Sandy Garossino: Arts cost little but could have big political impact in B.C.

The following is an unedited response by Sandy Garossino, Alliance for Arts and Culture board member and advocacy task force chair, to a Georgia Straight news item, "Liberals clarify B.C. Spirit Festivals plan to arts groups". This comment was originally posted on the Alliance’s Facebook page.

Having these grants administered by independent peer review and based on population is a positive step. The government did listen and did hear the importance of these two issues.

Regrettable that this new program is launched under the cloud of cuts to the BCAC, gaming grants, and provocative language about BC culture from Minister Rich Coleman and others.

The government has far to go to regain the ground it lost by cutting arts so disproportionately from other sectors, and for achieving so little in bottom line savings for the damage it has done.

They don't seem to realize the toll that looking mean-spirited has done to them politically, especially among swing voters. Remember Vander Zalm and the cartoon of picking the wings off flies. It's all part of the larger picture that has the Liberals looking out of touch with BC's values, and part of why they are polling at historic lows.

And many traditional Liberal major donors are also arts philanthropists. Having built many of our cultural institutions, they are now being called upon to save them out of their own pockets--a strangely indirect taxation. Do the Liberals think these people will be happy to contribute generously to party coffers for the next election in an effort to keep a deeply unpopular government in power?

The Liberal cuts to arts are costing many of their own major donors far more than any tax increase the NDP would bring in. Has anyone in government really thought this through?

The Liberals do not seem to recognize the political cost of looking like an insensitive bully. While people have not historically voted the arts, they do vote on the intangible elements that make up an overall impression.

It could be so different. Imagine the political advantage of having the arts community on your side, celebrating your vision. How the arts community has reach and organization in every town, village and hamlet in BC. How it has microphones, stages, and media connections across the province.

The arts cost so incredibly little, yet have the potential to move the dial politically.

Don't know why neither the NDP or Liberals have figured out how to leverage this in a positive way.

The government has boxed itself into a difficult position. It probably would like to walk back from some of the unfortunate and damaging communications and policies it has generated, without having to publicly withdraw anything or admit to any mistakes.

We have been on a path toward high conflict and hardening attitudes--a destructive pattern that is divisive and has potential cost to our sector.

This is a good time for the sector to allow the minister some breathing room, while continuing the pressure for independence.

The relationship matters. This is an olive branch of sorts. Olive branches don't look like white flags of surrender. We are not going to get this government to issue an apology. Power doesn't work that way.

But it might just be possible to find enough common ground to find a way forward that advances the interests of the arts.

Comments

bowser
If "the arts cost so incredibly little", then why do you need the government to pay for the arts? Why not let the consumers of "the arts" pay for them? Simple - Because, the money put into"the arts" never equals the little return that is received. And if "the artists" could earn a living without the government money, they would. But obviously, the general public doesn't really support "the arts", or "the artist" wouldn't need government money.
 
notextinct
Often it's not about a monetary return. Sometimes what artists have to say needs to be heard. This week, the Neanderthal Arts Festival is presenting Highway 63: The Fort Mac Show. It's about the oilsands in Fort McMurray, Alberta. And coincidentally, there is a massive oil spill in Michigan caused by a Canadian company that has offices in Fort Mac. Shouldn't our Vancouver audiences be hearing this story?
 
bowser
Hmmm..... so it's not about the monetary return huh? I submit to you that everything related to government spending is about the monetary return. If I read you right, it's not important for arts groups to be profitable and responsible in their spending. Yet you complain that the government is not responsible in their spending. Hmmmm????
 
Stewart Champion
Bowser is barking up the wrong tree.

We support the arts because they identify us, they give our lives beauty and perspective, and they are the highwater mark of a civilized community.

Bowser's life may consist of little more than bones and Kibble. The rest of us see life as more beautiful than he will ever know, graced by art more important than he will ever understand.

I expect Bowser will soon start barking in favour of shutting down our libraries, parks and schools. They too don't actually make money. 'If they could earn a living without government support, they would.'

Bowser is enough to give the Philistines a bad name.
 
Noclique
You can support arts without coming across as some out of touch, elitist, pretentious know it all. Not everyone who doesn't think arts should receive funding is a Philistine. Arts funding is an issue that will always have to be debated and reviewed, cause we do live in a democracy. In the past to receive patronage, artists had to please the King. Now the real King is the voting public. Figure this out. Stop alienating people who like country music.
 
 
[Comments Disclaimer]
Post a comment
· Use your real name to have your comment considered for publication in print.
· URLs and email addresses will be automatically turned into links.