Peter Hamilton: To vote or not to vote on dolphins in captivity should not be the question

Comments

By Peter Hamilton

Following the death of a beluga at the Vancouver Aquarium, park board commissioners will once again debate if voters will finally be allowed to stop the inhumane cetacean imprisonment. An aquarium captivity plebiscite in 2011 shouldn’t be questioned! It should be a right in order to protect animals and voters.

All elected Vision Vancouver and COPE politicians must now support Green commissioner Stuart Mackinnon’s proposal to begin a process to phase out the imprisonment of dolphins. They must not be intimidated by the Vancouver Aquarium.

Lifeforce fought hard to have the Stanley Park Zoo expansion issue put to a vote during two civic elections in 1990 and 1993. Twice the people said “No zoo in Stanley Park!” and the NPA finally stopped trying to railroad it through. There is no difference between the pacing polar bears and the dolphins swimming around and around and around. The Vancouver Aquarium’s dolphin prisons and zoo shows must be stopped.

There is no educational or scientific justification for keeping dolphins in confinement. It is life and death in a toilet bowl for captive dolphins. They are deprived of their psychological and behavioral needs. They swim in tiny pools polluted with their excrement. They are deprived of freedoms that are only provided for in their ocean homes. It is tantamount to a person spending their life in a bathroom.

Most of the belugas were captured in the wild. The Pacific white-sided dolphins were deemed to be unfit for release by Japanese aquariums yet are physically able to perform all the stressful, difficult tricks. There are dolphins surviving in the wild with far greater injuries.

The Vancouver Aquarium is not a leader in conservation. They do what is profitable. They have been part of the problems not the solutions. They bragged about having the first captive orca who didn’t die when harpooned to be used as a model for a sculpture. Their insensitivity, in fact, resulted in the decimation of local populations now designated as endangered species.

They also want more dolphin deals from a country that notoriously opposes international whaling bans. Japan’s “drive fisheries” to kill dolphins for food and aquariums were exposed in the Oscar-winning documentary The Cove. The Vancouver Aquarium continues to send dolphins to U.S. SeaWorlds that exploit orcas and others for entertainment. They have already sent wild-caught male and female belugas while they are presently waiting for a permit to send their last male beluga.

The seal pup rehabilitation can be done without dolphin captivity. Other international well-respected wildlife rehabilitation centres have done so for decades.

All the slick “conservation” advertising fails to reveal that the Vancouver Aquarium has only joined other long-standing programs, such as beach cleanups and eating sustainable fish, while turning the Lumberman’s Arch picnic grounds into a office trailer park and garbage dump for the proposed expansion, and while serving up abused farm animals that contribute to global warming in their cafe and at parties.

So it is wake-up time for some of the public and politicians who need to be reminded of the cruelty and public opposition to exploitation for so-called entertainment. There have been at least 36 deaths of dolphins as a result of this business. The public said “No Stanley Park Zoo!” and it was closed. The rodeos and exotic animal circus acts in Vancouver were also stopped.

Existing captives who were captured from the wild will probably not be returned to their ocean homes. Sadly, they and those born in captivity will die prematurely. But at least that will end the Vancouver Aquarium’s legacy of violations against nature.

A plebiscite is the peoples’ right. Captures are perpetuated by the aquarium slave trade, which is dependent on wild captures. Ending dolphin captivity should also include stopping the $120-million expansion of whale pools, with more dolphins and zoo exhibits, that failed to be completed for the 2010 Winter Olympics. The politicians must finally allow the democratic right of voters to say “No more dolphins!”

Peter Hamilton is the founding director of Lifeforce.

Comments (14) Add New Comment
glen p robbins
I'm with Peter and Pamela -- not my usual hang out -- but I think I will stay here for awhile.
0
0
Rating: 0
Glenn
I wholeheartedly agree. I went to aquariums as a child and only learned about animals in captivity. When I got older and realized that these animals were kept in such a sad simulation of their natural environment, aquariums became a depressing place for me to visit. It's time that our aquarium stopped putting these highly intelligent animals on display for people to gawk at. Teach respect rather than domination.
0
0
Rating: 0
stacey
What is the Straight's policy on Commentary contributors? Who sets the headlines? This headline is in complete opposition to the commentary.
0
0
Rating: 0
Stephen Hui
Hi stacey:

While our community contributors are encouraged to submit their own title, Straight editors determine the final headline.

In this case, the headline is a slightly modified version of the one suggested by the writer.
0
0
Rating: 0
stacey
Thank you Stephen.

For the record, I completely disagree with this commentary. My opinions are here:

http://www.straight.com/article-333738/vancouver/hold-plebiscite-whales-...

http://www.straight.com/node/334327
0
0
Rating: 0
johnathan
Peter Hamilton, Which dolphin died? the first sentence in your article reads:"Following the death of yet another dolphin at the Vancouver Aquarium...".

Is there a lot of fact checking going on at Lifeforce? It would be helpful to have actual, real information in the Straight rather than another propaganda piece.
0
0
Rating: 0
Stephen Hui
Thanks for pointing that out, johnathan.

I have revised the first sentence to refer to the fact it was a whale, the young beluga Nala, that died in June at the Vancouver Aquarium.
0
0
Rating: 0
Best practice
Stephen Hui, what are the Straight's professional guidelines regarding modifying an article after it has already been published?

Should there not be an editorial notice of a modification of the article? Should not the original be available so that the reader can examine the change that was made?

I realise that it seems (I use "seems" because without a copy of the original, how is the reader to know what was changed?) that you performed a simple word substitution, but is it ethical for you to make that change in the writing voice of Peter Hamilton?

If you made a correction of the facts, you should indicate who made the change (yourself and not Peter) and why.

I find it disturbing the Straight would alter the public record without explanation ("comments", notwithstanding.).
0
0
Rating: 0
Matthew
Nala died of a plastic bag and rocks in her blowhole, a condition that occurs outside the aquarium. The article talks about them swimming around in their own filth, well, the ocean is filled with the excrement of several hundred million other species, industrial pollution, and garbage. Yeah, the ocean sounds so much more natural and clean.
0
0
Rating: 0
Lifeforce

Belugas are members of the Superfamily Delphinoidea and
Family Monodontidae. Belugas belong to suborder Odontoceti (toothed whales). They are named Delphinapterus leucas. They are not "whales". Therefore it was a dolphin who was the 36th death due to the Vancouver Aquarium's pro-captivity policy. Killer whales or orcas are the largest members of the dolphin family. So much for aquarium education.

An editor has now clarified it by removing "whale" and using beluga.

And to Matthew: Humans also live in a polluted world and they do not choose to lock themselves in a room for their entire lives. In the oceans belugas can escape the excrement but not in an aquarium tank. PS. Nala died from a penny and rocks in the airway not a plastic bag.

Peter Hamilton
Lifeforce Founding Director
www.lifeforcefoundation.org
0
0
Rating: 0
stacey
The water in all the outdoor habitats is sourced directly from Burrard Inlet, filtered accordingly, and cooled to simulate ocean temperatures. It is also filtered constantly on an approximate 100-minute cycle. Therefore, The marine mammals on display are not swimming in their own filth; I agree with Matthew, in that the water at the Aquarium is decidedly cleaner than the water in the wild.

http://www.vanaqua.org/education/aquafacts/behind-the-scenes.html
0
0
Rating: 0
Lifeforce
Ridiculous. If the water is filtered on "an approximate 100 minute cycle" they are still in their feces and urine at less concentration from time to time. The excrement doesn't immediately disappear. One of the most common reported reasons for deaths in aquariums is bacterial infections.

Hey Matthew the water is from the polluted Burrard Inlet. The polluted "oceans" and their own wastes. Yuck!

And, of course, we must not forget that captivity denies them the freedom of swimming approximately 100 miles a day, diving to great ocean depths, foraging for a variety of food, their complex social structure and much more. See my video "Belugas: Far From Home". It tells the story of the brutal capture of wild belugas that are in the aquarium now. http://lifeforcefoundation.org/ecotv_play.php?id=25
Peter Hamilton
Lifeforce Founding Director
www.lifeforcefoundation.org
0
0
Rating: 0
RodSmelser
Mr Hamilton,

I have two questions for you. One, what is your professional or educational background in the field of marine mammals? Second, what do you propose to do, both personally and as an organization, if the referendum is held and it fails?
Rod Smelser
0
0
Rating: 0
beelzebub
Good questions Roddy. I would add one more, what are we to do if we come across wounded or orphaned marine mammals if we have no means to house them?
0
0
Rating: 0
Add new comment
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.