You can’t take photographs from the streets or sidewalks surrounding the Vancouver Olympic Centre, despite the fact they are public property.
At least that’s what this Georgia Straight journalist was told this morning (February 9) on three occasions while circumnavigating the 2010 Olympics’ curling venue at Hillcrest Park, before being escorted across the street for standing in an unfenced but apparently closed area.
The first incident occurred as I was taking pictures of video surveillance cameras located just behind the Olympic security fence along the Ontario Street sidewalk. A yellow-jacketed man behind a gate told me that objects inside the fence were off-limits for photography. I told him I was on public property and continued down the sidewalk.
A few minutes later, as I snapped shots of people gathered at an entry point along the fence, one of them approached me. He said he was from Vancouver Fire and Rescue Services, and he didn’t think I could take photos there due to “security reasons”.
When I told him I was on public property and from the Straight, he didn’t push the issue. He and his firefighting colleagues were there to take a tour of the venue, where a few of them will be stationed during the Games.
I continued walking around the fence to where it lines Midlothian Avenue, which is closed to vehicle traffic. As I aimed my camera at the media entry gate, I noticed a woman with a safety vest approaching me. Her accreditation badge identified her as an Olympic transportation attendant. I hit the record-video button on my camera.
“We’re actually closed right now,” she said. “So, all photography is actually not allowed.”
According to the attendant, although I was standing outside the fence, I was still within the security “perimeter”. I asked her where the boundary was, and she pointed to the grass of Queen Elizabeth Park on the other side of the street.
I observed that, as we spoke, a woman was walking down Midlothian. (Earlier, I had seen several other people strolling down the street without any interference.)
“Yeah, she is, but she also doesn’t have a camera,” the attendant said. “I’m sorry, I was just given strict instructions on photography.”
Then she said, “Sorry, I’ll just have to escort you out.”
As we walked up the street, she said Midlothian will be open to accredited media during the Games, when more security will be present.
“It’s just a little bit more of a strict guideline with the Olympics around, so we have to follow protocol,” she said.
After I arrived at work today, I called Rob Holmes, president of the B.C. Civil Liberties Association, for his thoughts on my experience. According to the lawyer, there’s no good reason why I couldn’t stand outside an Olympic fence and take pictures.
“I think it’s not the best start to the Olympic season if they’re doing that kind of stuff,” he said by phone. “The fact is that you’re entitled to take pictures of whatever you can see from a public place.”
Holmes argued that it’s important for citizens not to stay silent about run-ins with overzealous Olympic personnel.
“As our mothers used to say, you’re not supposed to be good just when somebody’s looking,” Holmes said. “So, it’s important that this be brought to the attention of the people who are in charge, so that they can actually show some managerial control over what’s going down on the ground.”
You can follow Stephen Hui on Twitter at twitter.com/stephenhui.
Update: No photography ban around Games venue, Olympic security unit says
See also: Photos: Olympics bring security checkpoints, fences, and closures to Vancouver





Comment (37)
Comments
Don't get me wrong, we need to watch the conduct of VANOC and the police during these games to ensure that our civil liberties are not violated. This however, is a non-issue.
Put your telephoto lens on, cross the street and take your pictures from there.
While I can sit here and be an armchair photographer, I wish the Straight photographer would have challenged the security guard and asked to speak with management. While VANOC and the Integrated Security Unit will no doubt be tough on photographers, it is our right (and duty) to stand our ground as photographers, writers and citizen journalists.
As far as not being able to take photos on public land... well, just wait until the hoards of Olympic ticket holders show up with their dSLRs, point-and-shoots and cell phone cameras. They cannot stop the unstoppable wave of digital media and it's worth pressing the issue if and when we are confronted.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/waxypoetic/4338544612/
Whatever.
Lame, Vancouver, very lame.
"How about getting a comment from the other side of the story? Oh yes, biased reporting!"
VANOC does not usually respond to journalists' calls.
Heil VANOC !
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jan/23/photographers-protest-stop-sear...
The cops have enough to do without you being a pest, and the security people are merely doing what they're told. 19 days for now, we'll all breathe a big sigh of relief, and days after that, the venue cameras will be taken down with nothing left to secure. Might as well start looking for another story and get a jump on the folks who can't let this one go. It's a done deal - might as well enjoy the circus as complain about it. And no, I don't like it any better than you do, friend.
The same line that is brought out every time any sort of new surveillance or security measure is placed on a population. As if it justifies every imaginable infringement on civil liberties and fundemental freedoms the people have.
The journalist from the Georgia Straight is owed an apology, and VANOC should instruct self-aggrandizing staff to leave policing and security to uniformed officers that know the law - preferably officers from our own, well-trained Vancouver Police Department.
Too bad he didn't take the VANOC employee up in talking with her manager as she offered in the his 'hidden video.'
BTW did the VANOC employee give you permission to film her? Talk about infringing on people's rights.
Progressive desensitization is the way they get us to accept more and more infringements of our rights. They also employ a mountain of skillfully crafted lies, engendering fear to make us lose our clarity and resolve. This entire 2010 Olympics security frenzy is built on two things - the terrorist response of some Palestinians in Munich to the organised mass terrorism of the zionist military who forcefully displaced 800,000 Palestinians, flattened their homes and villages, and stole their land, relegating them to a landless, stateless, impoverished status, living in refugee camps for 60 years, followed by countless additional war crimes, crimes against peace and crimes against humanity committed by the state of Israel - justified once again by a mountain of lies - against the Palestinian and the Lebanese peoples. These Palestinian people were sorely aggrieved, and there has been only salt added to their wounds for the past 60 years, which doesn't justify kidnapping or murder, but is an explanation for it. Without the state crimes that the USA, Canada, the UK, and Israel commit regularly, there would be no reason for there being any freedom fighters desperate enough to try the exact same tactics that the most powerful governments of the world commit daily with impunity - mass murder, bombing, assassinations, kidnapping, torture, etc.
The second excuse given for this 2010 Olympics orgy of security nonsense is the fake "War on Terror' based on the 9/11 U.S. government false flag terrorist attack on its own people to fuel its previously planned and prepared for illegal invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq. A thousand lies have been circulated by the complicit mass media to prop up this ridiculous and baseless 9/11 story that is being used to justify all the Orwellian reforms to global society that diminish our quality of life and sap our community resources like an overgrown leech. Every time people buy into the "Al Qaeda plans to attack us for no reason" argument by tolerating another infringement of our privacy, rights and freedoms in the name of "security" they add credibility this false government terrorist propaganda.
We are in fact one human race. If you think "Canadian" humans are less prone to fascism and oppression than "Chinese" humans then that may be where your confusion is beginning. We're the exact same monkey.
The good fight counts. If you do nothing - what can you expect?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/feb/10/athens-greece-protest-strike
@Human Nature - your post is absolutely false.
Gandhi would approve.
On the plus side, great story, and good for you for bringing this to the attention of your readers. Keep up the good work.
I don't like this at all.
Keep taking pictures folks...mine have been sent to friends lists in the US and Europe and are moving about freer than swine flu...
Perhaps its time for the IOC to take their Games and find their own property somewhere in the world, build their own facilities and pay for their #&!@? games themselves.
The Olympics is just another example of socializing debt and privatizing profit.
There were plenty of times to try and derail the olympics, including that plebiscite Larry Campbell had, but you were too lazy to vote. This is one of the most democratic countries in the world and you don't appriciate it.
I don't like seeing anyone's civil liberties infringed upon. But there are plenty of places in the world where you would have gotten a whole lot worse than what seems to have amounted to a "move along please" from a few people who sound like they didn't actually know what their policies were supposed to be.
Is there actually a story here? the guy had no accreditation and was taking pictures in an area deemed as a security zone.
To answer your question: yes. In fact, this is exactly the point. The area was not a security zone but public land. Thus, whether the photographer had accreditation or not us moot. He had every right to photograph.
That said, it's good to push back. Hopefully the photog will use this as a learning experience for the next time. I'm sure there will be one.
Why?