Tria Donaldson: Keep the Peace: Impact of Site C dam would be too high

    1 of 2 2 of 2

      Earlier this month, I went on an epic journey to the northeast corner of our province. Over 24 hours away as the Greyhound drives, over the other side of the Rocky Mountains, lies the Peace River Valley, a valley under threat from plans to build the Site C dam.

      I was heading up for the fifth annual Paddle for the Peace event, an annual event hosted by the West Moberly First Nations and the Peace Valley Environment Association. Each year, hundreds head down the river to appreciate the beauty of this spectacular river and to understand the impact the Site C dam project will have on the river valley.

      The proposed Site C Dam would be the third dam on the already constrained Peace River. The project would flood almost 100 kilometres of the valley I paddled down, and more land would be lost to erosion over time. Local citizens, and especially the Treaty 8 First Nations communities, have serious concerns about this project. To them, it is another example of destroying their local environment for the benefit of people from the south. Coming from the south, I don’t usually spend a lot of time thinking about where my electricity comes from. The Peace River is a long way away from my home in Victoria, a fact that over 24 hours on a Greyhound drove in further.

      When I arrived in the valley I was amazed. Each bend in the road revealed another stunning vista: a crystal clear river snaking through hills covered in old-growth forests on one side and rolling farmland on the other. Small islands dot the river, perfect habitat for creatures like deer and moose to give birth free from predators.

      The scenic beauty of the Peace River Valley is only part of what makes this valley so special. It is one of the only unprotected valleys in the proposed Yellowstone to Yukon conservation area, and a critical migratory corridor for grizzly bears, moose, elk, and a plethora of other wildlife. The waters of the Peace are home to threatened bull trout and the valley’s trees host a large number of owls and other raptors.

      This valley is also full of prime Class 1 agriculture land. Up and down the valley people are growing alfalfa, wheat, canola, and other grains. I stayed with one of the many farming families in the valley, Ken and Arlene Boon. Arlene’s family has been on the farm for three generations. Her grandfather was part of the original fight against B.C. Hydro 30 years ago, and was one of the people who never sold his land. Arlene told me about how he used to chase B.C. Hydro off his property with a shotgun. Arlene doesn’t quite resort to that, but her and Ken are part of the core of local landowners that are committed to fighting this project.

      After spending the night in a home that would be evacuated if the Site C project went ahead, I headed to the start of the paddle, near the community of Hudson’s Hope. I scarfed down some awesome pancakes prepared by the West Moberly First Nations before hopping in a canoe for the 30-kilometre journey.

      There were about 230 boats in the water, and over 500 people participated. The crowd was full of people of all ages—kids and elders, First Nations and cowboys, elected officials and environmentalists. As we paddled, we saw flood reserve signs that mark what will be lost to the Site C reservoir. Full sections of road will go under, people’s homes and fields will drown, and acres and acres of old-growth boreal forest will be lost forever.

      Site C would destroy a community’s livelihood and history, disrupt one of the largest and most important wildlife corridors in the continent, and submerge valuable carbon sinks instead of promoting food security and the need to adapt to climate change. And in return we’d get a man-made lake full of mercury-poisoned fish, and 4,500 gigawatt hours of electricity headed mostly for export to California or to expanding destructive natural-gas production in the region.

      The weekend I spent in the Peace River Valley introduced me to a place that is as beautiful as it ecologically important. It’s clear why twice before the people of B.C. have stopped Site C from going forward, and why those of us in the south need to stand up for a place that is as beautiful and important as it is distant.

      My final day in the valley, I headed up to see the W.A.C. Bennett Dam. Here the river has been choked and stifled. Every year during fall’s harsh storms, more land crumples into the reservoir and people loose more land. Dust storms are common, and there is still an advisory not to eat fish because of the mercury.

      We have enough electricity. We have enough rivers in pipes and behind dams. Let’s look at alternatives that make sense. Let’s keep the Peace flowing and free.

      Tria Donaldson is a youth climate activist that has been involved with the goBeyond project, the Sierra Youth Coalition, and the Canadian Youth Climate Coalition. She is currently the Vancouver Island outreach coordinator for the Wilderness Committee.

      Comments

      3 Comments

      RodSmelser

      Jul 20, 2010 at 12:38am

      On our trip back from Grande Prairie this May my wife and I drove Hwy 29 from Fort St John to Hudson's Hope and Chetwynd. We saw several flood level signs similar to the one in the picture and saw what looked to us like very good farmland, different in type from the rest of the farms in the district, those above the valley bottom.

      I have been reading parts of a book called 'This Was Our Valley' by Eark K. Pollon and Shirlee Smith Matheson, 1989, Detselig Enterprises of Calgary, ISBN 0-920490-92-1. It spells out some of the adverse impacts of the dams already built on the Peace, WAC Bennett and Peace Canyon. The low cost electricity from these plants came at a price borne by some local residents, and a price borne by all in terms of lost opportunities for other river basin values to be fully utilized.
      Rod Smelser

      From Fort St. John

      Jul 20, 2010 at 11:40am

      Hats off to Tria Donaldson for helping people in southern BC understand the devastation that the so-called "Site C clean energy project" will wreck on the human and wild residents of the Peace River valley. But more than those direct impacts of the dam, the citizens of British Columbia have to realize the downside of pursuing this ill-conceived idea that was hatched in the middle decades of the last century. BC Hydro's $ 6.6 billion estimate to build Site C was based on assumptions that have already been discounted (e.g., design upgrades are required for new earthquake standards, the inability to find fill materials within a reasonable distance from the proposed dam site, transmission line upgrades, etc.). British Columbia already has a heavy debt load and the taxpayers of the province will be required to "co-sign" BC Hydro's multi-billion dollar loan. Factor interest into the equation and Site C means one thing -- your power bill is going to go up.

      Anthony Robinson

      Jul 23, 2010 at 10:20pm

      Site C may not be required at all if modern trends in efficiency continue to pick up momentum.

      Consider the lack of electricity demand as more 'PowerSmart' appliances replace energy hungry equipment.

      Think of the near future where homes will have their own power and heat plants. The Bloombox is in use by UPS. Walmart, Google and other big corporations. Something like a heat pump, but supplies power as well.

      Volkswagon is working on a home based power supply, but so are hundreds of other firms. These are expensive machines, yet the more reliable power they provide the less demand on the grid. Also, as use widens the economy of scale brings down costs.

      So as these modern trends, like led lights taking over from flouran lamps, gather momentum, the need for a site C dam project diminishes.
      TG