It's a scene that's sure to anger at least some Canadians who care about the freedoms of peaceful assembly and expression.
A crowd of G20 protesters gathered at Queen Street and Spadina Avenue in Toronto sing the national anthem, as riot police look on.
As the protesters peacefully wrap up their rendition of O Canada, police charge.
The incident was captured in the following video.
You can follow Stephen Hui on Twitter at twitter.com/stephenhui.




Comment (15)
Comments
Charlie Veitch: Arrested, Tortured, Caged by Toronto Fascist Police at G8/G20
http://www.infowars.com/charlie-veitch-arrested-tortured-caged-by-toront...
I lived on Queen West for half a decade before moving out to Vancouver, and witnessing the actions of the violent faction of the protesters is nothing short of obscene. Seeing what they did to Queen St, which is probably the most liberal, progressive neighborhood in the city and intimidating it with violence was absolutely revolting. I was lightly supportive to the actions of the protest movement before this past weekend, now I'll never condone them.
I've seen a few burning cars in my life, but this weekend on the news is the FIRST time I've ever seen people NOT being moved a safe minimum distance away. I agree it was likely a set-up as an attempt to justify the excessive security costs. Did anyone notice if the 'black bloc' groups were wearing police issue footwear?
–noun
1.
( sometimes initial capital letter ) a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.
2.
( sometimes initial capital letter ) the philosophy, principles, or methods of fascism.
3.
( initial capital letter ) a fascist movement, esp. the one established by Mussolini in Italy 1922–43.
NO WHERE IN THIS DOES IT SAY
- a cop doing his job
Yes, the clip is disturbing. It is possible that the police attacked innocent protesters. It is equally possible that the police reacted to something out of the camera's view.
What happened prior? The camera swings to the right to show more police down the street, but does not swing left to show what is up the street on the protesters' side. What was happening at that end of the street? What happened after the police charge?
This clip seems to selected to reinforce a belief in police brutality. Otherwise, why not show more of what happened? This is not to say police brutality does not occur (or could not have occured), but this in itself is not solid evidence.
Go Canada
Stupid brats!