News and Views » Commentary

Brian Bonney: Give business back the municipal vote in B.C.

Brian Bonney.

By Brian Bonney

Up until 1993, B.C. small businesses could vote in municipal elections. This ability to vote recognized the contribution small and medium-sized businesses make to the economy and to our communities. The decision to rescind the business vote was a historic mistake that must be corrected.

Like the Boston Tea Party, it’s an issue of taxation without representation. B.C.’s small businesses are being taxed to the breaking point by municipal governments. Businesses pay on average three and up to seven times more property tax than a resident on same value property.

In Vancouver, a resident paid $3,870 on an average residential property worth $941,999 in 2008. A business owner paid $18,973—over five times more—on the same value property. To add insult to injury, businesses pay for their garbage collection on top of that.

Yet a January 2007 study by the City of Vancouver shows that businesses use only 24 percent of municipal services while residents use 76 percent. If residents were taxed like businesses, there would be a tax revolt.

Over-taxed and under-represented, small and medium-sized businesses are the backbone of B.C.’s economy. They account for 98 percent of all businesses and 34 percent of our gross domestic product. Eighty-two percent have fewer than five employees, and together they employ 56 percent of B.C.’s private-sector workforce.

Many small business owners work over 60 hours a week. Many take very personal risks like mortgaging their homes or taking out loans against RRSPs in order to start, expand, or keep staff employed in tough circumstances. In the recent recession, businesses with one to 19 employees only laid off 0.5 percent of their staff compared to businesses with more than 500 employees that laid off 8.8 percent.

The next time you drive by a soccer field or baseball diamond think about the small business that likely donated the children’s uniforms. In many cases, the team’s coach has more than likely been let off early by a Vancouver business owner to help teach our kids or is possibly a small business owner themselves.

Small business owners take tremendous personal risks that drive the economy and benefit society in general.

So how can we get municipal governments to recognize this vital contribution?

The answer lies in a well-established principle—no taxation without representation. If municipalities are going to tax small businesses to the hilt, fairness requires we grant business owners the vote.

Robin Blencoe repealed the business vote in 1993, claiming that it removes the possibility of people simply leasing parking spots and storage lockers to vote. Blencoe’s flippancy was just one indication of how decision-makers overlook the concerns of small businesses.

In London, England, the birthplace of our democracy, businesses have a number of votes based on their number of employees. CFIB suggests every business would qualify for one vote only, whether they own, lease, or rent their premises, just as residents qualify regardless of whether they own, lease, or rent a home.

In B.C., the business right to vote in municipal elections was removed. This decision reflected widespread ignorance about small businesses owners—the risks they take, their importance to the economy, their contributions to society, their heavy tax burden, and their lack of representation. Business owners deserve fair representation. The only thing that will start to grant them representation with their municipal tax masters is restoration of the municipal business vote.

Brian Bonney is the director of provincial affairs for B.C. at the Canadian Federation of Independent Business. CFIB is a nonprofit, nonpartisan business association that seeks to give small independent business a greater voice when it comes to government decision-making.

Comments

S Wehner
I suggest that giving the vote to Vancouver residents who are not Canadian citizens should have higher priority.

Non-Canadians can already easily incorporate businesses in BC. With Mr. Bonney's scheme they would then obtain a vote.

-- Stephan
 
Hub
So what about non-citizen voting as well? After all they pay taxes (including property tax if applicable), contribute like any other citizen, but can't vote because they don't have citizenship.
 
C-Man
Repulsive! Democracy is a function of citizens, not taxpayers. Leave it to a highly partisan CFIB representative to conceive of democracy as a matter of taxes. If you want your vote to represent you as a taxpayer, fine, but don't ask the rest of us to defer to your "greater worth". We are too close to a plutocracy as it is!
 
spartikus
1 man/woman -> 1 vote.

Businesses are not people and this isn't the 19th century. If you want to be represented I would humbly suggest a pulse as a requirement.

And yeah, about London, England...the birthplace of our democracy...they also have hereditary peerage. Just because it's "British" doesn't mean it's worth emulating.
 
pfak
What an absolutely ridiculous idea. Businesses are not persons -- They should not have a vote in any kind of election. Besides, most likely already lobby each and every politician which is more powerful than a vote these days.
 
cgordon
Give votes to all artificial bodies bent on self interest. I look forward to the election of the robocalypse party
 
cgordon
Yeah, I'm with Bonney on this one, let's go one better: honestly why not just give 1 vote per $100,000 of net worth it will correspond to the person's value to society, think next time you see someone playing with their child, a rich business owner allows that to happen (because they have dismissed that person from their sacred duty to work for their profit) you literally live and die at the charity of businesspeople you plebs so they deserve extra votes.
 
spartikus
One further comment - Bonney is being highly misleading when he says "London, UK". It's actually the City of London. Not Greater London, but the geographically small borough in the heart of the Greater London. 450,000 people work there each day, but only 8000 actually live there. Hence the medieval system being retained and which, prior to the reforms of 2002, hadn't been changed since 1850.

The rest of the UK, including the other boroughs of Greater London, discarded this system in 1969. And so we must too, as they're the birthplace of our democracy!!! LOL
 
Ironist
"Robin Blencoe repealed the business vote in 1993, claiming that it removes the possibility of people simply leasing parking spots and storage lockers to vote. "...

Talk about flippant! Blencoe, as well as the entire NDP government, did not move to this position because of parking spots and storage lockers; it was a much wider debate than Bonney's flippant comments would imply. The NDP were confronting issues like equality, the status of corporations, and who could vote according to the Charter. Maybe these are insignificant issues to business people; after all, the pro-small business Socreds were infamous for telling us that "meeting a payroll" was all you needed in order to be an MLA. I guess those other issues are merely the petty concerns of the unwashed masses.
 
DBW
As a small business owner who works 60+ hours a week as well as a resident in Vancouver, there is a very unfair tax burden placed on the small businesses in vancouver.
I pay taxes on both sides and my residential taxes are no where near what my taxes are on for my business, there has to be a change! Yes to the CFIB!
 
RG
What about property owners? Property contributes more tax than businesses in some cases.

I say if businesses get to vote, then property should get a vote too.

Don't forget that in 1993 we also had the Vancouver Stock Exchange...the most corrupt and scandalous exchange in north America. Do you really want to go backwards to those days? Lets one up this proposal...how about we go back to 1800's, where it was legal to carry a gun in the city... How far backwards shall we move?
 
RickW
RG asks "How far backwards shall we move?" With conservatives, I'd say all the way back to "barefoot, pregnant, and chained to the kitchen stove".

And to DBW, I run a small business, but I don't expect to have two votes to my customers' one.
RickW
 
np
I don't agree that business should get a vote. However, it does look like the tax burden is being unfairly put on the shoulders of business in Vancouver. As much as people like to make business the bad guy, it is business that creates/provides jobs that generates individual wealth and taxes that pay for all of our social programs.
 
RMS
To businesses that belong to the CFIB more and mre of us when we find out a business is amember we don't visit anymore. If they had there way all taxes would be paid by the little guy. Some taxes are not fair, the HST is not a fair tax so suck it up and pay your taxes. Gordo has given you enough breaks, and yes I was a small business owner.
 
miguel
Businesses are owned by people with a vote; if a business has a vote, then someone gets to vote twice.

Put not your faith in a company, for it hath not a soul to love, nor a body to kick.
Miguel
 
Gong
Please define: what is a business? Probably needs to include baby sitting and dog walking.

I hear there are thousands of numbered companies registered in Victoria, with downtown Vancouver addresses. Are they also going to be able to vote?
 
RodSmelser
Can anyone please tell me, what is the situation in other provinces, Alberta, Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan? What provisions, if any, do these provinces make for a business or property owner vote in local elections?

Does the CFIB want the property/business vote reinstated for elections to municipal councils alone, or for elections to school boards as well?

Rod Smelser
 
glen p robbins
No
 
spartikus
For the interested, the Local Government Elections Task Force has a discussion paper on this issue:

http://www.localelectionstaskforce.gov.bc.ca/library/Corporate_Vote_Disc...

It gives a history of corporate voting in BC. To answer RodSmelser's question: no other jurisdiction was found in the world other than the City of London, UK that allows corporations to vote.
 
PaulT
I think the question is a little bit misleading here. This isn't about allowing a company to vote. The point here is that small business owners sometimes live in one city but do business in another. Those people normally spend most of their waking hours in the city they do business in. For those people, they have no ability to vote for their municipal representatives that are affecting their business. This is not about giving a piece of paper the right to vote, this is about giving a human-being a right to vote on matters that affect them. It will be difficult to implement fairly, but it's definitely worth looking at.
 
Michael L
Businesses are already buying votes on a federal and provincial level, it makes sense they attempt to influence things on a municipal level. The real question is can we stop them?
 
glen p robbins
In my opinion it isn't worth looking at.
 
RodSmelser
===>>> spartikus

Thanks for that link. Very useful.

It seems there is some provision in other provinces for non-resident property owners to vote. I wonder if that applies only to non-resident owners of residential properties, or of industrial and commerical ones as well?
Rod Smelser
 
Quimby
"Yet a January 2007 study by the City of Vancouver shows that businesses use only 24 percent of municipal services while residents use 76 percent."

So what's the percentage of business properties in Vancouver? I am willing to bet that it is less then 24%.
If my assumption is true then, they are getting a deal.
 
Geo
The CFIB and the LINOs don't think our opinions are worth paying any heed to, on any level, municipal or provincial (or federal for that matter).

When I hear the CFIB and like groups decrying the LINOs treatment of the homeless who are able to collect some assistance (minus $75/month in this last budget), or foodbank folk (too many and too many who work FT), or children (who do not live alone, BC has the highest poverty rate in Canada! for years now. And now Canada's poverty rate is growing too.), or the sick and disabled and elderly (horror stories abound and no one deserves such hardships)... and then doing something tangible about all of this, then come talk to me about what a good municiple "persons" you and your members are. Then maybe we'll talk about giving "you" the vote. Making tax deductible donations does not impress me.

Giving people low paid jobs with no benefits,no pension and no future security but for the next two weeks maybe and making a bloody good profit for yourself is really not the message you want to send to real voters.

So impress me with what a good "Corp" you are, that you deserve 2 votes to my one.

I was pissed when I learned that my Credit Union gave a (to my mind) seriously large donation to the BC Liberal party, last election, but nothing to any of the opposition parties. It was explained that the Board liked some of the financial directions the LINOs were promising. So the fees of myself and many others go towards a LINO promise that we may or may not benefit from and we do not learn about it till after the election. Now I can walk with what little bit of cash I have and bank elsewhere but really no one cares what one person does (the power of like-minded numbers of people ie; unions, the enemy or corps and LINOs, comes to mind).
I shall encourage my CU to make similarly sized donations to other political parties in the name of keeping democracy alive a little while longer in this country, or maybe this province, or maybe even North Vancouver.
mmm Would the NS Credit Union vote downtown and in North Vanc. and in Bby. or wherever else they are located, or just at the main branch on Lonsdale? NO, not a one of them. They already have too much sway at election time anyway.

Didn't Taylor give all BC businesses a big break on taxes as her good-bye gift when she walked out on Gordo?

And Bonney, keep your twisted history points to yourself. That's just low.
 
macacanadian
Maybe I'll start thinking about letting corporations vote the second I see one go to jail for crimes committed. Fraud, improper disposal of waste, tax evasion, unsafe working conditions leading to employee injury or death...

No, generally the companies just lobby for no punishment whatsoever or declare bankruptcy letting the principals walk away clean. How many mining companies have walked away from dying mines in BC leaving us - real citizens, real taxpayers - to pay for the clean up?

This is just another ploy for large companies to gain more influence using the "small businessman" as a shield.

I'm tired of corporations wanting the benefits of personhood without any of the responsibility.

 
Birdy
Can we just skip the foreplay and give Goldman Sachs a monopoly on voting rights?
 
Running Frog
Apparently somebonney needs to go off and suck his own dick now..
 
what a crock
I suggest we feed Bonney to his altruistic corporations.
 
Lothar of the Hill People
So damn stupid. Corporations already have too many of the rights of natural persons, without many of the same obligations. Hey Bonehead, call me when corporations serve jail time for the crimes they commit! hahaha
 
Paulo R
Mr Bonney needs to get his facts right. Representation is reserved for citizens which are human beings. A taxpayer and a citizen are two separate things. Corporations were created to draw risk away from the individuals who wish to incorporate a business ventures. This means if your business fails you don't have to go down with your company. This is supposed to encourage risk taking which, when it works (ie. makes a profit), creates tangible benefits for society (employment, consumer goods).

Mr Bonney needs to introduce himself to the basic concepts of civics, human rights and then maybe he should read up on this time in history known as The Enlightenment. Businesses do not have full individual rights because they are not people. 1 person,1 vote, that is democracy. Corporations already have far too much power, way more than they were ever intended to have.
Get a life Mr Bonney. Canadians are too reasonable to ever want your watered down version of Fascism.
 
 
[Comments Disclaimer]
Post a comment
· Use your real name to have your comment considered for publication in print.
· URLs and email addresses will be automatically turned into links.