News and Views » Commentary

Tria Donaldson: Alberta visit raises ugly truths about B.C. fossil fuel profiteering

A protest against the Gateway Program.

Ben West
By Tria Donaldson,
Ben West

Sustainable Campuses Conference.

I recently had the privilege of driving over the Rocky Mountains with 21 youth activists into what one of them called “the heart of conservative darkness” for a conference on campus sustainability. We were going to connect with youth leaders from across Western Canada and to brainstorm and share ideas about how to make our campuses greener. The conversation quickly turned to the vital role we play here in Western Canada at the front lines of the fight to stop runaway climate change.

The Rocky Mountains are one of the most beautiful natural landscapes in Canada, if not the world. Tourists flock from all over the world to check out the glaciers, the big horn sheep, the hot springs, and the bears. To some, the Rocky Mountains also divide us from them—“us” being environmentally friendly, tree-hugging folks from B.C., “them” being dirty oil-producing Albertans.

See also

Cathy Wilander and Eric Doherty: Scrub the greenwash off the Freeway Olympics

Celia Brauer: Superheroes needed ASAP to save us from paving paradise again

Carmen Mills: With B.C. building Gateway to climate chaos, it's time for direct action

Anne Murray: Paving paradise to put up the South Fraser Perimeter Road

But, visiting Alberta and some of B.C.’s own fossil-fuel-extraction hot spots, I have learned the mountains are about the only thing that separate us. Especially when you take into account B.C.’s very own growing fossil-fuel industry, and our own special role in expansion of the tar sands.

Under the federal Gateway strategy, B.C.’s pristine northern wilderness will be crisscrossed by oil pipelines to ship tar sands crude, Vancouver’s ports and highways expanded for coal shipping, and coal mines expanded to supply China with cheap energy. Each part of the project has a devastating impact on the environment, human health, and our ability to meet the B.C. government’s own emissions-reduction targets.

The proposed Enbridge Northern Gateway project would build two massive twin pipes between the port of Kitimat to Alberta’s tar sands. One pipe would carry crude oil; one would be full of condensate, the chemical used to transform the thick tar-like substance extracted from the oil sands into a product suitable for pipeline transfer. In the process, it would cross over 1,000 pristine rivers, many of which bear salmon and are watersheds for interior communities.

On the other end of the pipe in Kitimat, tankers would wait to transport the oil into the treacherous northern waters. As I heard recently, oil barges are like balloons, and B.C.’s northern passages are sharp pointy rocks. It is only a matter of time until something happens that will threaten sensitive marine life.

At the same time plans are underway to build miles of pipe to move tar sands crude through northern B.C., there are plans to expand coal mining throughout the province, and coal shipping through Deltaport.

The southern Gateway project is designed to make shipping consumer goods from the Asia-Pacific region and shipping coal and oil to the Asia-Pacific easier.

The highway expansion planned in the Lower Mainland is part of a port infrastructure expansion plan. This project would pave over some of the best agricultural land in the province and place the sensitive Burns Bog ecosystem at risk—all to move more fossil fuels out and move more containers of finished goods made abroad through the region on big trucks.

All of this in a year where natural gas extraction has surpassed forestry as B.C.’s number one economic driver. B.C. in it’s own right is now a petro-state economy.

While so much energy is put into fighting the tar sands, the B.C. government’s hypocrisy knows no bounds and it has not yet been made to answer for this glaring contradiction. While claiming climate leadership, the B.C. government has opened up this province to fossil fuels extraction on an unprecedented scale. For a government that has recognized the impact that runaway global warming will have on this province and the world, this is unacceptable. What sort of leadership is that?

At the conference in Edmonton, we talked a lot about these projects and what it means for activists on both sides of the Rockies. What is abundantly clear is that the tar sands are not the only megaproject we need to shut down. B.C.’s own fossil fuel profiteering marks us as climate hypocrites.

To be real climate leaders, we need to stop pointing fingers at Alberta and realize that we all need to work together to transition our economies to be more just and sustainable.

The youth at the conference in Edmonton gave me reason to be hopeful about the future and our potential to make change. We have a lot of work ahead of us but we will face these challenges together and we know we must succeed.

Tria Donaldson is a youth climate activist that has been involved with the goBeyond project, the Sierra Youth Coalition, and the Canadian Youth Climate Coalition. She is currently the Vancouver Island outreach coordinator for the Wilderness Committee.

Comments

thetimeisnow
thanks for this timely report. we need to thoroughly debunk the mythmaking and greenwashing being perpetrated by the BC government and corporations in 2010. a coalition is forming to take action now: http://www.beyondtalk.net/2010/02/climate-change-activists-join-the-vanc...
 
Bernadette Keenan
Besides the damage to Burns Bog and making Food Security even more difficult by paving over Farmland, the South Fraser Freeway - part of the proposed Gateway projects will wrack havoc with the ecosystems all along the South Fraser, and tear apart communities, all the while promoting fossil fuel dependency. There are many things that could be done to promote a more sustainable vision for the South Fraser, such as investing in Green Transportation Solutions, that would have the added impact of reducing our carbon foot print as a society and province. We need to work together, say no to the destruction that will follow in the wake of projects like the Tarsands, Enbridge Oil piplines and South Fraser Freeway and yes to life itself. Its good to see that young people are figuring it out.
BernadetteK
 
kudos
Thank you for this article. It is refreshing to see that some environmentalists are still thinking clearing and can see that the premier has no clothes. The hyprocisy of many so-called environment groups is even more disturbing than that of the BC government.
 
timetowakeup
The coal mines in BC mine metallurgical coal for use in steel production. The world is not going to get by without steel. If you want to protest coal burning then protest all the coal fired hydro plants. There's much greener ways to produce electricity. We all know that. How about people who make big commutes everyday back and forth from there work to home. People should live close to where they work so they can walk or ride a bike when weather permits. What about limiting the amount of miles someone can fly in a year. There's far too many people taking vacations and traveling all over world. How about others who always need that new vehicle every couple years. The simple fact is there's going to be suppliers where there is a demand. How about smartening up everyone.
 
Mary MacDonald
I am writing from the area of the proposed Enbridge Northern Gateway. Many people in this area do NOT want this project to go ahead. The rivers & landscape of northern BC are incredibly beautiful, pristine & in my view sacred.
The north of BC is not just about resource extraction & exploitation. Please check out Sea to Sands Conservation Alliance on facebook & http://s2sca.blogspot.com. Thanks for the article!
 
Hurtin Albertan
Many albertan's regret the environmental concessions we've made to the oil and gas industry. With communities poisoned and ecosystems detroyed, more and more people question the cost of our alleged "prosperity". When Alberta's one big dried up toxic dustbowl I hope I'll have somewhere to go. Stay gold BC!
 
RodSmelser
timetowakeup

". People should live close to where they work so they can walk or ride a bike when weather permits"
===================================

Regardless of real estate prices near where you work? Regardless of the fact that in two earner families the work locations may be widely separated? Regardless of the fact that people are free to change jobs if a better one is on offer, and that they also loose jobs unexpectedly?

You're right about one thing. It IS time to wake up, and time to grow up.

Rod Smelser
 
greg bly
Time to wake up is on the right track. Rod will never leave his coolcar and get on a dorky bus. A high pressure oil pipeline runs right beside the Coquitlam watershed.Money makes the world get fat.I mean go round.Na I mean get fat.
G Bligh
 
seby
To compare a twin hulled oil tanker to a balloon is simply an overstreched comparison that does not wash. The rocks on the North Coast of BC are also no more jagged and sharp than on the south coast of BC, Wash or Oregon for that matter . To also contend that Northern BC will be criss crossed with oil pipe lines is once again overstating the facts. One twin pipeline running underground does not qualify as pipelines crisscrossing the North of BC.

I grew up in Northern BC and currently live here and throughly enjoy the rivers, mountains and the lakes. For most of us who call Northern BC home we want to preserve our natural environment and protect it's future yet we also want the careful, prudent development of the North. Why should Vancouver have the only West Coast port allowed to handle shipping crude oil. By the way, the Industrial sized line running to Vancouver from Alberta that handles Crude for export has never encountered a spill.

You also talk about travelling to Alberta from BC. I suspect that you burned some fossil fuels in ther process. Before you impose your values on the rest of BC stop and think about the fact that we who live in Northern BC are enduring one of the most significant down turns in our economy. Mills and Pulp mills are closing left and right.At this point we do not want development at all costs but we do need some economic activity. My vote is to work hard at protecting the environment but to also encourage economic activity.

One final thought for those who think building a pipeline through Northern Bc to carry oil is too big a risk. I would like to ask you; Do you fly in Airplanes? If you do then you consider the advantages of modern flight to outweigh the potential risks. I consider the risk to transporting and shipping oil to be very small indeed given the success of the line that has run to Vancouver and its subsequent shipment abroad for over 30 years without incident.
 
 
[Comments Disclaimer]
Post a comment
· Use your real name to have your comment considered for publication in print.
· URLs and email addresses will be automatically turned into links.