Jock Finlayson: Why the HST is smart tax policy for B.C.

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      By Jock Finlayson

      To a visiting policy analyst from almost any other advanced economy, the near-hysterical criticism being levelled at B.C.’s proposed harmonized sales tax would seem strange indeed. Most prosperous jurisdictions around the world have long since adopted integrated value-added sales taxes that closely mirror the HST, which consists of the existing five-percent federal goods and services tax along with a seven-percent provincial tax that will be applied to a similar tax base. In Canada, Ontario is implementing its own HST next month, while Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Newfoundland, and Quebec did so in the late 1990s—with no evident harm to their economies.

      There are several reasons why the HST is smart tax policy. Most significantly, it removes all current provincial sales tax from “inputs”—the goods and services that companies in B.C. must purchase in order to carry out their own business. While the PST is often viewed as a consumption tax, the reality is that it applies to elements of both consumption and production.

      Approximately 40 percent of PST revenue collected by Victoria is paid by businesses on an array of inputs used in producing goods and services—everything from computers, equipment, vehicles, office supplies, furniture, and fixtures to legal services, purchased energy, and construction materials. These input taxes represent additional costs for B.C. businesses in the range of $2 billion annually. Taxing business inputs raises the cost of capital, penalizes exports, and favours some sectors over others because firms rely on purchased inputs to varying degrees. Under the HST, the provincial sales tax on inputs is removed, as the seven-percent provincial portion will be credited along with the five-percent GST for most goods and services that B.C. firms use to carry out their business operations.

      Experience in Atlantic Canada confirms that shifting to a value-added sales tax like the HST paves the way for a sizable jump in business investment. University of Toronto economics professor Michael Smart found that investment in machinery and equipment rose 12 percent above trend levels in the years following the 1997 sales-tax reform. There is good reason to anticipate similar gains in B.C., where capital investment per worker has long lagged the national average. Over time, higher investment will lead to stronger economic growth, increased productivity, more exports, and higher wages for private sector workers.

      Another benefit of harmonization is lower compliance costs and greater administrative simplicity. Under the present system of bureaucratically unconnected B.C. and federal sales taxes, businesses have to remit separately to the federal and provincial governments and ensure they are in compliance with two sets of tax rules (including a litany of exemptions in the case of the PST). Administrative and other compliance costs will be far lower once the HST is implemented.

      Shifting from a retail to a value-added sales tax means the tax base is broadened so that some items—especially services—now exempt from the PST (but that are covered by the GST) become subject to the combined 12-percent HST. Consumers will pay additional tax on items not currently subject to PST. However, for about 80 percent of total consumer spending there will be no increase in taxes—these items are already subject to the PST or else are HST-exempt.

      But contrary to what many believe, the net result is not to raise the tax-inclusive cost of these items to the final consumer by seven percent. The reason is that the prices of most goods and services sold in the B.C. market will fall as the costs imposed on businesses by the PST disappear. Experience in Quebec and the Atlantic provinces confirms that the reduced sales tax on business inputs was passed on to consumers in the form of lower (pre-tax) prices. This outcome is not surprising in a competitive marketplace.

      B.C.’s restaurant industry is worried that the HST will dampen business as consumers are charged 12 percent on restaurant meals, versus the five percent GST today. At the margin, there is likely to be a (small) reallocation of the household “food dollar” away from restaurants and toward home-prepared meals. Nationally, restaurant sales did drop when the GST was introduced in 1991, but they quickly rebounded. Between 1991 and 1997, per capita restaurant sales in Canada rose by one-quarter.

      Consumption taxes are sometimes criticized for being “regressive” by disproportionately affecting lower income households. To address this concern, the provincial government intends on providing a refundable HST credit which will be paid quarterly, along with the existing GST credit and carbon tax credit, to lower income individuals. Instead of squabbling over the principle of the HST, the NDP might usefully probe whether a more generous HST tax credit is warranted.

      Jock Finlayson is the executive vice president of the Business Council of British Columbia.

      Comments

      21 Comments

      Hub

      Jun 10, 2010 at 11:57am

      What about we make HST for each and every province, at that the percentage (hello Alberta) and mandate that prices to consumer be displayed WITH the tax included, like it is required in several European countries?

      WYSIWYP (What You See Is What You Pay)

      Dave Macdonald

      Jun 10, 2010 at 12:41pm

      My only concern is that the Provincial Government's definition of "lower income individuals" is not broad enough. There's a gap between the maximum income to qualify and the poverty level in the Lower Mainland, most notably in Vancouver, that is entirely unfair.

      Other than that, system wide, the HST makes sense.

      tim

      Jun 10, 2010 at 12:43pm

      so, in other words, finlayson is trying to say: "the hst is a good thing because i get to make more money off of your back! go hst!"

      NDB

      Jun 10, 2010 at 12:46pm

      Jack, the vast majority thinks you are wrong. Thanks for coming out, and you don't have to sign the petition.

      not quite

      Jun 10, 2010 at 1:19pm

      I think we are all in agreement that HST is a huge benefit for big business, but there are some practical problems with your theory that it's good for the rest of us.
      First, most of the $2 billion transferred from consumers to businesses will benefit customers in other countries and provinces where our exports end up.
      Second, you overlooked a homegrown example of how savings are NOT passed on to customers: The Libs gave private liquour stores two big cost advantages, discounted liquor and non-union labour. Now check out the cost of matching products in private wine stores and government stores. That's why we don't believe your story about passing on the savings.
      Also, Atlantic Canada is not a good comparison because the HST there was lower than PST plus GST, so consumers weren't hit as hard. In BC the consumer impact is so bad that the Libs needed to save the news until after the election.
      But the worst thing is that the BC version of HST is revenue neutral, so each not-poor household pays thousands of dollars in extra tax and none of it goes to health, education, or social serives. That's why it's hard for voters to celebrate the big business win.

      glen p robbins

      Jun 10, 2010 at 1:36pm

      I would ask Mr. Finlayson where was he in the weeks and months leading up to the May 2009 general provincial election. I note he has his love HST brand really rolling after the election. (I would love to have Mr. Finlayson under discovery).

      Did he-- or anyone from his organization acting on his behalf ever at any time talk to either Premier Campbell or Finance Minister Colin Hansen, or former Finance Minister Carole Taylor, or anyone in the BC Liberal caucus EVER about the HST?

      If not -- then why not?

      Mr. Finlayson would appear like the BC Liberal government to be a lightning convert to the HST? One of the blogs under his name refers to him as a financial wizard -- but I do not see any evidence of his foresight vis-a-vis the HST -- meetings, speeches, seminars or any clear public disclosure that he was bullish on the HST. There seems to be a consistent pattern between Gordon Campbell - Colin Hansen, and their friends of little or no discussion -- pitching to the public or to business --about the benefits of the HST prior to the election -- and to the announcement of the HST following the 2009 election.

      There has to be a class action in here -- and I believe there is enough evidence for a 1st year political science or journalism student -- to scream political fraud -- the after the fact (election) exhortations in favour of the HST set the stage for a more strident investigation of what all of these 'interests' knew and precisely when they knew it.

      If Mr. Finlayson only got religion on the HST after the election -- at the same time as Campbell and Hansen -- his promotion of the HST NOW is pure hucksterism in my opinion.

      Darby

      Jun 10, 2010 at 1:49pm

      It wasn't too long ago that big business and politicians were telling us how much the GST was going to benefit everyone from home buyers.
      Now the HST has suddenly become the great cure all for the economy.
      Let's cut the nonsense, adding a tax increases the cost of the item...
      The HST shifts more taxation costs to the consumer from big business..nothing more..

      cherylb

      Jun 10, 2010 at 1:53pm

      "Near hysterical, eh Jock?" You guys still don't get it. We don't like liars and we especially don't like liars who right up until the election is over are still telling us it's not a good tax for BC. Whether the tax is good or not kinda pales to that, doesn't it?

      pippatch

      Jun 10, 2010 at 2:22pm

      Who's right - a 600,000+ ordinary folks or a few Liberal backed 'economists'?

      Don H

      Jun 10, 2010 at 2:50pm

      I think you expect me to believe that business is going to have lower costs so they will naturally lower price to me as a consumer. If you believe this than I have a "tall building" that I own in Paris and would like to sell to you.