enough to try the exact same tactics that the most powerful governments of the world commit daily with impunity - mass murder, bombing, assassinations, kidnapping, torture, etc.
The second excuse given for this 2010 Olympics orgy of security nonsense is the fake "War on Terror' based on the 9/11 U.S. government false flag terrorist attack on its own people to fuel its previously planned and prepared for illegal invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq. A thousand lies have been circulated by the complicit mass media to prop up this ridiculous and baseless 9/11 story that is being used to justify all the Orwellian reforms to global society that diminish our quality of life and sap our community resources like an overgrown leech. Every time people buy into the "Al Qaeda plans to attack us for no reason" argument by tolerating another infringement of our privacy, rights and freedoms in the name of "security" they add credibility this false government terrorist propaganda.
 
Dominique
If the Olympic representative is being "newsworthy" in a public place no permission is required. My understanding of the law (which is limited) is that the Georgia Straight photographer is well within his rights.
 
Human nature
GS wrote: "We are not China!!! We are Canada... we are supposed to be free!!!!"

We are in fact one human race. If you think "Canadian" humans are less prone to fascism and oppression than "Chinese" humans then that may be where your confusion is beginning. We're the exact same monkey.

The good fight counts. If you do nothing - what can you expect?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/feb/10/athens-greece-protest-strike
 
fan22
"We are in fact one human race. If you think "Canadian" humans are less prone to fascism and oppression than "Chinese" humans then that may be where your confusion is beginning. We're the exact same monkey."

@Human Nature - your post is absolutely false.
 
Grumpy Auld Scot
Everyone grab your Nikon and head out to the forbidden zone and shoot everything you see... The only response to this is massive passive civil disobedience.
Gandhi would approve.
 
AS
Dude, be more assertive! I'm a newspaper photographer as well, and get into these situations where someone decides to exercise their little bit of power to push you around. "...oh...well...it doesn't make much sense to me." You're a journalist! You have rights! Don't let yourself be pushed around like that.
On the plus side, great story, and good for you for bringing this to the attention of your readers. Keep up the good work.
 
I don't like this
I don't like this. Walking down a public sidewalk in my city and being told I'm "not allowed" to take a picture? In public? In my city?
I don't like this at all.
 
pwlg
I have been taking photos of security perimeters since last week, several of the cameras 37, 38, 39 and 40 along the north side of False Creek where the seawall pathway is open for public access, not because they are kind enough to do that but because the Edgewater Casino has to have access...so much for security, I took pictures of the tents that house the x-ray screening devices for people entering BC Place Stadium and several other aspects of security. Not once was I asked to put my camera away even chatted with two RCMP officers who unhappily had no choice but told to go to Vancouver and stand in the rain for the next few weeks.

Keep taking pictures folks...mine have been sent to friends lists in the US and Europe and are moving about freer than swine flu...

Perhaps its time for the IOC to take their Games and find their own property somewhere in the world, build their own facilities and pay for their #&!@? games themselves.

The Olympics is just another example of socializing debt and privatizing profit.
 
PT
I am also a photographer and am also assisting with the RCMP with security since work is scarce. It could be different with certain venues but the general rule that was distributed was that photographers can take pics of anything, even the officers an security personnel as long as they don't actually pose for the photos unless approved by the venue or security manager.
 
Dan
Hmmmm.... asserting your "rights" to film. Sounds like something a terrorist would say. Sir I'm going to have to ask you to stand over here and answer a few questions. You're not in trouble, of course. Unless you're a terrorist. You aren't a terrorist, are you? Are you? Prove you aren't a terrorist.
 
Stupid protesters...
Go to a third world country and take a picture of a security camera. You have no idea how lucky you are to be living in Canada you spoiled brats.

There were plenty of times to try and derail the olympics, including that plebiscite Larry Campbell had, but you were too lazy to vote. This is one of the most democratic countries in the world and you don't appriciate it.
 
Tenth Doctor
Well said SP. Photographing security cameras is suspicious behaviour at the best of times. The simple fact is that a high profile event like this brings with it an increased possibility for some manner of large scale attack.

I don't like seeing anyone's civil liberties infringed upon. But there are plenty of places in the world where you would have gotten a whole lot worse than what seems to have amounted to a "move along please" from a few people who sound like they didn't actually know what their policies were supposed to be.
 
Local resident
Is there actually a story here? the guy had no accreditation and was taking pictures in an area deemed as a security zone. He didn't want to talk to the person's manager and didn't push the issue any further. Just because you say your a photographer from a paper wont really get you far now-a-days.
 
John Goldsmith
Local Resident says:

Is there actually a story here? the guy had no accreditation and was taking pictures in an area deemed as a security zone.

To answer your question: yes. In fact, this is exactly the point. The area was not a security zone but public land. Thus, whether the photographer had accreditation or not us moot. He had every right to photograph.

That said, it's good to push back. Hopefully the photog will use this as a learning experience for the next time. I'm sure there will be one.

 
spath
Lets see, you walk around photographing security gates, cameras, and personnel like you're "casing" the joint for an attack. Not once do you mention snapping photos or videoing anything the usual olympic-goer would find interesting.

Why?

 
 
[Comments Disclaimer]
Post a comment
· Use your real name to have your comment considered for publication in print.
· URLs and email addresses will be automatically turned into links.