But, visiting Alberta and some of B.C.’s own fossil-fuel-extraction hot spots, I have learned the mountains are about the only thing that separate us. Especially when you take into account B.C.’s very own growing fossil-fuel industry, and our own special role in expansion of the tar sands.
Under the federal Gateway strategy, B.C.’s pristine northern wilderness will be crisscrossed by oil pipelines to ship tar sands crude, Vancouver’s ports and highways expanded for coal shipping, and coal mines expanded to supply China with cheap energy. Each part of the project has a devastating impact on the environment, human health, and our ability to meet the B.C. government’s own emissions-reduction targets.
The proposed Enbridge Northern Gateway project would build two massive twin pipes between the port of Kitimat to Alberta’s tar sands. One pipe would carry crude oil; one would be full of condensate, the chemical used to transform the thick tar-like substance extracted from the oil sands into a product suitable for pipeline transfer. In the process, it would cross over 1,000 pristine rivers, many of which bear salmon and are watersheds for interior communities.
On the other end of the pipe in Kitimat, tankers would wait to transport the oil into the treacherous northern waters. As I heard recently, oil barges are like balloons, and B.C.’s northern passages are sharp pointy rocks. It is only a matter of time until something happens that will threaten sensitive marine life.
At the same time plans are underway to build miles of pipe to move tar sands crude through northern B.C., there are plans to expand coal mining throughout the province, and coal shipping through Deltaport.
The southern Gateway project is designed to make shipping consumer goods from the Asia-Pacific region and shipping coal and oil to the Asia-Pacific easier.
The highway expansion planned in the Lower Mainland is part of a port infrastructure expansion plan. This project would pave over some of the best agricultural land in the province and place the sensitive Burns Bog ecosystem at risk—all to move more fossil fuels out and move more containers of finished goods made abroad through the region on big trucks.
All of this in a year where natural gas extraction has surpassed forestry as B.C.’s number one economic driver. B.C. in it’s own right is now a petro-state economy.
While so much energy is put into fighting the tar sands, the B.C. government’s hypocrisy knows no bounds and it has not yet been made to answer for this glaring contradiction. While claiming climate leadership, the B.C. government has opened up this province to fossil fuels extraction on an unprecedented scale. For a government that has recognized the impact that runaway global warming will have on this province and the world, this is unacceptable. What sort of leadership is that?
At the conference in Edmonton, we talked a lot about these projects and what it means for activists on both sides of the Rockies. What is abundantly clear is that the tar sands are not the only megaproject we need to shut down. B.C.’s own fossil fuel profiteering marks us as climate hypocrites.
To be real climate leaders, we need to stop pointing fingers at Alberta and realize that we all need to work together to transition our economies to be more just and sustainable.
The youth at the conference in Edmonton gave me reason to be hopeful about the future and our potential to make change. We have a lot of work ahead of us but we will face these challenges together and we know we must succeed.
Tria Donaldson is a youth climate activist that has been involved with the goBeyond project, the Sierra Youth Coalition, and the Canadian Youth Climate Coalition. She is currently the Vancouver Island outreach coordinator for the Wilderness Committee.
Comments
BernadetteK
The north of BC is not just about resource extraction & exploitation. Please check out Sea to Sands Conservation Alliance on facebook & http://s2sca.blogspot.com. Thanks for the article!
". People should live close to where they work so they can walk or ride a bike when weather permits"
===================================
Regardless of real estate prices near where you work? Regardless of the fact that in two earner families the work locations may be widely separated? Regardless of the fact that people are free to change jobs if a better one is on offer, and that they also loose jobs unexpectedly?
You're right about one thing. It IS time to wake up, and time to grow up.
Rod Smelser
G Bligh
I grew up in Northern BC and currently live here and throughly enjoy the rivers, mountains and the lakes. For most of us who call Northern BC home we want to preserve our natural environment and protect it's future yet we also want the careful, prudent development of the North. Why should Vancouver have the only West Coast port allowed to handle shipping crude oil. By the way, the Industrial sized line running to Vancouver from Alberta that handles Crude for export has never encountered a spill.
You also talk about travelling to Alberta from BC. I suspect that you burned some fossil fuels in ther process. Before you impose your values on the rest of BC stop and think about the fact that we who live in Northern BC are enduring one of the most significant down turns in our economy. Mills and Pulp mills are closing left and right.At this point we do not want development at all costs but we do need some economic activity. My vote is to work hard at protecting the environment but to also encourage economic activity.
One final thought for those who think building a pipeline through Northern Bc to carry oil is too big a risk. I would like to ask you; Do you fly in Airplanes? If you do then you consider the advantages of modern flight to outweigh the potential risks. I consider the risk to transporting and shipping oil to be very small indeed given the success of the line that has run to Vancouver and its subsequent shipment abroad for over 30 years without incident.