I'm all for Boobquake, because it stands for a lot of things, just don't go toting it around in "the name of science". If you're going to test a theory, do it right. Read the quote by the cleric again: "Many women who do not dress modestly lead young men astray and spread adultery in society which increases earthquakes." It's the adultery, not the boobs, not the SKIN, that is supposed to cause earthquakes; it's all the promiscuity it generates (because when women show skin, guys just can't help themselves, apparently). If everyone parades around showin' off, you prove nothing, unless everyone one of them goes home to shag for a while.
Scientifically, you would need solid evidence that an increase in cleavage increases the amount of sex and promiscuity going on; then I SUPPOSE you could have a Hypothetical Syllogism to test the theory that Boobs = Quakes.
(Sex = quakes, boobs = sex; boobs = sex = quakes)
 

It is always good to keep challenging theories for the sake of science....everyday. 

Boobs are nice.

What the BBC and other cherry-picking, ideologically fixated Western news agencies choose to report about Iran -- not so much.  

what has been seen cannot be unseen.  

Next Monday: Knobquake! 

why are there so many earthwuakes in Iran?
perhaps they are covering up too much

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_earthquakes_in_Iran 

It never fails to amaze me just what insanity that religious zealots (of ANY denomination, not JUST 'christian'), can reveal to the world at large.

To other girls of Vancouver, let's show this moron just how insane his views are... let's let 'em Shake, Jiggle and Roll! 

John, isn't every day Knobquake?  

Knobquake! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA (Okay. So I read this late.)
Beth 

The follow up to boobquake and what's next - in a comedy video on YouTube! :-D