TransLink’s draft three-year plan freezes transit service hours
If you believe that getting more people out of their cars and into public transit is good for the environment, you will not find much encouragement in TransLink’s draft three-year plan.
According to the regional transportation authority’s draft 2011 Base Plan and Outlook, there will be no expansion in the transit system between next year and 2013. Further, bus service in some areas will be cut.
Fares will also increase in 2013, a move that the document itself acknowledges will discourage people from taking transit.
“The priorities that are being set by TransLink aren’t our priorities,” Burnaby mayor Derek Corrigan told the Georgia Straight in a phone interview.
Corrigan said that while many suburban communities clearly need better bus service, the transportation body’s major capital expenditure in its three-year program is for new electronic fare-card ticketing technology. The project, which includes the installation of fare gates, will cost $171 million. TransLink’s share is $101 million, with the provincial and federal governments chipping in for the balance.
“We have been through this argument a dozen times, and recognize that it's a foolish expenditure of very hard-won capital,” Corrigan said.
TransLink spokesperson Ken Hardie explained in a phone interview that the plan will “keep things in a state of good repair”. But he also admitted that it doesn’t fund projects that would increase transit use, such as the long-delayed Evergreen Line.
“The base plan represents the level of services that TransLink can sustain based on its current revenues,” Hardie told the Straight.
Bus service will remain at the 2010 levels of 4.93 million hours each year through 2013. The Expo, Millennium, and Canada lines will continue to run for 1.28 million hours annually, as in 2010. SeaBus service will be maintained at 11,000 hours per year, while the West Coast Express will run a stable 35,000 hours annually. Custom transit services like HandyDart will remain constant at 2010 levels.
The document acknowledges that the three-year plan starting in 2011 will contribute only “modest progress” to achieving the objectives of Transport 2040. This is the region’s ambitious transportation strategy, whose goals include significant reductions of greenhouse-gas emissions and a major shift from private automobile use to transit, walking, and cycling.
“Without the allocation of additional resources and a strong demand-side management strategy, these gains will be eroded during the subsequent Outlook period of 2014-2020 and the prospect of achieving the goals of Transport 2040 will be more difficult,” the plan states.
TransLink released copies of the 2011 Base Plan and Outlook on June 14. A Metro Vancouver report, which goes to the board on June 25, notes that the transportation authority’s plan will “frustrate the achievement of regional economic, environmental, greenhouse gas reduction, and broad planning goals”.
Written by Metro Vancouver senior regional planner Raymond Kan, the report states that these regional objectives “depend in part on there being sustainable funding to construct and operate new transit lines and to expand the bus network, in particular to serve the rapidly urbanizing northeastern and South of the Fraser subregions”.
Although the plan maintains overall service, about four to five percent of conventional bus-service hours will be redirected by 2012. Through this, the transportation body expects to “increase the productivity of the system by just over two percent through increased revenue ridership”.
“It’s not the intention to cut service to save money,” Hardie explained. “It’s the intention to cut service to reallocate those services to where they can basically do a better job in terms of meeting demand in moving people.”
Vancouver councillor Andrea Reimer told the Straight that civic officials want to know which areas will get a reduction in bus services. TransLink will hold consultations on this initiative by the fall.
The 2011 Base Plan and Outlook also forecasts a 12-percent increase in average fares in 2013. The new fares will be determined in 2012.
These rate hikes will be on top of the nine-percent increase in average fares in 2010. TransLink expects to collect $412 million in fares this year. Fare revenues are projected to rise to $505 million in 2013.
The plan notes that ridership has increased by an average of over three percent per year over the past two decades. However, it also points out that “ridership growth will be constrained in 2013 due to the lack of new capacity to meet increasing regional demand”.
“In addition, the 12 percent fare increase scheduled for 2013 will impact ridership due to price elasticity effects,” it states. “The effect of the price increase combined with no service growth will limit ridership growth to about one percent in 2013.”




Follow us on Twitter
Like us on Facebook
Comments
"Burnaby Mayor Derek Corrigan, however, warned TransLink's plans are unaffordable and argued scarce funding should be used to sustain service to areas with strong existing ridership rather than areas with low transit use if cuts are required.
"There are significant subisides going into many of the South of Fraser routes that are questionable in terms of business efficiency,""
-------
http://www.straight.com/article-265804/mayors-will-capitulate-and-okay-1...
"Burnaby mayor Derek Corrigan believes his fellow Metro Vancouver mayors will “capitulate” and approve $130 million in additional funding to keep TransLink solvent and stave off service cuts. "
--------------------
What will he say next week?
TransLink couldn't even plan for an "outhouse" where $160 thousand a year spin-doctors are deemed more important than bus drivers.
You really want to attract the motorist from the car? Build with LRT as it is the proven method of doing so. That is why almost every major city in the world has LRT or is building with it.
Who buys with SkyTrain? Very, very few as Vancouver has become an international example on not how to run a transit system.
Grumpy is as Grumpy does!
Every other metropolitan city has 24 hour transit,but nope,not green Vancouver.
Uh, couldn't TransLink suspend the B-Lines over the summer to UBC and use them where they are needed? It's not as if the B-Lines are welcome, anyways. People have been complaining about the noisy, crappy and noxious B-Lines for at least 10 years.
Visit RFail for teh Valley.
You make an excellent point.
No doubt that's why so many have disagreed with you. You're making a well-founded criticism of the transportation pronouncements of someone who enjoys a certain "special status" because of his yahoo opposition to the PMH1 project.
Rod Smelser
Almost 70% of every transit seat is paid by taxpayers. Not expanding transit seems like a win-win deal to me: it won't encourage people who walk or cycle in Vancouver to move to Coquitlam and to take transit, and we won't be feeding TransLink the gluttonous transit-pig with more tax dollars. Oink!
More to the point, why is there two 17s and two 4s at night. Why no light rail from Waterfront to Wall Street instead of the bedroom community West Coast Express. Why instead of increases of zones, why the airport isn't a zone 5; why not more. Like Sunshine coast.
Typical of Government, really need to find some way of at least finding private alternatives. Make license and permit requirements the same for them as cab and limo drivers even. I fear even that will lead to more paper work madness and state stupidity. Overfed greedy child.
Gí¶lí¶k Z Buday
@gzlfb
Buses and Seabus
District of West Vancouver
Blue Bus
BC Rapid Transit Company
(Expo and M Line)
ProTrans BC (Canada Line)
South Coast British Columbia Transit Police
West Coast Express
Transit Security Department
Aircare
HandyDART run by 7 different contractors
Bridges
Knight Street Bridge
Pattullo Bridge
Westham Island Bridge
Golden Ears Bridge
Major Projects: Coordinates and funds capital projects on major road networks.
Minor Projects: Contributes up to half the costs of municipal capital projects
Bike Lanes
So much duplication of services. Give the bridges back to the cities to manage, same with the roads. Put all the buses, sea bus's and handyDARTS into one company. Put all the rapid transit Skytrain, Canada Line, Weast Coast Express into 1 company and let the cities deal with the bike lanes.
Tranlink is to dam big for its own good. There is at least 10 companies that make up tranlink and prob more. They dont need there own police service since they have Transit Security Department which has the authority to arrest people on transit property. Off property or potentially violent person call the cops. Wonder how much the Transit police costs the system.
BTW the turn styles are a total waste of money. Go to San Francisco or NY to see. If you dont have people there manning it people jump it. It slows things down, looks ugly causes problems for people with stuff. Costs a lot of money with no gain. All we need to do now is to hire fare inspectors at each station. Since you need people there anyways for turn styles to work might as well skip the styles and just add the people.
IE where I live, in the old days the 151, 154, 155 all where a hour in between but they hit my area about 20 minutes apart from each other. Effectively providing 20 minute service if you didnt mind walking a few streets over to catch the right bus at the right stop. After translink took over they took out the 151, the 154 and 155 got renamed to different busses even though it was the same route to make it look like they added buses to the 153 and 157 and made them run with in 10 minutes of each other. End result, if you missed the bus your waiting 50 minutes for the next one now. Its stuff like that which resulted in me saying good bye to transit and hello car.
Greater Vancouver's traffic problems are part of the Lower Mainland's lack of long term planning and design. Retrofitting , whether it be roads and bridge or mass transit is proving expensive because for decades there was no real regional planning as the population grew.A wise, reformed provincial government is now needed to address tomorrow's challenges today rather than yesterday's problems today.
The LRT public transportation (Skytrain) and Westcoast Express, while definitely an improvement, are already inadequate.
The Chinese recently built an extensive railway that travels 580 kilometers per hour. It makes long distance personal and freight transportation more attractive, efficient and ecologically and economically feasible. Its impact has already been favorably felt on the Chinese economy.
Coquitlam to Vancouver in 5 minutes, no stops and no Mickey Mouse compromise with the scamtrains replacing local transit to make transit worse and more expensive. I could go for that!
The smartest men in the room at enron (I mean translink) sure know how to milk! What next a translink shuttle to moon? How come they not in jail, yet?
Why no light rail from Waterfront to Wall Street instead of the bedroom community West Coast Express.
================================
Golok, how would LRT be an improvement over the WCExpress?
Rod Smelser
Shifting resources from freeways to transit is essential to overcoming the oil addiction that is now wrecking our planet and economy.
==========================
We need more of both. They are as much complements as substitutes.
The SFPR has environmental problems that could be addressed by an appropriate route change.
Rod Smelser
Your idea or more transit to save us from the impending doom of peak oil while well intentioned is naive. Less transit is what we need because more transit will just lead to a mass migration of more people here to take advantage of the available transit. Kind of, if you build it (transit) greedy developers will come and corrupt politicians will benefit as we all get screwed in the process. Got it?
Have you ever been on Hastings (between Commercial and Renfrew) at rush hour? It is hell. Hastings street needs help: a switch to one-way traffic, LRT, removed street parking, or SOMETHING!
Having a train (LRT) go from Waterfront to Wall street (which is near Hastings between Commercial and Renfrew) would be a great improvement, IMO.
We need more trains (not skytrains, too pricey) and less automobiles...
This is the way to wean ourselves off of oil/carbon dependency.