Rick Jeffery: HST will help coastal forest industry in B.C.
By Rick Jeffery
It’s a shame that voters are more upset about the way the HST was announced than about the tax itself. Unfortunately, the benefits the harmonized sales tax will bring to the province are being lost in rhetoric as the grassroots revolt led by ex-premier Bill Vander Zalm continues to gain steam. With Vander Zalm’s tarnished history in this province, one has to wonder about his true motivation and agenda.
But for the forest industry, which is still struggling through the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression and at the same time being significantly impacted by a high Canadian dollar, the HST is a lifeline.
Since the economic crisis in 2008, on the coast there has been a 40 percent employment loss in forestry and manufacturing. Manufacturing is less than half the size it was a decade ago on the coast. Some economists predict the Canadian dollar will trade as high as US$1.20 causing even more hardship to wood products manufacturers and exporters. Each one-cent movement of the Canadian dollar means a loss in revenue of $90 million for the B.C. forest sector.
We’re in survival mode and are bracing ourselves. Ninety percent of forest products are sold in U.S. dollars. The fast pace in which the Canadian dollar has gained strength presents a serious challenge to the coastal industry, especially in the markets for our high-value products, which are disproportionately impacted by the rising dollar.
Views on the HST
Jock Finlayson: Why the HST is smart tax policy for B.C.
John Winter: HST is key to a strong economy in B.C.
Chris Delaney: Finance Minister Colin Hansen’s magical HST land doesn’t exist
Bill Vander Zalm: Fight against HST is chance to take back democracy in B.C.



Follow us on Twitter
Like us on Facebook
Comments
Problem solved.
HST is an unfair sales tax because it is not harmonized across the country, and it remove the autonomy in taxation that the Province had with the PST, where they exempted a certain category of product in order to stimulate consumers.
Rod Smelser
And I completely disagree that a federal tax is better than a provincial tax. Personally, I don't want to give my money to a spend happy federal government with no accountability to people in provinces and to a province that's a competitor.
The HST is a good idea, but sometimes good ideas mean nothing when they're introduced by a government that has some debased itself that it literally can be seen in the voter's eyes as doing no right. There's little sense that the business community, particularly those portions of it which have so tightly aligned themselves with the BC Liberals, got the message that the HST was a powderkeg, and thus didn't defend it right from the beginning.
WRONG.
Its sort of a shame that you have resorted to miss quoting, or miss interpreting the publics feelings for your own person agenda. Yes people didn't like being lied too, but the reality is the over taxed people of BC dont want to pay more taxes to help big business. IF the tax refund for business is so important then the government should learn to streamline and cut in order to fund it for big business.
Anyway...like I told the other small minority of blog writers with share the same opinion of you. Thanks for your thoughts, and you dont have to sign the petition. Meanwhile step aside and let the majority decide whats best for the majority.
I have a questions about the HST. Gordon Campbell and the Liberals (which I supported) stated that without the HST they would 700 million less to give to essestials and important services. The 1 Billion + dollars from the federal govt would have to be returned.
Campbell stated that he never considered the HST until after the election. Yet during the election didnt he promise to have balanced books and no extra taxes. If that was the case they should not be short any money.
So it appears to me that the Liberals always considered the money from the HST before the election or else they would have have been able to balance the books. So in other words he lied and this is prove.....
Big business shouldnt get comfortable with the HST because they is a great possible that many other members of the liberals will either bold or vote against it to save their career. Or else recall.
Thanks GORDO for killing the Liberals you dont seen to care about the newer MLA that will replaced with recall.
I have heard that this is the case regarding most, if not all, of FightHST's organizers & canvassers. Key organizers have been known to say that for them, the issue has never been about whether the HST is good or bad but how it was rolled out ....
IMO, it is almost criminal that some FightHST organizers have been permitted to canvass for signatures and even lecture to citizens on tax reform, when they do not fully understand it themselves. I think that it is scandalous that Elections BC has permitted this to take place.
I am also wondering why NDP operative, Bill Tieleman, hasn't had more of a "public" face on the FightHST team, since he is/has been, one of Mr. Vander Zalm's key strategists.
We, as citizens/voters elect people to office, they are not appointed by business interests. But then, I guess 75% opposition to HST (most polling numbers) or 2.25 million people are not worthy or must be just plain idiots in your august opinion.
Kindly spare me any of the Liberal talking points about mis-information. That would be the result of the governments' lack of ensuring the full information was out there in the first place which would not have changed the response. These folks promised opennes and transparency when they were elected in 01. Thus far they have failed on all accounts.
The forest industry in BC is one sixth of what it was.
Please put that crackpipe down ' o' meter 8.5/10 brown - nosin'
am also wondering why NDP operative, Bill Tieleman, hasn't had more of a "public" face on the FightHST team, since he is/has been, one of Mr. Vander Zalm's key strategists.
===============================
Incredible.
An anonymous poster (PAB?) demands to know why someone else, Bill Tieleman, who's been publicly leading a lot of the opposition to the HST, isn't featured even more prominently. Since Bill Tieleman is not and has never been an employee of the NDP, how is he an NDP "operative"?
Rod Smelser
Remember some say the HST is good for big business but at the end that make sense. When the govt take the taxes from the people and gives the saving to big business of course it good for there business. Where a large amount of people are giving money to anything business will always be better. But what happens when the people decide not to gvie there money anymore? Alot of business are going to be punished because of the HST and it wont be there fault but consumer will take it out on them. Alberta and Washington state will be smiling all the way to the bank