Lois Jackson: UBC-area residents deserve democratic, accountable local government

By Lois E. Jackson

When will the rapidly-growing residential community at the University of B.C. have its own democratic and accountable local government?

The UBC area—and some rural lands in Metro Vancouver, such as Barnston Island in the Fraser River and the west side of Pitt Lake—do not lie within the boundaries of the City of Vancouver or any Metro Vancouver municipality.

A family with a farm on Barnston Island and a professor who lives in one of the new high-rise towers at UBC have at least one thing in common: They both live in one of the unincorporated areas that are collectively known as “Electoral Area A". Every three years, instead of voting for a mayor and council, these Canadians elect one person as their representative. That person becomes one of the directors on the Metro Vancouver board—which represents communities with a total population of almost 2.5 million people.

The UBC campus and the University Endowment Lands are the only urbanized lands in Metro Vancouver without their own municipal councils and local government. An estimated 16,000 residents and students now live there. By the year 2020, that residential population is projected to grow to 24,000.

Until recently, Metro Vancouver oversaw land use administration on the UBC campus. Situations where UBC acts as proponent, developer, and approver for development projects have been cause for concern for some time. A recent UBC proposal to move and shrink the UBC Farm to make way for more development is but one example. The inherent conflict of interest contributes to a lack of accountability in the burgeoning UBC campus on Point Grey.

Metro Vancouver attempted last year to introduce land use development provisions that would have made progress toward increasing accountability. This was by no means unusual, given that every other major Canadian university situated within a heavily urbanized metropolitan area operates under a zoning bylaw. However, introduction of a zoning bylaw of any kind was opposed by the university. In November 2009, UBC president Stephen Toope called Metro Vancouver’s proposal “an attempt to intervene in the governance of UBC in a way that could be devastating to our academic freedom".

Metro Vancouver agrees that academic freedom is one of the hallmarks of a democracy. Another is a citizen’s right to have a democratic and accountable local government.

In May 2010, the Province of British Columbia enacted Bill 20. That law contains a provision that makes the B.C. minister of community and rural development responsible for local and regional land use planning on the UBC Point Grey campus. The UBC board of governors will be responsible for development of a land use plan, as well as the process of public consultation associated with it. Under the new authority, the minister will be able to adopt a local land use plan prepared by UBC. Metro Vancouver continues to be the regional government and will supply regional utilities and services. With the transfer of Metro Vancouver’s local and regional land use planning responsibilities to a provincial ministry, future plans for accountability remain unclear.

However, this is not a viable long-term solution since it does not address the long-standing board priority of finding an alternate governance system for UBC.

On several occasions, the Metro Vancouver board had asked Victoria to initiate a new governance system for UBC. The board never asked for, or expected, the bill now passed by the legislature.

In recent years, UBC has grown into much more than a university. It is a vibrant and diverse community with expanding scope, a growing population and international recognition for innovation and sustainability. The Metro Vancouver board supports governance reforms that will lead to greater accountability at UBC—accountability of the sort that provides access to formal democratic avenues found in other Metro Vancouver municipalities.

The minister of community and rural development and UBC have agreed that it is time to explore a more representative form of local government for the Point Grey peninsula. The speed in travelling this road to democracy will depend on the interest and involvement of the university and residential communities.

Metro Vancouver would hope that the Province of B.C. will work with area residents and UBC to develop democratic and accountable governance structures, because sustainability and accountability go hand in hand. UBC residents and students deserve no less.

Let their voices be heard. Let them have their own democratic and accountable local government.

Lois E. Jackson is the chair of Metro Vancouver’s board of directors. She is also the mayor of Delta.

Comments

2 Comments

Reader via e-mail

Jul 30, 2010 at 11:11am

Re: UBC-area residents deserve democratic, accountable local government (online, July 19)

This opinion piece from Metro Vancouver chair Lois Jackson states that UBC acts as proponent, developer and approver for development projects. In fact, UBC residential housing is provided by private development companies. Developments are approved by a separate board from the university's Board of Governors, and they are assessed against a plan that was approved by Metro.

Therefore, Mayor Jackson's claims that UBC is the only party to this process, and the insinuation that UBC manipulates this process, are demonstrably false and misleading.

Mayor Jackson's opinion piece identifies UBC Farm as an example of Metro concern about UBC’s accountability. Yet there is no better illustration of UBC accountability than what is now happening with the UBC Farm.

In fact, the UBC Board of Governors carefully considered public input to the planning process for our academic lands, and stated that this area would be kept as an academic resource rather than a housing reserve. Further the Board requested a new academic plan and a density transfer to enable this to happen. The academic plan ("Cultivating Space") plan is done, and we are now working diligently to effect the density transfer.

Last year, Metro told UBC that its long-standing policy was to no longer govern electoral areas -- period. That policy priority has subsequently been addressed for the UBC campus by Bill 20, which transfers land use responsibility to the provincial government. It is manifestly no longer Metro’s responsibility to lobby for a local governance solution.

I look forward to the students, residents, faculty and staff who form our campus community having the opportunity to discuss the form of governance that best meets the needs of our academic mission and the unique university town that has emerged on our Vancouver campus.

Stephen Owen
Vice President, External, Legal and Community Relations
The University of British Columbia

glen p robbins

Aug 7, 2010 at 3:12am

From Ms. Jackson-"When will the rapidly - growing residential community at the University of BC have its own democratic and local government?"

Is there evidence the people living in the community what more accountability and governance?

Ms. Jackson's letter suggests that a lack of accountability and governance - may be providing an opportunity for conflict particularly in the area of development ($$$$).

She asserts that through a provision in Bill 20 enacted May 2010 makes the provincial minister "responsible for local and regional land use planning on the UBC Point Grey campus" and "With the transfer of Metro Vancouver’s local and regional land use planning responsibilities to a provincial ministry, future plans for accountability remain unclear."

Mr. Owen in his response to Ms. Jackson's letter assures us there are sufficient democratic safeguards with respect to concerns over development conflicts.

Mr. Owen refutes Ms. Jackson's comments with respect to developments with UBC Farm - proclaiming that "this area would be kept as an academic resource rather than a housing reserve."

Mr. Owen then questions Ms. Jackson's credibility by stating "Last year, Metro told UBC that its long-standing policy was to no longer govern electoral areas -- period." and last (but not least) - Mr. Owen questions jurisdiction -- in any event "and the unique university town that has emerged on our Vancouver campus."

Assuming the best of the truth - as presented I have to admit that Ms. Jackson does spark my interest in the goings on over at UBC - recent land dealings with aboriginals--however, given Mr. Owens assertion that Metro Vancouver ceded to the provincial government - who also has oversight of post secondary institutions---and with that in mind UBC is not exclusively a Vancouver campus -- (but is mostly a Vancouver campus?), I have to wonder what Ms. Jackson's motives are - given she is moving at UBC primarily through the argument of lack of democratic accountability -- respectfully - a difficult place from which to launch - at this juncture for any politician in BC.

I don't believe that Ms. Jackson has sufficiently made her case for me at this point - and would hold for Mr. Owen - until such time as Ms. Jackson can more fully explain why the democratic changes she proposes are necessary for residential community at UBC - and what the implications are for the average person -- in Coquitlam - or Surrey.