Arts » Arts Notes

Visual artists face special concerns over resale in Copyright Act changes

By Yvonne Robertson,

Although the proposed changes to Canada’s Copyright Act have their benefits, they have failed to consider the visual-artist community on two key points: fair dealing and Resale Right, say advocates.

The proposal to expand fair dealing to educational use will leave artists losing out on an important source of income, says CARFAC (Canadian Artists' Representation/le Front des artistes), adding schools will no longer have to pay for slides or other visual aids.

“It amounts to about 12% of visual artist income,” said Julie McIntyre, a Vancouver artist and the president of CARFAC B.C. “So it can be a substantial loss.”

McIntyre said the guidelines surrounding this new proposal are unclear and many artists will need to go to court to figure out their rights, an option that few have due to financial constraints.

The changes also failed to include a Resale Right. This right would have allowed artists to receive a percentage royalty payment for the resale of their work. It currently exists in 56 countries and the state of California.

“We are really disappointed that they didn’t include the Resale Right,” said McIntyre. “I know it’s a huge job, but it’s a huge loss of income for artists.”

The value of an art piece is usually not recognized until it hits the secondary market, according to McIntyre.

“It takes time for art to develop and become part of the history,” said McIntyre. “You don’t always know if it’s going to become a classic, so a lot of visual artists depend on this secondary market.”

However, McIntyre is not giving up and CARFAC will continue to campaign for the inclusion of the Resale Right. If it is adopted in Canada, an artist will still benefit from the resale if his or her work is sold in any of the other 56 countries involved.

“It’s only something that affects visual artists because they have only the one, original piece,” said McIntyre. “They don’t rely on selling copies of their work like books or albums.”

See also http://www.straight.com/article-327319/vancouver/new-copyright-legislati....

Comments

Birdy
Dear Julie McIntyre,
If you want to make your customers sign weird life-long resale clauses at the time of quasi-purchase then go right ahead, but stop trying to force everyone else into it. Stop infusing bureaucracy into art. Different artists prefer different business models, and you do not represent all Canadian artists.

Can I offer you a portrait of Milton Friedman?
 
Artist
If an artist chooses not to exercise his resale rights, that is completely his choice to make. However, the law in Canada as it stands today does not allow an artist to take advantage of resale rights if he wishes to. If the law is changed to allow resale rights both artists who wish to use them and artists who do not want to are able to do so. It is not about bureaucracy, it is about options.
 
Julie McIntyre
Ah yes Birdy, this free market economy is doing so well for artists, we earn 61 percent less than the average Canadian worker. Britain did have opposition from some artists when DACs lobbied to bring in the resale right in 2006, but you know what - not one artist refused to cash his cheque and the art market has never been stronger there. $15 Million dollars went to British artists last year in resale rights alone. If you want to hold on to the starving independent artist motif, go right ahead, but perhaps you shouldn't cash your CARFAC exhibition fee cheques either.
 
 
[Comments Disclaimer]
Post a comment
· Use your real name to have your comment considered for publication in print.
· URLs and email addresses will be automatically turned into links.