Lower Mainland municipalities want lower RCMP costs

    1 of 1 2 of 1

      Richmond councillor Greg Halsey-Brandt says municipalities serviced under contract by the RCMP should get a break in terms of policing costs.

      Halsey-Brandt insists that the current funding formula must be changed, with either the provincial or federal government absorbing more expenses.

      “Last year, our RCMP cost [in Richmond], I think, was a 10-percent increase overall,” Halsey-Brandt told the Georgia Straight in a phone interview. “It’s so hard to sustain other programs when you’ve got increased costs like that. You end up having to cut back on other things to cover the RCMP or reduce programs or raise taxes more than you want to. It looks like that’s going to happen again this year for us, so it’s not a very pleasant prospect.”

      Under the current RCMP contract, which is due to expire on March 31, 2012, municipalities with populations in excess of 15,000 pay 90 percent of total expenses, excluding overtime, with the federal government picking up the remaining 10 percent of the tab.

      Municipalities with populations ranging from 5,000 to 15,000 pay 70 percent of the cost of RCMP services.

      But according to a June 20, 2010, memorandum prepared by the secretariat of the Union of B.C. Municipalities, local governments may not find significant relief from the ongoing renegotiation of the RCMP contract.

      The report noted that back in 2007, “federal negotiators received approval from Cabinet to maintain the current cost shares and population thresholds.”

      Municipalities, according to the document, wanted the funding formula of 90-10 and 70-30 adjusted to 70-30 and 50-50.

      Instead, the B.C. negotiating team has proposed that the federal government modify the cost-sharing agreement covering cadet training, regional integrated teams, divisional administration, complaints process, and police dogs from the present 90-10 to 70-30.

      The memorandum also stated that an “agreement in principle” for a new 20-year RCMP contract is expected by fall.

      Former Mountie Kevin Begg, now assistant deputy minister and director of police services with the Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General, heads the committee representing B.C. and seven other provinces in the contract-renewal talks with the federal government. Begg declined an interview request by the Straight. The ministry wouldn’t make available any officials who could talk on the record about the negotiations.

      Halsey-Brandt noted that many municipal officials are frustrated over the lack of public input into the contract talks. “We’re asking for more transparency,” he said. “We’re just the ones that pay the money and have no information on it and no real say on it.”

      Results of an Angus Reid survey in December 2009 showed a steep decline in the public-approval rating of the RCMP in B.C. The poll indicated that 61 percent of British Columbians reported that their “confidence in the internal operations and leadership of the RCMP has decreased over the last two years”.

      Doug MacKay-Dunn, a former Vancouver police officer and now a councillor in the District of North Vancouver, noted that many local-government officials are worried that their councils may not have enough time to review the terms of their new contracts with the RCMP.

      “We’re concerned that they don’t wait until the last minute to jam it through and say, ”˜Oh, well, we don’t have much time. We have to make these decisions now,’ ” MacKay-Dunn told the Straight by phone.

      Comments

      3 Comments

      Municipalities Cop Out

      Jul 19, 2010 at 11:33am

      Does that mean crime is down or cops are up or maybe a bit of both as one thing for certain gangs will be up on this.

      beelzebub

      Jul 20, 2010 at 11:16am

      What is lost in the discussions for lowering of costs is the insane costs of the rest of the legal system that causes the police and the courts to push the per case costs through the roof. Impaired driving is a prime example. One impaired, 2 to 3 cops off the road for 4 to 6 hours to process. Several hundred percent increase over time per case. Thanks to the bottom feeders who pretty well guarantee an acquittal on technicality for anyone with a few bucks to spend.

      Multiply that over the myriad of offenses taken to court, then appeal courts and then to the SCC.

      Beenaroundtheblock

      Aug 13, 2010 at 1:02pm

      The TV plays up cops and lawyers as something much more exciting and brave as they really are.
      More and more police time is taken up by enforcing the war on drugs.
      What better way to ensure a nice big anti-drug budget if you present cannabis GARDENS as "growops" then say that they're a threat to your children and neighbours(laughable). As for a dangerous job: it is a fact that Loggers have a higher chance of being hurt or killed on the job than a cop, WHY????

      >>>>>Because the cops have enjoyed an image of courage that is so far from the truth it's scary. They LOVE marijuana busts (almost 0% chance of running into violence with lots of paid court time), it's MUDERERS(like Picton) they seem to try to avoid!
      Yikes!

      While not ALL cops and lawyers are accomplice to this scam(the biggest scam in the world beside military contracts),
      most are or they turn a blind eye to the obvious :
      THIS IS A RACKET THAT THE COPS AND LAWYERS HAVE BEEN MAKING BILLIONS OFF OF FOR ALMOST A CENTURY NOW.

      And this "Gangs" hype is getting old ,gangs have been around for decades, just not hyped out like now, another scam for scaring the public out of more money.
      No wonder we're always short on money for Schools, Hospitals, and decent Social Services, and all the other things that were supposed to make this a first-class society.

      I mean we got people feeding their pigs human , and you're worried about a plant . PRIORITIES PEOPLE