Public education in jeopardy in Vancouver
Ideal Mini School student Sydney Jang (left) and her mother Kris voiced concerns that the Vancouver school district’s budget shortfall will result in deep cuts.
Some say that potential budget cuts to Vancouver’s public schools will stretch the system to a breaking point.
(Editor's note: After this article was sent to the printer on April 28, the Vancouver school board decided to delay voting on its 2010–11 budget until June.)
Parents and children bond in lots of different ways. Often, doing things they haven’t tried before makes them proud of each other. This was the case on April 23 for Kris Jang and her daughter Sydney.
It was their first time participating in a protest together. Standing on the back lawn of the Vancouver school board’s main office on West Broadway, mother and daughter were part of a group of at least 200 people, mostly secondary students. The protesters had assembled to confront the possibility that the district will implement its most drastic reduction of services in recent years.
Education
Public education in jeopardy in Vancouver
School districts across the Lower Mainland feel budget pinch
New Westminster schools in limbo
War on public schools rages
Debate sheds light on students in sex work
Their demand was clear: for the province to fully fund the cost of public education.
“I’m very proud to be here with my daughter protesting budget cuts,” a beaming Jang told the Georgia Straight.
Her daughter is in Grade 11 at Ideal Mini School, a small alternative school within the district system. Located on its own campus on West 59th Avenue, Ideal offers a complete academic program for grades 8 to 12, with an emphasis on the arts and social responsibility, and the environment in particular.
“We’re probably one of the greenest schools in Vancouver,” Jang said about her daughter’s school. “We recycle everything. We have a composting program. We grow organic herbs and sometimes vegetables to use in the food that students prepare for lunches.”
With a funding shortfall of $16.32 million projected for the 2010–11 school year, district staff recommended in an April 27 report to the school board the elimination of the equivalent of 69.1 full-time teaching positions. This move would be felt across the system, and mini schools are no exception.
Another 30.5 teaching support staff positions are potentially on the chopping block. And that’s not the end of the list. Some 14.79 jobs in school administration; 18.3 in continuing, adult, and summer education; 10.3 in district administration; and 18.7 in facilities maintenance could be slashed.
All in all, staff have recommended slashing 161.7 positions across the district. The board will vote on the final budget this evening (April 29). If it doesn’t balance the books, the provincial government has the legal authority to fire school trustees, who are elected officials.
In a phone interview the Straight asked Education Minister Margaret MacDiarmid point-blank if she would dismiss boards that don’t balance their budgets. “You know, trustees are aware that the legislation is in place, that balanced budgets need to be submitted to us,” she replied. “They have an excellent track record of doing that. I believe that they will provide us with balanced budgets.”
In a recent open letter to parents and staff, superintendent of schools Steve Cardwell described the financial tempest. “We are in the midst of a perfect storm as this shortfall represents the culmination of declining enrolment, loss of Ministry of Education grants, and escalating operating costs,” Cardwell stated.
In the April 27 report, staff pointed out that the proposed cuts would “shake the very core of the system”. According to the report, the reductions would “compound and compromise the ability for our system to maintain and continue the same level of service provided in the past”. They would “undoubtedly take a toll on an already overworked system”, it said.
To put these cuts in perspective, the Vancouver school board has cut a total of 276.8 full-time positions since the 2002–03 school year.
The board must submit a preliminary budget for the next school year by June 30 this year.
Comments
Why does the teachers union expect tax dollars to directly fund their pensions and health care premiums? Why isn't that coming out of their union dues?
Why are the teachers giving themselves yet another raise, and have the next one lined up as well?
What are the enrollments rates for Sept, considering the last baby boom is well over and done with and we're in a natural demographic lull? Some areas have seen a 25% drop in enrollment over the last decade.
How many schools are running well below capacity?
Why does the teacher's union think their industry is/should be constant steady growth when historically it never has been?
Why is the teachers union a sacred cow that no one will admit is passing some nasty gas?
Is this really about the kids?
Billions of dollars flying to - to where exactly...
better recheck your fact sources. BCTF pension fund is not part of some all encompassing government plan. it is administered separately by its own board and determines investments. Go to the BCTF union website it has all the details.
That's the question I'm asking. As for where I'd like the money to go - to kids. Arts, music, sports, support programs. Keeping every school open with 50% - 75% enrollment levels but cutting back all the kids' programs is good only for the teachers. Apologies that I care more about the kids and effective use of available tax dollars than I do about the teachers union.
First, all these things you suggest must have staff present. Either volunteer time or paid time. I know how much volunteer time teachers and support staff give. Cutting back kids programs is not good for teachers either! Teachers care. Like it of not, Sophia, it is not the fault of the unions that the provincial government has been underfunding public education. As a parent with a child in grade 7, I have seen the decimation of public education over the years - caused by the provincial government continually underfunding districts. There is a reason this is happening across the province. It is the provincial government trying to destroy public education and people who buy into the bash the unions for the problem help that government. I strongly suggest you study educational funding and get all the facts straight.
L. Clemens
Since you feel so qualified to speak about the facts - please provide them. I have a list of questions above that I look forward to seeing you answer (please be sure to include all stats and links to sources). Thanks!
(Sarcasm Off)
Teachers do not command huge salaries. (The starting salary is around $35,000 and the average salary of all teachers is around $60,000, less than in Alberta, Ontario & The Yukon) Suggesting that teacher salaries and unions are the reason why the Province cannot afford to fund education is inaccurate and frankly when one looks at the facts, such an assertion is almost laughable.
Public education requires ever increasing investment as new tools and technologies become part of the curriculum. More competitive countries seem to get that investing in public education creates the conditions that drive future wealth. This is really about priorities. Teacher salaries have stayed pretty constant when you factor in inflation so the union is not responsible for the provincial funding shortfall.
If enrollment is too low to justify continued operations, schools get closed down and that's nothing new, but this one factor does not explain why the funding is not there to ensure children don't lose days of instruction. Does it seem fair to suggest that teachers, with their middle class salaries, should take a pay cut? Why don't we just spend our money better? Instead of rolling back wages for middle income earners who have to support a family, why don't we rollback the giant corporate tax cut of 2001? Or why don't we introduce a luxury sales tax, since wealth is becoming more stratified, and now almost one our of four children in BC lives below the poverty line?
Let's just be human and pay to keep the kids in school, can't we?