It's easy to understand why Jane Danzo quit her position as chair of the B.C. Arts Council.
This year, the B.C. Liberal government seriously slashed funding to the arms-length council, leaving Danzo hanging.
In the last budget, Finance Minister Colin Hansen also announced $30 million in new arts-legacy funding over three years.
"Even after the announcement, the Board was not consulted for input, nor was it permitted to know the details as they were developed by ministry staff over a four month period," Danzo write in an August 16 letter to Tourism, Culture and the Arts Minister Kevin Krueger. "Meanwhile, the arts community struggled, some members with life-threatening uncertainty, as they reduced their programming, laid off staff and made poignant appeals to patrons and donors for further support. And the Board remained awkwardly silent until the government released more information about the Arts Legacy Fund."
Unfortunately for the arts community, Danzo chose to quit in the middle of August.
The public doesn't pay nearly as much attention to the news at this time. This means that the impact of her departure won't be nearly as great as it should have been.
Had Danzo chosen to quit while the legislature was in session in the fall, it would have attracted a great deal more media coverage.
The NDP would have picked up on the issue, peppering Krueger during question period.
And the reactions from others, including the Canadian Conference for the Arts, would have received more play.
Of course, there's no guarantee that Premier Gordon Campbell will recall the legislature this fall, given the public backlash against the harmonized sales tax.
But even if Danzo had waited until after Labour Day, more British Columbians would have noticed.
Timing is as important to politics as location is to real estate.
Campbell is probably secretly thrilled that Danzo quit in August because he knows the story is more likely to blow over at this time.
The next time the B.C. arts community wants to take a run at the B.C. Liberals for undermining arms-length funding of culture, it shouldn't take place in late summer.
Do it during the fall arts season when audiences and the rest of the public will take notice.
Follow Charlie Smith on Twitter at twitter.com/csmithstraight.
Former B.C. Arts Council chair Jane Danzo speaks out
Full text of former B.C. Arts Council Chair Jane Danzo's letter to Arts Minister Kevin Krueger
Former B.C. Arts Council Chair Jane Danzo speaks on everything from her board to press releases
Canadian Conference for the Arts president rips into B.C. arts cuts and praises Jane Danzo
Pacific Association of Artist-Run Centres calls for arm's-length B.C. Arts Council
Headlines Theatre's David Diamond warns Kevin Krueger about an eroding democracy
John McLachlan: What I really think of the B.C. Spirit Festival idea
Tom Durrie asks Assembly of B.C. Arts Councils to refuse to disperse spirit festival funding
George Zukerman pens open letter to Kevin Krueger on B.C. arts cuts
Canadian Dance Assembly calls B.C. arts cuts "scorched earth policy"




Comment (3)
Comments
Although I do wonder about the BC (and Canadian) media across the board sometimes...one could also argue that the events were covered more because it's the slow season. The media might have had even less interest and space than they already do when things are busier in the fall with other big issues on the political agenda.
At any rate, it is undeniably the dog days of summer, and all the BC creatives, the BC Arts Council and Jane Danzo herself will have to put all their heads together to do a renewed, massive and very cool public relations invasion in the fall.
Most of us find no heroism in what she did. At best, this is a mild case of pique.
Had she a fundamental awareness of the intolerable harm caused by her government, she would have used her bully pulpit to defend the arts. She might have had the courage to force her own firing. She would have made a more powerful point thereby.
This is no champion we have 'lost'; at best, a mere shadow boxer has disappeared from the ring.
She could not have made a stronger statement concerning these matters, and the arts community should be very grateful that someone of her stature was prepared to break ranks and take a strong public position defending the sector.
Her timing was governed by personal considerations not of her own choosing, and she should not be criticized. Let's not make the perfect the enemy of the good. Her actions were effective. Not every ally will do things in exactly the way that we think they should.
Anyway, Minister Krueger is doing a masterful job of keeping the arts in the news well into September!