News and Views » Commentary

One year after Iran election fraud, western governments still miss the point

By Setareh Danesh

Last week marked the first anniversary of the fraudulent Iranian elections on June 12, 2009, and the shaping of what has come to be known as the Green Movement. This time last year, the world was watching brave acts of nonviolent resistance, and suppression which no word is violent enough to describe.

On June 13, 2009, tens of thousands of protesters poured onto the streets asking “Where is my vote?” On June 14, plainclothes militia, the Basij, attacked the University of Tehran, Isfehan, and Shiraz dormitories, murdering at least five students. June 15 was a day of silent demonstration for three million people in Tehran, which ended with the Basij opening fire on protesters from the rooftop of a mosque.

On June 16, the staff of a nearby hospital protested against the number of deaths by bullet wounds and the fact that the injured and the bodies of the dead were being forcefully removed from the hospital. The demonstrations continued in the days following until the supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, held Tehran’s Friday prayers on June 19, threatening people with further bloodshed. Sure enough, on June 20, we not only witnessed more protests, but the painful death of a 27-year-old student, Neda Agha-Soltan, as she stared at the cellphone camera recording her, dying with her eyes open.

Despite the vicious crackdown that followed after, the Green Movement has been standing strong for a year now. The 70 percent of the Iranian demographic which is under the age of 30 has a strange ability to survive the arrests, tortures, and rapes through the world of information and technology. And this alone has caused enough structural blows to the Islamic Republic that the nuclear issue, at least in the past year, has been the least of its concerns.

And as usual, western governments, and the G8 and the UN Security Council, are missing the point. The sanctions on Iraq and Libya never worked and only caused humanitarian crises, and of course the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are still not working. However, it seems as if all political discussions on Iran are forever destined to be confined to the nuclear issue, leaving us with only two options: sanctions or war. Or, in other words, to kill civilian populations slowly through starvation, or promptly with bombs.

If there is one entity that can prevent the Iranian government from producing nuclear weapons, it is Iranian civil society. In a country where we are witnessing the region’s single most progressive student, worker, feminist, and environmentalist movements, now all active under the political umbrella of the Green Movement, the only object of fear for Khamenei and his puppet government is the Iranian people. And the best possible solution for them to steer out of their current crisis of legitimacy is for a military attack to be imposed on Iran, so that they can align the people against a foreign enemy, and silence all domestic dissidence under the label of treason.

After all, this is precisely what was done during the eight-year Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s, when western governments threatened by the Islamic revolution supported Iraq in the war and sanctioned Iran. This single-handedly intensified Ayatollah Khomeini’s domestic support as a result of wartime nationalism, which further allowed him to execute some 10,000 political dissidents, and guarantee the establishment’s power until at least another generation.

And today, we are the other generation. Last week, there were protests in over 90 cities around the world, including Vancouver and Victoria, in solidarity with the Iranian Green Movement. If western governments manage to not miss the point again, there are many opportunities for the world’s nations and states to support the Iranian people and allow the regime to deteriorate from within. But, if they do miss it, we shall soon be witness to a western-backed Israeli attack which will destroy Iranian civil society and crush all hopes for a democratic, non-nuclear Iran.

Setareh Danesh is a founding member of the Green Student Movement of Vancouver and the Students for Iranian Green Movement Association of Victoria. She is writing under a pseudonym to avoid being arrested while visiting Iran.

Comments

Yousef Bozorgmehr

Oh, please....spare us this "rigged / stolen" election nonsense.

Unless you can accept the will of the majority, any claim to be a democrat is meaningless.
 
glen p robbins
Respectfully, we have our hands full here at home getting rid of Campbell and the HST.
 
Arvand Tiv
I could easily argue that tough sanctions would not only slow things down but also favor some internal organizations (such as IRGC) by boosting their financial state within. Lack of competition with private companies and doing illegal business promotes “clientelism” which at the end would only raise handful of stacks.
 
Sandy Verlot
I believe the writer misses out on a pivotal points concerning the current uprisings :
The uprisings are not the result of a “fraudulent election” but the result of at least 30 years of brewing dissent under the social society which gradually realized that this regime and its idol Khomeini were not after all sent by God and that they differ not much in content and nature, only over power and investment under the pretext of religion
This fact is approved strongly by: 1- The slogans which are mainly “Down with dictator” and are targeting the Supreme Leader and the RGC ( the main back one of suppression and the present regime)
2- The active presence of protesters even though the suppression has violently exceeded 3 folds in comparison to last year, despite the withdrawal of MOUSSAVI from the protests! Meaning as been reflected by Students in Universities the message : “ This uprising movement is not the result of a MOUSSAVI vs Khamenei power struggle and does not follow hopes for reform, but seeks change for DEMOCRACY and Freedom.
The second point MISSED OUT HERE is : The sanctions DO not point at Iranian people but the RGC which hold 90 % of the country’s wealth, industry , weaponry production, exchange, transport and banks . The Iranian people have reflected in their needs through slogans on streets that they need strong and firm action to make this regime weak enough for them to do what they intend to do in Iran. Being soft on this regime is only a failed 30 year old policy that has only lead to killings in Iran.
3- There is not wish for any WAR as such, no ONE is for it and if there was a more firm and earlier strict policy to restricts the RGC in Iran, there would have been no possibility of an option called WAR. In a way : the very possibility now of this option lends its hand to the fact that through out these years the EU and US gave way and helped this regime because of political pragmatisms which never plays in the favour of Any Iranian NATIONALISTIC INTERESTS
 
Setareh Danesh
Thank you all for the view points, just very quickly these are my thoughts.

- There are plenty of better ways to prove that an election was fair than the violent suppression of protesters.

- The issues at home are plenty, adding homelessness, the environment, and the city's violence to the list. But whether or not we approve, the conservative government is pushing for more sanctions, and as the constituency we are responsible for what our governments do.

- I am not of the opinion that the current struggle is one between Mousavi and Khamenei, rather it is one between a people and a dictatorship. The struggle has been on going for 3 decades and was only triggered by the elections, however, it is only now that it has gained such populism.

- Finally, insofar as sanctions are meant to pressure a regime to give way to particular requests, they have never been effective. In every single case, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Cuba, North Korea, etc. they have NOT forced the governments to comply with the international community's requests, they have NOT weakened the governments domestically, rather, they HAVE caused widespread poverty which immediately works to destroy the country's civil society.
 
JC22
I would like to thank the writer for this peice, I think it's important for such issues to be brought to the attention of people of all different backround.
 
 
[Comments Disclaimer]
Post a comment
· Use your real name to have your comment considered for publication in print.
· URLs and email addresses will be automatically turned into links.