News and Views » Commentary

David Suzuki: Our oil addiction has always been messy

By David Suzuki and Faisal Moola,

The explosion on BP’s Deepwater Horizon platform in the Gulf of Mexico and subsequent uncontrolled release of millions of litres of oil a day is a monumental disaster. But why are we surprised? Oil drilling and transportation are not like brain surgery; they involve brute technology to obtain and move crude oil, and oil is slopped around in this process every day. Over the years, numerous major spills have occurred on land, from drilling platforms at sea, and after collisions and breakups of ships.

See also

Big oil eyes B.C. coast, notwithstanding Gulf of Mexico spill

B.C. Liberals set stage for offshore oil and gas drilling

Richard Heinberg: This is what the end of the oil age looks like

David Suzuki: What the Gulf of Mexico oil disaster tells us

Amateur video of Gulf of Mexico oil slick

Back in 1967, the Torrey Canyon spilled 117 million litres of crude oil off Cornwall, England. In 1976, the Argo Merchant dumped 29 million litres of fuel oil off Massachusetts. A blow-out at the offshore Ekofisk Bravo platform in 1977 released about 30 million litres into the North Sea in 1977, and the Amoco Cadiz dumped 260 million litres off France in 1978.

We’ve seen oil spilled in dozens of other collisions, blowouts, deliberate releases (in 1991, Iraq released up to 1.9 billion litres of crude oil into the Persian Gulf), and storms (in 2005, hurricane Katrina caused the release of more than 25 million litres). Closer to home, in 1970, the Arrow spilled almost 10 million litres into Chedabucto Bay in Nova Scotia, and in 1988, the Odyssey dumped 159 million litres off St. John’s, Newfoundland. And in 1989, the Exxon Valdez spilled over 40 million litres into the pristine waters of Prince William Sound off the Alaska coast.

Today, tens of thousands of wells operate on land and at sea, massive supertankers move huge quantities across oceans, and pipelines and trucks transport oil over land. Stuff happens: earthquakes, accidents, storms, tides, icebergs, and of course, human error.

What can we learn from the disaster in the Gulf of Mexico? First, there’s no such thing as a “foolproof” technology because, as the computer Hal in the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey knew, the biggest threat to a mission is a fallible, imperfect human being. We should also learn that relying so heavily on non-renewable fossil fuels for most of our energy needs carries numerous risks, from devastating spills to catastrophic climate change.

In 1979, I hosted a program called Tankerbomb that warned of the hazards of supertanker traffic from Alaska past the treacherous B.C. coast. A decade later, the Exxon Valdez spill confirmed that warning. More recently, a ferry, the Queen of the North, ran into Gil Island on B.C.’s North Coast.

Human beings are fallible, and in B.C., our coast is marked by numerous rocks and reefs. That’s why coastal First Nations are unanimous in their opposition to the proposed Enbridge pipeline to transport oil from the Alberta tar sands to the West Coast where it would be loaded onto ships. The possibility of a tanker accident is too great a risk to their communities and fishing grounds.

Supertankers are huge, up to 300 metres in length, and can haul enough energy to fuel a small city. It takes three kilometres and 14 minutes for such a vessel going at full speed to stop and reverse direction. Although most newer supertankers are equipped with double hulls to reduce the threat of a spill in the event of a collision, many ships still sport single hulls.

Corporations don’t focus enough on prevention nor do they consider victims of their accidents a high priority. The Exxon Valdez spill led to litigation by several citizens’ groups, including fishers, tour guides, and First Nations. The courts awarded them money, but the oil company appealed numerous decisions. During almost two decades of stalling, Exxon continued to earn record profits.

Supertanker accidents and the Gulf spill reveal how little attention is paid to prevention. As oil continues to gush from the deep-sea well in the Gulf, BP’s response has been pathetic. We have to plan in exquisite detail for any exigency, not play fast and loose with our claims of having everything under control. And we really must start shifting from fossil fuels to cleaner renewable energy sources. We can all do our part as well by conserving energy and by reducing our reliance on cars. And here in Canada, we can let our leaders know that we’re counting on them to make sure our oceans and coastlines are protected from catastrophes like the one in the Gulf of Mexico.

Learn more at www.davidsuzuki.org.

Comments

Jeffrey M
I'm surprised the Ixtoc oil spill of 1979 was left out of the list considering it was in much the same region as the current one is. Although it was nowhere near as massive as many of the other oil spills in the world it still released over 11 million litres of oil into the Gulf. Many of the same techniques that were tried and failed with this spill were tried on that one, and failed. It was finally capped after relief wells were drilled, something that should have been done prior to this blowout.

I've learned they may go ahead with an idea drilling a similar well of our coast. Hopefully they take a lot more precautions than BP did if it goes forward including drilling relief wells. Although I would rather see BC put money into new technological innovations, such as the new Nissan Leaf electric car that will be unveiled for the first time in Canada in Vancouver. As technology advances we don't want to be seen as a fossil with the types of fuel we use. It's better to be a leader in this sort of thing than follow others.
 
BCLiberal's position:
The B.C. Liberal government has been pushing Ottawa to lift the offshore drilling and tanker moratoriums. A spokesman for the B.C. energy ministry said the government "supports environmentally and socially responsible oil and gas development" off the province's coast.

http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Federal+offshore+drilling+legally+bindi...
 
A question for the DSF:
Is there a way that drilling for oil and gas off the coast of BC can be "environmentally and socially responsible"?
 
What's the CNN Have to Say
CNN says its very, very lucky the spill happened in the Gulf and Americans where there to clean it up and not Newfoundland where the wells are much deeper and the ability of Canadians to clean up desperately lagging. So are Canadians feeling lucky because Canada is sure acting like it with here a well, there a well, nice deep wells because like who is going to stop Canada now that she is knee deep in oil with tankers filled to the brim. Investors? Harper? As we couldn't expect anything environmential responsible from our Prime Minister who has oil running through his veins and lots of stocks in oil I'm sure of it. This is like Russian Roulette where all it will take is human error to blow away any chances of survial for all that is dependent on our waters.
 
Capt. James T. Kirk!
Actor William Shatner said he wants British Columbia's wild salmon to live long and prosper as he threw his support behind an NDP effort to outlaw open net salmon farms on the West Coast.

The Canadian icon, who is famous for his starring role as Capt. James T. Kirk in the Star Trek television series, waded into efforts to protect wild fish from sea lice on Thursday.
 
Max
Suzuki seems to have a monopoly on environmental commentary / opinion pieces in the Straight. Am I the only person who is tired of this guy? He's such a tired middle of the road liberal. Can't the Straight find anyone else with a bit of edge to write on environmental issues?
 
Actually Max he's a BC Liberal
Max wrote:

"He's such a tired middle of the road liberal."

Actually Max he's a BC Liberal through and through!

http://www.straight.com/article-88538/canwest-goes-to-suzuki-for-greenwa...

http://www.straight.com/article-112543/two-faces-of-gordo

etc, etc...
 
Why the sudden silence?
The B.C. Liberal government has been pushing Ottawa to lift the offshore drilling and tanker moratoriums. A spokesman for the B.C. energy ministry said the government "supports environmentally and socially responsible oil and gas development" off the province's coast.

Again a question to the DSF:

Is there such a thing as "environmentally and socially responsible oil and gas development" off our province's coast.
 
Ian, are you on vacation?
One last time:

Again the question to the DSF:

The BCLiberas and Gordon Campbell are working to open our BC waters to offshore drilling and oil tanker traffic in what they call a "environmentally and socially responsible" way.

Is there such a thing as "environmentally and socially responsible oil and gas development" off our province's coast.
 
 
[Comments Disclaimer]
Post a comment
· Use your real name to have your comment considered for publication in print.
· URLs and email addresses will be automatically turned into links.